臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：收入對婚姻權力及婚姻暴力的影響
書刊名：中華輔導與諮商學報
作者：楊連謙／董秀珠
作者(外文)：Yang, Lien-chien／Tung, Hsiu-chu
出版日期：2013
卷期：35
頁次：頁121-146
主題關鍵詞：收入；婚姻暴力；婚姻衝突；婚姻權力；精神分裂症；精神病；Income；Marital conflict；Marital power；Marital violence；Mental illness；Schizophrenia
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:146
  • 點閱點閱:115
本研究探討夫妻的收入對婚姻暴力及權力的影響。研究者依夫妻之相對收入將70 對丈夫為施暴者的夫妻分為「夫收入高」（n = 25）、「收入相當」（n = 20）和「妻收入高」（n = 25）三組。研究者回溯參與者初次暴力發生前的衝突情景，用由事務、情感及資源三個權力維度組成的婚姻權力臨床量表評量其婚姻權力。研究者以統計方式比較這三組，描述其暴力特徵，並探討收入對婚姻權力的影響。統計結果可證實「在三個權力維度中，收入與資源權力最相關，且為正相關，而與情感權力相關性最低」的假設，並發現：（1）妻子的收入較高，尤其是貧窮與丈夫罹患精神病的夫妻，婚姻暴力較嚴重；（2）收入較高的妻子，婚姻權力也較大，但只有與資源維度是正相關；（3）「夫收入高」組的丈夫在三個權力維度上都是優勢，「妻收入高」組沒有任一維度為妻優勢；（4）「收入相當」的夫妻最平權；（5）不論妻子的收入高低，丈夫都情感權力優勢。本研究的發現可佐證「施權宰制」、「無權反撲」及「性別矯飾」等現象，並討論四個臨床處遇的要點：（1）處理婚姻權力結構的變動：揭露／面對舊結構、共構／適應新結構；（2）面對問題、修補關係；（3）喚醒女性關係權力潛能、教導男性獲得關係權力的能力；（4）更有意識地與配偶共同建構平權關係。
This study explores the influence of spousal income on marital violence and marital power. Seventy couples with husband-to-wife aggression were recruited from a psychiatric center and were divided into three groups based on spousal income: (a) husbands higher in income (n = 25), (b) equal in income (n = 20), and (c) wives higher in income (n = 25). The authors tracked participant's marital conflicts which occurred before the first violent episode, and measured couple's marital power by the Marital Power Clinical Rating Scale, consisting of matter, affection, and resources subscales. Results supported the hypothesis that, among three components of marital power, spousal income positively correlated with resources power the most, yet correlated with affection power the least. The results also revealed that: (a) couples with wives higher in income suffered severer marital violence, especially when the couples were poor or the husbands had mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, anxiety disorder); (b) the more the wife's income, the greater the marital power, but only the resources power positively correlated with her income; (c) couples with husbands higher in income were husband-dominant in all the three marital power dimensions, yet couples with wives higher in income were wife-dominant in none of the marital power dimensions; (d) couples with equal in income were the most egalitarian ones; (e) no matter how high the wife's income was, her husband had greater affection power. The clinical implications were discussed in four areas: (a) help couples deal with the changes in marital power structure; (b) help couples confront their problems and mend their marital relations; (c) develop wives' relational power, and teach husbands to obtain relational power; and (d) help couples coconstruct egalitarian relations in a conscious manner.
期刊論文
1.徐安琪(20010200)。婚姻權力模式--城鄉差異及其影響因素。國立臺灣大學社會學刊，29(2)，251-281。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊連謙、葉光輝、董秀珠(2011)。重型精神病患丈夫為施暴者之婚姻處遇:施暴者之特徵及治療成效研究。中華心理衛生學刊，24(2)，311-334。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊連謙、董秀珠、葉光輝(2005)。精神科專科醫院拾療婚姻暴力之經驗。北市醫學雜誌，2(8)，713-721。  延伸查詢new window
4.Coleman, D. H.、Straus, M. A.(1986)。Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples。Violence and Victims，1(2)，141-157。  new window
5.Gray-Little, B.、Burks, N.(1983)。Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique。Psychological Bulletin，93，513-538。  new window
6.Rosenbaum, A.、Leisring, P. A.(2003)。Towards an understanding of partner abusive men。Journal of Comparative Family Studies，34(1)，7-22。  new window
7.Umberson, D.、Anderson, K.、Glick, J.、Shapiro, A.(1998)。Domestic violence, personal control, and gender。Journal of Marriage and the Family，60，442-452。  new window
8.Xu, X.、Lai, S. -C.(2002)。gender ideologies and marital power。Journal of Family Issues，23，209-245。  new window
9.Pyke, K. D.(1996)。Class-based masculinities: The interdependence of gender, class, and interpersonal power。Gender and Society，10(5)，527-549。  new window
10.Babcock, Julia C.、Waltz, Jennifer、Jacobson, Neil S.、Gottman, Jonh M.(1993)。Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，61(1)，40-50。  new window
11.Fox, G. L.、Blanton, P. W.(1995)。Noncustodial fathers following divorce。Marriage and Family Review，1，257-282。  new window
12.Levant, Ronald F.(1997)。Gender equality and the new psychology of men: Comment on "The Politics of Gender in Family Therapy"。Journal of Marital and Family Therapy，23(4)，439-444。  new window
13.Tichenor, V. J.(1999)。Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power。Journal of Marriage and Family，61(3)，638-651。  new window
14.楊連謙、董秀珠、葉光輝(20060500)。婚姻暴力與夫妻離合。北市醫學雜誌，3(5)，450-460。  延伸查詢new window
15.簡文吟、伊慶春(20040600)。共識與歧見：夫妻配對研究的重要性。臺灣社會學，7，89-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Safilios-Rothschild, C.(1976)。A Macro-and Micro-examination of Family, Power and Love: An Exchange Model。Journal of Marriage and Family，38(2)，355-362。  new window
17.McDonald, Gerald W.(1980)。Family Power: The Assessment of a Decade of Theory and Research。Journal of Marriage and the Family，42(4)，841-854。  new window
18.董秀珠、楊連謙(20040300)。丈夫經濟弱勢夫妻權力歷程的性別文化影響。中華心理衛生學刊，17(1)，25-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Rodman, Hyman(1972)。Marital Power and the Theory of Resources in Cultural Context。Journal of Comparative Family Studies，3(1)，50-69。  new window
20.Hotaling, G. T.、Sugarman, D. B.(1986)。An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge。Violence and Victims，1(2)，101-124。  new window
21.潘淑滿(20030500)。婚姻暴力的性別政治。女學學誌，15，195-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.呂玉瑕、伊慶春(20051200)。社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工：臺灣七○年代與九○年代社會文化脈絡的比較。臺灣社會學，10，41-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.楊連謙(20091100)。嫉妒妄想：結構-策略取向婚姻治療的處理經驗。諮商與輔導，287，7-19+23。  延伸查詢new window
24.Straus, M. A.(1979)。Measuring intra-family conflict and violence: the conflict tactics scale。Journal of Marriage and the Family，41，75-88。  new window
會議論文
1.呂玉瑕、伊慶春(1998)。社會變遷中婦女就業與家庭地位--以家務分工為例。中國家庭及其倫理研討會。台北：漢學研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃淑如(2004)。處理精神病患與藥酒癮個案家庭暴力議題之現況與困境。台北市第五屆家庭暴力暨性侵害防治週：家庭暴力及性侵害防治工作網絡整合研討會。台北市政府社會局。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊連謙、葉光輝、董秀珠(2004)。弱勢婚暴加害人的困獸之鬥：論述進入醫療體系婚暴夫妻的權力歷程與處遇模式 (計畫編號：DOH93-TD-M-113-020)。台北：台北市立聯合醫院。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊連謙、董秀珠、葉光輝(2006)。婚姻暴力夫妻治療模式的效果評估-TCPC治療模式檢驗 (計畫編號：D0H94-TDM-113-034)。台北：台北市立聯合醫院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Crabtree, B. F.、Miller, W. L.、黃惠雯、童琬芬、梁文蓁、林兆衛(2007)。新質性方洗與研究。台北：韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊連謙、董秀珠(2008)。主體實踐婚姻/家庭治療--在關係和脈絡中共構主題性。台北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Potuchek, Jean L.(1997)。Who Supports the Family? Gender and Breadwinning in Dual-Earner Marriages。Stanford, Calif.：Stanford University Press。  new window
4.Giddens, Anthony、周素鳳(2001)。親密關係的轉變：現代社會的性、愛、慾。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Olson, David H.、Cromwell, Ronald E.(1975)。Power in Families。New York：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.楊連謙、董秀珠(1997)。結構：策略取向家庭治療。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.胡幼慧(1999)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北：巨流圖書。  延伸查詢new window
8.行政院主計處(1992)。中華民國職業標準分類。臺北：行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
9.Olson, D.、DeFrain, J.(2003)。Marriages and families: Intimacy, diversity and strengths。New York：McGraw Hill。  new window
其他
1.陳素玲(2010)。勞參率男創新低。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳靜慧(2005)。蹺蹺板的兩端--家庭中的權力與決策，http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/48/48-45.htm， 2005/06/15。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2010)。兩成美國男人靠老婆養家，http://www.bcc.com.tw/news/newsview.asp?cde=1053446， 2010/01/21。  new window
圖書論文
1.Straus, M. A.(1990)。The national family violence surveys。Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families。New Brunswick, Canada：Transaction。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：344（臺灣：343，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67155748
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上