:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從「城鄉差距」到「城鄉差異」:理論與實務的省思
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:葉明勳 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Ming-hsun
出版日期:2013
卷期:19:4
頁次:頁115-133
主題關鍵詞:城鄉差距城鄉差異城市區域小型城市普通統籌分配稅款Urban-rural gapUrban-rural differenceCity-regionSmall cityGeneral centrally-funded tax revenues
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:126
  • 點閱點閱:512
本研究對象為臺北市、新北市、基隆市及桃園縣,藉由「城鄉差距」概念,並以「中央普通統籌分配稅款」說明我國直轄市與縣(市)間的發展差距是不可避免之現實。實務上,地方政府普遍面臨預算不足窘境,如果僅僅尋求中央預算補助及縣(市)升格,企圖弭平直轄市與縣(市)間之差距問題是「消極」的作法,畢竟,財政資源的大餅永遠是這麼大,要公平分配給各個地方政府是不可能的。因此,本研究試圖以「城市區域」與「小型城市」的相關論述,提出在城鄉差距的現實環境中,相對落後地區必須拋棄傳統「城鄉差距」的消極觀念,轉化成更具積極性的「城鄉差異」觀點與作法;並搭配新北市「產業黃金走廊計畫」的實務案例,說明規模較小的城市,必須認知到與其它城市的「差異」存在,充分利用自身擁有的特殊資源,及建構出與眾不同的利基,展現難以被取代的區域性功能,進而與鄰近較大城市發展出「功能互補」關係,如此將能依靠自身優勢在區域發展過程中佔有一席之地,而不被排除在外。
The objects of this study include Taipei City, New Taipei City, Keelung City and Taoyuan County, and the purpose of this study is through using ”urban-rural gap” concept and taking ”centrally-funded tax revenues” as case to explain that the development gap between municipal cities and counties (cities) of our country is an inevitable reality. In practice, local governments generally face budget deficiency dilemma, however, attempting to make up the gap problem between municipal cities and counties (cities) only by seeking central budget subsidies and county (city) upgrade is a ”passive” approach, after all, the scale of financial resources pie is always the same, impossible to fairly allocate to each local government. Therefore, through theoretical connotation of ”City-Region” and ”Small City”, this study attempts to suggest that, under the realistic environment of urban-rural gap, relatively less-developed regions must abandon the negative concept of traditional ”rural-urban gap”, and transform into more active perspective and approach of ”urban-rural difference”; and coordinated with the practical case of New Taipei City ”The Golden Corridor of Industry Project” to explain that, in order to demonstrate irreplaceable regional functions, smaller scale cities have to recognize the existence of ”difference” with other cities, make full use of their own special resources, and construct distinct niches, and then further to develop ”functional complementarity” relationship with neighboring larger cities, such that, through relying on their own advantages, in regional development process they will be able to take a place without being excluded.
期刊論文
1.劉志宏、郭乃菱(20120600)。歲入多元化與歲入穩定之研究:臺灣地方財政之實證分析。行政暨政策學報,54,83-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭全政(20111200)。全球化下的城市與區域發展。研考雙月刊,35(6)=286,19-26。  延伸查詢new window
3.簡博秀(20100600)。新區域主義、區域治理與長江三角洲城市區域的策略。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,15,1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.簡博秀(20100400)。鐵本事件:新都會區域主義、競爭與區域治理。遠景基金會季刊,11(2),139-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Bell, DJayne, M.(2009)。Small cities ? towards a research agenda。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,33(3),683-99。  new window
6.Clancey, G.(2004)。Local memory and worldly narrative: the remote city in America and Japan。Urban Studies,41(12),2335-55。  new window
7.Lundin, M.(2007)。Explaining Cooperation: How Resource Interdependence, Goal Congruence and Trust Affect Joint Actions in Policy Implementation。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,17,651-72。  new window
8.Rondinelli, D.(1983)。Towns and small cities in developing countries。The Geographical Review,73,379-95。  new window
9.Tewdwr(2000)。The politics of city-region planning and governance。European Urban and Regional Studies,7,119-34。  new window
10.徐仁輝、鄭敏惠(20111200)。新六都時代地方財政的挑戰與展望。研考雙月刊,35(6)=286,57-70。  延伸查詢new window
11.李長晏、曾淑娟(20090600)。北臺與高高屏區域聯盟治理營運之比較。臺灣民主季刊,6(2),1-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.周志龍(20021200)。全球化、國土策略與臺灣都市系統變遷。都市與計劃,29(4),491-512。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.夏鑄九、劉昭吟(20030900)。全球網絡中的都會區域與城市:北臺都會區域與臺北市的個案。城市與設計學報,15/16,39-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Friedmann, J.、Wolff, G.(1982)。World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,6(3),309-344。  new window
15.陳小紅(20071200)。城市競爭與區域治理--兩岸案例探索「兩岸四地都市治理與地方永續發展」。國家與社會,3,1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.江啟臣、黃富娟(20061000)。全球化下城市競爭力指標之探討。研考雙月刊,30(5)=255,27-41。  延伸查詢new window
17.趙永茂(20030600)。臺灣府際關係與跨域管理:文獻回顧與策略途徑初探。政治科學論叢,18,53-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Huxham, Chris(2000)。The Challenge of Collaborative Governance。Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory,2(3),337-358。  new window
19.Feiock, Richard C.(2007)。Rational choice and regional governance。Journal of Urban Affairs,29(1),47-63。  new window
20.簡博秀(20080600)。沒有治理的政府:新區域主義與長江三角洲城市區域的治理模式。公共行政學報. 政大,27,1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳立剛(1998)。地方財政問題與調整之道。政策月刊,30,8-9。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李長晏(2011)。英國都會體制變革與區域治理組織的制度發展--以大倫敦都會政府為例。第五屆「地方自治與民主發展學術研討會」,(會議日期: 20111215)。臺中:東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hall, P. G.(1966)。The World Cities。London:Weidenfeld and Nicolson.。  new window
2.Keating, M.(2002)。Governing cities and regions: territorial restructuring in a global age。In Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy.。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Robinson, J.(2005)。Ordinary Cities。Routledge, London。  new window
4.Scott, A. J. etc.(2002)。Global city-regions: an overview/。Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy.。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Thrift, N.(2000)。Not a straight line but a curve, or cities are not mirrors of modernity。City Visions。Prentice Hall, Harlow。  new window
6.周志龍(2002)。全球化、知識與區域。臺北:詹氏書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Sassen, Saskia(1991)。The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo。Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE