:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:你唱的是什麼科技爭議?臺灣反核音樂人傳播的科學知識民主化意涵
書刊名:傳播與社會學刊
作者:黃俊儒
作者(外文):Huang, Chun-ju
出版日期:2017
卷期:41
頁次:頁149-179
主題關鍵詞:科技爭議邊界物反核運動科學知識民主化Technological controversyBoundary objectAnti-nuke movementScience knowledge democratization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:157
  • 點閱點閱:37
期刊論文
1.范玫芳(20071000)。風險論述、公民行動與灰渣掩埋場設置爭議。科技、醫療與社會,5,43-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Witte, K.、Allen, M.(2000)。A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns。Health Education & Behavior,27(5),591-615。  new window
3.Nowotny, Helga(2003)。Democratising Expertise and Socially Robust Knowledge。Science and Public Policy,30(3),151-156。  new window
4.杜文苓、施麗雯、黃廷宜(20071000)。風險溝通與民主參與:以竹科宜蘭基地之設置為例。科技、醫療與社會,5,71-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.何明修(20120100)。反國光石化運動的「公民」展演。傳播研究與實踐,2(1),45-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hess, D. J.(2005)。Technology- and Product-Oriented Movements: Approximating Social Movement Studies and Science and Technology Studies。Science, Technology, & Human Values,30(4),515-535。  new window
7.Collins, Harry M.、Evans, Robert(2002)。The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience。Social Studies of Science,32(2),235-296。  new window
8.Star, Susan Leigh、Griesemer, James R.(1989)。Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology。Social Studies of Science,19,387-420。  new window
9.雷旋(2013)。香港抗議之聲:嬉笑怒罵,溫柔反叛。思想,24,161-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.謝竹雯(2013)。島人之寶:沖繩音樂與沖繩社會運動。思想,24,169-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Allgaier, J.(2012)。On the shoulders of YouTube: Science in music videos。Science Communication,35(2),267-276。  new window
12.Eden, S.(2011)。Food labels as boundary objects: How consumers make sense of organic and functional foods。Public Understanding of Science,20(2),179-194。  new window
13.Elmesky, R.(2011)。Rap as a roadway: creating creolized forms of science in an era of cultural globalization。Cultural Studies of Science Education,6(1),49-76。  new window
14.Haenfler, R.(2004)。Collective identity in the straight edge movement: how diffuse movements foster commitment, encourage individualized participation, and promote cultural change。The Sociological Quarterly,45(4),785-805。  new window
15.Huang, C.-J.、Allgaier, J.(2015)。What science are you singing?--A study of the science image in the mainstream music of Taiwan。Public Understanding of Science,24(1),112-125。  new window
16.Leão, M.、Castro, S.(2012)。Science and rock: How music festivals can boost the progress of science。EMBO Reports,13(11),954-958。  new window
17.Snow, David A.、Benford, Robert D.(1988)。Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization。International Social Movement Research,1(1),197-218。  new window
18.林國明、陳東升(20031200)。公民會議與審議民主:全民健保的公民參與經驗。臺灣社會學,6,61-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張鐵志(20131000)。「唱自己的歌」:臺灣的社會轉型、青年文化與流行音樂。思想,24,139-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Benford, Robert D.、Snow, David A.(2000)。Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment。Annual Review of Sociology,26(1),611-639。  new window
21.何明修(20041200)。文化、構框與社會運動。臺灣社會學刊,33,157-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.黃俊儒(2013)。你唱的是什麼科學?--初探臺灣流行音樂中的科學意象。臺灣科技與社會研究學會第五屆年會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Eyerman, Ron、Jamison, Andrew(1998)。Music and Social Movements: Mobilizing Traditions in the Twentieth Century。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Irwin, Alan(1995)。Citizen Science。London:Routledge。  new window
3.Collins, Harry M.、Evans, Robert(2007)。Rethinking expertise。Chicago, Illinois:University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.張鐵志(2004)。聲音與憤怒:搖滾樂可能改變世界嗎?。臺北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
5.Perrow, Charles(1984)。Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
6.Epstein, Steven(1996)。Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
7.Goffman, E.(1974)。Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience。New York:Harper Colophon。  new window
8.張鐵志(2010)。時代的噪音:從狄倫到U2的抗議之聲。臺北:印刻文學生活雜誌出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Eyerman, R.、Jamison, A.(1991)。Social movement: A cognitive approach。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Snow, David A.、Benford, Robert D.(1992)。Master Frames and Cycles of Protest。Frontiers in Social Movement Theory。Yale University Press。  new window
2.黃俊儒(2015)。跨科際視角下的科學傳播三階段論。界定跨科際。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wynne, B.(1996)。May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide。Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology。London:Sage。  new window
4.何東洪(2004)。[聲音與憤怒:搖滾樂可能改變世界嗎?]導言。聲音與憤怒:搖滾樂可能改變世界嗎?。臺北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
5.范玫芳(2014)。核能科技風險與價值衝突。臺灣科技爭議島。新竹:交通大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.傅大為(2014)。導論:STS視野下的科技爭議運動。臺灣科技爭議島。新竹:交通大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bucchi, M.、Lorenzet, A.(2008)。Before and after science: Science and technology in pop music 1970-1990。Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices。Berlin:Springer Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE