臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：親密關係衝突中的建設性轉化歷程：行動者與伴侶相依模式之探討
書刊名：中華心理衛生學刊
作者：蕭綱玉／葉光輝／吳志文
作者(外文)：Chiao, Victor K. Y.／Yeh, Kuang-hui／Wu, Chih-wen
出版日期：2018
卷期：31:1
頁次：頁29-67
主題關鍵詞：親密關係衝突；建設性轉化；衝突屬性認知評估信念；衝突因應策略；行動者與伴侶相依模式；Intimate relationship conflict；Constructive transformation process；Functional-oriented appraisal of conflict；Conflict resolution strategy；Actor-partner interdependence model
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:303
  • 點閱點閱:68
研究目的：探討情侶關係衝突的建設性轉化歷程，並關注伴侶間的相互影響，主張關係中雙方對衝突採取功能性評估與競爭性評估信念，會透過相應的因應策略影響自身與對方的關係滿意度與安適幸福感。研究方法：援用行動者與伴侶相依模式，以189對未婚情侶於2016年6月至8月期間填答網路調查的對偶資料進行結構方程模型分析。研究結果：針對行動者效果，對衝突持功能性評估者會透過兼容並蓄因應策略提升自身的關係滿意度；持競爭性評估者會透過規避逃離因應策略降低自身的關係滿意度；男性採自我犧牲策略者會提升自身的關係滿意度與安適幸福感，採功利主義策略者會降低自身的關係滿意度。針對伴侶效果，採自我犧牲策略者會降低對方的安適幸福感；女性採兼容並蓄策略者會降低男性的安適幸福感；男性採兼容並蓄策略者會提升女性的關係滿意度，採功利主義策略者會提升女性的安適幸福感。研究結論：本研究以對偶資料突顯出情侶雙方對衝突的認知評估與因應策略會相互影響衝突的建設性轉化歷程。
Purpose: We collected dyadic data from unmarried lovers to explore the constructive transformation process of conflict in intimate relationships. We investigated the different resolution strategies mediated the relationships between the type of cognitive appraisal (functional-oriented or competitive-oriented) used to assess conflict in intimate relationship and personal adaptation (satisfaction with the relationship and peace of mind).Method: We used the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM) and structural equation modeling (SEM) for data analysis. Data were collected from 189 pairs of unmarried lovers by online surveyfrom June through August in 2016. Results: For both genders, a functional-oriented appraisal of conflict was positively related to a compatible resolution strategy, and consequently contributed to higher satisfaction with the relationship. For both genders, a competitive-oriented appraisal of conflict was positively related to an escape resolution strategy, and consequently contributed to lower satisfaction with the relationship. For men, a self-sacrifice resolution strategy was associated with higher satisfaction with the relationship and peace of mind, but a utilitarian resolution strategy was associated with lower satisfaction in the relationship. For both genders, if one partner had a self-sacrifice resolution strategy, the other had lower satisfaction with the relationship. If the female had a compatible resolution strategy, the male had lower peace of mind, but if the male had a compatible resolution strategy, the female had higher satisfaction with the relationship. The male partner's utilitarian resolution strategy was related to his partner's higher peace of mind. Conclusion: The results would be informative in investigating the dyadic conflict interaction process between unmarried young lovers, as well as in providing professional consultants a better understanding of the constructive transformation process of conflict in intimate relationships.
期刊論文
1.Simpson, J. A.、Rholes, W. S.、Phillips, D.(1996)。Conflict in close relationships: an attachment perspective。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，71(5)，899-914。  new window
2.Norris, S. L.、Zweigenhaft, R. L.(1999)。Self-monitoring, trust, and commitment in romantic relationships。Journal of Social Psychology，139(2)，215-220。  new window
3.葉光輝(2012)。青少年親子衝突歷程的建設性轉化：從研究觀點的轉換到理論架構的發展。高雄行為科學學刊，3，31-59。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hojjat, M.(2000)。Sex differences and perceptions of conflict in romantic relationships。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships，17(4/5)，598-617。  new window
5.Rahim, M. A.、Bonoma, T. V.(1979)。Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention。Psychological Reports，44(3)，1323-1344。  new window
6.卓紋君(20000600)。從兩性關係發展模式談兩性親密關係的分與合。諮商與輔導，174，25-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Rahim, M. A.(1983)。A measure of styles of handing interpersonal conflict。The Academy of Management Journal，26(2)，368-376。  new window
8.Karney, B. R.、Bradbury, T. N.(1997)。Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，72(5)，1075-1092。  new window
9.李怡真、林以正(20060300)。愛情關係中的情緒表達衝突之縱貫研究。中華心理學刊，48(1)，53-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張妤玥、陸洛(20070600)。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關連。中華心理衛生學刊，20(2)，155-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Hendrick, Susan. S.、Hendrick, Clyde、Adler, Nancy L.(1988)。Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together。Journal of Personality & Social Psychology，54(6)，980-988。  new window
12.Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K.、Bane, C.、Glaser, R.、Malarkey, W. B.(2003)。Love, marriage, and divorce: Newlyweds’ stress hormones foreshadow relationship changes。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，71(1)，176-188。  new window
13.葉光輝(19951200)。孝道困境的消解模式及其相關因素。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，79，87-118。  延伸查詢new window
14.Kline, R. B.(1998)。Software programs for structural equation modeling: AMOS, EQS, and LISREL。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，16，343-364。  new window
15.Fisher, L.、Kokes, R. F.、Ransom, D. C.、Phillips, S. L.、Rudd, P.(1985)。Alternative strategies for creating "relational" family data。Family Process，24(2)，213-224。  new window
16.Heavey, C. L.、Layne, C.、Christensen, A.(1993)。Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，61(1)，16-27。  new window
17.Rusbult, Caryl E.、Zembrodt, Isabella M.(1983)。Responses to Dissatisfaction in Romantic Involvements: A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，19(3)，274-293。  new window
18.Impett, E. A.、Beals, K. P.、Peplau, L. A.(2001)。Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples。Current Psychology，20(4)，312-326。  new window
19.Lee-Baggley, D.、Preece, M.、DeLongis, A.(2005)。Coping with interpersonal stress: Role of Big Five traits。Journal of Personality，73(5)，1141-1180。  new window
20.葉光輝、曹惟純(20140600)。成人親子衝突之建設性轉化路徑：功能性衝突評估、共享式解決策略與個人生活適應的關聯。中華心理衛生學刊，27(2)，173-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Kenny, D. A.、Ledermann, T.(2010)。Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor-partner interdependence model。Journal of Family Psychology，24(3)，359-366。  new window
22.McNulty, J. K.(2010)。When positive processes hurt relationships。Current Directions in Psychological Science，19(3)，167-171。  new window
23.Murray, S. L.、Holmes, J. G.、Collins, N. L.(2006)。Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships。Psychological Bulletin，132(5)，641-666。  new window
24.Overall, N. C.、Fletcher, G. J.、Simpson, J. A.、Sibley, C. G.(2009)。Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，96(3)，620-639。  new window
25.Powers, S. I.、Pietromonaco, P. R.、Gunlicks, M.、Sayer, A.(2006)。Dating couples' attachment styles and patterns of cortisol reactivity and recovery in response to a relationship conflict。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，90(4)，613-628。  new window
26.Rogge, R. D.、Bradbury, T. N.(1999)。Till violence does us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，67(3)，340-351。  new window
27.陳富美、利翠珊(20041200)。不同情感組型夫妻在家事分工上的差異：對偶資料的分析。應用心理研究，24，95-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.蕭英玲、黃芳銘(20101200)。婚姻滿意度與憂鬱傾向：貫時性對偶分析。中華心理學刊，52(4)，377-396。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.葉光輝(19971100)。親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式--孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，82，65-87+89-114。  延伸查詢new window
30.Geist, R. L.、Gilbert, D. G.(1996)。Correlates of expressed and felt emotion during marital conflict: Satisfaction, personality, process, and outcome。Personality and Individual Differences，21(1)，49-60。  new window
31.Little, Todd D.、Cunningham, William A.、Shahar, Golan、Widaman, Keith F.(2002)。To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，9(2)，151-173。  new window
32.楊國樞(20041200)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究，22，11-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1999)。Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，6(1)，1-55。  new window
34.MacCallum, Robert C.、Browne, Michael W.、Sugawara, Hazuki M.(1996)。Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling。Psychological Methods，1(2)，130-149。  new window
會議論文
1.吳志文、莊詩怡、葉光輝(2012)。兩種觀點，親子衝突歷程大不同：功能性與防衛性評估對衝突消解策略與生活適應的作用效果。第51屆台灣心理學會暨學術研討會，亞洲大學主辦 。臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李怡真(2009)。安適幸福感的構念發展與情緒調控機制之探討(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.鐘冠群(2004)。部門內人際衝突與員工效能：調節變項之研究(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林倩如(2014)。愛情關係中成人依附、衝突態度與衝突因應方式之相關研究(碩士論文)。中山醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cahn, D. D.(1992)。Conflict in intimate relationships。New York, NY：The Guilford Press。  new window
2.Weiten, W.、Lloyd, M. A.(2008)。Psychology applied to modern life。Boston, MA：Wadsworth Cengage Learning。  new window
3.Lazarus, Richard S.、Folkman, Susan(1984)。Stress, appraisal, and coping。Springer Publishing Company。  new window
4.黃囇莉(2006)。人際和諧與衝突：本土化的理論與研究。揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Peterson, D. R.(1983)。Conflict。Close relationships。NY：W. H. Freeman。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：510（臺灣：495，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1328876 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67135725
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上