:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「昆蟲學」師培課程培育國小師資生開發「昆蟲桌遊」教具與設計測驗卷
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:盧秀琴李怡嫻
作者(外文):Lu, Chow-chinLi, Yi-xuan
出版日期:2016
卷期:9:3
頁次:頁1-27
主題關鍵詞:國小師資生昆蟲學師培課程昆蟲桌遊教具科學過程技能思考智能Pre-service teachersEntomology teacher training coursesInsect board games' aidsInsect science process testThinking intelligence test
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:79
  • 點閱點閱:529
因應知識經濟的時代,要培育具有競爭力的學生就需要有良好的師資培育;故本研究培育國小師資生具備開發「昆蟲桌遊」教具與設計測驗卷的能力,以35 名國小師資生為研究對象,進行「昆蟲學」師培課程的培育。首先教授昆蟲學科知識、ADDIE 模式發展桌遊教具、如何配合桌遊教具設計「科學過程技能測驗」及「思考智能測驗」。其次,國小師資生玩「昆蟲大富翁」桌遊後,開發「昆蟲桌遊」教具、設計「科學過程技能測驗」及「思考智能測驗」。最後,使用桌遊教具設計評鑑表(ETGD)、科學過程技能評鑑表(SPTE)、思考智能評鑑表(TITE)檢核之。結果顯示:1. 國小師資生能利用昆蟲學科知識、ADDIE模式開發「昆蟲桌遊」教具。2. 共7 組國小師資生所開發的「昆蟲桌遊教具」獲得AA 到AAA 級的評鑑,達到良好~ 特優等級,顯示師資生具備開發「昆蟲桌遊教具」的能力。3.7 組國小師資生所設計的「科學過程技能測驗」經過SPTE 評鑑,達到「普通」至「優等」,顯示師資生具備設計「科學過程技能測驗」的能力。4. 共7 組國小師資生所設計的「思考智能測驗」經過TITE 評鑑,達到「普通」至「優等」,顯示師資生具備設計「思考智能測驗」的能力。
In response to the era of the knowledge-based economy, there is a growing need to cultivate competitive students, which requires good teacher education in turn. This study aims to help pre-service teachers advance their abilities through the development of insect board games' aids (IBGA) and two accompanying tests, by means of "Entomology" teacher education courses. Thirty-five pre-service teachers participated in this study. First, in regards to IBGA, the teacher educators taught insect subject knowledge, using the ADDIE model to develop IBGA and to design "Insect Science Process Test, ISPT" and "Thinking Intelligence Test, TIT". Second, after playing "Insects Playing Board Games", the pre-service teachers were divided into 7 groups to design IBGA, ISPT, and TIT. Finally, the qualities of IBGA, ISPT, and TIT developed by the pre-service teachers were evaluated using the Evaluation of Board Games Design (EBGD), Science Process Test Evaluation (SPTE), and Thinking Intelligence Test Evaluation (TITE). The results are as follows. 1. Pre-service teachers were able to use the insect subject knowledge and the ADDIE model to develop IBGA. 2. For the development of IBGA, the performances of the 7 groups of pre-service teachers were rated at AA to AAA levels, achieving a status of good to excellent. 3. The 7 groups of pre-service teachers exhibited performances in the development of ISPT that were rated as fair to excellent. 4. The 7 groups of pre-service teachers had performances in the development of TIT that were also rated as varying from fair to excellent.
期刊論文
1.Ozorio, B.、Fong, D.(2004)。Chinese Casino Gambling Behaviors: Risk Taking in Casinos vs. Investment。UNLV Gaming Research and Review Journal,8(2),27-38。  new window
2.Mansor, R.、Halim, L.、Osman, K.(2010)。Teachers' knowledge that promote students' conceptual understanding。Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences,9,1835-1839。  new window
3.Kanter, D. E.、Konstantopoulos, S.(2010)。The impact of a project-based science curriculum on minority student achievement, attitudes, and careers: The effects of teacher content and pedagogical content knowledge and inquiry-based practices。Science Education,94(5),855-887。  new window
4.Jaeggi, S. M.、Buschkuehl, M.、Jonides, J.、Perrig, W. J.(2008)。Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,105(19),6829-6833。  new window
5.盧秀琴、戴文雄(20120400)。國小師資生應用Big6技能於自然領域探究式教學的學習與改進。科學教育學刊,20(2),171-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Vincent, A.、Decker, B.、Mumford, M.(2002)。Divergent Thinking, Intelligence, and Expertise: A Test of Alternative Models。Creativity Research Journal,14(2),163-178。  new window
7.Hitchens, M.、Patrickson, B.、Young, S.(2013)。Reality and terror, the first-person shooter in current day settings。Games and Culture,9(1),3-29。  new window
8.Feyzioglu, B.、Demirdag, B.、Akyildiz, M.、Altun, E.(2012)。Developing a science process skills test for secondary students: Validity and reliability study。Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,12(3)。  new window
9.Gee, J. P.(2003)。What video games have to teach u s about learning & literacy?。ACM Computers in Entertainment,1(1),20-24。  new window
10.Hong, J. C.、Lu, C. C.、Hwang, M. Y.、Kuo, Y. C.、Wang, C. C.、Chou, C. Y.(2015)。Larvae phobia relevant to anxiety and disgust reflected to the enhancement of learning interest and self-confidence。Learning and Individual Differences,42,147-152。  new window
11.Hou, H. T.(2015)。Integrating cluster and sequential analysis to explore learners' flow and behavioral patterns in a simulation game with situated-learning context for science courses: Avideo-based process exploration。Computers in Human Behavior,48,424-435。  new window
12.Jauk, E.、Benedek, M.、Dunst, B.、Neubauer, A. C.(2013)。The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoints detection。Intelligence,41(4),212-221。  new window
13.Kind, V.(2009)。Pedagogical content knowledge i n science education perspectives and potential for progress。Studies In Science Education,45(2),169-204。  new window
14.Shahali, E. H. M.、Halim, L.(2010)。Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills。Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,9,142-146。  new window
15.宋曜廷、張國恩、林慧藍、李宜芬、陳明溥(20091200)。數位學習教材之品質認證標準的建立及其信度分析。電子商務學報,11(4),823-845。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.洪榮昭(19971000)。精釋(Hermeneutic)研究法在政策評量的應用。中等教育,48(5),39-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.盧秀琴、施慧淳(20160300)。玩「昆蟲大富翁」遊戲培養國小學童的科學過程技能。科學教育學刊,24(1),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.梁福鎮(20061200)。我國教師專業發展的現況、問題與對策。教育科學期刊,6(2),77-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張世忠、蔡孟芳、陳鶴元(20121000)。國中科學教師的學科教學知識與科學教學導向之探討。科學教育學刊,20(5),413-433。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。  new window
21.Wang, Shiang-Kwei、Hsu, Hui-Yin(2009)。Using the ADDIE Model to Design Second Life Activities for Online Learners。Tech Trends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning,53(6),76-81。  new window
會議論文
1.陳明星、張鴻章、游志豪、林伶如、游閔智、曾宜萱(2010)。ADDIE教學設計模式融入小學五年級數位教材開發--以「我們來看星星」單元為例。2010第六屆知識社群研討會。臺北市:中國文化大學推廣教育部。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.盧秀琴(2016)。21世紀的職前師資培育課程--發展「昆蟲桌上遊戲教具、昆蟲線上遊戲教材、昆蟲生理實驗」培養學童「科學過程技能」 (計畫編號:MOST103-2511-S-152-005-MY2)。臺北市:科技部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林毓哲(2016)。國小自然科在職教師設計「昆蟲桌遊」培養國小學童的玩興、沉浸經驗與科學過程技能(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳靜賢(2010)。國小自然科教學困難單元之探討與解決途徑--以5Why鷹架式提問探究教學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭蓁蓁(2014)。桌上遊戲設計之研究-以環境教育為例(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳亭伶(2013)。發展「昆蟲大富翁」科學遊戲教具及教學以培養學童的昆蟲認知、科學態度和科學過程技能(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dick, W. O.、Carey, L.、Carey, J. O.(2005)。The systematic design of instruction。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.Hinebaugh, J. P.(2009)。A board game education。Rowman & Littlefield Education。  new window
3.National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century(2000)。Before it's too late: A report to the nation from the National Commission on Mathematics And Science Teaching for the 21st Century。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。  new window
4.顏春煌(2010)。數位學習:觀念、方法、實務、設計與實作。碁峰。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Lee, W. W.、Owens, D. L.(2004)。Multimedia-based instructional design。Pfeiffer。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2011)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要,臺北市:教育部。,http://www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=153260, 。  延伸查詢new window
2.余陽(20141124)。從遠古走來的桌遊,http://www.ycwb.com/EPAPER/YCWB/html/2011-07/09/content_1156834.htm。  new window
3.自然科學教育學系(2014)。國立臺北教育大學自然科學教育學系簡介,臺北市:國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Katissuave(2010)。Psychology eye exam: Memory, thinking, intelligence and language,http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/story.php?title=psychology-exam-memorythinking-intelligence-language.。  new window
5.Teube, K.(2008)。The settlers of catan game rule & almanac,http://www.boardgamer.org/images/rule/MGI3061.pdf卡坦島。  new window
圖書論文
1.林佳蓉(2009)。教學設計理論基礎與重要模式。教育科技--理論與實務(下)--理論、研究方法篇。學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE