:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣國中中輟輔導復學資源運用之困境與相關挑戰:以生態系統論整合國中輔導教師觀點為例
書刊名:臺北市立大學學報. 教育類
作者:宋宥賢
作者(外文):Sung, Yu-hsien
出版日期:2017
卷期:48:2
頁次:頁53-84
主題關鍵詞:生態系統理論中輟輔導資源中輟輔導困境國中輔導教師Ecological system theoryResources of dropout counselingDilemma of dropout counselingTeacher-counselor in secondary school
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:35
本研究主透過生態系統論(ecological systems)觀點,整合國中輔導教師評估中輟 輔導歷程中資源運用之相關困境與原由,置入中輟生之生態系統層面進行探究。 本研究共招募 15 位國中輔導教師參與(平均年齡 29.06 歲;平均輔導年資為 4.2 年; 平均中輟個案數為 6 位),並透過質性深度訪談蒐集研究資料以摘錄分析。研究 結果將相關資源運用困境與原由鑲嵌至中輟生生態系統中探究:(1) 於微系統:a. 校內教育資源有特定助益,然其效益仍受經費、課程規範、及舊有校園生活影響; b. 復學歷程受限於輔導教師人力不足,甚難完整關照,亦影響再輟可能;c. 學校 端教師與同儕接納不足,影響中輟生復學;d. 警政單位甚為重要督促資源,然普 遍缺乏強制力,型塑中輟輔導困境;(2) 於中系統:a. 家長端為督責復學關鍵,然 失功能情形嚴重,政府協助資源仍不足,故難促成親師合作;b. 復學歷程輔導教 師受限於職分與立場不同,難與校端溝通復學條件;(3) 於外系統:中介教育機構 具有助益,然仍受資源不足衍生之適配性、可近性影響,難催化中輟生就學動力。 綜上,皆會影響輔導教師進行中輟輔導工作及資源之輔導成效。最後,本研究根 據上述結論凝聚若干實務與未來研究建議。
This study aimed to investigate the resource challenges faced by secondary school full-time counseling teachers when assisting dropouts. It used in-depth interviews to collect data, which were analyzed by constant analysis, and the researcher integrated the outcomes into the ecosystem of dropouts through the ecological system theory. The subjects of this study included 15 secondary school full-time counseling teachers. The significant findings were as follows: School full-time counseling teachers generally agreed that there were benefits as well as challenges to utilizing dropout counseling resources. The researcher integrated the details into the ecosystem of dropouts as follows: (1) The mircosystem: a. Specific benefits of school educational resources were noted; however, their effectiveness was influenced by government funds, the dropouts’ characterstics, and past campus life; b. Inadequate human resources made it difficult for the subjects to provide comprehensive care, which might also affect the dropout rate; c. Dropouts did not receive enough support from teachers and peers; d. Police were an important resource for helping dropouts; however, there were not enough officers to supervise the dropouts effectively. (2) The mesosystem: a. Government support for the parents of dropouts was lacking, and it was difficult for school full-time counseling teachers to build partnerships with those parents; b. Different ranks and positions within schools made it difficult for counseling teachers to negotiate with the administration and homeroom teachers regarding the conditions of a dropout returning to school; (3) The exosystem: Some benefits in intermediary institutions were noted; however, their effectiveness was influenced by the need for government funds. Finally, the researcher proposed suggestions and implications for educational instruction and future studies.
期刊論文
1.Fortin, L.、Marcotte, D.、Potvin, P.、Royer, É.、Joly, J.(2006)。Typology of students at risk of dropping out of school: Description by personal, family and school factors。European Journal of Psychology of Education,21(4),363-383。  new window
2.賀孝銘、林清文、李華璋、王文瑛、陳嘉雯(20071100)。我國中輟防治工作現況與困境之研究。輔導與諮商學報. 彰師大,29(2),73-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.胡中宜(20110600)。學校社會工作實務中的倫理兩難。教育心理學報,42(4),543-566。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.賀孝銘(2008)。中輟生復學輔導的現況與未來。師友月刊,491,8-15。  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇金蟬(20110900)。從中輟問題談親師合作的困境。社區發展季刊,135,248-261。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳芝儀(20000600)。國中階段中輟學生輟學經驗與危機因素之研究。犯罪學期刊,5,179-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Battin-Pearson, Sara、Abbott, Robert D.、Hill, Karl G.、Catalano, Richard F.、Hawkins, J. David、Newcomb, Michael D.(2000)。Predictors of Early High School Dropout: A Test of Five Theories。Journal of Educational Psychology,92(3),568-582。  new window
8.趙曉美、王麗斐、楊國如(20060600)。臺北市諮商心理師國小校園服務方案之實施評估。教育心理學報,37(4),345-365。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Archambault, I.、Janosz, M.、Morizot, J.、Pagani, L.(2009)。Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout。Journal of School Health,79(9),408-415。  new window
10.Christle, Christine A.、Jolivette, Kristine、Nelson, C. Michael(2007)。School Characteristics Related to High School Dropout Rates。Remedial and Special Education,28(6),325-339。  new window
11.Doll, Jonathan Jacob、Eslami, Zohreh、Walters, Lynne(2013)。Understanding Why Students Drop Out of High School, According to Their Own Reports Are They Pushed or Pulled, or Do They Fall Out? A Comparative Analysis of Seven Nationally Representative Studies。SAGE Open,3(4),1-15。  new window
12.汪敏慧、鍾思嘉(20081200)。為什麼要上學?--三位國中瀕臨中輟生的改變歷程。諮商輔導學報,19,1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蔡麗紅、關百娟、涂慧慈、羅于惠、沈昱名、史麗珠(20110600)。桃園地區中輟生物質濫用情形及影響因素。秀傳醫學雜誌,10(1/2),25-36。  延伸查詢new window
14.Song, C.、Benin, M.、Glick, J.(2012)。Dropping out of high school: The effects of family structure and family transitions。Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,53,18-33。  new window
15.Wood, L.、Kiperman, S.、Esch, R. C.、Leroux, A. J.、Truscott, S. D.(2017)。Predicting dropout using student- and schoollevel factors: An ecological perspective。School Psychology Quarterly,32,35-49。  new window
16.Prevatt, F.、Kelly, F. D.(2003)。Dropping out of school: A review of intervention programs。Journal of School Psychology,41,377-395。  new window
17.Kim, E. M.、Sheridan, S. M.(2015)。Foundational aspects of family-school connections: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, and research needs。Foundational Aspects of Family-School Partnership Research,1,1-14。  new window
18.Onwuegbuzie, A. J.、Collins, K. M. T.、Frels, R. K.(2013)。FOREWORD: Using Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory to frame quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research。International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches,7(1),2-8。  new window
19.Ingholt, L.、Sørensen, B. B.、Andersen, S.、Zinckernagel, L.、Friis-Holmberg, T.、Frank, V. A.、Stock, C.、Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T.、Rod, M. H.(2015)。How can we strengthen students' social relations in order to reduce school dropout? An intervention development study within four Danish vocational schools。BMC Public Health,15,1-13。  new window
20.Davies, J. D.、Lee, J.(2006)。To attend or not to attend? Why some students choose school and others reject it。Support for Learning,21,204-209。  new window
21.Bowers, A. J.、Sprott, R.、Taff, S. A.(2013)。Do we know who will drop out? A review of the predictors of dropping out of high school: Precision, sensitivity and specificity。The High School Journal,96,77-100。  new window
22.Bjerk, D.(2012)。Re-examining the impact of dropping out on criminal and labor outcomes in early adulthood。Economics of Education Review,31,110-122。  new window
23.簡里娟(20090300)。中輟學生輔導工作:學校與社區合作方式之初探。輔導季刊,45(1),60-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.謝振裕、陳振盛(20110900)。學校社工在中輟生輔導網絡上角色運用之研究:以臺南市為例。社區發展季刊,135,228-247。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.趙心瑜(20151000)。中輟學生的資源連結與應用。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(10),81-86。  延伸查詢new window
26.黃雅雯(20130500)。轉角遇見希望--找回中輟生的心。臺灣教育評論月刊,2(5),25-26。  延伸查詢new window
27.郭凡琦(20130200)。中輟復學生輔導--從學校輔導人員角色出發。諮商與輔導,326,62-63。  延伸查詢new window
28.許舜賢(20150800)。青少年中途輟學相關因素之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(8),161-178。  延伸查詢new window
29.朱偲韻(20130900)。為中輟生建立一個正向支持系統。諮商與輔導,333,22-25。  延伸查詢new window
30.宋宥賢(2015)。臺灣中輟輔導之困境與挑戰:校園現場與政策現況之反思。新社會政策,40,56-60。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.楊士隆、吳芝儀、董旭英、林獻情(2003)。我國處遇中輟生復學之各類中介教育實施現況及成效評估研究報告。臺北:教育部訓育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.嚴學復、黃靜怡(2007)。國民中學中輟學生返校復學成功案例之研究--以臺北縣國中為例。臺北縣:臺北縣政府教育局。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2014)。中華民國103年教育統計。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2013)。教育部補助各直轄市、縣(市)政府辦理輔導人力成效評估--打造「輔導黃金三角」,守護孩子幸福未來。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.柯秀薇(2003)。規訓與叛逆:國中中輟生輔導措施之反思(碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.粟惇瑋(2007)。中輟學園帶領中輟生往何處去?論中輟學園的中介教育(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳華芬(2014)。中學中輟生經由中介教育復學歷程探討--以某民俗技藝團為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.余宗晉(2009)。國中輔導教師之中輟防治角色知覺.困境及其支援需求之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林萬億、黃韻如、胡中宜、蘇寶蕙、張祉翎、李孟儒、林佳怡(2010)。學校輔導團隊工作:學校社會工作師、輔導教師與心理師的合作。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Rumberger, R. W.、Lim, S. A.(2008)。Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research。Santa Barbara, CA:California Dropout Research Project。  new window
3.Merriam, S. B.(2002)。Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.McWhirter, J. J.、McWhirter, B. T.、McWhirter, A. M.、McWhirter, E. H.(1998)。Atrisk youth: A comprehensive response。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
5.Baker, M. L.、Sigmon, J. N.、Nugent, M. E.(2001)。Truancy reduction: Keeping students in school。Washington, DC:United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention。  new window
6.石英、池旭臺、李榮純、楊曉媚、鄭婉儀(2010)。返璞歸真,重現風華--中輟復學輔導。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Erikson, Erik Homburger(1968)。Identity: Youth and crisis。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
8.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet(1998)。Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounder Theory。Sage。  new window
其他
1.高宜凡(2009)。體檢台灣少年福利政策與分配,經費僅占教育預算0.1%,我們真的重視中輟?,https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=13417。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Clarke, B. L.、Sheridan, S. M.、Woods, K. E.(2009)。Elements of healthy family-school relationships。Handbook of school-family partnerships。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
2.宋宥賢(2016)。「鞏固教育品質穩定的力量」--初探專任輔導教師如何深耕諮商效能。教育品質。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE