:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地方財政的政治景氣循環分析:固定效果與隨機效果模型的估算比較
書刊名:臺灣政治學刊
作者:王鼎銘 引用關係詹富堯
作者(外文):Wang, Ding-mingChan, Fu-Yao
出版日期:2006
卷期:10:2
頁次:頁63-100
主題關鍵詞:政治景氣循環理論地方政府預算固定效果模型隨機效果模型Political business cycleLocal government financeFixed effect modelRandom effect model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(20) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:20
  • 共同引用共同引用:137
  • 點閱點閱:127
在民主國家政黨體制的運作下,執政當局常善於利用政策制定權及行政資源來製造選舉行情,藉著開立選舉支票或採行擴張性財政政策來刺激短期的經濟成長,以博取選民的支持,這種總體經濟表現可能伴隨選舉起伏波動的情形,即是所謂「政治景氣循環」(Political Business 台灣縣市政府的角度來看,雖然地方政府並無執行貨幣供給的政策工具,然而財政預算卻 Cycle)的現象。從台灣縣市政府的角度來看,雖然地方政府並無執行貨幣供給的政策工具,然而財政預算卻是地方施政計畫的具體表現,也是縣市首長重要的職權之一。故本文針對解嚴後台灣省二十一縣市相關的統計資料進行迴歸分析,來驗證地方政府支出預算是否存在政治景氣循環的現象。研究結果發現,各縣市政府的歲出預算確實在選舉年有較為擴張的趨勢,符合投機派政治景氣循環(Opportunistic Political Business Cycle)理論的推論;相對地,縣市首長由哪一個政黨執政對於地方政府預算的編列並無顯著的影響,基本上也就不符合黨性派政治景氣循環(Partisan Political Business Cycle)理論的預期。此外,我們也發現預算規模具遞延效果,而且地方經濟發展程度也對預算具正面的影響力。最後,本文也發現在宋楚瑜職掌省府期間,縣市政府的財政預算確實存在擴張的情形。
The incumbents in a democracy tend to manipulate the economy by adopting expansionary fiscal policy to stimulate short-run expansion during electoral periods. By doing so, the macroeconomic performance is affected by the election and it is so called the political business cycle. In order to test whether policy instruments are affected by the election or not, this paper focuses on the electoral and partisan cycles in local budgets in Taiwan Province between 1988 and 2003. More specifically, we try to explore the scenario of political business cycle at local governments. The result shows that local governments' annual budgets do expand during the electoral years, which is corresponding to the theory of opportunistic political business cycle. On the other hand, we do not find the evidence to support the partisan political business cycle theory, since different incumbent parties have similar decision making for their budget during elections. Furthermore, we find a significant lag impact on the current budget setting. Finally, the empirical result reveals that local governments' budgets and expenditures expand during James Soong as a Chairman and Governor of Taiwan Provincial Government.
期刊論文
1.Klevmarken, N. A.(1989)。Panel Studies: What Can We Learn from Them? Introduction。European Economic Review,33,523-529。  new window
2.Alesina, Alberto、Roubini, Nouriel(1992)。Political Cycles in OECD Economies。The Review of Economic Studies,59(4),663-688。  new window
3.Rogoff, Kenneth(1990)。Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles。American Economic Review,80(1),21-36。  new window
4.Rogoff, K.、Sibert, A.(1988)。Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles。Review of Economic Studies,55(1),1-16。  new window
5.傅彥凱(20021200)。地方政治預算循環之實證研究:以臺灣省縣市長選舉為例。行政暨政策學報,35,137-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Schultz, A. Kenneth(1995)。The Politics of the Political Business Cycle。British Journal of Political Science,25,79-99。  new window
7.傅彥凱(20020600)。民主政治下的經濟政策制定--政治景氣循環理論之分析。中國行政評論,11(3),139-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Borcherding, Thomas E.、Deacon, Robert T.(1972)。The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments。The American Economic Review,62(5),891-901。  new window
9.Clark, W. R.、Reichert, U. N.、Lomas, S. L.、Parker, K. L.(1998)。International and Domestic Constraints on Political Business Cycles in OECD Economies。International Organization,52(1),87-120。  new window
10.Hsiao, Cheng(1985)。Benefits and Limitations of Panel Data。Econometric Reviews,4(1),121-174。  new window
11.Blais, A.、Nadeau, R.(1992)。The Electoral Budget Cycle。Public Choice,74(3/4),389-403。  new window
12.Case, A.(1994)。Taxes and the Electoral Cycle: How Sensitive Are Governs to Coming Elections?。Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review,3,17-26。  new window
13.Galli, Emma、Rossi, Stefania P. S.(2002)。Political Budget Cycles: The Case of the Western German Lander。Public Choice,110(3/4),283-303。  new window
14.Kalecki, Michael(1943)。Political Aspects of Full Employment。The Political Quarterly,14(4),322-330。  new window
15.Poterba, J.(1993)。State Response to Fiscal Crises: The Effects of Budgetary Institutions and Politics。NBER Working Paper,4375,1-37。  new window
16.Reid, Bradford G.(1998)。Endogenous Elections, Electoral Budget Cycles and Canadian Provincial Governments。Public Choice,97(1/2),35-48。  new window
17.Phillips, A. W. H.(1958)。The Relation Between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957。Economica,25(100),283-299。  new window
18.Berger, Helge、Woitek, Ulrich(1997)。Searching for Political Business Cycles in Germany。Public Choice,91(2),179-197。  new window
19.Nordhaus, William D.(1975)。The Political Business Cycle。The Review of Economic Studies,42(2),169-190。  new window
20.徐仁輝(20010100)。地方政府支出預算決策的研究。公共行政學報,5,1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr.(1977)。Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy。American Political Science Review,71(4),1467-1487。  new window
22.吳重禮、黃紀、張壹智(20030300)。臺灣地區「分立政府」與「一致政府」之研究:以1986年至2001年地方府會關係為例。人文及社會科學集刊,15(1),145-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳正芬、官有垣(19971200)。政黨競爭、地方自主性與社會福利以民進黨執政的臺北市為例。中國行政評論,7(1),57-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.張慈佳(20000700)。地方經濟之政治景氣循環現象--以臺灣地區之縣市長選舉為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊‧人文及社會科學,10(3),362-377。  延伸查詢new window
25.王鼎銘(20030500)。政策認同下的投票效用與選擇:空間投票理論在不同選舉制度間的比較。選舉研究,10(1),171-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Cukierman, A.、Meltzer, A.(1986)。A Positive Theory of Discretionary Policy, the Cost of Democratic Government, and the Benefits of a Constitution。Economic Inquiry,24,367-388。  new window
27.施富士(2000)。我國政府支出成長之政經決策模型-各級政府總支出之實證分析。財稅研究(財稅研究雜誌社),32(3),42-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.May, A. M.(1987)。The Political Business Cycle: An Institutional Critique and Reconstruction。Journal of Economic Issues,21,713-722。  new window
29.Mundlak, Y.(1978)。On the Polling of Time Series and Cross Section Data。Econometrica,46,69-85。  new window
30.Price, S.(1997)。Political Business Cycles and Macroeconomic Credibility: A Survey。Public Choice,92(3/ 4),407-427。  new window
31.李文郎(2003)。精省後縣(市)長權限及其去職規定之探討。空大行政學報,13,271-310。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.蔡吉源、林健次(2005)。臺灣中央與地方財政關係:制度與歷史的觀察(1952-2003)。財稅研究,37(5),137-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Alesina, Alberto(1987)。Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-party System as a Repeated Game。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,101,651-678。  new window
34.Alesina, Alberto(1988)。Macroeconomics and Politics。NBER Macroeconomics Annual,3,13-52。  new window
35.Bergstrom, T. C.、Goodman, R. P.(1973)。Private Demand for Public Goods。The American Economic Review,63(3),280-296。  new window
36.Gonzalez, R. A.、Mehay, S. L.(1985)。Bureaucracy and the Divisibility of Local Public Output。Public Choice,45(1),89-101。  new window
研究報告
1.郭石吉、林時機、林鉅鋃、烏以工、黃守高、張德銘(2004)。健全地方財政自主透明機制專案調查研究報告。0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Persson, T.、Tabellini, G.(1990)。Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility, and Politics。Harwood Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Hibbs, D. A.(1987)。The American Political Economy。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Alesina, Alberto、Roubini, Nouriel、Cohen, Gerald D.(1997)。Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy。MIT Press。  new window
4.黃臺心(2005)。計量經濟學。台北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
5.Baltagi, Badi H.(2001)。Econometric Analysis of Panel Data。Chichester, New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.羅清俊(20010000)。臺灣分配政治。臺北:前衛。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Tufte, Edward R.(1978)。Political Control of the Economy。Princeton, N. J.:Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Alt, James E.、Chrystal, K. Alec(1983)。Political Economics。University of California press。  new window
9.Gujarati, Damodar N.(1995)。Basic Econometrics。McGraw-Hill, Inc.。  new window
10.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
11.Hsiao, Cheng(1986)。Analysis of Panel Data。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Solon, G. S.(1989)。The Value of Panel Data in Economics Research。Panel Surveys。New York, NY。  new window
13.林惠玲、陳正倉(2001)。統計學:方法與應用。統計學:方法與應用。臺北市:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
14.林健次、蔡吉源(2004)。臺灣中央與地方財政關係的研究。臺灣中央與地方財政關係的研究。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE