臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：論公民參與刑事審判--從國際法的公民權法理談起
書刊名：成大法學
作者：莊杏茹
作者(外文)：Chuang, Hsing-ju
出版日期：2014
卷期：27
頁次：頁45-137
主題關鍵詞：公民參與刑事審判；公民與政治權利國際公約；正當法律程序；公平審判；公民權；社會參與；公民社會；Citizen participation in criminal trial；International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights；Due process of law；Fair trial；Civil rights；Social participation；Civil society
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:449
  • 點閱點閱:59
期刊論文
1.李念祖(19950100)。實施參審制度在我國憲法上的幾個基本問題。憲政時代，20(3)，16-25。  延伸查詢new window
2.張文貞(20090501)。人權保障與憲法解釋：對司法院大法官釋憲的期許。臺灣法學雜誌，127，94-98。  延伸查詢new window
3.Doran, Sean、Jackson, John D.、Seigel, Michael L.(1995)。Rethinking Adversariness in Nonjury Criminal Trials。Am. J. Crim. L.，23，1-5。  new window
4.Park, Ryan Y.(2010)。The Globalizing Jury Trial: Lessons and Insights from Korea。American Journal of Comparative Law，58(3)，525-582。  new window
5.Hans, Valerie P.(2007)。Citizens as Legal Decision Makers: An International Perspective。CORNELL INT’L L. J.，40，303。  new window
6.Law, David S.(2008)。Globalization and the Future of Constitutional Rights。Northwestern University Law Review，102，1277-1278。  new window
7.Chesterman, Simon C.(2008)。An International Rule of Law?。The American Journal of Comparative Law，56(2)，331-361。  new window
8.Soldwedel, Arne F.(2008)。Testing Japan’s Convictions: The Lay Judge System and the Rights of Criminal Defendants。Vand J.Transnat’l L.，41，1417。  new window
9.Diesen, Christian(2001)。Lay Judges in Sweden-A short Introduction。Int’l Rev.Penal L.，72，313。  new window
10.Leib, Ethan J.(2008)。A Comparison of Criminal Jury Decision Rules in Democratic Countries。Ohio St. J.Crim. L.，5，629。  new window
11.Fukurai, Hiroshi(2007)。The Rebirth of Japan’ s Petit Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems: A Cross-National Analysis of Legal Consciousness and the Lay Participatory Experience in Japan and the U.S.。Cornell Int’l L. J.，40，315。  new window
12.Jackson, John D.、Kovalev, Nikolay P.(2006)。Lay Adjudication and Human Rights in Europe。Colum. J. Eur. L.，13，83-123。  new window
13.三井誠、陳運財(20100400)。日本檢察審查會制度。法學新論，21，13-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.謝在全(19751100)。我國刑事訴訟可否部份酌採陪審制度。法律世界，11，11-23。  延伸查詢new window
15.Weissbrodt, David(2010)。The Role of the Human Right Committee in International and Developing Humanitarian Law。U. PA. J. INT’L L.，31，1185。  new window
16.李震山(200211)。審判獨立。月旦法學教室，2，30-32。  延伸查詢new window
17.張文貞(2010)。國際人權法與內國憲法的匯流--台灣施行兩大人權公約之後。台灣人權促進會季刊，10，12-22。  延伸查詢new window
18.莊杏茹(20110400)。正當法律程序下指定辯護制度之實踐。中央警察大學法學論集，20，179-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.高澤弘明(201112)。裁判員制度における憲法解釈問題。東洋法學，55(2)，257-267。  延伸查詢new window
20.Allen, Ronald J.(1988)。Unexplored Aspects of the Theory of the Right to Trial by Jury。WASH. U. L.Q.，66，33。  new window
21.Amar, Akhil Reed(1996)。Twenty-Fifth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: Foreword: Sixth Amendment First Principles。Geo. L.J.，84，641。  new window
22.Amar, Vikram David(1995)。Jury Service as Political Participation Akin to Voting。Cornell L. Rev.，80，203。  new window
23.Appleman, Laura I.(2009)。The Lost Meaning of the Jury Trial Right。IND. L. J.，84，397。  new window
24.Bibas, Stephanos(2005)。Originalism and Formalism in Criminal Procedure: The Triumph of Justice Scalia, the Unlikely Friend of Criminal Defendants?。Geo. L. J.，94，183。  new window
25.Boggs, Danny J.(1998)。The Right to a Fair Trial。U. CHI. LEGAL F.，1998，1。  new window
26.Brown, Darryl K.(1997)。Jury Nullification Within the Rule of Law。MINN. L. Rev.，81，1149。  new window
27.Cecil, Joe S.、Hans, Valerie P.、Wiggins, Elizabeth C.(1991)。Symposium Issue on the Selection ana t unction of the Modern Jury: Article: Citizen comprehension of Difficult Issues: Lessons from Civil Jury Trials。Am. U. L. Rev.，40，727。  new window
28.(1997)。Developments in the Law: II. The Civil Jury: The Value of the Civil Jury。Harv. L. Rev.，110，1421。  new window
29.Fukurai, Hiroshi、West, Mark(1992)。Prosecution Review Commissions: Japan’s Answer to the Problem of Prosecutorial Discretion。Colum. L. Rev.，82，684-724。  new window
30.Fukurai, Hiroshi、Chan, Kay-Wah、Miyazawa, Setsuo(2010)。The Resurgence of Lay Adjudicatory Systems in East Asia。ASIAN-PACIFIC L. & POL’YJ，12，1。  new window
31.Grossman, Joanna L.(1115)。Women’s Jury Service: Right of Citizenship or Privilege of Difference?。STAN. L. Rev.，46，1115。  new window
32.Hans, Valerie P.(2007)。Introduction: Citizens as Legal Decision Makers: An International Perspective。Cornell Int'l. L. J.，40，303-314。  new window
33.Jackson, John D.(2001)。Paradoxes of Lay and Professional Decision Making in Common Law Criminal Systems。INT’L REV. PENAL L.，72，579。  new window
34.Joseph, Sarah(1999)。A Rights Analysis of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights。J. Int’l Legal Stud.，5，57。  new window
35.Kostakopoulou, Theodora(1999)。Nested“Old”and“New”Citizenships in the European Union: Bringing Out the Complexity。COLUM. J. EUR. L.，5，389。  new window
36.Lempert, Richard O.(2007)。The Internationalization of Lay Legal Decision-Making: Jury Resurgence and Jury Research。CORNELL IN T’L L.J.，40，477。  new window
37.Lombardi, Mary(2009)。Reassessing Jury Service Citizenship Requirements。Case W. Res.，59(3)，725-766。  new window
38.Mott, Nicole L.(2003)。Symposium: III. The Jury in Practice: The Current Debate on Juror Questions: To Ask Or Not to Ask, That Is the Question。Chi.-Kent L. Rev.，78，1099。  new window
39.Pertnoy, Leonard(1993)。The Juror’s Need to Know vs the Constitutional Right to a Fair Trial。DICKINSON L. REV.，97，627。  new window
40.Ramirez, Deborah A.(1994)。The Mixed Jury and the Ancient Custom of Trial by Jury De Medietate Linguae: A History and a Proposal for Change。B.U. L. Rev.，74，777。  new window
41.Ritter, Gretchen(2002)。Jury Service and Women's Citizenship Before and After the Nineteenth Amendment。LAW & HIST. REV.，20，479。  new window
42.Robinson, David, Jr.(1996)。Perspective: The Shift of the Balance of Advantage in Criminal Litigation: The Case of Mr. Simposon。AKRON L. REV，30，1。  new window
43.Schuller, Regina、Vidmar, Neil(2011)。Symposium on Comparative Jury Systems: The Canadian Criminal Jury。Cffl.-KENT L. Rev.，86，497。  new window
44.Silverman, Phyllis Novick(1983)。Comment: Survey of the Law of Peremptory Challenge: Uncertainty in the Criminal Law。U. PITT. L. Rev.，44，673。  new window
45.Smith, Douglas G.(1997)。Citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment。SAN Diego L. Rev.，34，681。  new window
46.Thaman, Stephen C.(2001)。Japan New System of Mixed Courts: Some Suggestions Regarding Their Future Form and Procedures?。St. Louis-Warsaw TRANS’L，2001/2002，89。  new window
47.Thaman, Stephen C.(2001)。The Ideal of Conference。INT’L Rev. PENAL L.，72，19。  new window
48.(1996)。Twenty-Fifth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure III. Trial。GEO. L.J.，84，1115。  new window
49.王寶輝(20110100)。從司法文化窺探臺灣司法倫理--淺談臺灣司法反思能力。月旦法學，188，93-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.Vorenberg, James(1981)。Decent Restraint of Prosecutorial Power。Harvard Law Review，94，1521-1573。  new window
51.林永謀(19950100)。論國民參與司法暨參審制之採行。憲政時代，20(3)，3-13。  延伸查詢new window
52.陳運財(20040600)。論日本刑事司法制度之改革。東海大學法學研究，20，113-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
53.Smith, Douglas G.(1997)。Structural and Functional Aspects of the Jury: Comparative Analysis and Proposal for Reform。Ala. L. Rev.，48，441。  new window
54.Ivković, Sanja Kutnjak(2007)。Exploring Lay Participation in Legal Decision-Making: Lessons From Mixed Tribunals。Cornell International Law Journal，40(2)，429-453。  new window
55.陳運財(20100100)。大法官釋字第六六五號解釋評析。月旦法學，176，24-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
56.Levin, Douglas G.(2008)。Saiban-in-seido:Lost in Translation? How the Source of Power Underlying Japan’s Proposed Lay Assessor System May Determine Its Fate。Asia-Pacific L.&Pol’ y J.，10，199。  new window
57.蘇永欽(20040900)。橫看成嶺側成峰--從個別社會部門整合憲法人權體系。月旦法學，112，142-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
58.陳運財(19990200)。刑事訴訟之回顧與展望。月旦法學，45，20-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
59.陳運財(20030900)。刑事訴訟制度之改革及其課題。月旦法學，100，73-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
60.陳運財(20100500)。國民參與刑事審判之研究--兼評日本裁判員制度。月旦法學，180，131-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
61.陳運財(20091100)。恣意裁判之禁止與法定法官原則。法官協會雜誌，11，51-60。  延伸查詢new window
62.蘇永欽(19890200)。參審制度有無違憲之研究。律師通訊，113，22-23。  延伸查詢new window
63.蘇永欽(19950100)。從憲法及司法政策角度看參與及其試行。憲政時代，20(3)，25。  延伸查詢new window
64.Amar, Akhil Reed(1991)。The Bill of Rights as a Constitution。Yale L. J.，100。  new window
65.蕭淑芬(20090300)。「新興人權」之保障與發展初探--我國與日本之比較。中研院法學期刊，4，207-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
66.廖元豪(20100200)。外人做頭家？--論外國人的公民權。政大法學評論，113，245-306。new window  延伸查詢new window
67.Alschuler, Albert W.、Deiss, Andrew G.(1994)。A Brief History of the Criminal Jury in the United States。University of Chicago Law Review，61，867-928。  new window
68.廖元豪(20110200)。美國憲法學對臺灣憲法實務與理論之影響--以方法論為重心。月旦法學教室，100，51-69。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳運財(2012)。日本裁判員制度的觀察報告--兼評人民觀審試行條例草案。第67屆司法節學術研討會，37-60。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hans, Valerie P.、Vidmar, Neil(1986)。Judging the Jury。Perseus Publishing。  new window
2.Amar, Akhil Reed(1998)。The Bill of Rights: Creation and reconstruction。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
3.蘇永欽(1998)。司法改革之再改革。  延伸查詢new window
4.渋谷秀樹(2007)。憲法。  延伸查詢new window
5.Abramson, Jeffrey(1994)。We the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy。  new window
6.Aristotle、Barker, Ernest、Stalley, Richard(1995)。The Politics。  new window
7.Becker, Theodore L.(1970)。Comparative Judicial Politics: The Political Functions of Courts。  new window
8.Constable, Marianne(1994)。The Law of the Other: The Mixed Jury and Changing Conceptions of Citizenship, Law, and Knowledge。  new window
9.Jackson, John D.、Summers, Sarah J.(2012)。The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions。  new window
10.Kirp, David L.、Yudof, Mark G.、Franks, Marlene Strong(1986)。Gender Justice。  new window
11.Levy, Leonard(1988)。Original Intent and the Framers’ Constitution。  new window
12.Malsch, Marijke(2009)。Democracy in the Courts Lay Participation in European Criminal Justice Systems。  new window
13.陳樸生(19970500)。刑事證據法。三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Kalven, Harry Jr.、Zeisel, Hans(1966)。The American Jury。Boston, MA：Little, Brown and Company。  new window
15.Nowak, Manfred(2005)。U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary。N. P. Engel Publisher。  new window
16.Steiner, Henry J.、Alston, Philip、Goodman, Ryan(2008)。International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
17.法治斌、董保城(200309)。憲法新論。台北：法治斌。  延伸查詢new window
18.國民大會秘書處(1946)。(制憲)國民大會實錄。南京：國民大會秘書處。  延伸查詢new window
19.林紀東(1989)。中華民國憲法逐條釋義。台北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.Janoski, Thomas(1998)。Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations in Liberal, Traditional, and Social Democratic Regimes。Cambridge University Press。  new window
21.Marshall, T. H.、Bottomore, T.(1992)。Citizenship and Social Class。Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.。London, Concord (Mass.)：Pluto Press。  new window
22.Damaska, Mirjan R.(1986)。The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process。  new window
23.黃靜嘉(20020000)。春帆樓下晚濤急：日本對臺灣殖民統治及其影響。臺北：臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.李震山(20070000)。多元、寬容與人權保障：以憲法未列舉權之保障為中心。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林鈺雄(2007)。證人概念與對質詰問權--以歐洲人權法院相關裁判為中心。刑事程序與國際人權。國立台灣大學人文社會高等研究院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳新民(1993)。驚鴻一瞥的憲法學慧星--談徐道鄰的憲法學理論。公法學劄記。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇永欽(1994)。參審制沒有違憲。走向憲政主義。  延伸查詢new window
4.蘇永欽(2002)。部門憲法--憲法釋義的新路徑。當代公法新論(上)--翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Jackson, John(2000)。The Impact of Human Rights on Judicial Decision Making in Criminal Cases。The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings。  new window
6.蘇永欽(2004)。司法行政組織的發展趨勢--從審判獨立與國家給付行政義務的緊張關係談起。法治與現代行政法學--法治斌教授紀念論文集。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳運財(1998)。憲法正當法律程序之保障與刑事訴訟。刑事訴訟法與正當之法律程序。元照。  延伸查詢new window
8.李念祖(2000)。美國憲法上「政治問題」理論與釋字第328號解釋。司法者的憲法。台北：五南書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.程家瑞(2000)。國際法對各國憲法法律體系國際化發展之影響。東吳大學百年校慶法學紀念論文集。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1085（臺灣：1076，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67532022
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上