政商網絡的建立必然使企業獲利嗎？__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	政商網絡的建立必然使企業獲利嗎？
書刊名：	管理學報
作者：	張琬喻
作者(外文)：	Jang, Woan-yuh
出版日期：	2005
卷期：	22:2
頁次：	頁155-172
主題關鍵詞：	政商關係；政治投資；事件研究法；認知評估；Government-business relationships；Political investment；Event study methodology；Cognitive appraisal
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:5 共同引用:330 點閱:27

本研究以民國78年1月至民國91年4月間擔任臺灣公開發行公司重要職位者第一次當選立法委員及擁有立委身分者兼任公開發行公司重要職位者為樣本，共55筆，採用事件研究法來探討股票市場對政商網絡建立的消息是否有異常報酬。本研究發現，就商入政樣本而言，當上市上櫃公司擔任重要職位者第一次參與立委選舉當選時，股票市場有商入政效應。細究之，此商入政事件若發生於多頭市場，有正的平均異常報酬，若發生於空頭市場則為負。另外就政入商樣本而言，當立委身分者受邀擔任公司重要職務之事件宣告時，無論多空頭時期，股票市場皆有負的政入商效應。

以文找文

The so-called ”government-business relationship” is an interactive process between the political market and the economic market. French political economist De Jouvenel (1957) thinks that economics is concerned with making effective use of available resources while politics is concerned with increasing resources. When politics and economics seek to increase or use effectively ”limited resources,” the most probable method would be to use ”power to draw out profit” or ”profit seeks power” and then combine politics and economics after all. Although economics and politics are divided into different fields in terms of functions and research logic, as well as the development of the discipline, nevertheless economic behavior is usually a means to achieve political objectives; political behavior is also seen as a way to further economic ends. Moreover, political sociologist Marger (1981) believes that the governing body (government) and the business class (firms) are what can most reveal the power relationship and economic process of political power and economic power. For rulers, the business class has the support of production and government; in the eyes of the business class, ruling power protects and distribute. Even if the way businesses operate can help businesses gain reasonable profit, however, owners or high-level executives hope that political investments can effective influence their own firms or the determination of financial policies related to industry profi. In this way, uncertainty can be minimized while its survival chances improved and profits are maximized. In this light, the current research addresses the effects of businessmen joining politics (business entering politics) and politicians joining businesses (politics entering business); the study also evaluates the effect of the establishment of a government-business network on company performance. Concretely, this research uses the event study method to study important executives working at stock market listed companies who have been elected for the first time as legislators and people with legislative status who are invided to be major executives in publicly listed companies. The study also observes the effect of the announcement of these two events on stock market (that is, if there are businessmen entering politics and politicians entering business). Aside from the above, the research further divides the capital market into bull and bear market periods based on Block's (1977) definition in order to explore whether or not announcements of events in different market periods (bull and bear) will give rise to different results. This study is the first to concretely evaluate the effect on company values when announcements of businessmen entering politics or politicians entering business are made. Based on the empirical study, this research hopes to provide, through the research results, concrete management suggestions to investors and businesses. The research collects 55 cases, as sample, of important executives working at stock market listed companies who have been elected for the first time as legislators and people with legislative status who are also invited to be major executives in publicly listed companies from January 1989 to April 2002. The group is divided into two samples: businessmen entering politics, and politicians entering business. After this, the bull and bear market factor is introduced and then the event study method explores whether any abnormal returns are caused on the stock market when news of politics-business relationships are announced. In other words, the study investigates the effect of the announcement of businessmen entering politics and politicians entering business on stockholder wealth. Through verification analysis, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. When important executives of publicly listed companies join elections for the first time and when legislators are elected, the stock market displays a ”businessmen entering politics effect.” Further investigation reveals that if the event happens in a bull market, the stock prices tend to rise; if it happens in a bear market, prices slide. 2. When announcement is made about legislators occupying important positions in a publicly listed company, no matter whether it is in a bull or bear market period, the stock market will display a negative ”politician entering business reaction.” After the announcement, the negative average abnormal return will last at least for four trading days. At all times and in all countries, ”politics-business combinations” and ”anti-business complexes” are manifest and present, becoming two opposing forces in society. This is shown in cases such as Taiwan's close relationship with the U.S. (Clinton's ”Whitewater scandal”), Japan (Ruei Ke Luke Co.'s insider trading incident), and Korea (Kim Do Huan and Roh Tai Yu corruption cases) until Taiwan's (Hua Long case) that revealed the scandal of politics-business collusions. This has resulted in a mostly negative evaluation of the majority of people regarding the business world's seeking to have relationships with politics (such as the recent cases of the massage case of the cabinet minister, entertainment scandals, and political contributions). People think that when businesses and government officials have a certain relationship, that relationship is a sort of collusion, resulting in severe harm on people's privileges and benefits. A certain outline of this phenomenon can be gleaned from the research results. Thus, the many bills resulting from politics-business relationships: lobbying law, political contribution law, purchasing law, information transparency law, and the profit avoidance law and such other laws that call for transparency should be quickly passed and fully implemented. Only in this way will the establishment of a politics-business network be given legitimacy (in accordance with the spirit of institutional theory). Moreover, the media's insistence on the principle of reporting the truth will continue to be exercised. Therefore, investors can approve of the relationship between business and government bodies, giving it space for rationalization, and accepting the development toward the normality of the relationship between business and government entities in conformity with legal standards.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Dodd, P.、Warner, J.(1983)。On Corporate Governance: A Study of Proxy Contests。Journal of Financial Economics，11(1)，401-438。
2.	Siegel, D.、McWilliams, A.(1997)。Event Studies in Management Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues。The Academy of Management Journal，40，626-657。
3.	Daniel, K.、Titman, S.(1997)。Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock Return。The Journal of Finance，52(1)，1-33。
4.	Block, Fred(1977)。The Ruling Class Does not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State。Socialist Revolution，33，6-28。
5.	Mcguire, J. S.、Schneeweis, T.、Naroff, J.(1988)。Effects of Top Managers' Cabinet Appointments on Shareholders' Wealth。Academy of Management Journal，31(1)，201-212。
6.	Maheu, John M.、McCurdy, Tomas H.(2000)。Identifying bull and bear markets in stock returns。Journal of Business and Economic Statistics，18(1)，100-112。
7.	Bhardwaj, R. K.、Brooks, L. D.(1993)。Dual Betas from Bull and Bear Markets: Reversal of the Size Effect。Journal of Financial Research，16(4)，269-283。
8.	McQueen, Grant、Roley, V. V.(1993)。Stock Price, News, and Business Conditions。The Review of Financial Studies，6(3)，683-707。
9.	Fama, Eugene F.、French, Kenneth R.(1989)。Business Conditions and Expected Returns on Stocks and Bonds。Journal of Financial Economics，25(1)，23-49。
10.	Keim, G.、Baysinger, B.(1998)。The Efficacy of Business Political Activity: Competitive Considerations in a Principal-Agent Context。Journal of Management，14，163-180。
11.	劉阿榮(19960500)。戰後臺灣政商關係之演變--理論架構與經驗意涵。社會文化學報，3，1-41。延伸查詢
12.	Daniel, K.、Titman, S.、Wei, K. C. J.(2001)。Explaining the cross-section of stock returns in Japan: Factors or characteristics?。Journal of Finance，56(2)，743-766。
13.	Pittman, Russell(1977)。Market Structure and Campaign Contributions。Public Choice，31，37-52。
14.	Boehmer, E.、Musumeci, J.、Poulsen, A. B.(1991)。Event-study Methodology under Conditions of Event-Induced Variance。Journal of Financial Economics，30(2)，253-272。
15.	Porter, Michael E.(1987)。From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy。Harvard Business Review，65(3)，43-59。
16.	Wood, R. A.、McInish, T. H.、Ord, J. K.(1985)。An Investigation of Transactions Data for NYSE Stocks。Journal of Finance，40(3)，723-739。
17.	Meyer, J. W.、Rowan, B.(1977)。Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony。American Journal of Sociology，83(2)，340-363。
18.	DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Walter W.(1983)。The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields。American Sociological Review，48(2)，147-160。
19.	Das, Somnath、Sen, Pradyot K.、Sengupta, S.(19980200)。Impact of Strategic Alliances on Firm Valuation。The Academy of Management Journal，41(1)，27-41。
20.	Zucker, Lynne G.(1977)。The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence。American Sociological Review，42(5)，726-743。
21.	Carhart, Mark M.(1997)。On persistence in mutual fund performance。The Journal of Finance，52(1)，57-82。
22.	Fama, Eugene F.、French, Kenneth R.(1993)。Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds。Journal of Financial Economics，33(1)，3-56。
23.	Brown, Stephen J.、Warner, Jerold B.(1980)。Measuring security price performance。Journal of Financial Economics，8(3)，205-258。
24.	Fama, Eugene F.(1970)。Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work。The Journal of Finance，25(2)，383-417。
25.	Brown, Stephen J.、Warner, Jerold B.(1985)。Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies。Journal of Financial Economics，14(1)，3-31。
26.	Jegadeesh, Narasimhan、Titman, Sheridan(1993)。Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency。The Journal of Finance，48(1)，65-91。
27.	Mullins, D. W., Jr.、Asquith, P.(1986)。Signalling with Dividends, Stock Repurchase and Equity Issues。Financial Management，15，27-44。
28.	朱雲漢(1992)。如何面對民主時代政商關係的挑戰。國家政策雙周刊，37，6-8。延伸查詢
29.	陳明通(1992)。臺灣地區政商關係之演變。國家政策雙周刊，37，3-5。延伸查詢
30.	Baysinger, B.、Keim, G.、Zeithaml, C.(1985)。An Empirical Evaluation of the Potential for Including Shareholders in Corporate Constituency Programs。Academy of Management Journal，28，180-200。
31.	Boddewyn, J.、Brewer, T.(1994)。International Business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions。Academy of Management Review，19，119-143。
32.	Boddewyn, J. J.(1995)。The Legitimacy of International-business Political Behavior。The International Trade Journal，9，143-161。
33.	Chaney, P. K.、Devinney, T. M.、Winer, R. S.(1991)。The Impact of New Product Introductions on the Market Value。Journal of Business，64，573-611。
34.	Coate, M.、Higgins, F.、McChesney, F.(1990)。Bureaucracy and Politics in F. T. C. Merger Challenges。The Journal of Law & Economics，33，463-482。
35.	Cordell, D. M.(2001)。Investment Advising in Good Times and Bad。Journal of Financial Service Professionals，55，74-85。
36.	De Bondt, W. F. M.(1993)。Impact of Strategic Alliances on Firm Valuation。Academy of Management Journal，41，27-44。
37.	Epstein, E.(1980)。Business Political Activity: Research Approaches and Analytical Issues。Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy，2，1-55。
38.	Hillman, A. J.、Zardkooohi, A.、Bierman, L.(1999)。Corporate Political Strategies and Firm Performance: Indications of Firm-specific Benefits from Personal Service in the U.S. Government。Strategic Management Journal，20(1)，67-81。
39.	Horiuchi, A.、Shimizu, K.(2001)。Did Amakudari Undermine the Effectiveness of Regular Monitoring in Japan?。Journal of Banking & Finance，25(3)，573-596。
40.	Keim, G.、Zeithaml, C.(1986)。Corporate Political Strategy and Legislative Decision Making: A Review and Contingency Approach。Academy of Management Review，11，828-843。
41.	Lee, P. M.(1997)。A Comparative Analysis of Layoff Announcements and Japan。Strategic Management Journal，18，879-894。
42.	Lee, P. M.(2001)。What's in a Name.com? the Effects of '.com' Name Change on Stock Prices and Trading Activity。Strategic Management Journal，22，793-804。
43.	Lenway, S.、Rehbein, K.(1991)。Leaders, Followers, and Free Riders: An Empirical Test of Variation in Corporate Political Involvement。Academy of Management Journal，34，893-905。
44.	Lockwood, L. J.、Mclnish, T. H.(1990)。Tests of Stability for Variances and Means of Overnight/ Intraday Returns During Bull and Bear Markets。Journal of Banking and Finance，14(6)，1243-1253。
45.	Lord, M. D.(2000)。Corporate Political Strategy and Legislative Decision Making: The Impact of Corporate Legislative Influence Activities。Business & Society，39，76-93。
46.	Russo, M.(1993)。On Collective Strategy in the Public Policy Domain。Advances in Strategic Management，9，353-374。
47.	Schaede, U.(1995)。The "Old Boy" Network and Government-business Relationship in Japan。The Journal of Japanese Studies，21(2)，293-293。
48.	Schuler, D. A.(1996)。Corporate Political Strategy and Foreign Competition: The Case of the Steel Industry。Academy of Management Journal，39(3)，720-737。
49.	Van Rixtel, A. A. R. J. M.、Hassink, W. H. J.(2002)。Monitoring the Monitors: Are Old Boys Networks Being Used to Monitor Japanese Private Banks?。Journal of the Japanese and International Economies，16，1-30。
50.	Vogel, D.(1996)。The Study of Business and Politics。California Management Review，38，146-165。
51.	Wagner, J. C.(1997)。Why Market Timing Works。Journal of Investing，6，78-81。
52.	Zardkoohi, A.(1985)。On the Political Participation of the Firm in the Electoral Process。Southern Economic Journal，51，804-817。

會議論文
1.	蕭全政(1990)。Economic Liberalization and Political Democratization。0。

研究報告
1.	黃秀端(1998)。金權政治和立院的財政、經濟與交通委員會。0。延伸查詢
2.	Kenji, S.(2001)。Effect of Amakudari on Bank Performance in the Post-bubble Period。0。

學位論文
1.	蕭有鎮(1995)。立法委員為誰立法：臺灣地區民選立委的權力結構分析(碩士論文)。東海大學。延伸查詢
2.	蔣宸厚(2000)。民主化過程中台灣資本主義國家與大企業互動之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。延伸查詢
3.	劉鳳珍(1995)。企業關係與立法委員對財經法案之問政(碩士論文)。東吳大學。延伸查詢
4.	陳惠芳(1998)。組織正當性、組織學習、與組織同形之關係研究－制度理論整合觀點，0。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Marger, Martin N.(1981)。Elites and Masses: An Introduction to Political Sociology。New York：D. Van Nostrand Company。
2.	Sharpe, W.、Alexander, G. J.、Bailey, Jeffery V.(1999)。Investments。New Jersey：McGraw-Hill, International Editions。
3.	Turner, J. H.(1994)。Sociology: Concepts and uses。New York：McGraw-Hill。
4.	O'Donnell, Guillermo、Schmitter, Philippe(1987)。Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。
5.	Shiller, Robert J.(1989)。Market Volatility。The MIT Press。
6.	Francis, J. C.(1986)。Portfolio Analysis。Upper Saddle River, NJ：New Jersey：Prentice Hall。
7.	Olson, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。New York：Mcgraw-Hill College。
8.	Lazarus, R. S.(1976)。Psychological stress and the coping process。New York：McGraw-Hill。
9.	徐瑞希(1991)。政商關係解讀：臺灣企業實用政治學入門。臺北市：遠流出版社。延伸查詢
10.	周陽山(1993)。民族與民主的當代詮釋。臺北：正中。延伸查詢
11.	De Jouvenel, Bertrand(1957)。Sovereignty: An Inquiry into the Political Good。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。
12.	蕭全政(1988)。政治與經濟的整合：政治經濟學的基礎理論。台北：桂冠圖書公司。延伸查詢
13.	陳東升(19950000)。金權城市：地方派系、財團與臺北都會發展的社會學分析。臺北：巨流。延伸查詢
14.	沈中華、李建然(2000)。事件研究法--財務與會計實證研究必備。華泰文化事業公司。延伸查詢
15.	Ostry, S.、Nelson, R. R.(1995)。Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: Conflict and Cooperation。Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: Conflict and Cooperation。Washington, DC。
16.	Abercrombie, N.、Hill, S.、特納(1986)。The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology。The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology。0。
17.	Getz, K.(1993)。Selecting Corporate Political Tactics。Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs。New Park, CA。
18.	郭承天(1998)。Private Governance in Taiwan。Beyond the Developmental State: East Asia's Political Economies Reconsidered。New York, NY。
19.	Lazarus, R. S.(1968)。Patterns of Adjustment and Human Effectiveness。Patterns of Adjustment and Human Effectiveness。New York, NY。
20.	Mahon, J.(1993)。Shaping Issues/ Manufacturing Agents: Corporate Political Sculpting。Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs。Newbury Park, CA。
21.	Walker, J.(1992)。Mobilizing Interest Groups in America。Mobilizing Interest Groups in America。Ann Arbor, MI。
22.	Wood, D.(1986)。Strategic Uses of Public Policy。Strategic Uses of Public Policy。Marshfield, MA。

其他
1.	薛承泰(2004)。老人照顧老人將是臺灣現象，http://ntu.edu.tw/~psc_news9312/120701.htm， 20041207。延伸查詢

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	今天拆大埔，明天換政府？臺灣民主化後的土地開發與選舉，1993~2015
2.	都市社會學，臺大社會創系的軌跡線
3.	再探科學工業園區規劃開發之結構性問題
4.	論居住正義及其解方：臺灣與臺北
5.	專業組織的持續組裝與知識創新：臺灣大學社會學系60年的變遷
6.	全球政經變局下的苗栗客庄：土地、開發與地方重構
7.	我國地方政府土地財政現象的理論與實務：以臺中市財政表現的實證研究
8.	論學者陳志梧對20世紀末臺灣社區營造與歷史保存思維之貢獻
9.	政治關聯、管理者能力與公司績效之關聯性
10.	從課責觀點探討臺灣都市計畫委員會審議制度設計
11.	臺灣都市計畫實施的問題與對策
12.	都市空間發展結構歷程與治理的困局--以高速鐵路苗栗車站特定區為例
13.	制度化壓力下國小導師使用班級網站之行為研究
14.	游移在發展型國家與新自由主義之間的開發與治理：以高速鐵路桃園車站特定區為例
15.	地方派系的資源配置策略：以嘉義縣社區營造資源為例的個案研究

1.	科學工業園區設置開發流程民眾參與之研究―以中科四期科學工業園區設置開發案為例
2.	發展主義與新自由主義化交織的區域交通基礎設施－以台灣高鐵建設與開發為例
3.	我國利益團體遊說活動之研究：遊說法制化前後之比較分析
4.	政治甄補與地方治理：金門縣的個案分析
5.	邁向生態城市規劃與治理之比較研究
6.	後代議民主之參與制度設計－以我國觀光賭場博弈公投為例
7.	美國對中關係正常化偏差動員之研究，1969-1979
8.	我國半總統制的形成與少數政府憲政困境—歷史制度主義的觀點
9.	後教師工會時期的教師圖像－聖職已遠，典範在夙昔
10.	高科技產業全球生產網絡下的國家角色困境
11.	東亞區域金融合作的政治經濟分析 1997-2012
12.	鹿港老鎮再生的文化產業建構
13.	金門紀念品：從在地鑲嵌到文化創意的實踐
14.	都市政治與土地政策之政經結構分析－以台南科學工業園區特定區開發案為例
15.	台灣制憲運動之研究

1.	誰說了算？：從蘇花高到蘇花改政策變遷的倡議聯盟分析(1990~2014)
2.	農業與環境：臺灣問題與歐盟對策
3.	東亞金融政治 : 日韓臺金融體制的形成、發展與轉變
4.	地方永續觀光發展與社區觀光培力
5.	全球化背景下：上海陸家嘴和臺北信義計畫區的研究比較
6.	廚房之舞 : 身體與空間的日常生活地理學考察
7.	政黨與選舉：理論與實踐
8.	歷史、結構與教育 : 技職教育變革的探討
9.	澎湖的政治生態
10.	治理互賴與政策執行
11.	邁向地方治理 : 議題、理論與實務
12.	跨域治理
13.	制度、網路與府際治理
14.	地方政府與地方制度法
15.	永續發展 : 大地反撲的省思

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫