臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：分立政府--肇因、影響、改革
書刊名：中國行政評論
作者：吳重禮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Chung-li
出版日期：2001
卷期：10:4
頁次：頁1-22
主題關鍵詞：分立政府；分裂投票；政府表現；領導效能；Divided government；Split-ticket voting；Government performance；Leadership efficiency
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(19) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:95
  • 點閱點閱:77
近十年來，探討「分立政府j(divided government)議題似乎成為美國政治學界研究的主流之一。鑑於分立政府的研究具有重要的理論意涵及實際政治的參考價值，本文旨在檢視三項核心議題，其包括形成分立政府的肇因、分立政府與「一致政府」(unified government)運作的影響差異，以及如何改革分立政府所造成的可能弊端。儘管學者曾提出來多關於分立政府起因的解釋，但是迄今仍未發展出一套周全的學說，足以為多數學者所認同。同樣地，關於一致政府與分立政府之體制運作及其影響，亦有不同評價輿論述。換言之，相對於一致政府的運作，分立政府是否較易導致政策滯塞(policy gridlock)、停頓(deadlock)與缺乏效率(inefficiency) ，以及行政與立法部門之僵局(stalemate)，仍是眾說紛紜，莫衷一是。另外，在前兩項議題研究尚未釐清之前，對於杜絕分立政府可能產生的缺失，所應揖取的政治改革搗議，似乎仍嫌過早。在結語中，本文認為，我國學界尚未確切知悉台灣地區分立政府的肇因與影響之前，立即提出各顯改革方案，恐仍有待商榷。
For the past decade, the study of divided government - that is, the executive and legislative branches are controlled by different political parties - seemingly becomes one the major paradigms in American political science. In view of the important implications of divided government theoretically and practically,出is study concentrates on three core issues on divided government: causes, consequences, and reforms. Concerning the causes of divided government, researchers have developed some distinct approaches to the study of split-ticket voting behavior, but none of them provided a comprehensive explanation. Just as not knowing the causes of divided government, the question about the consequences of divided government---do policy gridlock, deadlock, inefficiency, and stalemate arise under divided government?-remains contentious. In addition, any proposals of reform for divided government are obviously inappropriate unless both causes and consequences can be thoroughly clarified and comprehended. The phenomenon of divided government has become daily reality in Taiwan' s national and local politics. Yet it receives relatively little attention from a comparative perspective. I conclude that any suggested reforms could be seriously problematic before we make a fundamental assessment of the causes and consequences of divided government in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Brady, David W.(1993)。The Causes and Consequences of Divided Government: Toward a New Theory of American Politics?。American Political Science Review，87(1)，189-194。  new window
2.Mebane, W. R., Jr.(2000)。Coordination, Moderation, and Institutional Balancing in American Presidential and House Elections。American Political Science Review，94(1)，37-57。  new window
3.Petracca, Mark P.(1991)。Divided Government and the Risks of Constitutional Reform。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，634-637。  new window
4.Sigelman, Lee、Wahlbeck, Paul J.、Buell, Emmett H. Jr.(1997)。Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government: Lessons of 1992。American Journal of Political Science，41(3)，879-894。  new window
5.Burden, B.、Kimball, D. C.(1998)。A New Approach to the Study of Ticket-Splitting。American Political Science Review，92(3)，533-544。  new window
6.Goodin, Robert E.(1996)。Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond。American Political Science Review，90(2)，331-343。  new window
7.吳重禮(19990900)。美國聯邦政府老人行政署的功能及其執行支出之影響因素評析。美歐季刊，13(3)=135，261-285。  延伸查詢new window
8.Binder, Sarah A.(1999)。The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96。American Political Science Review，93(3)，519-533。  new window
9.Born, Richard(1994)。Split-ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina's Policy-balancing Model。Legislative Studies Quarterly，19(1)，95-115。  new window
10.Jacobson, G. C.(1991)。Explaining Divided Government: Why Can't the Republicans Win the House?。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，640-643。  new window
11.Krehbiel, Keith(1999)。Paradoxes of Parties in Congress。Legislative Studies Quarterly，24(1)，31-64。  new window
12.Mattei, Franco、Howes, John S.(2000)。Competing Explanations of Split--Ticket Voting in American National Election。American Politics Quarterly，28(3)，379-407。  new window
13.Mayhew, David R.(1991)。Divided Party Control: Does It Make a Difference?。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，637-640。  new window
14.Thurber, James A.(1991)。Representation, Accountability, and Efficiency in Divided Party Control of Government。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，653-657。  new window
15.Weatherford, M. Stephen(1994)。Responsiveness and Deliberation in Divided Government: Presidential Leadership in Tax Policy Making。British Journal of Political Science，24(1)，1-31。  new window
16.Alesina, Alberto、Rosenthal, Howard(1996)。A Theory of Divided Government。Econometrica，64(6)，1311-1341。  new window
17.Shugart, Matthew S.(199506)。The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government。American Political Science Review，89(2)，327-343。  new window
18.Menefee-Libey, David(1991)。Divided Government: as Scapegoat。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，643-646。  new window
19.Edwards, George C. III、Barrett, Andrew、Peake, Jeffrey(1997)。The Legislative Impact of Divided Government。American Journal of Political Science，41(2)，545-563。  new window
20.Alt, James E.、Lowry, Robert C.(1994)。Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States。American Political Science Review，88(4)，811-828。  new window
21.Coleman, John J.(19991200)。Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness。American Political Science Review，93(4)，821-835。  new window
22.Sundquist, James L.(1990)。Response to the Petracca-Bailey-Smith Evaluation of the Committee on the Constitutional System。Presidential Studies Quarterly，20(3)，533-543。  new window
23.Sundquist, James L.(1988)。Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States。Political Science Quarterly，103(4)，613-635。  new window
24.Leonard, John(1991)。Divided Government and Dysfunctional Politics。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，651-653。  new window
25.Cutler, Lloyd N.(1988)。Some Reflections about Divided Government。Presidential Studies Quarterly，18(3)，485-492。  new window
26.Cutler, Lloyd N.(1980)。To Form a Government: On the Defects of Separation of Powers。Foreign Affairs，59(1)，126-143。  new window
27.Beck, Pual Allen、Baum, Lawrence、Clausen, Aage R.、Smith, Charles E. Jr.(1992)。Patterns and Sources of Ticket Splitting in Subpresidential Voting。American Political Science Review，86(4)，916-928。  new window
28.Riker, William H.(19821200)。The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science。American Political Science Review，76(4)，753-766。  new window
29.許增如(19990300)。一九九六年美國大選中的分裂投票行為：兩個議題模式的探討。歐美研究，29(1)，83-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.吳重禮(20000300)。美國「分立性政府」研究文獻之評析：兼論臺灣地區的政治發展。問題與研究，39(3)，75-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.吳重禮(19980600)。美國「分立性政府」與「一致性政府」體制運作之比較與評析。政治科學論叢，9，61-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Marimon, Ramon、Jones, Larry E.、Chari, V. V.(1997)。The Economics of Split-Ticket Voting in Representative Democracies。The American Economic Review，87(5)，957-976。  new window
33.Bawn, K.(1999)。Voter responses to electoral complexity: Ticket splitting, rational voters and representation in Federal Republic of Germany。British Journal of Political Science，29(3)，487-505。  new window
34.Bugarin, M. S.(1999)。Vote Splitting as Insurance Against Uncertainty。Public Choice，98(1)，153-169。  new window
35.Forgette, R.、Platt, G. J.(1999)。Voting for the person, not the party: Party defection, issue voting, and process sophistication。Social Science Quarterly，80(2)，409-421。  new window
36.Petracca, Mark P.、Bailey, Lonce、Smith, Pamela(1990)。Proposals for constitutional reform: An evaluation of the Committee on Constitutional System。Presidential Studies Quarterly，20(3)，503-532。  new window
研究報告
1.Fiorina, M. P.、Ansolabehere, S.、Brady, David W.(1988)。The Marginals Never Vanished?。Stanford。  new window
圖書
1.Fiorina, Morris(1996)。Divided Government。New York：Macmillan。  new window
2.Hardin, Charles M.(1989)。Constitutional Reform in America。Ames, IA：Iowa State University Press。  new window
3.Robinson, Donald L.(1989)。Government for the Third American Century。Boulder：Westview Press。  new window
4.Tarrance, V. Lance、De Vries, Walter、Mosher, Donna L.(1998)。Checked & Balanced: How Ticket-Splitters Are Shaping the New Balance of Power in American Politics。Grand Rapids, MI：William B. Eerdmans。  new window
5.Van Assendelft, Laura A.(1997)。Governors, Agenda Setting, and Divided Government。New York：University Press of America。  new window
6.Waterman, Richard W.(1989)。Presidential Influence and the Administrative State。Knoxville, TN：University of Tennessee Press。  new window
7.Wattenberg, Martin P.(1990)。The Decline of American Political Parties。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Wattenberg, Martin P.(1991)。The Rise of Candidate Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Kernell, Samuel(1993)。Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
10.Alesina, Alberto、Rosenthal, Howard(1995)。Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Neustadt, Richard E.(1990)。Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan。New York：Free Press。  new window
12.Jones, Charles O.(1994)。The Presidency in a Separated System。Brookings Institution Press。  new window
13.Mayhew, David R.(1991)。Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990。New Haven：Yale University Press。  new window
14.Krehbiel, Keith(1998)。Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.Sundquist, James L.(1986)。Constitutional Reform and Effective Government。Washington, D.C.：Brookings Institution。  new window
16.胡佛(1998)。憲政結構與政府體制。臺北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.Ornstein, Norman J.、Mann, Thomas E.、Malbin, Michael J.(1994)。Vital Statistics on Congress, 1993-1994。Vital Statistics on Congress, 1993-1994。Washington, DC。  new window
圖書論文
1.McCubbins, Mathew D.(1991)。Government on Lay Away: Federal Spending and Deficits Under Divided Party Control。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO.：Westview Press。  new window
2.Fiorina, Morris P.(1991)。Divided Government in the States。The Politics of Divided Government。Westview Press。  new window
3.Quirk, Paul J.、Nesmith, Bruce(1994)。Explaining Deadlock: Domestic Policymaking in the Bush Presidency。New Perspective on American Politics。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
4.Cox, Gary W.、Kernell, Samuel(1991)。Introduction: Governing a Divided Era。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
5.Linz, Juan J.(1994)。Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Differnce?。The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspective。Baltimore：John Hopkins University Press。  new window
6.Stewart, Charles H.(1991)。Lessons from the Post-Civil War Era。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
7.Petrocik, John R.(1991)。Divided Government: Is It All in the Campaigns?。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：615（臺灣：594，外國：21） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1473665 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67274788
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上