:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兒童與青少年審美思考之調查研究
書刊名:師大學報. 人文與社會科學類
作者:陳瓊花 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Jo Chiung-hua
出版日期:2000
卷期:45
頁次:頁45-65
主題關鍵詞:審美思考審美客體審美教育審美能力審美經驗Aesthetic thinkingAesthetic objectsAesthetic educationAesthetic abilitiesAesthetic experience
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:291
  • 點閱點閱:57
     本研究試圖澄清兒童與青少年思考畫作與實物界、觀賞者與畫作、藝術家與畫作、藝術家與觀者之間的關係, 並比較我國學童藝術思考之模式與弗利門(Freeman, 1995)研究結果之異同。 研究結果,我國學童審美的思考,隨年級的增長,對於藝術家與觀者的觀念,由二者之間角色的互換而至逐漸分離對立。年幼的學生即扮演著藝術家,亦是觀者,大約在國小5、6年級藝術家與觀者二者之角色逐漸分化,高年級的學生視藝術家是具有特殊能力,可以掌控觀者情感的人,但並非人人可為。對個體而言,當認知到藝術家與觀者之間並非等同時,藝術家與觀者之角色乃逐漸分離, 二者之間遂存在著鴻溝。 本研究不支持弗利門(Freeman,1995):「思考藝術家角色是先於觀者角色」的觀念,其研究結果不具普遍性。
     This study aims to examine and clarify the developmental growth of young people's thinking about art. The objectives of the study are to investigate how young children and adolescents at different grade levels think about the relationship between: 1) a picture and the world, 2) beholders and pictures, 3) artists and pictures, 4) artists and beholders, and to 5) compare the findings of Freeman (1995) with the present study. The sample population of students were randomly drawn from grades 3,5,6 of elementary public school, and grades 2 of junior of senior high public school in Taipei and Kinmen. The students were asked to respond to ten structured questions from the study of Freeman (1995). The results of data analysis reveals that the ability to differentiate the roles of artist and beholder increased with grade level. Younger students tend to emerge these roles. They often think of themselves as artists and beholders. Therefore, they feel confident in inferring artists' feelings from the pictures, and agree that artists always think of other people's opinion when they create their works. Younger students also indicate that artists' feelings determine picture qualities. Around grade 5 or 6, the roles of artist and beholder are gradually differentiated. Senior students are able to appreciate the ability of an artist. They think not everyone can be an artist, and feel uncomfortable in inferring artists' feelings from the pictures. When the individuals become aware of the differences between the artist and beholder, the roles of these two become distinct. This finding does not suport the suggestion of Freeman who argued that a conception of the role of the artist in picture production emerges before a conception of the role of the beholder.
期刊論文
1.Gardner, H.(1989)。Zero-based arts education: An introduction to arts propel。Studies in Art Education,30(2),71-83。  new window
2.Ecker, D. W.(1973)。Analyzing children's talk about art。Journal of Aesthetic Education,7(1),58-73。  new window
3.Frechtling, J. A.、Davidson, P. W.(1970)。The development of the concept of artistic style: a free classification study。Psychonmic Science,18(2),243-259。  new window
4.Freeman, N. H.(1995)。Commonsense aesthetics of rural children。Visual Arts Research,21(2),1-10。  new window
5.Gardner, H.、Winner, E.、Kircher, M.(1975)。Children's conceptions of the arts。Journal of Aesthetic Education,9(3),60-77。  new window
6.Gardner, H.(1970)。Children's sensitivity to painting styles。Child Development,41(3),813-821。  new window
7.Hardiman, G. W.、Zernich, T.(1977)。Influence of style and subject matter on the development of children's art preferences。Studies in Art Education,19(1),29-34。  new window
8.Hardiman, George W.、Zernich, Theodore(1985)。Discrimination of style in painting: a developmental study。Studies in Art Education,26(3),157-162。  new window
9.Johnson, N. R.(1982)。Children's meanings about art。Studies in Art Education,23(3),61-67。  new window
10.Kern, E. J.(1984)。The aesthetic education curriculum program and curriculum reform。Studies in Art Education,25(4),219。  new window
11.Lark-Horowitz, B.(1937)。On Art Appreciation of Children: I. Preference of Picture Subjects in General。Journal of Educational Research,31(2),118-137。  new window
12.Lark-Horowitz, B.(1938)。On Art Appreciation of Children: II. Portrait Preference Study。Journal of Educational Research,31(8),572-598。  new window
13.Machotka, P.(1966)。Aesthetic criteria in childhood: justifications of preference。Child Development,37,877-885。  new window
14.Moore, B. E.(1973)。A description of children's verbal responses to works of art in selected grades one through twelve。Studies in Art Education,14(3),21-34。  new window
15.Parsons, M. J.、Johnston. M.、Durham, R.(1978)。Developmental stages in children's aesthetic responses。Journal of Aesthetic Education,12,85-104。  new window
16.Russell, R. L.(1988)。Children's philosophical inquiry into defining Elementary classroom。Studies in Art Education,29(3),282-291。  new window
17.Wolf, D. P.(1988)。Artistic learning: what and where is it?。Journal of Aesthetic Education,22(1),143-155。  new window
18.Taunton, M.(1982)。Aesthetic responses of young children to visual arts。Journal of Aesthetic Education,16(3),93-109。  new window
19.Taunton, M.(1980)。The influence of age on preferences for subject matter, realism, and spatial depth in painting reproductions。Studies in Art Education,25(4),219-225。  new window
20.Steinberg, D.(1986)。Preschool children's sensitivity to artistic style in paintings。Visual Arts Research,72(1),1-10。  new window
21.郭禎祥、Kindler, Anna M.、Darras, Bernard(19961200)。幼童對美術館的初起概念:跨文化研究。美育,78,41-53。  延伸查詢new window
22.郭禎祥(19971000)。Young Children's Philosophy of Art as a Reflection of Culture and Society: A Three Point Perspective。師大學報. 人文與社會科學類,42,29-42。new window  new window
23.陳瓊花(19970900)。我國青年藝術觀念探討之一--繪畫表現上「像」與「不像」問題的看法。美育,87,29-38。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.NAEP(1978)。Attitudes Toward Art (計畫編號:Report 06-A -03)。Denver:Education Commission of the States。  new window
2.NAEP(1978)。Knowledge About Art (計畫編號:Report 06-A -02)。Denver:Education Commission of the States。  new window
3.NAEP(1980)。The Second Assessment of Art, 1978- 79: Released Exercise Set (計畫編號:No. 10-A-25)。Denver:Education Commission of the States。  new window
4.NAEP(1981)。Procedural Handbook: 1978-1979 Art Assessment (計畫編號:Report 10-A-40)。Denver:Education Commission of the States。  new window
學位論文
1.Brunner, C.(1975)。Aesthetic judgment: Criteria used to evaluate representational art at different ages(博士論文)。Columbia University。  new window
2.Chen, C. H.(1996)。Conceptions of art of young children and adolescents: A developmental study(博士論文)。University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign。  new window
3.Coffey, A. W.(1968)。A developmental study of aesthetic preference for realistic and nonobjective paintings(博士論文)。University of Massachusetts,Amherst, MA。  new window
4.Clayton, J. R.(1974)。An investigation into the developmental trends in aesthetics: A study of qualitative similarities and differences in young(博士論文)。University of Utah。  new window
5.Housen, A.(1983)。The eye of the beholder: Measuring aesthetic development(博士論文)。Harvard Graduate School of Education,Boston, MA。  new window
6.林明助(1998)。美術鑑賞統合教學法對國小學生繪畫風格鑑賞能力影響之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳瓊花(1996)。Conception of Art of Young Children and Adolescents: A Developmental Study(博士論文)。University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana。  new window
8.羅美蘭(1993)。美術館觀眾特性與美術鑑賞能力關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Smith, R.、Simpson, A.(1991)。Aesthetics and arts education。University of Illinois Press。  new window
2.郭禎祥(1992)。中美兩國藝術教育鑑賞領域實施現況之比較研究。台北:文景書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.崔光宙(1992)。美感判斷發展研究。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.林清山(1993)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱經明(1994)。教育統計學。台北:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳瓊花(2000)。兒童與青少年如何說畫。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉昌元(1984)。西方美學導論。台北:聯經出版事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉文潭(1981)。現代美學。台北:台灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張紹勳(1998)。統計分析。台北:松崗電腦圖書。  延伸查詢new window
10.Csikszentmihalyi, M.、Robinson, R. E.(1990)。The art of seeing。Malibu, California:The Getty Center for Education in the Arts。  new window
11.Feldman, D. H.(1994)。Beyond universals in cognitive development。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
12.Hospers, J.(1969)。Introductory readings in aesthetics。New York:Free Press。  new window
13.Kohlberg, L.(1981)。The philosophy of moral development。New York:Harper & Row Inc.。  new window
14.Langer, S. K.(1957)。Philosophy in a new key。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.NAEP(1998)。NAEP Report Card。DC:National Center for Education Statistics。  new window
16.Parsons, M. J.(1987)。How we understand art。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Parsons, M. J.、Blocker, H. G.(1993)。Aesthetics and education。Urbana and Chicago:University of Illinois Press。  new window
18.Piaget, J.(1963)。The origins of intelligence in children。New York:Norton。  new window
19.Piaget, J.(1954)。The construction of reality in the child。New York:Basic Books。  new window
20.Wolheim, R.(1993)。The mind and its depths。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
21.張春興(1992)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Coffey, A. W.(1968)。A developmental study of aesthetic preference for realistic and nonobjective paintings。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gardner, H.(1988)。A cognitive view of the arts。Research readings for discipline-based art education: A journey beyond creating。The National Art Education Association。  new window
2.許信雄(1994)。兒童對國畫的偏好之研究。海峽兩岸兒童藝術教育的改革與研究論文集。臺北:中華民國美術教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Crawford, D.(1991)。The questions of aesthetics。Aesthetics and arts education。Urbana。  new window
4.Child, I. L.(1964)。Esthetic sensitivity in childhood。Development of sensitivity to esthetic values。New Haven, Connecticut:Yale University。  new window
5.Battin, M. P.(1994)。Cases for kids; using puzzles to teach aesthetics to children。Aesthetics for young people。Champaign, Illinois:University of Illinois。  new window
6.Gardner, H.(1992)。The cognitive revolution: consequences for the understanding and education of the child as artist。The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Parsons, M. J.(1992)。Cognition as interpretation in art education。The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Parsons, M. J.(1994)。Can children do Aesthetics? A developmental account。Aesthetics for young people。Reston, VA:National Art Education Association。  new window
9.Wolf, D. P.(1992)。Becoming knowledge: the evolution of art education curriculum。Handbook of Research on Curriculum。New York:Macmillan Publishing Co。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE