:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣與南韓民主化後的政黨和政黨體系制度化:政黨與選民的連結關係
作者:魏德榮
作者(外文):Mark Weatherall
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:朱雲漢
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:政黨政黨制度化政黨體系制度化政黨與選民的連結關係台灣南韓Political partiesparty institutionalizationparty system institutionalizationparty-voter linkagesTaiwanSouth Korea
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:57
本論文的觀點認為,政黨與政黨體系的制度化是民主政治的重要核心,這個論點也受到政治學文獻的廣泛支持。我們利用第三波民主化中的兩個新興民主政體 (台灣與南韓) 的實證經驗,檢視其民主化後的政黨政治發展,嚐試填補東亞政黨與政黨體系制度化研究的缺口。本研究區分了兩個相關但具有區別的概念—「政黨體系制度化」與「政黨制度化」。我們特別關注兩個問題:
1. 為何在民主化之後,相較於南韓,台灣實現了更快速地政黨體系制度化?
2. 為何兩個國家中的主要政黨,政黨制度化的程度並不一致?
為了回答這些問題,本研究透過檢視過去兩國獨裁政權的不同遺緒,試圖解釋台灣和南韓政黨體系制度化之所以不同的原因。同時,我們也開發了一個解釋模型來顯示,選民和政黨之間的聯繫方式,將會影響個別政黨的制度化結果。
透過審視台灣與南韓的選民與四個主要政黨的聯繫方式,結合了綱領性/意識型態與情感/侍從主義不同聯結,我們嚐試解釋兩個國家的政黨制度化在民主化後為何有不同的程度。
本文發現,若政黨與選民之間具有較強的綱領性/意識型態性聯結,並結合較弱的情感/侍從主義性聯結,其政黨制度化的水準最高。如果政黨與選民之間,綱領性/意識型態性以及情感/侍從主義性的聯結都強的話,政黨制度化的程度將會降低,這是因為政黨具有在正式組織之外動員選民的選項。然而,弱的綱領性/意識型態性聯結加上弱的情感/侍從主義性聯結,政黨的制度化程度會比弱的綱領性/意識型態性聯結加上強的情感/侍從主義性選民的組合來的更低,因為雖然缺乏了綱領性/意識型態性選民聯結,但情感/侍從主義性聯結至少提供了政黨與選民之間的聯繫渠道。
最後,在台灣和南韓個別的個案研究章節中,本論文提供了兩國的主要政黨在自由化以來的發展概況,探討威權遺緒、政黨與選民的聯結以及政黨制度化之間的關係。
This study is premised on the belief, widely accepted in the political science literature, that party and party system institutionalization is important for democracy, and the desire to fill a gap in research on party and party system institutionalization in East Asia by examining the development of political parties in the region’s two third wave democracies – Taiwan and South Korea – since democratization. The study distinguishes between two related, but analytically distinct concepts – “party system institutionalization” and “party institutionalization.” In particular, we address two key questions: (1) Why has Taiwan witnessed much more rapid party system institutionalization than South Korea following democratization? (2) Why has the pace of party institutionalization varied between the major parties in the two countries? To answer these questions, the study tries to explain the different levels of party system institutionalization in Taiwan and South Korea by reference to the legacies of the authoritarian regimes in the two countries, before developing a model that shows how linkages patterns between voters and parties may influence the institutionalization of individual political parties. By examining the combination of programmatic/ideological and affective/clientelist linkages between voters and the four major parties in Taiwan and South Korea, we try to explain why parties in the two countries have institutionalized at different paces since democratization. We find that strong programmatic/ideological party-voter linkages combined with weak affective/clientelist party-voter linkages produces the highest level of party institutionalization. When strong programmatic/ideological party-voter linkages are combined with strong affective/clientelist linkages, party institutionalization will be lower as parties have the option of mobilizing voters outside the formal party organization. However, weak party programmatic/ideological party-voter linkages combined with weak affective/clientelist linkages produces lower levels of institutionalization than the combination of weak party programmatic/ideological linkages and strong affective/clientelist linkages, as in the absence of programmatic/ideological party-voter ties, affective/clientelist ties at least offer a channel for parties to link with voters. Finally, separate case study chapters on Taiwan and South Korea provide an overview of the development of each of the major political parties in the two countries since liberation, exploring the relationship between authoritarian legacies, party-voter linkages, and party institutionalization.
Abramson, Paul R. “Generational Change and the Decline of Party Identification in America: 1952-1974.” The American Political Science Review 70, no. 2 (1976): 469-478.
Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963.
Amsden, Alice H. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Amsden, Alice H., and Wan-Wen Chu. Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.
Amsden, Alice H. The Rise of “the Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Bartolini, Stefano, and Peter Mair. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Basedau, Matthias, and Alexander Stroh. Measuring Party Institutionalization in Developing Countries: A New Research Instrument Applied to 28 African Political Parties. GIGA Working Papers, 2008.
Bedeski, Robert E., and James Robert Brown. The Transformation of South Korea: Reform and Reconstitution in the Sixth Republic Under Roh Tae Woo, 1987-1992. London: Routledge, 1994.
Birch, Sarah. “Electoral Systems and Party System Stability in Post-Communist Europe.” Paper prepared for presentation at the 97th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, 30 August – 2 September, 2001.
Birnir, Johanna Kristin. Ethnicity and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Calvo, Ernesto, and Maria Victoria Murillo. “When Parties Meet Voters Assessing Political Linkages Through Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile.” Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 7 (2013): 851–882.
Campbell, Angus. The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Casal Bertoa, Fernando. The Institutionalization of Party Systems in East Central Europe: Explaining Variation, PhD theses, Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, 2011.
Cha, Victor D. “South Korea in 2004: Peninsular Flux.” Asian Survey 45, no. 1 (2005): 33–40.
Chang, Li-sheng. Taiwan sheng difang zizhi yanjiu zhuankan [Research Report on Taiwan Province Self-Government]. Taipei: Taiwan Self-Government Research Association, 1949.
Chen, Ming-tong, and Jih-wen Lin. “Taiwan difang xuanju de qiyuan yu guojia shehui guanxi zhuanbian [The Origins of Local Elections in Taiwan and Changes in State-Society Relations],” in Liang’an jiceng xuanju yu zhengzhi shehui bianqian [Basic-Level Elections and Sociopolitical Change on Both Sides of the Strait], edited by Ming-tong Chen and Yongnian Zheng. Taipei: Yuedan, 1998.
Chen Tai-yin. “Minzhuhua hou de Taiwan difang paixi: yi Jiayi Xian weili [Local Factions in Taiwan after Democratization: The Case of Chiayi Country].” Master’s Thesis, Tsinghua University, 2009.
Cheng, Tun-Jen. “Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan.” World Politics 41, no. 4 (1989): 471–499.
Chu, Yun-han. “Guazhan jingji yu weiquan zhengzhi tizhi [Monopolistic Economy and Authoritarian Regime],” in longduan yu boxue: weiquan zhuyi de zhengzhi jingji fenxi [Monopoly and Exploitation: Political Economy of the Authoritarian Regime], edited by Hsin-huang Hsiao. Taipei: Taiwan Research Fund, 1989.
———. Crafting Democracy in Taiwan. Taipei, Institute for National Policy Research, 1992.
Chu, Yun-han and Hyug Baeg Im. “Power Rotation and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea and Taiwan,” Paper prepared for presentation at International Conference on Democracy in East Asia and Taiwan in Global Perspective, Taipei, Taiwan, August 24-25, 2011.
Converse, Philip E. “Of Time and Partisan Stability.” Comparative Political Studies 2, no. 2 (1969): 139–171.
———. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort-Analysing Party Identification. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1976.
Cox, Gary W. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 34, no. 4 (1990): 903–935.
Croissant, Aurel. “Electoral Politics in Southeast and East Asia,” in Electoral Politics in Southeast and East Asia, edited by Aurel Croissant and Marei John. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2002.
Curtis, Gerald L. The Japanese Way of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.
———. The Logic of Japanese Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.
Dalton, Russell J., Ian McAllister, and Martin P. Wattenberg. “The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment,” in Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Martin P. Wattenberg. New York, Oxford University Press, 2002.
Dalton, Russell J., and Steven Weldon. “Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization.” Party Politics 13, no. 2 (2007): 179–196.
Diamandouros, Nikiforos P., and Richard Gunther. Parties, Politics, and Democracy in the New Southern Europe. The New Southern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
Diamond, Larry J., and Richard Gunther, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
Diamond, Larry J., “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5, no. 3 (1994): 4–17.
Dix, Robert H. “Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 24, no. 4 (1992): 488–511.
———. “Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 22, no. 1 (1989): 23–37.
Dominguez, Jorge I. “The Perfect Dictatorship? South Korea versus Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico,” in The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea, edited by Byung-Kook Kim and Ezra F Vogel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011.
Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper, 1957.
Duch, Raymond M., and Randolph T. Stevenson. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Elgie, Robert. “A Fresh Look at Semipresidentialism: Variations on a Theme.” Journal of Democracy 16, no. 3 (2005): 98–112.
———. Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types And Democratic Performance. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
———. “South Korea – Semi-Presidentialism on the Constitutional Agenda,” available online at http://www.semipresidentialism.com/?p=514 [Accessed June 6, 2014].
Epstein, David L., Robert Bates, Jack Goldstone, Ida Kristensen, and Sharyn O’Halloran. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3 (2006): 551–569.
Evans, Peter B. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
Faiola, Anthony. “Court Rejects S. Korean President’s Impeachment.” Washington Post, May 14, 2004, available online at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25441-2004May13.html [Accessed June 6, 2014].
Feldman, Stanley. “Economic Self-Interest and Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 26, no. 3 (1982): 446-466.
Fields, Karl J. “KMT, Inc. Party Capitalism in a Developmental State.” JPRI Working Paper No. 47, 1998, available online at http://www.jpri.org/publications/workingpapers/wp47.html [Accessed June 6, 2014].
Foweraker, Joe. “Review Article: Institutional Design, Party Systems and Governability – Differentiating the Presidential Regimes of Latin America.” British Journal of Political Science 28, no. 4 (1998): 651–676.
Franklin, Mark, Thomas Mackie, and Henry Valen. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research Press, 2010.
Gallup, Korea. Hangug Gaelleob Je 17 Dae Daetonglyeong Seongeo Gyeolgwa Yecheug [Gallup Korea Predicted Outcome of the 17th Presidential Election], available online at: http://www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/reportContent.asp?seqNo=169&;pagePos=25&;selectYear=&;search=&;searchKeyword= [Accessed June 12, 2014]
Geddes, Barbara, and Erica E. Frantz. “The Legacy of Dictatorship for Democratic Parties in Latin America,” Paper prepared for presentation at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, Aug 30–Sep 2, 2007.
Gherghina, Sergiu Marian. “Explaining Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe&;#8239;: A Party Organizational Approach.” PhD Thesis, Department Political Science, Leiden University, 2012.
Goodin, Robert E., and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Grofman, Bernard Norman, Sung-Chull Lee, Edwin Winckler, and Brian Woodall, eds. Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.
Hahm, Chaibong. “South Korea’s Miraculous Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 19, no. 3 (2008): 128–42.
Han, Y. C. “Political Parties and Political Development in South Korea.” Pacific Affairs 42, no. 4 (1969): 446–464.
———. “The 1969 Constitutional Revision and Party Politics in South Korea.” Pacific Affairs 44, no. 2 (1971): 242–258.
Helgesen, Geir. Democracy and Authority in Korea: The Cultural Dimension in Korean Politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
Hellmann, Olli. “Party System Institutionalization Without Parties: Evidence from Korea.” Journal of East Asian Studies 14 (2014): 53–84.
———. Political Parties and Electoral Strategy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Henderson, Gregory. Korea: The Politics of the Vortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1978.
Heo, Uk. “What Delays Democratic Consolidation in South Korea?” Korean Observer 44, no. 4 (2013).
Heo, Uk, and Hans Stockton. “The Impact of Democratic Transition on Elections and Parties in South Korea.” Party Politics 11, no. 6 (2005): 674–688.
Hicken, Allen, and Erik Martinez Kuhonta. “Shadows From the Past: Party System Institutionalization in Asia.” Comparative Political Studies 44, no. 5 (2011): 572–597.
Hoffmann, Steven A. “Faction Behavior and Cultural Codes: India and Japan.” The Journal of Asian Studies 40, no. 02 (1981): 231–254.
Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng. “The Origins and Consequences of Electoral Reform in Taiwan.” Issues and Studies 45 (2009).
Hsu, Hsin-liang. Tiaozhan Li Denghui [A Challenge to Lee Teng-Hui]. Taipei: Liming, 1995.
Huang, Chuan-chou. “Gongfei xuanju zhidu zhi yanjiu – yi Taiwan di si dao di liu liwei xuanju wei li [Research on Public Financing of Elections – The Case of Legislative Elections in Taiwan between 1998 and 2005].” Master’s Thesis, National Chengchi University, 2008.
Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.
———. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon &; Schuster, 1996.
Im, Hyug Baeg. “Faltering Democratic Consolidation in South Korea: Democracy at the End of the ‘Three Kims’ Era.” Democratization 11, no. 5 (2004): 179–198.
Inglehart, Ronald. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1990.
———. “The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies.” The American Political Science Review 65, no. 4 (1971): 991–1017.
———. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1977.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Wayne E. Baker. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65, no. 1 (2000): 19.
Jager, Sheila Miyoshi. Narratives of Nation Building in Korea: A Genealogy of Patriotism. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2003.
Jung, Suk-ku. “Will Chungcheong Region’s Choice Sway Presidential Election Again?” Korea Times, May 14, 2007, available online at http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/special/2014/04/180_2890.html [accessed June 12, 2014]
Kabashima, Ikuo, and Gill Steel. Changing Politics in Japan. New York, Cornell University Press, 2010.
Kang, David C. “Bad Loans to Good Friends: Money Politics and the Developmental State in South Korea.” International Organization 56, no. 1 (2002): 177–207.
———. “The Institutional Foundations of Korean Politics,” in Understanding Korean Politics: An Introduction, edited by Soong Hoom Kil and Chung-in Moon. New York: SUNY Press, 2001.
Kang, WooJin. “Regional Party System, Causal Attribution and Economic Voting in New Democracies: The Case of the 2007 Korean Presidential Election.” International Political Science Review 34, no. 2 (2013): 173–190.
Keefer, Philip. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 4 (2007): 804–821.
Kihl, Young Whan. Transforming Korean Politics: Democracy, Reform, and Culture. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2005.
Kil, Soong Hoom. “Development of Korean Politics — A Historical Profile,” in Understanding Korean Politics: An Introduction, edited by Soong Hoom Kil and Chung-in Moon. New York: SUNY Press, 2001.
Kil, Soong Hoom, and Chung-in Moon, eds. Understanding Korean Politics: An Introduction. New York: SUNY Press, 2001.
Kim, Byung-Kook. “The Labyrinth of Solitude: Park and the Exercise of Presidential Power,” in The Park Chung Hee Era: the Transformation of South Korea, edited by Byung-Kook Kim and Ezra F Vogel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011a.
Kim, Byung-Kook, and Ezra F Vogel. The Park Chung Hee Era: the Transformation of South Korea. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011.
Kim, C. I. Eugene. “Patterns in the 1967 Korean Elections.” Pacific Affairs 41, no. 1 (1968): 60–70.
———. “Significance of the 1963 Korean Elections.” Asian Survey 4, no. 3 (1964): 765–773.
———. “The Meaning of the 1971 Korean Elections: A Pattern of Political Development.” Asian Survey 12, no. 3 (1972): 213–224.
Kim, HeeMin, Jun Young Choi, and Jinman Cho. “Changing Cleavage Structure in New Democracies: An Empirical Analysis of Political Cleavages in Korea.” Electoral Studies 27, no. 1 (2008): 136–50.
Kim, Hyung-A. “State Building: The Military Junta’s Path to Modernity through Administrative Reforms,” in The Park Chung Hee Era: the Transformation of South Korea, edited by Byung-Kook Kim and Ezra F Vogel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011b.
Kim, Kyong-dong. “Presidential Election and Social Change in South Korea.” Development and Society 32, no. 2 (2003): 293–314.
Kim, Sunhyuk. “‘Contentious Democracy’ in South Korea An Active Civil Society and Ineffectual Political Parties.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 8, no. 2 (2012): 51–61.
Kim, Youngmi. The Politics of Coalition in Korea: Between Institutions and Culture. London: Routledge, 2011c.
Kim, Yung Myung. “Patterns of Military Rule and Prospects for Democracy in South Korea,” in The Military and Democracy in Asia and the Pacific, edited by Ronald James May and Viberto Selochan. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2004.
King, Gary. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Kitschelt, Herbert. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 6–7 (2000): 845–879.
Kitschelt, Herbert, Kirk A. Hawkins, Juan Pablo Luna, Guillermo Rosas, and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Steven I. Wilkinson, eds. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Taipei Times, “KMT Assets Are Source of Graft: DPP,” July 10, 2010, Available online at http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2011/07/10/2003507871 [accessed June 12, 2014].
Kohli, Atul. “Indian Democracy: Stress and Resilience.” Journal of Democracy 3, no. 1 (1992): 52–64.
Kohno, Masaru. “Rational Foundations for the Organization of the Liberal Democratic Party in Japan.” World Politics 44, no. 3 (1992): 369–97.
Kostelecky, Toma. Political Parties after Communism: Developments in East-Central Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.
Krauss, Ellis S., and Robert J. Pekkanen. The Rise and Fall of Japan’s LDP: Political Party Organizations as Historical Institutions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011.
Kung, I-chun. Wailai zhengquan yu bentu shehui: gaizao hou Guomindang zhengquan shehui jichu de xingcheng [Outsider Regime” and Native Society: The Formation of the KMT Regime’s Social Basis Following Internal Party Reorganization]. Taipei, SMC Publishing, 1998.
Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12, no. 1 (1979): 3–27.
Lai, Jerry. “Why Is Taiwan Lagging Behind?” Commonwealth Magazine no. 448, available online at http://english.cw.com.tw/article.do?action=show&;id=12004 [accessed June 12, 2014].
Lang, Yu-hsein, and Wen-chun Chen. Zhonghua Minguo xuanju lishi [A History of Elections in the Republic of China]. Taipei: Central Election Committee, 1987.
Lee, Hong Yung. “South Korea in 2002: Multiple Political Dramas.” Asian Survey 43, no. 1 (2003): 64–77.
Levitsky, Steven. “Institutionalization and Peronism The Concept, the Case and the Case for Unpacking the Concept.” Party Politics 4, no. 1 (1998): 77–92.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.
Lijphart, Arend. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” The American Political Science Review 65, no. 3 (1971): 682–693.
———. “The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 8, no. 2 (1975): 158–177.
Lin, Chia-lung. “Paths to Democracy: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective.” PhD Thesis, Department of Political Science, Yale University, 1998.
Lin, Jih-wen. “The Politics of Reform in Japan and Taiwan.” Journal of Democracy 17, no. 2 (2006): 118–31.
Linz, Juan J. “Presidentialism or Parliamentarism: Does It Make a Difference,” in The Failure of Presidential Democracy, edited by Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1994.
———. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1, no. 1 (1990): 51–69.
Linz, Juan J., and Alfred C. Stepan. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1996.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. “The Indispensability of Political Parties.” Journal of Democracy 11, no. 1 (2000): 48–55.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, 1967.
Liu, Chin-ching. Taiwan zhanhou jingji fenxi [Analysis of Taiwan’s Post-War Economy] Taipei: Renjian, 1991.
Liu Shih-chung, “Will the KMT Ever Be Separated from Its Business Assets?” Taipei Times, March 1, 2000, available online at: http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/insight/archives/2000/03/01/0000026165 [last accessed June 12, 2014].
Magnier, Mark, and Tyler Marshall. “Opposition Candidate Picks Middle Ground.” Los Angeles Times (February 8, 2004). Available online at http://articles.latimes.com/2004/feb/08/world/fg-lien8 [accessed June 12, 2014].
Mainwaring, Scott. “Political Parties and Democratization in Brazil and the Southern Cone.” Comparative Politics 21, no. 1 (1988).
———. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1999.
Mainwaring, Scott P., Ana Maria Bejarano, and Eduardo Pizarro Leongomez. “The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes: An Overview,” in The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes, edited by Scott P. Mainwaring and Eduardo Pizarro Leongomez. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006.
Mainwaring, Scott P., and Mariano Torcal. “Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory: After the Third Wave of Democratization,” in Handbook of Party Politics, edited by Richard S. Katz and William J. Crotty. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 2006.
Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy R. Scully, eds. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford University Press, 1995.
Mainwaring, Scott, and Edurne Zoco. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies.” Party Politics 13, no. 2 (2007): 155–178.
Manning, Carrie. “Assessing African Party Systems after the Third Wave.” Party Politics 11, no. 6 (2005): 707–727.
Markus, Gregory B. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 32, no. 1 (1988): 137.
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. “What Are the Political Consequences of Trust? A Test of Cultural and Institutional Theories in Russia.” Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 9 (2005): 1050–1078.
Morlino, Leonardo. “Consolidation and Party Government in Southern Europe.” International Political Science Review 16, no. 2 (1995): 145–167.
Nahm, Andrew C., and James Hoare. Historical Dictionary of the Republic of Korea. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 2004.
Nakane, Chie. Japanese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970.
Nam, Chang-Hee. “South Korea’s Big Business Clientelism in Democratic Reform.” Asian Survey 35, no. 4 (1995): 357–366.
Nemoto, Kuniaki, Robert Pekkanen, and Ellis Krauss. “Over-Nominating Candidates, Undermining the Party: The Collective Action Problem under SNTV in Japan.” Party Politics, published online July 24, 2012.
Nohlen, Dieter. Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook Volume II: South East Asia, East Asia, and the South Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Oka, Takashi. “Korean Government Party: Democratic or Army Puppet?” Christian Science Monitor, January 30, 1981. Available online at : http://www.csmonitor.com/1981/0130/013050.html [accessed June 12, 2014].
Pacek, Alexander C. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 38, no. 3 (1994): 723–744.
Panebianco, Angelo. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Translated by Marc Silver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Park, Jaehoo. “The Conservatization of the 386 Generation: Cohort Effects in Voting Behavior of a Political Generation in South Korea,” Master’s Project, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, 2011a.
Park, Kyungmee. “Party Mergers and Splits in New Democracies: The Case of South Korea (1987–2007).” Government and Opposition 45, no. 4 (2010): 531–552.
Park, Myung-Lim. “The Chaeya,” in The Park Chung Hee Era: the Transformation of South Korea, edited by Byung-Kook Kim and Ezra F Vogel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011b.
Pedersen, Mogens N. “Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems, 1948–1977: Explorations in Explanation,” in Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, edited by Hans Daalder, Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications, 1983.
———. “The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility.” European Journal of Political Research 7, no. 1 (1979): 1–26.
Pinto, Antonio Costa, and Leonardo Morlino. Dealing with the Legacy of Authoritarianism: The “Politics of the Past” in Southern European Democracies. London: Routledge, 2013.
Powell, Eleanor Neff, and Joshua A. Tucker. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science 23 (2013): 1–25.
Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Comparative Studies in Behavioral Science. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1970.
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Frances M. Rosenbluth. Japan’s Political Marketplace. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Randall, Vicky, and Lars Svasand. “Party Institutionalization in New Democracies.” Party Politics 8, no. 1 (2002): 5–29.
Reich, Gary M. “Coordinating Party Choice in Founding Elections Why Timing Matters.” Comparative Political Studies 34, no. 10 (2001): 1237–1263.
Remmer, Karen L. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.” The American Political Science Review 85, no. 3 (1991): 777.
Rich, Timothy S. “Evaluating South Korea’s Mixed Legislative System: A Cross-National Analysis of District Competition.” Korean Observer 44, no. 3 (2013): 365–87.
Rigger, Shelley. Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. London: Routledge, 1999.
Roberts, Kenneth M., and Erik Wibbels. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations.” The American Political Science Review 93, no. 3 (1999): 575–90.
Romer, Thomas, and Howard Rosenthal. “The Elusive Median Voter.” Journal of Public Economics 12, no. 2 (1979): 143–170.
Rose, Richard. Elections in Central and Eastern Europe Since 1990. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, 1998.
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, and Michael F. Thies. Japan Transformed: Political Change and Economic Restructuring. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
Sartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
Saxer, Carl J. “‘A Generational Earthquake’?: An Analysis of the 2002 Presidential Election in South Korea.” The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 18 (2005): 23–39.
———. From Transition to Power Alternation: Democracy in South Korea, 1987-1997. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Scheiner, Ethan. Democracy without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Shefter, Martin. “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and Italy.” Politics &; Society 7, no. 4 (1977): 403–451.
Shen, Yu-cheng. “Presidentialization of Semi-Presidentialism in Taiwan: View of Party Politics,” Paper Prepared for presentation at XXII International Political Science Association World Conference, Madrid, Spain, 8-12 July 2012.
Shin, Doh Chull. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
———. Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
———. “Political Parties and Democratization in South Korea: The Mass Public and the Democratic Consolidation of Political Parties.” Democratization 2, no. 2 (1995): 20–55.
Shinoda, Tomohito. Leading Japan: The Role of the Prime Minister. Boston, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg. “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns.” French Politics 3, no. 3 (2005): 323–351.
Sohn, Yul, and Won-Taek Kang. “South Korea in 2012: An Election Year under Rebalancing Challenges.” Asian Survey 53, no. 1 (2013): 198–205.
Son, Won-je. “Han Myeong-Sook Wins Comfortably in DUP Leadership Election,” The Hankyoreh January 16, 2013, available online http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/514913.html [accessed June 12, 2014].
Steinberg, David I., and Myung Shin. “From Entourage to Ideology? Tensions in South Korean Political Parties in Transition,” East-West Center Working Papers, Politics, Governance, and Security Series, no. 9 (2005).
———. “Tensions in South Korean Political Parties in Transition: From Entourage to Ideology?” Asian Survey 46, no. 4 (2006): 517–537.
Stockton, Hans. “Political Parties, Party Systems, and Democracy in East Asia Lessons from Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 34, no. 1 (2001): 94–119.
Steinmo, Sven, Kathleen Thelen, and Frank Longstreth. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Suh, Dae-Sook. “South Korea in 1981: The First Year of the Fifth Republic.” Asian Survey 22, no. 1 (1982): 107–115.
Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinations of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
Taipei Times. “Ma Pledges Party Reform, Handling KMT’s ‘last’ Asset,” June 21, 2013, Available online at http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2013/06/21/2003565317 [accessed June 12, 2014].
Tavits, Margit. “The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 2 (2005): 283–298.
The Economist. “The Nationalists Are Back in Taiwan.” May 23, 2008. Available online at http://www.economist.com/node/10903499 [accessed on June 12, 2014].
Tien, Hung-mao. Government and Politics in Kuomintang China, 1927-1937. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1972.
Wade, Robert. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press, 2003.
Wang, Chin-shou. “Democratization and the Breakdown of Clientelism in Taiwan, 1987-2001.” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina, 2004.
———. “Wajie zhong de difang paixi, yi pingdong xian wei li (Collapsing Local Factions: The Case of Pingtung County).” Taiwanese Sociology, no. 7 (2004).
Wang, Yi-ting. “A Case Study of Parties’ Programmatic and Clientelistic Electoral Appeals in South Korea,” in Research and Dialogue on Programmatic Parties and Party Systems – Case Study Reports. International IDEA, 2012.
Wang, Zhengxu, and Ern Ser Tan. “Self-Expression, ‘Asian Values,’ and Democracy: East Asia in Global Perspective,” in Citizens, Democracy, and Markets around the Pacific Rim, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Doh C. Shin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Welzel, Christian. “The Asian Values Thesis Revisited: Evidence from the World Values Surveys.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 12, no. 1 (2011): 1–31.
Winckler, Edwin A. “Institutionalization and Participation on Taiwan: From Hard to Soft Authoritarianism?” The China Quarterly, no. 99 (1984): 481–99.
Wong, Joseph, and Edward Friedman. Political Transitions in Dominant Party Systems: Learning to Lose. London: Routledge, 2008.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith, ed. The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.
Wu, Nai-teh. “The Politics of a Regime Patronage System: Mobilization and Control within an Authoritarian Regime.” PhD Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Chicago, 1987.
Yard&;#305;mc&;#305;-Geyikci, &;#350;ebnem. “Party Institutionalization and Democratic Consolidation Turkey and Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective.” Party Politics, June 7, 2013.
Yu, Ching-hsin. “The Evolving Party System in Taiwan, 1995-2004.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 40, no. 1–2 (2005): 105–123.
Zuckerman, Alan. The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE