:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從福特主義到後福特主義及其對高等教育課程之影響
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:戴曉霞 引用關係
作者(外文):Tai, Hsiou-hsia
出版日期:2002
卷期:48:2
頁次:頁199-231
主題關鍵詞:福特主義後福特主義高等教育FordismPost-fordismHigher education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(3) 專書(2) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:208
  • 點閱點閱:73
本文旨在探討由「福特主義」轉進「後福特主義」對於生產模式、企業組織與人力需求的影響,及對高等教育,特別是課程方面的衝擊。雖然福特汽車公司在1910年代就率先發展出突破性的生產模式,但是由於1930年代經濟大蕭條所導致的消費不足,福特主義要道了1950到1970年代之間才蓬勃發展。1970年代之後,由於資訊科技、全球化、消費文化的快速發展,各工業國家先後進入後工業時代,生產模式也由福特主義的大量生產轉進以彈性生產為主要模式的後福特主義。由福特主義轉向後福特主義不只是生產模式的改變,更是一種政治和社會的改變,是大學作為一種社會機構及其所在的社會之間權力的重構。本文先探究福特主義和後福特主義的特質,並分析生產模式轉變的社經背景,最後再探討這種轉變對高等教育在課程方面的影響。
In the past two decades, the transition from Fordism to Post-Fordism, with its impact on production made, organizational structure and human resources and consequently, higher education has attracted the attention of many researchers. Although the Fordist production mode was developed in the 1910’s, it was not until the 1950’s that Fordism gained worldwide acceptance and application. The period between the 1950’s and the 1970’s was characterized by mass production, mass employment and mass consumption. However, with the acceleration technology, globalization and consumer culture, Fordism in industrial countries was replaced by Post-Fordism which was featured by flexible production, flexible organization and a new set of competences. After examining the features of Fordism and Post-Fordism, the author argues that the transition is not limited to the change of production mode, it is actually a political and social transformation and will inevitably lead to the restructuring of the relation between society and higher education. The freedom which the university has been granted in inventing and transmitting knowledge, in deciding what to teach and how to teach is teach is losing its ground.
期刊論文
1.Hall, M. R.(1992)。The decentralization of development: Impact on power, priorities, faculty perceptions。Teachers College Record,93,569-582。  new window
2.戴曉霞(20010700)。全球化及國家/市場關係之轉變:高等教育市場化之脈絡分析。教育研究集刊,47,301-328。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Edens, Kellah M.(2000)。Preparing problem solvers for the 21st century through Problem-based Learning。College Teaching,48(2),55-60。  new window
4.Carter, J.(1997)。Post-fordism and the theorization of educational change: What's in the name?。British Journal of Sociology of Education,18,45-61。  new window
5.Lane, C.(1988)。Industrial change in Europe: The pursuit of flexible specialization in Britain and West Germany。Work, Employment, and Society,2,141-167。  new window
6.Van Berkel, H. J. M.、Schmidt, H. G.(2000)。Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning。Higher Education,40(2),231-242。  new window
會議論文
1.Wallerstein, I.(2001)。Globalization or the age of transition?: A long-term view of the trajectory of the world-system。臺北。  new window
圖書
1.Amin, Ash(1994)。Post-fordism: A reader。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
2.Kerr, C.(1963)。The Uses of the University。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Liptietz, A.、Lipietz, Alain(1987)。Mirages and Miracles: The Crises of Global Fordism。London, UK:Verso。  new window
4.Symes, C.、McIntyre, J.(2000)。Working knowledge: The new vocationalism and higher education。Buckingham:SRHE/Open University Press。  new window
5.Delanty, G.(2001)。Challenging knowledge: The university in the knowledge society。Buckingham:The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press。  new window
6.Barnett, R.(1994)。The limits of competence。Buckingham:The Society for Research into Higher Education:Open University Press。  new window
7.Newman, John H. Cardinal(1996)。The Idea of a University。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
8.Daft, Richard L.、李再長(1999)。組織理論與管理。華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.大前研一、李宛蓉(1996)。民族國家的終結。臺北:立緒文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Braverman, Harry(1974)。Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century。Monthly Review Press。  new window
11.Gibbons, Michael、Limoges, Camille、Nowotny, Helga、Schwartzman, Simon、Scott, Peter、Trow, Martin(1994)。The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies。London:Sage。  new window
12.安東尼.紀登斯、鄭武國(2002)。第三條路:社會民主的更新。台北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Castells, Manuel、夏鑄九、王志爱、殷寶寧、溫蓓章、黃麗玲、魏慶嘉(1998)。網絡社會之崛起。臺北:唐山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.Leadbeater, Charles、李振昌(2001)。知識經濟大趨勢。台北:時報文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hounshell, D. A.(1984)。From the American system to mass production 1800-1932: The development of manufacturing technology in the United States。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins。  new window
16.Osborne, David、Gaebler, Ted(1992)。Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
17.Beck, Ulrich、孫治本(1999)。全球化危機:全球化的形成、風險與機會。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
18.Bocock, Robert(1993)。Consumption。London:New York:Routledge。  new window
19.戴曉霞(2000)。高等教育的大眾化與市場化。臺北:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Piore, Michael J.、Sabel, Charles F.(1984)。The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity。New York:Basic Books。  new window
21.門田安宏、黃一魯(1987)。豐田式生產體系。財團法人中國生產力中心。  延伸查詢new window
22.Kelly, K. S.(1991)。Fund Raising and Public Relations: A Critical Analysis。Fund Raising and Public Relations: A Critical Analysis。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
23.Segal, N.、Blackman, C.(1992)。Industry and Higher Education。The Encyclopedia of Higher Education。Oxford。  new window
24.王來旺、王貳瑞(1997)。工業管理。工業管理。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.戴曉霞(2000)。大學模式和理念的轉變。高等教育的大眾化與市場化。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.Allen, J.(1992)。Fordism and modern industry。Political and economic forms of modernity。Cambridge。  new window
27.Allen, J.(1992)。Post-industrialism and post-fordism。Modernity and its futures。Cambridge。  new window
28.Brown, P.、Lauder, Hugh(1992)。Education for economic survival: From fordism to post-fordism。Education for economic survival: From fordism to post-fordism。New York, NY。  new window
29.Saunders, M.、Fulton, O.、McHugh, G.(1996)。Work-based learning and its accreditation: Can higher education deliver?。Work-based learning and its accreditation: Can higher education deliver?。United Kingdom。  new window
30.Gramsci, A.(1992)。Prison Notebooks。Prison Notebooks。New York, NY。  new window
31.Murray, R.(1989)。Fordism and post-fordism。New times。London, UK。  new window
32.Oblinger,D. G.、Verville, A. L.(1998)。What business wants from higher education。What business wants from higher education。Phoenix, AZ。  new window
33.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2001)。OECD in figures: The second edition。OECD in figures: The second edition。Paris, France。  new window
34.洗子恩(1992)。科學管理原則。科學管理原則。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.行政院經濟建設委員會(2001)。新世紀人力發展方案,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林孝信、黃俊傑(1997)。美國現代大學的理念與實踐--以芝加哥大學為例。大學理念與校長遴選。臺北:中華民國通識教育學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.戴曉霞(1997)。行銷理念在高等教育課程革新之運用。邁向未來的課程與教學。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE