:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論議會透明化:以英國大倫敦市議會為例
書刊名:人文社會學報. 國立臺灣科技大學
作者:王保鍵 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Pao-chien
出版日期:2016
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁159-181
主題關鍵詞:議事運作資訊公開透明化議員操守大倫敦市議會Legislative proceduresFreedom of the informationTransparencyCouncilors' personal integrityLondon Assembly
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:23
本文以國民主權原則、民主參與原則、資訊公開原則為理論基礎,運用個案研究法,分析英國大倫敦市議會之運作,論證議會透明化之內涵應包含議員的「議事行為」及「操守行為」兩個構面;至於獲致議會透明化之途徑為「資訊充分公開」。又就大倫敦市議會之運作經驗以觀,除以「政府資訊充分公開」獲致議會透明化外,尚可透過「深化公眾民主參與」進一步提升議會之透明化。而議會透明化可讓立法權強化對行政權之監督量能。
This study employed the principle of national sovereignty, democratic participation, and freedom of the information as its overarching theory, and utilized the methodology of a case study method. By analyzing the London Assembly, this study suggests that the idea of parliamentary transparency includes disclosing legislative procedures and promoting the personal integrity of councilors'. It was found that the best approach to establish parliamentary transparency is to facilitate more than the freedom of the information. In addition to the approach of the freedom of the information, the transparency of parliament could be promoted by engaging more citizens to involve parliamentary agendas in terms of the experience of the London Assembly. In addition, the parliamentary transparency can bring the parliament more power to oversee executive administration.
期刊論文
1.Kalyvas, Andreas(2005)。Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power。Constellations,12(2),223-243。  new window
2.Harvey, A. D.(1999)。London's Boroughs。History Today,49(7),15-17。  new window
3.Walker, J. L.(1996)。A critique of the elitist theory of democracy。The American Political Science Review,60(2),285-295。  new window
4.O'Leary, B.(1987)。Why was the GLC abolished?。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,11(2),193-217。  new window
5.Fishkin, J. S.(2011)。Making deliberative democracy practical: public consultation and dispute resolution。Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution,26(4),612-626。  new window
6.Feldhoff, T.(2002)。Japan's construction lobby activities: Systemic stability and sustainable regional development。Asien,84,34-42。  new window
7.顧忠華、何嵩婷(2009)。「議事直播系統」讓我們的國會更陽光、更透明。新世紀智庫論壇,45,124-127。  延伸查詢new window
8.公民監督國會聯盟政策部(2013)。《會計法》凸顯立法院黨團協商已成國家亂源。監督國會,142,44-46。  延伸查詢new window
9.趙永茂(20071200)。英國地方治理的社會建構與發展困境。歐美研究,37(4),593-633。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.呂明哲(20091200)。國民主權,民主政治及違憲審查:一個反省。法政學報,22,1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳敦源(20090400)。透明之下的課責:臺灣民主治理中官民信任關係的重建基礎。文官制度季刊,1(2),21-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Wood, E.(1998)。The greater London authority bill: A mayor and assembly for London。London, England:House of Commons Library。  new window
圖書
1.Lowi, Theodore J.(1969)。The End of Liberalism, Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority。New York:W. W. Norton and Company。  new window
2.Department for Communities and Local Government(2011)。London and the localism act。London, UK:DCLG。  new window
3.Sandford, M.(2013)。The greater London authority。London, England:House of Commons Library。  new window
4.Morgan, B.(1998)。The local elections of 7 May 1998 and the London Referendum。London, England:House of Commons Library。  new window
5.London Assembly(2012)。Decision making framework: the London assembly and its committees。London, England:London Assembly。  new window
6.Economist Intelligence Unit(2012)。Hot spots: Benchmarking global city competitiveness。London:Economist Intelligence Unit。  new window
7.Ackerman, B.(1993)。We the people: Foundations。Cambridge, MA:Belknap Press。  new window
8.Mutz, Diana C.(2006)。Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Gerry, John(2006)。Case study research: Principles and practices。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.George, Alexander L.、Bennett, Andrew(2005)。Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences。MIT Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.黃德福(2001)。立法院委員會資深制之建立,http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/CL/090/CL-R-090-019.htm,(憲政(研)090-019號)。 2001/04/26。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Turley, A.(20111213)。A plain English guide to the localism act,http://www.futureoflondon.org.uk/2011/12/13/london-and-the-localism-act/。  new window
2.Telegraph(20091104)。MPs' expenses scandal: A timeline,http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/6499657/MPsexpenses-scandal-a-timeline.html。  new window
3.London Assembly。Committee structure,http://www.london.gov.uk/moderngov/mgListCommittees.aspx?bcr=1。  new window
4.Bureau of International Information Programs(20101123)。Freedom of information laws,http://iipdigital.ait.org.tw/st/english/publication/2010/11/20101123121633nayr0.1337484.html#axzz31a7HynZx。  new window
5.BBC(20140604)。Bill-by-bill guide to Queen's Speech,http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-27693435。  new window
6.BBC(19860331)。1986: Greater London Council abolished,http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/31/newsid_2530000/2530803.stm。  new window
7.聯合報(20151121)。國會改革法案藍綠角力戰【新聞群組】,http://udn.com/news/story/6656/1328453。  延伸查詢new window
8.公民監督國會聯盟(20131207)。針對部分縣市議會質疑透明度調查之聲明,http://www.ccw.org.tw/p/19784。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.湯德宗(2007)。政府資訊公開請求權入憲之研究。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE