東亞民眾的制度不信任感及其政治回應__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	東亞民眾的制度不信任感及其政治回應
書刊名：	臺灣民主季刊
作者：	湯晏甄
作者(外文)：	Tang, Yen-chen
出版日期：	2015
卷期：	12:2
頁次：	頁39-85
主題關鍵詞：	制度信任感；發聲；忠誠；冷漠；政治參與；Institutional trust；Voice；Loyalty；Apathy；Political participation
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:75 點閱:101

當民眾的制度信任感降低時，會產生什麼樣的政治行為來回應這個令他失望的政治環境？這是本文的問題意識。本文援引Hirschman（1970）的「退出、發聲，與忠誠」理論，重新修正後作為本文的行為理論架構。本文使用「亞洲民主動態調查」第三波調查資料進行實證分析。研究結果顯示，制度信任感確實會影響政治回應行為。在自由民主政體，制度信任感低的民眾，傾向「退出」；在選舉民主政體，制度信任感低的民眾，傾向積極的「發聲」行為。造成此差異的主要原因在於，在自由民主政體，民眾選擇「發聲」或「退出」的自由度較高。由於制度信任感是長期累積的經驗，如果先前的經驗不佳，那麼會導致他對付出成本來改善現狀缺乏信心，因而降低「發聲」意願，傾向「退出」。至於選舉民主政體，「退出」受到較多限制，但仍有一些「發聲」空間。然而，在較封閉的政治環境裡，「發聲」付出的成本較高，因此制度信任感高的民眾並沒有太大的誘因選擇「發聲」。反而是制度信任感低的民眾，多數認為既有體制的民主制度有很大的問題，有較強的動機對改善制度採取積極的「發聲」行為。

以文找文

What forms of political behavior emerge in response to disappointment with the political environment as popular trust in institutions declines? This study answers this important question. This study adopts and revises the theoretical approach outlined in Hirschman's (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty for our theoretical framework. This study uses data from the third wave of the ＂Asian Barometer Survey＂ for empirical analysis. The results show that institutional trust has a clear influence on political responses. In liberal democracies, citizens with low levels of institutional trust tend towards ＂exit＂. In electoral democracies, citizens with low institutional trust tend towards exercising their ＂voice.＂ The cause of this difference is largely due to the fact that in liberal democracies, citizens have more freedom to choose between ＂voice＂ or ＂exit,＂ since institutional trust is accumulated over a long period of time. Bad past experiences will result in a lack of confidence in the returns from any effort to improve the current system. This will reduce the willingness to choose ＂voice＂ as citizens would veer towards ＂exit.＂ While there are more limitations to ＂exit＂ in electoral democracies, there is still some space for ＂voice.＂ However, in more closed political environments, the cost of ＂voice＂ is higher. Therefore, citizens with higher institutional trust do not have sufficient incentives to choose ＂voice.＂ However, most citizens with low levels of institutional trust believe that the existing democratic system has many problems; therefore, they have a greater motivation to actively use their ＂voice＂ to improve the system.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Park, Chong-Min、Shin, Doh Chull(200606)。Do Asian Values Deter Popular Support for Democracy in South Korea?。Asian Survey，46(3)，345-357。
2.	Paige, Jeffrey M.(1971)。Political Orientation and Riot Participation。American Sociological Review，36(5)，810-820。
3.	Levi, Margaret、Stoker, Laura(2000)。Political Trust and Trustworthiness。Annual Review of Political Science，3(1)，475-507。
4.	Dalton, Russell J.(2008)。Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation。Political Studies，56(1)，76-98。
5.	廖福特(20090300)。泰國國家人權委員會之設立及發展--在軍事政變與民主立憲之間。中研院法學期刊，4，1-79。延伸查詢
6.	Brockett, Charles(1991)。The Structure of Political Opportunities and Peasant Mobilization in Central America。Comparative Politics，23(3)，253-274。
7.	Dalton, Russell J.、Sickle, Alix Van、Weldon, Steven(2009)。The Individual--Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour。British Journal of Political Science，40(1)，51-73。
8.	Dean, Dwight G.(1960)。Alienation and Political Apathy。Social Forces，38(3)，185-189。
9.	Diamond, Larry(2002)。Thinking about Hybrid Regmes。Journal of Democracy，13(2)，21-35。
10.	Hirschman, Albert O.(1974)。Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Further Reflections and A Survey of Recent Contributions。Social Science Information，13(1)，7-26。
11.	Kaase, Max(1999)。Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and Non-institutionalised Political Participation in Western Europe。West European Politics，22(3)，1-21。
12.	Janowitz, Morris(1980)。Observations on the Sociology of Citizenship Rights and Obligations。Social Forces，59(1)，1-24。
13.	Lane, Harlan(1965)。The Motor Theory of Speech Perception: A critical Review。Psychological Review，72(4)，275-309。
14.	Lyons, William E.、Lowery, David(1989)。Citizen Responses to Dissatisfaction in Urban Communities: A Partial Test of a General Model。The Journal of Political，51(4)，841-868。
15.	Lyons, William E.、Lowery, David(1986)。The Organization of Political Space and Citizen Responses to Dissatisfaction in Urban Communities: An Integrative Model。Journal of Politics，48(2)，321-346。
16.	Nuyen, A. Tuan(2000)。Confucianism, the Idea of Min-Pen, and the Democracy。Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies，14，130-151。
17.	Orbell, Jone M.、Uno, Toru(1972)。A theory of Neighborhood Problem Solving: Political Action vs. Residential Mobility。American Political Science Review，66(2)，471-489。
18.	Rosenberg, Morris(1951)。The Meaning of Politics in Mass Society。Public Opinion Quarterly，15(1)，5-15。
19.	Perloff, Richard M.、Kinsey, Dennis(1992)。Political Advertising as Seen by Consultants and Journalists。Journal of Advertising Research，32(3)，53-60。
20.	Sherkat, Darren E.、Blocker, T. Jean(1994)。The Political Development of Sixties' Activists: Identifying the Influence of Class, Gender, and Socialization on Protest Participation。Social Forces，72(3)，821-842。
21.	Schussman, Alan、Soule, Sarah A.(2005)。Process and Protest: Accounting for Individual Protest Participation。Forces，84(2)，1083-1108。
22.	Finifter, Ada W.(1970)。Dimensions of Political Alienation。American Political Science Review，64(2)，389-410。
23.	Easton, David(1975)。Theoretical Approaches to Political Support。Canadian Journal of Political Science，9(3)，431-448。
24.	Hetherington, Marc J.(1999)。The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote, 1968-96。American Political Science Review，93(2)，311-326。
25.	Hirschman, Albert O.(1978)。Exit, Voice, and the State。World Politics，31(1)，90-107。
26.	Madsen, Douglas(1987)。Political Self-Efficacy Tested。American Political Science Review，81(2)，571-582。
27.	McAdam, Doug、Tarrow, Sidney、Tilly, Charles(1996)。To Map Contentious Politics。Mobilization: An International Quarterly，1(1)，17-34。
28.	McAdam, Doug(1992)。Gender as a Mediator of the Activist Experience: The Case of Freedom Summer。American Journal of Sociology，97(5)，1211-1240。
29.	Mueller, John E.(197003)。Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson。American Political Science Review，64(1)，18-34。
30.	Pharr, Susan J.、Putnam, Robert D.、Dalton, Russell J.(2000)。A Quarter-Century of Declining Confidence。Journal of Democracy，11(2)，5-25。
31.	Rudolph, Thomas J.、Evans, Jillian(2005)。Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Government Spending。American Journal of Political Science，49(3)，660-671。
32.	Winichakul, Thongchai(2008)。Toppling Democracy。Journal of Contemporary Asia，38(1)，11-37。
33.	Weissberg, Robert(1975)。Political Efficacy and Political Illusion。Journal of Political，37(2)，469-487。
34.	Rusbult, Caryl E.、Zembrodt, Isabella M.、Gunn, Lawanna K.(1982)。Exit, Voice, Loyalty and Neglect: Response to Dissatisfaction in Romantic Involvements。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，43(6)，1230-1242。
35.	Miller, Arthur H.、Goldenberg, Edie N.、Erbring, Lutz(1979)。Type-Set Politics: Impact of Newspapers on Public Confidence。American Political Science Review，73(1)，67-84。
36.	黃慕也、張世賢(20080300)。政治媒介藉由政治效能、政治信任對投票行為影響分析--以2005年選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊，5(1)，45-85。延伸查詢
37.	Citrin, Jack(1974)。Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government。American Political Science Review，68(3)，973-988。
38.	Mishler, William、Rose, Richard(2005)。What Are the Political Consequences of Trust? A Test of Cultural and Institutional Theories in Russia。Comparative Political Studies，38(9)，1050-1078。
39.	Miller, Arthur H.(1974)。Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970。American Political Science Review，68(3)，951-972。
40.	Pinkleton, B. E.、Fortman, K. K. J.、Austin, E. W.(1998)。Relationships of Media Use and Political Disaffection to Political Efficacy and Voting Behavior。Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media，42(1)，34-49。
41.	McAdam, Doug(1986)。Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer。American Journal of Sociology，92(1)，64-90。
42.	Li, Lianjiang(2004)。Political Trust in Rural China。Modern China，30(2)，228-258。
43.	何明修(20041200)。政治機會結構與社會運動研究。國立政治大學社會學報，37，33-80。延伸查詢
44.	Kitschelt, Herbert P.(1986)。Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies。British Journal of Political Science，16(1)，57-85。
45.	Mishler, William、Rose, Richard(2001)。What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies。Comparative Political Studies，34(1)，30-62。
46.	Ikeda, Ken'ichi(20130700)。Social and Institutional Trust in East and Southeast Asia。Taiwan Journal of Democracy，9(1)，13-45。
47.	Diamond, Larry(1996)。Is The Third Wave Over?。Journal of Democracy，7(3)，20-37。
48.	黃秀端(19950500)。一九九四年省市長選舉選民參與競選活動之分析。選舉研究，2(1)，51-76。延伸查詢
49.	Tiebout, Charles M.(1956)。A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures。Journal of Political Economy，64(5)，416-424。
50.	Graham, J. W.(1991)。An essay on organizational citizenship behavior。Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal，4(4)，249-270。
51.	Eisinger, P. K.(1973)。The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities。American Political Science Review，67(1)，11-28。

會議論文
1.	Chu, Yun-han、Chang, Yu-tzung(2010)。The East Asian Puzzle in Comparative Perspective。the workshop of Ambivalent Democrats: Political Culture and Democratic Legitimacy in Asia, East Asia Democratic Studies，(會議日期: 20100904-20100905)。Washington D.C.。
2.	Chang, Eric、Chu, Yun-han、Hu, Fu(2003)。Regime Performance and Support for Democratization。workshop of How East Asians View Democracy: The Region in Global Perspective, Asian Barometer Survey，(會議日期: 20031208-20031209)。Taipei：National Taiwan University。
3.	Ikeda, Kenichi、Kobayashi, Tetsuro、Nathan, Andrew J.(2010)。The Impact of Cultured。the workshop of Ambivalent Democrats: Political Culture and Democratic Legitimacy in Asia, East Asia Democratic Studies，(會議日期: 20100904-20100905)。Washington D.C.。

圖書
1.	Janowitz, Morris(1983)。The Reconstruction of Patriotism: Education for Civic Consciousness。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。
2.	Rossi, P. H.(1980)。Why Families Move。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage Publications。
3.	Dalton, Russell J.(2004)。Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choice: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracy。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。
4.	胡逢瑛、吳非(2006)。反恐年代中的國際新聞與危機傳播。台北：秀威資訊科技。延伸查詢
5.	Booth, John A.、Seligson, Mitchell A.(2009)。The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations。Cambridge. UK：Cambridge University Press。
6.	Kent, Jennings M.、van Deth, Jan(1989)。Continuities in Political Action: a Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies。Berlin：de Gruyter。
7.	Roeh, Itzhak、Cohen, Akiba A.、Levy, Mark R.、Gurevitch, Michael(1996)。Global Newsrooms, Local Audiences: A Study of the Eurovision News Exchange。London：John Libbey。
8.	McAdam, Douglas(1988)。Freedom Summer。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。
9.	Moore, Barrington Jr.(1978)。Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt。White Plains, New York：M. E. Sharpe。
10.	Dahl, Robert Alan(1998)。On Democracy。Yale University Press。
11.	Lane, Robert Edwards(1959)。Political Life: Why and How People Get Involved in Politics。New York：Free Press。
12.	Barnes, Samuel H.、Kasse, Max、Allerbeck, Klause R.(1979)。Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies。Beverly Hills, Calif：Sage Publications。
13.	Conway, Margaret M.(1991)。Political Participation in the United States。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly。
14.	Oberschall, A.(1973)。Social Conflict and Social Movements。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall, Inc。
15.	Kornberg, Allan、Clarke, Harold D.(1992)。Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy。Cambridge University Press。
16.	Tilly, Charles(1978)。From Mobilization to Revolution。Michigan：Addison-Wesley。
17.	Milbrath, Lester W.、Goel, Madan L.(1977)。Political participation: How and why people get involved in politics?。Chicago：Rand McNally College Pub. Co.。
18.	Rosenstone, Steven J.、Hansen, John Mark(1993)。Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America。Longman。
19.	Goldfarb, Jeffrey C.(1991)。The Cynical Society: the Culture of Politics and the Politics of Culture in American Life。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。
20.	Easton, David、Hess, R.(1965)。A System Analysis of Political Life。New York, NY：John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。
21.	Dahl, Robert A.(1971)。Polyarchy: Participation & Opposition。New Haven, CT。
22.	Almond, Gabriel A.、Verba, Sidney(1963)。The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。
23.	Crozier, Michel J.、Huntington, Samuel P.、Watanuki, Joji(1975)。The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission。New York, NY：New York University Press。
24.	Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York：Harper and Row。
25.	Hetherington, Marc J.(2005)。Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism。Princeton University Press。
26.	Pateman, Carole(1970)。Participation and Democratic Theory。Cambridge University Press。
27.	Verba, Sidney、Schlozman, Kay Lehman、Brady, Henry E.(1995)。Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics。Harvard University Press。
28.	Wolfinger, Raymond E.、Rosenstone, Steven J.(1980)。Who Votes?。New Haven, Connecticut：Yale University Press。
29.	Hirschman, Albert O.(1970)。Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States。Harvard University Press。
30.	Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1991)。The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century。University of Oklahoma Press。
31.	Warren, Mark E.(1999)。Democracy and Trust。Cambridge University Press。
32.	Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。
33.	Verba, Sidney、Nie, Norman H.(1972)。Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality。New York：Harper & Row。
34.	Norris, Pippa(2011)。Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited。Cambridge University Press。
35.	Campbell, Angus、Gurin, Gerald、Miller, Warren E.(1954)。The Voter Decides。Westport, Connecticut：Evanston, IL：Greenwood Press：Row, Peterson & Company。

其他
1.	UNQP(2012)。Global Parliamentary Report: the Changing Nature of Parliamentary Representation，http://www.ipu.org/pdf/publications/gpr2012-full-e.pdf， 2015/07/25。

圖書論文
1.	Wang, Zhengxu、Dalton, Russell J.、Shin, Doh Chull(2006)。Political Trust, Political Performance, and Support for Democracy。Citizens, Democracy, and Markets around the Pacific Rim。New York：Oxford University Press。
2.	Uslaner, Eric M.(1999)。Democracy and Social Capital。Democracy and Trust。Cambridge University Press。
3.	Aldrich, John H.、Niemi, Richard(1996)。The Sixth American Party System: Electoral Change, 1952-1992。Broken Contract: Changing Relationships between Americans and Their Government。Boulder, CO：Westview。
4.	Bumham, Walter Dean(1991)。Critical Realignment: Dead or Alive?。The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Eras。Madison：University of Wisconsin Press。
5.	Farah, Barbara G.、Barnes, Samuel H.、Heunks, Felix(1979)。Political Dissatisfaction。Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。
6.	Hirschman, Albert O.(1986)。Exit and Voice: An Expanding Sphere of Influence。Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays。New York：Viking。
7.	Marien, Sofie、Christensen, Henrik(2013)。Trust and Openness: Prerequisites for Democratic Engagement。Democracy in Transition: Political Participation in the European Union。Berlin：Springer。
8.	Tyler, Tom R.(1998)。Trust and Democratic Government。Trust and Governance。New York：Russell Sage Foundation。
9.	Thomassen, Jacques(1990)。Economic Crisis, Dissatisfaction and Protest。Continuities in Political Action: a Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies。Berlin：de Gruyter。
10.	Crespi, Irving(1980)。The Case of Presidential Popularity。Polling on the Issues。Washington D.C.。
11.	Harding, R.(1998)。Trust in Government。Trust ana Governance。New York：Russell Sage Foundation。
12.	Marks, Gary、McAdam, Doug(1999)。On the Relationship of Political Opportunity Structure to the Form of Collective Action: the Case of the European Union。Social Movements in a Globalizing World。London：Macmillan。
13.	Norris, Pippa(1999)。Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens?。Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government。Oxford University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	2018年公務人員年金改革對我國文官態度之影響
2.	2020年總統選舉客家族群改投給蔡英文嗎？客庄與非客庄的分野
3.	所得變數於政治學民意調查研究中之測量與應用
4.	政治知識的面向與政治參與的類型
5.	政治情緒與選舉參與：2012年和2016年臺灣總統選舉的經驗分析
6.	A Study on the Association between Political Media and Perceived Political Efficacy among Taiwanese Military Cadets--Exemplified by Fu Hsing Kang College at the National Defense University
7.	傳統媒體與網絡媒體：媒介新聞使用對青年政治表達的影響及政治效能的中介作用
8.	影響臺灣民眾政治參與的因素：從公民規範認知的觀點出發
9.	納入隱匿產出策略的生產衝突競租模型
10.	儒家思想的正統觀與兩岸交流前景：「中國印象調查」的實證初探
11.	ECFA政治擴溢效應的實證初探
12.	國民黨的原住民選舉動員：一個社會文化互動途徑的初探分析
13.	「兩岸關係因素」真的影響了2012年的臺灣總統大選嗎？
14.	交叉壓力、意見表達與政黨認同：2008年立法委員選舉的實證分析
15.	校園選舉投票行為之研究

1.	東亞民眾的制度不信任感及其政治回應行為
2.	台灣民眾民主態度及相關因素路徑關係之研究
3.	制度變遷、社會資本與政治參與間關係
4.	臺灣地方政府入口網站課責機制與成效之研究
5.	跨世紀（1991-2001）台灣地區大學生政治態度與行為變遷之研究
6.	國民小學校長領導風格與校園選舉行為關係之研究：以組織文化為中介和調節變項
7.	網際網路使用行為與選舉參與模式探析
8.	立委選制變遷對選民投票行為之影響：投票穩定與變遷的分析
9.	台灣民眾的政府績效感受與政府信任
10.	司法違憲審查在台灣民主鞏固時期之角色分析
11.	候選人競選行為及其效能之研究：以台灣2000年總統選舉為例

1.	信心危機：臺灣民眾的政治信任及其政治後果
2.	制度變遷、社會資本、政治參與：三者之間的關係
3.	國家人權委員會
4.	誰是投票穩定者與變遷者？2008年總統選舉的實證分析
5.	誰是泛藍、泛綠認同者？臺灣民眾政黨認同的實證分析
6.	告知與動員：新聞媒體使用、政治知識與政治參與的關係
7.	閱聽人之研究--2000年總統大選選民媒介使用、政治參與與選後信心

無相關著作

1.	公民社會中的官僚回應困境：理性選擇的觀點
2.	一樣的身分、不一樣的角色：以2008年臺灣政府文官調查庫探索文官回應與類型
3.	爭辯國家安全：日本核能發展與政策爭論的分析
4.	臺灣農地政策變遷之探討：關鍵時刻觀點
5.	批判國際政治經濟學的發展、途徑與啟示
6.	美國總統款項否決權的爭議：聯邦最高法院Clinton v. City of New York一案之判決及其影響
7.	書評：Frank Fischer (法蘭克．費雪) and Herbert Gottweis (赫伯特．哥特懷斯) eds., «The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice» (再論政策之論證轉向--公共政策即為溝通實踐) (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012)
8.	臺灣快閃政治--新媒體、政黨與社會運動
9.	影響選舉預測市場準確度的因素--以2008~2010年未來事件交易所的選舉資料為例
10.	臺灣原住民選民投票參與之研究
11.	人民幣國際化之貿易與金融條件分析
12.	中國大陸社區居民委員會角色與功能的變遷：以東莞市塘廈鎮為例
13.	解析中國社會的政治支持：「續效困境」觀點的檢驗
14.	「中國式民主制度」的生成動力：內生性制度變遷的解釋
15.	Measuring Public Opinion toward Social Welfare in Taiwan

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫