:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:民氣可用:從「革命瓜分論戰」看晚清的民氣論述
書刊名:成大歷史學報
作者:林穎鈺
作者(外文):Lin, Yin-yu
出版日期:2017
卷期:52
頁次:頁209-238
主題關鍵詞:革命瓜分論戰民氣革命黨保皇黨晚清思潮Revolution leads to foreign partitionPeople's moraleRevolutionistsRoyalistsTrends of thought in the late Qing Dynasty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:84
  • 點閱點閱:14
晚清十年間(1900-1911)革命黨與保皇黨針對「中國國情能不能進行革命」發生了一場論戰。保皇黨提出「革命瓜分論」,主張革命必定引發列強瓜分,因此中國不適合革命。這除了暴露出當時社會恐懼瓜分的心理,也打擊了革命黨的士氣。革命黨則以「民氣可用」進行反擊,認為唯有革命才能激發民氣,唯有激發民氣才能阻止列強瓜分。「民氣可用」是晚清民氣論述的脈絡下的產物。民氣論述相信,人的精神意志,尤其是情感與情緒具有救國的力量,若能激發人民不甘被統治的憤怒情緒、愛國心與敢死氣概,這股力量便能抵禦外侮、保種救國。瞭解晚清的民氣論述,以及「民氣」在「革命瓜分論戰」中的作用,除了能夠認識到晚清的社會氛圍對於「人的精神意志力量」給予極高評價與信仰,也可以藉此觀察晚清的思潮與時局如何在社會氛圍與群眾情緒的影響中推進發展。
During the last decade of Qing dynasty, the royalists and the revolutionists debated the question "Can China afford a revolution?" By advocating "revolution leads to foreign partition," the royalists suggested that revolution could lead to an invasion by the Great Powers, thus revolution was not feasible. This not only exposed the psychology of fears of a split in society, but also attacked the morale of the revolutionists. Yet, the revolutionists argued that "people's morale is exploitable',and that only revolution could raise people's morale to resist an invasion by the Great Powers. The slogan "people's morale is exploitable" was in fact the outcome of debates on people's morale in the late Qing period The debates suggested that the human spirit could bring great force for the salvation of the country. If peopled anger, patriotism, and spirit of martyrdom were inspired against foreign rule, this force could then resist invasion and save the country. Understanding the debates on people's morale and its effect in the slogan of "revolution leads to foreign partition" could explain how "the power of the human spirit and will" was appreciated in the late Qing social context. It also helps explain how the political situation and attitudes were influenced by the social atmosphere and the mentality of the masses in the late Qing Dynasty.
學位論文
1.李仁淵(2002)。晚清的新式傳播媒體與知識份子:以報刊出版為中心的討論(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.邱權政、杜春和(1981)。辛亥革命史料選輯。長沙:湖南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1983)。江蘇。台北:中國國民黨中央委員會黨史史料編纂委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.中國人民政治協商會議全國委員會文史資料研究委員會(1981)。辛亥革命回憶錄。北京:文史資料出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫中山(1989)。國父全集。臺北:近代中國出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.汪精衛(1929)。汪精衛集。上海:光明書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1969)。民報。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會黨史史料編纂委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1968)。黃帝魂。中國國民黨中央委員會黨史史料編纂委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1966)。新民叢報。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.李劍農(1957)。中國近百年政治史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.康有為、湯志鈞(1981)。康有為政論集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.梁啟超、馮鏡如(1967)。清議報。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.張枬、王忍之(1960)。辛亥革命前十年間時論選集。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
13.路遙(2012)。義和團運動文獻資料匯編。濟南:山東大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.唐才常(1982)。唐才常集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.(1971)。東方雜誌。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.汪康年、梁啟超(1967)。時務報。臺北:華文書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.(1983)。蘇報。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會黨史史料編纂委員會。  延伸查詢new window
18.張朋園(19640000)。梁啟超與清季革命。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.譚嗣同、蔡尚思、方行(1981)。譚嗣同全集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.寺廣映雄、吳雁南、王富山、鄒念之(1980)。「革命瓜分論」形成中的若干問題--保皇派與革命派的爭論。辛亥革命史叢刊。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE