臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大學教師教學評鑑量表發展之研究
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：鄭博真 引用關係／黃義良 引用關係
作者(外文)：Jeng, Bor-jen／Hwang, I-liang
出版日期：2009
卷期：32:2
頁次：頁57-80
主題關鍵詞：教學評鑑；學生評鑑教學；驗證性因素分析；Teaching evaluation；Student evaluation of teaching；Confirmatory factor analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:67
  • 點閱點閱:124
本研究旨在發展大學教師教學評鑑量表。研究者以某大學現有教學評鑑工具為基礎，並依據教學評鑑理論，透過師生意見調查、師生代表座談會議、相關文獻歸納及問卷調查分析等步驟，進行量表題目編修工作。並以嚴謹的統計檢定程序，確認本量表題目之信效度。研究工具採用自編之調查問卷和量表，以某大學全校專任教師與學生樣本進行施測，驗證性因素分析的有效問卷836份。實證資料經由項目分析、探索性和驗證性因素分析考驗，發展出由教學內容、教學方法、師生互動、學習評量和學生學習等五個構面，18個題目組成的大學教師教學評鑑量表。本工具具有良好信度與效度，且具有不受師生變項影響的複核效度，適合大學生評鑑教師教學及教師自評教學使用。
The purpose of this study was to develop the University Teacher Teaching Evaluation Scale (UTTES). The study was based on the current teaching evaluation instrument and made reference to the theory of teaching evaluation. The scale was revised through teachers and students’ opinions reflective survey, teachers and students’ discussion, related literatures, and a questionnaire analysis. The reliability and validity of the scale was confirmed through the statistical analysis. The survey questionnaire and scale were used in this study. The subjects were the full-time teachers and student samples in the university. The empirical data were examined through item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The UTTES was consisted of 18 items. The 18 items can be divided into five dimensions: curriculum contents, teaching methods, the interaction of teachers and students, learning assessments, and students’ learning. The result showed that UTTES has a good reliability and validity. The UTTES can be used by students evaluating university teachers and teachers’ selfevaluation.
期刊論文
1.Hemphill, L.、Berry, J.、McGreal, S.(2004)。An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Pergormance: Part 1, Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Framework。Urban Studies，41(4)，725-755。  new window
2.湯誌龍(20060600)。屏東科技大學學生評鑑教師教學之工具修訂。臺東大學教育學報，17(1)，1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Chen, Yining、Hoshower, Leon B.(2003)。Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education，28(1)，71-88。  new window
4.葉連祺、董娟娟、楊世英、陳仁海、蕭芳華(20050600)。大學學生評鑑教師教學量表之編製。測驗學刊，52(1)，59-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.潘靖瑛(20040600)。通識教育課程學生評鑑教師教學問卷之發展--以慈濟大學為例。測驗學刊，51(1)，79-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Marsh, H. W.、Baily, M.(1993)。Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A profile an analysis。Journal of Higher Education，64(1)，1-18。  new window
7.Marsh, H. W.、Roche, L. A.(1997)。Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The central issues of validity, bias, and utility。American Psychologist，52(11)，1187-1197。  new window
8.Algozzine, B.、Beattie, J.、Bray, M.、Flowers, C.、Gretes, J.、Howley, L.、Mohanty, G.、Spooner, F.(2004)。Student evaluation of college teaching: A practice in search of principles。College Teaching，52(4)，134-141。  new window
9.張德勝(20051000)。臺灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究。師大學報. 教育類，50(2)，203-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Abrami, P. C.(1989)。How should we use student ratings to evaluate teaching?。Research in Higher Education，30(2)，221-227。  new window
11.Marsh, H. W.(1984)。Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases, and Utility。Journal of Educational Psychology，76(5)，707-754。  new window
12.Marsh, Herbert W.(1982)。SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching。British Journal of Educational Psychology，52(1)，77-95。  new window
13.Abrami, P. C.(1985)。Dimensions of effective college instructors。Review of Higher Education，8，211-228。  new window
14.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1989)。On the Use of Structural Equation Models in Experimental Designs。Journal of Marketing Research，26(3)，271-284。  new window
15.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。  new window
16.張郁雯(20030600)。大學生教學評鑑量表之發展研究。教育與心理研究，26(2)，227-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.林珊如(19991200)。大學生評鑑教學量表：編製及效度考驗。教育與心理研究，22(下)，295-321。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Kunter, M.、Baumert, J.(2006)。Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction。Learning Environments Research，9(3)，231-251。  new window
19.Stringer, M.,、Irwing, p.(1998)。Students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A structural modeling approach。British Journal of Educational Psychology，68，409-426。  new window
20.Ting, K.(2000)。A multilevel perspective on student ratings of instruction: Lessons from the Chinese experience。Research in Higher Education，41(5)，637。  new window
會議論文
1.張德勝(1999)。教師、科目之特性對學生評鑑教師教學之影響--以花蓮師範學院為例。八十七學年度花蓮師範學院學術研討會。花蓮：國立花蓮師範學院。77-118。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.毛郁雯(2000)。大學實施「學生評鑑教師教學」之研究--以國立台北師範學院為例(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳琦媛(2007)。我國公立大學教師教學評鑑之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Centra, John A.(1979)。Determining Faculty Effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Millman, J.(1981)。Handbook of Teacher Evaluation。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage Publications。  new window
3.Doyle, K. O.(1983)。Evaluating Teaching。DC：Heath and Company。  new window
4.DeVellis, R. F.、吳齊殷(1999)。量表的發展：理論與應用。台北：弘智文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：665（臺灣：660，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1806188 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67604793
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上