Art action as a new genre of artistic creation and form of praxis is not an extreme fracture to any former art genre. It has its own evolutive process and context. This article intends to examine the (Decontextualsation) of the art action in modernism period, in order to reach further understanding about the logics of the (Recontextualisation) of contemporary art action. Also to understand the formation of its archetype and developing context. Art action, or culture action, was a conscious social engagement or praxis for intellcctuals and cultural elites. The modernism period or the Avant-Garde movement, even the (Action culturelle) of the same period are all, in a certain way, the archetype of the art action of nowadays. Nevertheless, there exists a crucial difference between the art action from Avant-Garde and contemporary art action. The evolution of condition about the interaction from the action is subject to the context of the praxis. This article examines in the first place, the discourses of the Francfurt school which has been coexisted with the Avant-Garde movement. We will try to have a further understanding about Avant-Garde from this analysis. And, we will compare the differences from such discourses to the Habermas and Deleuze discourses. The differences between these comparisons could offer methodologies that realize the conscious developement from (Decontextualisation) to (Recontextualisation). Then we will turn back to the anthropology of Levi-Strauss and sociological thinking of Durkheim to revise how the contemporary art action recontextualisation could be distinctive from the Avant-Garde movement; letting this art action become efficient or, at least, an (organic) cultural action.