:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩岸關係與2008年臺灣總統大選:認同、利益、威脅與選民投票取向
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:陳陸輝耿曙王德育
作者(外文):Chen, Lu-hueiKeng, ShuWang, T. Y.
出版日期:2009
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:兩岸關係總統選舉臺灣認同經濟利益武力威脅Cross-strait relationsTaiwan's presidential electionTaiwan identityCalculation of interestsMilitary threats
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(27) 博士論文(4) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:26
  • 共同引用共同引用:321
  • 點閱點閱:135
本研究運用 2008年總統選舉前的民意調查資料,分析包括台灣民眾台灣意識的深淺、兩岸經貿的利害、及中共動用武力的預期等因素,觀察其對總統選舉投票行為的影響。根據上述架構,本研究發現:台灣民眾的台灣意識與藍綠政黨認同,是影響其投票行為的主要認同因素,愈具備台灣意識與泛綠政黨的認同者,愈傾向支持民進黨的候選人。另方面,民眾對兩岸經貿的開放態度以及預期因此獲利的程度,也將反映為其對國民黨候選人的支持。換言之,理性與感性兩類因素,在上次選舉中均扮演相當關鍵的角色。不過,比較出乎意外的,有關宣布獨立是否引起武力相向,則未見顯著的影響。參照本研究與之前相關研究發現,無論泛綠政黨所凸顯的武力威脅與台灣認同,或是泛藍政黨強調的兩岸交流與經濟利害,都與中國大陸的政策回應有關。因此,對岸如何緩和兩岸緊張,促進合作互惠,對兩岸和平穩定與台灣民主發展,都將至關緊要。
Based on the analysis of survey data collected on the eve of Taiwan’s 2008 presidential election, our study seeks to clarify the effects of the following factors on the island citizens’ voting behavior: (1)Taiwanese identity, (2)expected benefits from cross-Strait economic exchanges, and (3)the perceived likelihood of China’s use of military force. The findings show that, in addition to party identification, both Taiwanese identity and expected economic benefits have important effects on the islanders’ vote choices. Unexpectedly, China’s military threats played an insignificant role in voters’ decisions. Because Taiwanese identity and expected economic benefits are at the center of the political discourse on cross-Strait relations, future interactions between Taiwan and China will continue to play a significant role in the island’s politics.
期刊論文
1.Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng.(2005)。“Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan.”。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40,13-28。  new window
2.耿曙(2005)。經貿交流的政治影響:中共的對台新政與台灣的兩岸研究。中國大陸研究教學通訊,71,1-6。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lin, Tse-min、Chu, Yun-han、Hinich, Melvin J.(199607)。Conflict Displacement and Regime Transition in Taiwan: A Spatial Analysis。World Politics,48(4),453-482。  new window
4.耿曙、劉嘉薇、陳陸輝(20091200)。打破維持現狀的迷思:臺灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難。臺灣政治學刊,13(2),3-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.耿曙、林琮盛(20050300)。全球化背景下的兩岸關係與臺商角色。中國大陸研究,48(1),1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳陸輝(20001100)。臺灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷。選舉研究,7(2),109-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳陸輝、周應龍(20040700)。臺灣民眾統獨立場的持續與變遷。東亞研究,35(2),143-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.耿曙、陳陸輝、黃冠博(20061200)。Sense, Sensitivity, and Sophistication in Shaping the Future of Cross-Strait Relations。Issues & Studies,42(4),23-66。new window  new window
9.吳乃德(20051200)。麵包與愛情:初探臺灣民眾民族認同的變動。臺灣政治學刊,9(2),5-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳義彥、陳陸輝(20030900)。模稜兩可的態度還是不確定的未來:臺灣民眾統獨觀的解析。中國大陸研究,46(5),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.耿曙(20090900)。經濟扭轉政治?中共「惠臺政策」的政治影響。問題與研究,48(3),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.耿曙、陳陸輝(20031100)。兩岸經貿互動與臺灣政治版圖:南北區塊差異的推手?。問題與研究,42(6),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳玉山(20050300)。From Romantic Triangle to Marriage? Washington-Beijing-Taipei Relations in Historical Comparison。Issues & Studies,41(1),113-159。new window  new window
14.魏鏞(20020900)。邁向民族內共同體--臺海兩岸互動模式之建構、發展與檢驗。中國大陸研究,45(5),1-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Sears, David O., and Carolyn L. Funk.(1991)。“The Role of Self-interest in Social and Political Attitude.”。Experimental Social Psychology,24,1-91。  new window
16.Sears, David O., Carl P. Hensler, and Leslie K. Speer.(1979)。“Whites’ Opposition to Busing: Self-Interest or Symbolic Politics?”。American Political Science Review,73(2),369-384。  new window
17.Sears, David O., and Donald R. Kinder.(1985)。“Whites’ Opposition to Busing: On Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Group Conflict?”。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,5,1141-1147。  new window
18.Sears, David O., and Richard R. Lau.(1983)。“Inducing Apparently Self-Interested Political Preferences.”。American Journal of Political Science,27(2),223-252。  new window
19.Sears, David. O. et al.(1978)。“Political System Support and Public Response to the Energy Crisis.”。American Journal of Political Science,22,56-82。  new window
20.Sears, David O. et al.(1980)。“Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitude and Presidential Voting.”。American Political Science Review,74,670-684。  new window
會議論文
1.耿曙、林瑞華(20040430)。兩岸經濟整合的政治影響:分析兩岸整合的理論架構。第二屆亞太學術研討會。嘉義:南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Keng, Shu.(2003)。“Understanding the Impacts of Non-Official Contacts across the Taiwan Strait: Towards a New Analytical Framework.”。Philadelphia。  new window
研究報告
1.陳陸輝、耿曙、鄭夙芬、游清鑫(2008)。台灣認同的起源與政治效果之研究 (計畫編號:NSC95-2414-H-004-051-SSS)。臺北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Edelman, M. J.(1964)。The symbolic uses of politics。Chicago:University of Illinois Press。  new window
2.Edelman, Murray(1971)。Politics as Symbolic Action。Chicago, IL:Markham。  new window
3.Leng, Tse-kang(1996)。The Taiwan-China Connection: Democracy and Development Across the Taiwan Straits。Boulder, Colo:Westview Press。  new window
4.Long, J. Scott(1997)。Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables。Sage Publications。  new window
5.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
6.吳玉山(1997)。抗衡或扈從:兩岸關係新詮--從前蘇聯看臺灣與中國大陸間的關係。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Sears, David O., and Harris M. Allen Jr.(1984)。“The Trajectory of Local Desegregation Controversies and Whites’ Opposition to Busing.”。Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation。Orlando, FL。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳玉山(19990000)。臺灣的大陸政策:結構與理性。爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北:五南圖書出版有限股份公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hardin, Russell(1995)。Self-Interest, Group Identity。Nationalism and Rationality。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.黃紀(2000)。質變數的計量分析員選舉全國大型民意調查研究。政治學的範圍與方法。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sears, David O.(1993)。Symbolic Politics: A Socio-Psychological Theory。Explorations in Political Psychology。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
5.Sears, David O.(2001)。The Role of Affect in Symbolic Politics。Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE