臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：法治行政、正當程序與媒體所有權管制--借鏡美國管制經驗析論NCC對「旺旺入主三中」案處分之合法性與正當性
書刊名：法學新論
作者：黃銘輝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Ming-hui
出版日期：2009
卷期：17
頁次：頁105-150
主題關鍵詞：媒體所有權管制；跨媒體經營；結構性管制；言論自由；程序導向控制；Media ownership regulation；Cross-ownership；Structural intervention；Freedom of speech；Process-oriented control
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:1698
  • 點閱點閱:184
本文主要的目的在回顧台灣學界研究中共外交時，應用理論的現況，檢視其優缺點，並嘗試提出未來的研究方向。本研究的初步結果發現，台灣學界致力於透過理論進行中共外交研究的努力，在整體大陸研究學界並未形成主流，比較多的是政策研究，以及持續沿用較為廣義的現實主義（國家利益）架構。多年來，雖有學者陸續引進嚴謹的結構現實主義、自由制度主義、建構主義與批判性（反思性）國關理論，但此類案例文獻仍為數不多，學界透過國關理論的選擇與中共外交研究對話的深入性探索，仍有很大的發展空間。本文建議將來的議題可包括結合中國特色與國際比較、全球化下的地方對外行為、經濟互賴與衝突之間的關係、國際規範的遵循、能源與對外行為。
The main purpose of this essay is to review and evaluate the application of international relations (IR) theory to the study of Chinese foreign policy in Taiwan. In addition, it has provided some research directions for future study in this field. A broad survey of most works on Chinese foreign policy and IR theory in Taiwan suggests that policy oriented studies and basic national interest approach rather than serious theoretical discourse have dominated the study of this field. Despite some scholars on Chinese foreign policy in Taiwan have attempted to apply structural realism, liberal institutionalism, constructivism, and reflectivism to describe and explain Chinese foreign policy behaviors, the quantities remain limited. Future study should involve issues where the integration of Chinese foreign policy analysis with theory of international relations could benefit both. This study suggests that future directions for studying Chinese foreign policy and IR theory could include the comparison of Chinese foreign policy behavior with Chinese characteristics and IR theory, local government’s external relations under globalization, relationship between economic interdependence and conflict, energy and China’s foreign relations.
期刊論文
1.李建良(19990200)。行政處分附款之合法性。月旦法學，46，16-17。  延伸查詢new window
2.李建良(19960600)。違法的正當娛樂--行政法上權利義務之繼受問題。月旦法學，14，67-68。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪家殷(20061100)。行政處分：第七講 行政處分之撤銷及廢止、補正及轉換、附款。月旦法學教室，49，32-44。  延伸查詢new window
4.盛子龍(20010700)。行政處分附款之行政爭訟。中原財經法學，6，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.彭心儀(20090215)。由「稀有性」論頻譜資源的管制規範。臺灣法學雜誌，122，43-46。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉靜怡(20060400)。言論自由：第六講 言論自由、媒體類型規範與民主政治。月旦法學教室，42，34-44。  延伸查詢new window
7.Baker, C. E.(2002)。Media Concentration: Given Up on Democracy。FLA. L. REV.，54，839。  new window
8.Barron, J. A.(2008)。Access Reconsidered。GEO. WASH. L. REV，76，826。  new window
9.DiCola, P.(2007)。Choosing between the Necessity and Public Interest Standards in FCC Review of Media Ownership Rules。MICH. L. REV.，106，101。  new window
10.Dorgan, B. L.(2005)。The FCC and Media Ownership: The Loss of the Public Interest Standard。ND J. L. Ethics & Pub Pol'y，19，443。  new window
11.Emord, J. W.(1989)。The First Amendment Invalidity of FCC Ownership Regulations,。CATH U. L. REV.，38，401。  new window
12.Fishman, W.(2004)。Comments on the FCCfs Recent Mass Media Ownership Decision。Am. U. L. Rev.，53，583。  new window
13.Flarity, A.(2009)。David Slays Goliath: The Fight against the FCC's Recent Relaxation of the Newspaper-Broadcast Cross-Ownership Rule。BAYLOR L. REV，61，261。  new window
14.Hazlett, T. W.(1999)。Economic and Political Consequences of the 1996 Telecommunications Act。HASTINGS L. J.，50，1359。  new window
15.Hitchens, L.(2006)。Broadcasting Pluralism and Diversity。  new window
16.Moore, D. C.(2004)。Double Crossed: Why the Newspaper/Broadcast Cross-Ownership Ban Remains Necessary in the Public Interest。MINN. L. Rev.，88，1697。  new window
17.Noah, L.(1997)。Administrative Arm-Twisting in the Shadow of Congressional Delegations of Authority。WIS. L. REV.，1997，873。  new window
18.Pritchard, D.、Terry, C.、Brewer, P. R.(2008)。One Owner, One Voice?--Testing a Central Premise of Newspaper-Broadcast Cross-Ownership Policy。COMM. L. & POL'Y，13，1。  new window
19.Spulber, D. F.(2007)。Mandating Access to Telecom and the Internet: The Hidden Side of Trinko。COLUM. L. REV，107，1822。  new window
20.Thierer, A.(2007)。Why Regulate Broadcasting? Toward a Consistent First Amendment Standard for the Informative Age。COMMLAW CONSPECTUS，15，431。  new window
21.Weiser, P. J.(2008)。Reexamining the Legacy of Dual Regulation: Reforming Dual Merger Review by the DOJ and the FCC。Federal Communications Law Journal，61，167-198。  new window
22.廖元豪(20040500)。走自己的路--大法官「法律保留本土化」之路。臺灣本土法學雜誌，58，21-40。  延伸查詢new window
23.劉靜怡(20051100)。言論自由：第五講 言論自由、誹謗罪與名譽權之保障。月旦法學教室，37，36-46。  延伸查詢new window
24.Pildes, Richard H.、Sunstein, Cass R.(1995)。Reinventing the Regulatory State。University of Chicago Law Review，62(1)，1-129。  new window
25.張永明(20090700)。傳播生態變遷下的傳播自由與媒體責任。月旦法學，170，43-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Sunstein, Cass R.(1995)。The First Amendment in Cyberspace。Yale Law Journal，104(7)，1757-1804。  new window
27.廖元豪(20050900)。市場等同自由？政府即是公共？--從「公共的言論自由」評衛星頻道換照爭議。臺灣本土法學雜誌，74，68-74。  延伸查詢new window
28.Stewart, Potter(1975)。Or of the Press。Hastings Law Journal，26，631-637。  new window
29.Barkow, Rachel E.、Huber, Peter W.(2000)。A Tale of Two Agencies: A Comparative Analysis of FCC and DOJ Review of Telecommunications Mergers。University of Chicago Legal Forum，2000，29-84。  new window
30.Sturm, J. F.(2005)。Time for change on media cross-ownership regulation。Federal Communications Law Journal，57，201-208。  new window
31.Yoo, C. S.(2005)。Architectural censorship and the FCC。Southern California Law Review，78，669-732。  new window
圖書
1.翁岳生(200003)。行政法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.塩野宏、劉宗德、賴恆盈(1996)。行政法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.American Bar Association(2005)。Telecom Antitrust Handbook。Chicago, IL：ABA Section of Antitrust Law。  new window
4.Carter, T. B.、Dee, J. L.、Zuckman, H. L.(2007)。Communication Law。St. Paul, MN：Thomson/West。  new window
5.Creech, K. C.(2007)。Electronic Media Law and Regulation。Burlington, MA：Focal Press。  new window
6.Robinson, G. O.、Nachbar, T. B.(2008)。Communications Regulation。St. Paul, MN：West Group。  new window
7.Sadler, R. L.(2005)。Electronic Media Law。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Pub。  new window
8.Stone, Geoffrey R.、Seidman, L. S.、Sunstein, C. R.、Tushnet, M. V.、Karlan, P. S.(2003)。The First Amendment。New York, NY：Aspen Pub。  new window
9.Fiss, Owen(1996)。Liberalism divided：Freedom of speech and the many uses of state power。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
10.Stone, Geoffrey R., Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunstein, Mark V. Tushnet、Pamela S. Karlan(2003)。The First Amendment。New York, NY：Foundation Press。  new window
11.Breyer, Stephen G.、Stewart, R. B.、Sunstein, C. R.、Vermeule, A.(2006)。Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy。New York, NY：Aspen。  new window
12.Aman, A. C. Jr.、Mayton, W. T.(2001)。Administrative Law。St. Paul, MN：West Group。  new window
13.Fiss, Owen M.(1996)。The Irony of Free Speech。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
14.Baker, C. Edwin(2007)。Media concentration and democracy: Why ownership matters。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Benjamin, S. M.、Lichtman, D. G.、Shelanski, H.、Weiser, P. J.(2006)。Telecommunications Law and Policy。Durham, NC：Carolina Academic Press。  new window
16.陳敏(2007)。行政法總論。臺北：新學林。  延伸查詢new window
17.Bagdikian, Ben H.(2004)。The New Media Monopoly。Boston, MA：Beacon。  new window
18.McChesney, Robert W.(1999)。Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times。Urbana-Champaign, IL：University of Illinois Press。  new window
19.Baker, C. E.(2002)。Media, markets, and democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
20.McChesney, Robert W.(2004)。The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the 21st Century。New York, NY：Monthly Review Press。  new window
21.湯德宗(2003)。行政程序法論--論正當行政程序。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
22.林子儀(19990000)。言論自由與新聞自由。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.吳庚(200508)。行政法之理論與實用。臺北：三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.湯德宗(2005)。權力分立新論。台北：元照出版。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Einstein, M.(2004)。Media diversity: Economics, ownership, and the FCC。Mahwah, N.J.：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pub。  new window
26.Compaine, B. M.、Gomery, D.(2000)。Who owns the media? Competition and concentration in the mass media industry。Mahwah, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
27.Carter, T. B.、Franklin, M. A.、Wright, J. B.(2008)。The first amendment and the fourth estate：The law of mass media。New York：Foundation Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳春生(199608)。行政過程與行政處分。行政法之學理與體系--行政行為形式論。三民。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳新民(200012)。平等原則拘束行政權的問題--論「不法平等」。行政法爭議問題研究。五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉俊榮(2003)。二元民主與行政程序--從全球化的脈絡論行政程序法的時代機能。行政程序法之檢討、傳播行政之爭訟。元照。  延伸查詢new window
4.葛克昌(200012)。私法規定在行政法上之適用。行政法爭議問題研究。五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.許宗力(199910)。行政命令授權明確性之研究。法與國家權力。元照。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳愛娥(2000)。基本權作為客觀法規範：以「組織與程序保障功能」為例，檢討其衍生的問題。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：915（臺灣：904，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67404472
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上