近年來學界討論嘉慶後期宋學的復甦，焦點大多集中在外緣因素上，比較缺乏內在理路的辨析，以及實踐成績的考察。因此本文以嘉慶後期的宋學家管同，訂正〈洪範〉錯簡，其人其事為考察對象，站在宋學的視角，徹底釐清其中的修正與調整，繼而將考察所得，置入學術史的脈絡中審視，以為嘉慶後期的宋學發展，提供新的觀點和解釋。
根據本文考察，管同持桐城義法訂正〈洪範〉錯簡，既講究義理、辭章之脈絡，復勤加考據文獻，力求理論脈絡與歷史事實密切契合。得見嘉慶後期的宋學家論學，所關注的重點，逐漸從自家理論體系的完足度，延伸到對理論體系的實徵效驗之上。質言之，嘉慶後期的宋學家，已探求出一種理論脈絡與歷史事實密切契合的新趨向。

In recent years, much has been written and discussed about the recovery of Song Studies in late Jiaqing. Most of them focused on external factors, lack of explore of inner logic and investigate of performance. Therefore, the present study analysis how Guan Tong, the scholar of Song Studies, revised the dislocation on text of Hong Fan in late Jiaqing. Stand on the perspective of Song Studies, to explore and investigate which corrections and abjustments among them. Then put the explorations and investigations into the context of the academic history,to provide new perspectives and interpretations for the research of the recovery of Song Studies in late Jiaqing.
Based on the explorations and investigations, Guan Tong according to Tongcheng School’s theory and Methods, as well as textual criticism, to revised the dislocation on text of Hong Fan, purposefully combined theoretical context and historical facts. It can clearly be seen those scholars of Song Studies main concerns, were gradually shifted from completeness of theory to performance of theory. In pratical terms, a new trend which emphasis on theoretical context fit historical facts closely, was gradually forming in late Jiaqing.