臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Mind the Gap：研究與實務的整合
書刊名：社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者：張英陣 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Ying-chen
出版日期：2006
卷期：10:2
頁次：頁87-116
主題關鍵詞：以證據為基礎的實務；研究運用；經驗性實務；責信；Evidence-based practice；Research utilisation；Empirical practice；Accountability
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:268
  • 點閱點閱:53
社會工作者在從事實務的過程中，運用研究方法是專業倫理的要求，而我們服務的使用者也有權利要求獲得有效的處遇，以證據為基礎的實務也符合政府與社會大眾的責信期待。許多學者專家認為實務與研究是可以相互搭配的，而且社會工作者可以同時兼具實務工作者與研究者的角色。但是，不論從消費或生產的角度來看，當前的社會工作確實存在著實務與研究的間隙。兩者之間的落差主要來自於對研究的誤解，認為研究與實務工作無關，而且實務工作者也缺乏組識在技術上與財務上的支持。如果政府、社工專業組織、社會工作機構及社工教育單位能在社會工作再教育多提供研究技術的支持，並提供實務研究成果發表的管道，我們相信能慢慢彌補實務與研究的間隙。
Evaluating practice is one of the primary requirements of social work professional ethics. The service users have the right to receive effective treatments. The evidence-based practice could fulfil the expectations of accountability from the stakeholders, for example, the government and the public. As a matter of fact, many social workers and social work educators have advocated the role of social workers as a 'practitioner/researcher'. However, the gap between practice and research does exist in Taiwan from both the perspectives of research consumer and producer. The gap mainly resulted from some misunderstandings on research and lack of technical and financial supports for the practitioners. If government, professional organisations, social welfare agencies and schools of social work could collaborate to provide technical assistance and opportunities for publications, the gap between practice and research might be mended.
期刊論文
1.Alter, C.、Egan, M.(1997)。Logic Modeling: A Tool for Teaching Critical Thinking in Social Work Practice。Journal of Social Work Education，33(1)，85-102。  new window
2.Epstein, I.(1996)。In Quest of a Research-Based Model for Clinical Practice: Or, Why Can't a Social Worker Be More Like a Researcher?。Social Work Research，20(2)，97-100。  new window
3.Graham, H.、McDermott, E.(2005)。Qualitative Research and the Evidence Base of Policy: Insights from Studies of Teenage Mothers in the UK。Journal of Social Policy，35(1)，21-37。  new window
4.Hudson, W. W.(1982)。Scientific Imperatives in Social Work Research and Practice。Social Service Review，56(2)，246-258。  new window
5.Mullen, E. J.、Streiner, D. L.(2004)。The Evidence for and against Evidence-Based Practice。Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention，4(2)，111-121。  new window
6.Myers, L. L.、Thyers, B. A.(1997)。Should Social Work Clients Have the Right to Effective Treatment?。Social Work，42(3)，288-298。  new window
7.Reid, W. J.(1994)。The Empirical Practice Movement。Social Service Review，68(2)，165-184。  new window
8.Sackett, David L.、Rosenberg, William M. C.、Gray, J. A. Muir、Haynes, R. Brian、Richardson, W. Scott(1996)。Evidence Based Medicine: What It Is and What It Isn't。British Medical Journal，312(7023)，71-72。  new window
9.高迪理、趙善如(19911000)。從期刊文章分析臺灣地區社會工作專業發展情形。當代社會工作學刊，1，17-40。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.台灣社會工作專業人員協會(2006)。社工專業的風采與躍昇：專業形象、工作模式、績效展現研討會論文彙編。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.張英陣、許雅惠(2005)。服務績效的迷思：以弱勢家庭兒童少年的服務方案爲例。「非營利組織之評估：績效與責信」國際研討會。台北：海棠文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.張英陣、許雅惠(2004)。危機單親家庭弱勢兒童少年外展服務績效評估計畫。內政部兒童局。  延伸查詢new window
2.張英陣、許雅惠(2005)。隔代、單親及原住民弱勢家庭兒童少年外展服務區域督導計畫。內政部兒童局。  延伸查詢new window
3.許雅惠、張英陣(2004)。外籍與大陸配偶家庭弱勢兒童少年外展服務績效評估計畫。內政部兒童局。  延伸查詢new window
4.許雅惠、張英陣(2005)。外籍與大陸配偶家庭弱勢兒童少年外展服務區域督導與方案績效評估計畫。內政部兒童局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.苗栗縣政府社會局(2005)。社會工作論文發表：非營利組織管理與社會工作專業服務關係研討會。苗栗。  延伸查詢new window
2.Corcoran, K.、Fischer, J.(2000)。Measures for Clinical Practice: A Sourcebook。New York：The Free Press。  new window
3.Council on Social Work Education(2002)。Education Policy and Accreditation Standards。Washington, DC：Council on Social Work Education。  new window
4.Davies, H. T. O.、Nutley, S. M.、Smith, R. C.(2000)。What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services。Bristol：The Policy Press。  new window
5.Hess, P. M.、Mullen, E. J.(1995)。Practitioner-Researcher Partnerships: Building Knowledge from, in, and for Practice。Washington, DC：National Association of Social Workers。  new window
6.Marlow, C.(1998)。Research Methods for Generalist Social Work。Pacific Grove, CA：Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
7.Nurius, P. S.、Hudson, W. W.(1993)。Human Services Practice, Evaluation, and Computers: A Practical Guide for Today and Beyond。Pacific Grove, CA：Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
8.Royse, D.、Thyer, B. A.、Padgett, D. K.、Logan, T. K.(2006)。Program Evaluation: An Introduction。Thomas Brooks/Cole。  new window
9.台灣社會政策學會(2005)。九十四年推動受暴婦女優點個案管理模式第二次研討會。南投。  延伸查詢new window
10.簡春安、鄒平儀(2000)。社會工作研究法。台北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Sheldon, B.、Macdonald, G.(1999)。Research and Practice in Social Care: Mind the Gap。Exeter：Center for Evidence-Based Social Services, Exeter University。  new window
12.Wodarski, J. S.(1997)。Research Methods for Clinical Social Workers: Empirical Practice。New York：Springer。  new window
13.Zohar, D.、Marshall, I.(1994)。The Quantum Society: Mind, Physics, and a New Social Vision。New York：William Morrow and Company, Inc.。  new window
14.Skidmore, Rex A.(1995)。Social work administration: Dynamic, management, and human relationships。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
其他
1.內政部社會司(1998)。社會工作倫理守則，http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/08/new08.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.台灣社會工作管理學會(2005)。外籍與大陸配偶家庭暨隔代、單親及原住民弱勢家庭兒童少年外展服務成果發表，南投。  延伸查詢new window
3.台灣社會政策學會(2004)。外籍配偶暨危機單親家庭外展服務方案評估期末座談會議，南投。  延伸查詢new window
4.British Association of Social Workers(2002)。Code of Ethics for Social Work，http://www.basw.co.uk/printpage.php?articleId=2。  new window
5.National Association of Social Workers(1999)。Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers，http://from www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bolloch, S.(1999)。Education and Training in Social Work and Social Care。Social Services: Working under Pressure。Bristol：The Policy Press。  new window
2.Bronson, D. E.(1994)。Is a Scientist-Practitioner Model Appropriate for Direct Social Work Practice? No。Controversial Issues in Social Work Research。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
3.Dangel, R. F.(1994)。Is a Scientist-Practitioner Model Appropriate for Direct Social Work Practice? Yes。Controversial Issues in Social Work Research。Boston：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
4.Davies, R.(2000)。Contribution from Qualitative Research。What Works: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services。Bristol：The Policy Press。  new window
5.Epstein, I.(1995)。Promoting Reflective Social Work Practice: Research Strategies and Consulting Principles。Practitioner-Researcher Partnerships: Building Knowledge from, in, and for Practice。Washington, DC：National Association of Social Workers。  new window
6.Roberts, A. R.、Yeager, K.、Regehr, C.(2006)。Bridging Evidence-Based Health Care and Social Work。Foundations of Evidence-Based Social Work Practice。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Rossi, P. H.(1997)。Program Outcomes: Conceptual and Measurement Issues。Outcomes Measurement in the Human Services: Cross-Cutting Issues and Methods。Washington, DC：National Association of Social Workers。  new window
8.Smith, D.(2005)。Introduction: Some Versions of Evidence-Based Practice。Social Work and Evidence-Based Practice。London：Jessica Kingsley。  new window
9.Guba, Egon G.(1990)。The alternative paradigm dialog。The paradigm dialog。Sage Publications。  new window
10.Schön, D. A.(1995)。Reflective Inquiry in Social Work Practice。Practitioner-researcher Partnerships: Building Knowledge from, in, and for Practice。Washington, DC：National Association of Social Workers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：788（臺灣：787，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1473665 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67272025
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上