:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:女性在陽剛職場內的樣板處境 : 以海巡與消防單位為例
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:彭渰雯 引用關係林依依葉靜宜
作者(外文):Peng, YenwenLin, Yi-yiYeh, Chin-yi
出版日期:2009
卷期:27:4
頁次:頁115-169
主題關鍵詞:樣板理論陽剛特質性別分工性別隔離公務人力資源管理Theory of tokenismMasculinityGendered division of laborGender segregationPublic human resource management
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:84
隨著性別工作平等法的施行,以及行政院對於性別主流化的大力推動,許多以男性為主要人力的政府部會單位,逐漸取消原本招募人力時的性別門檻。於是,愈來愈多女性進入這樣的陽剛職場,也為組織內部慣有的制度與文化帶來新的挑戰。為了對這樣的改變有更深入的瞭解與因應,本研究以海洋巡防及消防工作為例,訪談在這些單位工作的女性及其男性同仁、長官,呈現女性進入陽剛職場的經驗與困境,並分析構成這些困境的原因。 從樣板理論 (theory of tokenism) 的視角出發,本文呈現了三項主要發現。首先,本文指出Rosabeth Moss Kanter所提出的三種樣板效應:角色誘捕、界線鞏固、放大檢視等,在本研究的研究對象身上,多半獲得印證。本文也強調在工作環境較為封閉、工作崗位過去很少出現女性以及女性同仁為初任者(實習或剛畢業的階段)的情況下,主管單位應當避免指派「單一女性」進入一個全男性的單位工作。 其次,本文發現樣板女性進入陽剛職場之後,有重新改寫陽剛工作內涵與模式的能動性。受訪的一些女性消防與海巡隊員,在實務經驗中挑戰了過去這些工作所定義的「核心能力」,指出某些女性常有的能力與特質,可以更增加工作安全與表現。此外,本文也指出女性員工的加入,凸顯了過去這些陽剛組織制度設計的男性中心傾向,也帶來組織重新檢討改革,邁向「性別友善」職場的契機。 第三,本文指出樣板效應的產生和女性的不適應,除了「數字」這個直接原因外,更結構性的因素在於主流社會的性別角色規範和分工,以及這些陽剛職場過去以男性為主的制度安排與組織文化。因此,在社會性別平權觀念尚未達到一定程度以前,組織內部的制度與文化改革,勢必面對一定的阻礙與困難。為此,本研究也在最後提出一些促進陽剛職場性別平權的配套建議。
With the legislation of the Gender Equality in Employment Act and the adoption of Gender Mainstreaming approaches, most male-dominated public sectors in Taiwan no longer set limits on the number of women in the recruitment process. As a result, an increasing number of women have entered these masculine occupational fields, and brought about challenges to the existing system and culture in the organizations. Using the cases of the coast guard and fire fighting sectors as examples, this research aims to explore and deliberate the situations of token women in these masculine fields, so as to develop policy recommendations. Drawing on Rosabeth Moss Kanter’s conceptual framework of tokenism as well as the supplementary notions made by other theorists, this paper explores three obstacles to women’s adjustment and performance in the occupational fields, namely the stereotypical gendered division of labor, male-centered occupational arrangement and establishment, and the pressure imposed on tokens due to excessive attention. Furthermore, the authors analyze the organizational, cultural and societal factors that contextualize and sustain tokenism. Finally, the paper concludes with several policy recommendations, both institutional and structural, to combat the above-mentioned token effects.
期刊論文
1.葉毓蘭(20040800)。女警政策回顧與前瞻。中央警察大學學報,41,107-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡良文(20050400)。新世紀考選體制變革之檢視評估。考銓季刊,42,1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Zimmer, Lynn(1988)。Tokenism and Women in the Workplace: The Limits of Gender-Neutral Theory。Social Problems,35(1),64-77。  new window
4.黃煥榮(20071200)。突破玻璃天花板--女性行政菁英事業生涯發展的問題與展望。國家菁英,3(4),85-108。  延伸查詢new window
5.West, Candace、Zimmerman, Don H.(1987)。Doing gender。Gender & Society,1(2),125-151。  new window
6.徐宗國(20011200)。拓邊照顧工作:男護士在女人工作世界中得其所在。臺灣社會學刊,26,163-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳嘉麗(20051000)。從限制性別的特考談人才考選的困境。考銓季刊,44,30-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Kanter, Rosabeth Moss(1977)。Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women。The American Journal of Sociology,82(5),965-990。  new window
9.Brown, Jennifer M.(1998)。Aspects of discriminatory treatment of women police officers serving in forces in England and Wales。British Journal of Criminology,38(2),265-283。  new window
10.Gruber, James and Lars Bjorn.(1982)。“Blue-collar Blues: The Sexual Harassment of Women Autoworkers.”。Work and Occupations,9,271-98。  new window
11.Gustafson, Joseph L.(2008)。Tokenism in Policing: An Empirical Test of Kanter's Hypothesis。Journal of Criminal Justice,36(1),1-10。  new window
12.Krimmel, John T. and Paula E. Gormley.(2003)。“Tokenism and Job Satisfication for Policewomen.”。American Journal of Criminal Justice,20, 1,73-88。  new window
13.Lippe, Tanja Van der et al.(2004)。“Gender Policies and the Position of Women in the Police Force in European Countries.”。Journal of European Social Policy,14, 4,391-405。  new window
14.Yoder, Janice D. and Laura Sinnett.(1985)。“Is It All in The Numbers? A Case Study of Tokenism.”。Psychology of Women Quarterly,9,413-418。  new window
15.Yoder, Janice D.(1991)。“Rethinking Tokenism: Looking Beyond Numbers.”。Gender and Society,5, 2,178-92。  new window
學位論文
1.楊濰萍(2006)。在陽剛職場中「打滾」的女人--以台灣基層女警的職涯路徑為例(碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.商綉 慧(2002)。〈台灣地區女警工作與角色之研究〉。  延伸查詢new window
3.許震雄(2009)。〈從海巡特考取消性別限制探究查緝員離職原因〉。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Archer, John、Lloyd, Barbara(2002)。Sex and Gender。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Yanow, Dvora(2000)。Conducting interpretive policy analysis。Sage。  new window
3.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Fraser, Nancy(1997)。Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the 'Postsocialist' Condition。Routledge。  new window
5.Connell, Raewyn W.(1995)。Masculinities。University of California Press。  new window
6.Kanter, Rosabeth Moss(1977)。Men and Women of the Corporation。Basic Books。  new window
7.彭渰雯(2007)。〈婦運與政治〉。性別向度與台灣社會》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kanter, Rosabeth Moss、Nakao Eki、國立編譯館(2008)。公司男女。台北:群學。  延伸查詢new window
9.Deaux, Kay and Joseph Ullman(1983)。Women and Steel。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃曬莉(2007)。性別歧視的多面性。性別向度與台灣社會。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE