:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:初探方法論上的整體主義:涂爾幹「社會事實」觀點之運用
書刊名:國立虎尾科技大學學報
作者:李世宏 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Shih-hung
出版日期:2010
卷期:29:3
頁次:頁103-112
主題關鍵詞:涂爾幹社會事實量化分析控制變數DurkheimSocial factQuantitative analysisControl variable
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:102
  • 點閱點閱:48
本研究以涂爾幹(Durkheim)的「社會事實」(social fact)爲基礎,探討整體主義(holism)進行社會科學量化分析的研究方法。本文認爲,具有「強制力」的「社會事實」對於個人行爲與態度深具影響力,並且在搜集相關文獻資料之後,嘗試整理成三項分析途徑。首先,可將「社會事實」視爲單一變數,與其他因素一起列入分析模型,探討該項「社會事實」對於依變數的「淨影響力」。其次,可以「情境變數」來看待「社會事實」。將不同的「社會事實」分別設定分析模型,再進行不同「社會事實」情境之下的分析,比較不同模型依變數與自變數的關係,以瞭解不同「社會事實」情境之下,其構成成員行爲影響因素之異同。再者,若是「社會事實」對於某項自變數具有特殊意義,則可將兩者予結合,以「交互影響變數」方式列入分析模型,以檢證其結合效應。在結論中,本文摘述研究要點,並提出未來研究方向與建議。
This study aims at probing holism for quantitative analysis of social sciences. In this view, we take advantage of the "social fact" of Durkheim and examine the influences on individual behavior and attitudes. This paper advocates that "social fact" compels individual behavior and attitudes influential, and try to compile three of way. First, "social fact" as a single variable included in the analysis, together with other factors measure the net-impact in model. Second, take "social fact" as " moderating variable", will be different "social fact" was set on model, and then with different situation under analysis, comparison of different models according to the relationship between dependent variables and independent variables in order to understand the members of its composition factors in different situation of "social fact". Furthermore, if the "social fact" with a special significance for variables, can be combined they to "interaction variable" included in analysis to examine how their effect. In conclusion, summarize the major findings and propose future research directions and suggestions.
期刊論文
1.江衍良(20001200)。涂爾幹的社會學方法論。元培學報,7,109-122。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳重禮、李世宏(20040700)。政府施政表現與選民投票行為:以2002年北高市長選舉為例。理論與政策,17(4)=68,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bobo, Lawrence、Gilliam, Franklin D. Jr.(1990)。Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment。American Political Science Review,84(2),377-393。  new window
4.Huckfeldt, Robert、Ikeda, Ken'ichi、Pappi, Franz Urban(2000)。Political Expertise, Interdependent Citizens, and the Value Added Problem in Democratic Politics。Japanese Journal of Political Science,1(2),171-195。  new window
5.Sears, David O.、Valentino, Nicholas A.(1997)。Politics Matters: Political Events as Catalysts for Preadult Socialization。The American Political Science Review,91(1),45-65。  new window
6.Converse, P. E.、Pierce, R. E.(1985)。Measuring Partisanship。Political Methodology,11(4),143-166。  new window
7.Abramson, Paul R.(1979)。Developing Party Identification: A Further Examination of Life-Cycle, Generational, and Period Effects。American Journal of Political Science,23(1),78-96。  new window
8.黃偉峰(20040900)。從選票區位結構試探影響2004年「和平公投」之相關因素。臺灣民主,1(3),73-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.傅恆德(19961100)。決定投票選擇的結構、心理和理性因素:民國八十五年總統選舉研究。選舉研究,3(2),157-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡錦昌(20010500)。涂爾幹所謂「實證科學」。東吳社會學報,10,289-295。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.吳重禮、徐英豪、李世宏(20040900)。選民分立政府心理認知與投票行為:以2002年北高市長暨議員選舉為例。政治科學論叢,21,75-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Huckfeldt, Robert、Sprague, John、Jeffery, Levin、Levine, Jeffrey(2000)。The Dynamics of Collective Deliberation in the 1996 Election: Campaign Effects on Accessibility, Certainty, and Accuracy。American Political Science Review,94(3),641-651。  new window
13.Gerber, Alan、Green, Donald Philip(1998)。Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes。American Political Science Review,42(2),794-818。  new window
會議論文
1.許勝懋(2003)。臺北市民具有制衡觀嗎?1998與2002市長選舉之比較研究。2002年台灣選舉與民主化調查研究」國際學術研討會,「台灣選舉與民主化調查」規劃與推動委員會與國立政治大學選舉研究中心 (主辦) 。臺北:國立政治大學綜合院館五樓國際會議廳。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Durkheim, E.(1964)。The Rules of Sociological Method。New York:The Free Press。  new window
2.Durheim, Émile、黃丘隆(1989)。自殺論。臺北:結構群文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.莫家豪(1997)。社會學與社會分析。香港:香港人文科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Benton, Ted,、Ian Craib(2001)。Philosophy of Social Science。New York:Palgrave。  new window
5.Hollis, Martin.(2000)。The Philosophy of Social Science。UK:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Neuman, W. Lawrence、朱柔若(2002)。社會研究方法--質化與量化取向。臺北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Berelson, Bernard R.、Lazarsfeld, Paul F.、McPhee, William(1954)。The Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Delanty, Gerard(1997)。Social Science: Beyond Constructivism and Realism。Minneapolis, Minnesota:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
9.Monroe, Alan D.(1975)。Public Opinion in America。New York:Dodd, Mead and Company。  new window
10.顧忠華(1997)。韋伯的《基督新教倫理與資本主義精神》導讀。台北市:台灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
11.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
12.Converse, Philipe E.(1964)。The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics。Ideology and Discontent。New York, NY:The Free Press。  new window
13.Miller, W. E.(1976)。The cross-national use of party identification as a stimulus to political inquiry。Party identification and beyond。New York:John Wiley and Son。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE