:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:身心障礙鑑定與需求評估制度實施經驗探討
書刊名:臺灣社會工作學刊
作者:周宇翔李淑貞謝東儒張聿淳
作者(外文):Chou, Yu-hsiangLee, Shwn-jenShieh, Jeffrey Tung-ruChang, Yu-chun
出版日期:2017
卷期:18
頁次:頁113+115-158
主題關鍵詞:身心障礙障礙鑑定需求評估DisabilityDisability evaluationNeeds assessmentICF
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:232
  • 點閱點閱:33
2012年我國正式實施身心障礙鑑定與需求評估制度,除了引進世界衛生組織頒布的「國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統」作為身心障礙鑑定與需求評估架構外,整體服務申請流程也有變動。本文研究目的為探究身心障礙鑑定與需求評估制度的實施經驗。本文採用焦點團體法,針對各縣市第二鑑定人員、需求評估人員、個案管理人員、身心障礙團體代表(服務使用者)及相關學者專家,共舉行21場焦點團體。本研究發現,併同辦理流程對於障礙者生活資訊蒐集有所限制;公所人員未能發揮預期功效,進而對後續流程順暢造成影響;醫院身心障礙者鑑定尚未參採「活動與參與」鑑定資料,障礙者表示因進行多次到醫院鑑定造成交通往返之不便;福利服務的分流模式有修正的必要,同時,需求評估人員與個案管理人員未來亦應加強合作機制;專業團隊運作方面,出現審查委員訓練不足及缺乏身心障礙者參與的情況。依據研究結果,本文針對前述議題提出若干建議,希冀藉由研究建議的提出,增進身心障礙鑑定與需求評估制度運作順暢性。
The current system for disability evaluation and needs assessment for persons with disabilities was implemented in 2012. This system not only introduced the concepts of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), but also practiced new procedures in welfare services. The aim of this study was to explore the implementation experiences of the current system for disability evaluation and needs assessment for persons with disabilities, by using focus groups. Twenty-one focus groups with professional workers, disability group representatives, as well as services users, and experts were conducted to understand the implementation experiences. As for the findings, there were some limitations and some aspects within the system that need to be changed. It showed that the life experiences of persons with disabilities could not be completely collected if it followed the procedures of "consolidation of disability evaluation and needs assessment." Local district affairs officers did not function as had been expected. In terms of disability evaluation institutions, the second disability evaluation had not yet been used within the disability qualifications, and was the cause of the transportation cost and inconvenience. Besides, the collaboration mechanism between needs assessment assessors and case managers should be strengthened. With the assessment team, not only did members receive insufficient training, but there was also a lack of participation on the part of persons with disabilities. Based on the above, several suggestions were recommended for future practice.
期刊論文
1.Schuntermann, M. F.(2005)。The implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in Germany: Experiences and problems。International Journal of Rehabilitation Research,28(2),93-102。  new window
2.林惠芳(20100600)。從國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統的引進談我國智能挑戰者福利服務未來的變革。社區發展季刊,130,252-258。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林萬億、吳慧菁、林珍珍(20111200)。國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統(ICF)與我國身心障礙者權益保障。社區發展季刊,136,278-295。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林義盛、曹愛蘭、鄭潔虹(20131200)。現實與掙扎:從社會福利組織觀點談臺南市ICF制度之實踐經驗。社區發展季刊,144,374-387。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王國羽、嚴嘉楓(20111200)。國際健康功能與障礙分類(ICF)系統專業團隊評估模式應用:分類一致性探討。身心障礙研究,9(4),207-227。  延伸查詢new window
6.周宇翔、李淑貞、何季蓉、張聿淳、劉旻宜(20131200)。從理念到落實--ICF在臺灣的實踐經驗:以身心障礙者福利與服務需求評估訪談表為例。身心障礙研究,11(4),249-261。  延伸查詢new window
7.許慧芬、江秀珠、徐菁寧、陳天文、黃茂雄(20140600)。運用醫品圈手法進行新制身心障礙鑑定服務之改善。安泰醫護雜誌,20(1),27-41。  延伸查詢new window
8.Allan, C. M.、Campbell, W. N.、Guptill, C. A.、Stephenson, F. F.、Campbell, K. E.(2006)。A conceptual model for interprofessional education: the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)。Journal of Interprofessional Care,20(3),235-245。  new window
9.Hare, Isadora(2004)。Defining social work for the 21st century: The international federation of social workers' revised definition of social work。International Social Work,47(3),407-424。  new window
10.Pope, C.、Ziebland, S.、Mays, N.(2000)。Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data。British Medical Journal,320(7227),114-116。  new window
11.Bickenbach, J. E.、Chatterji, S.、Badley, E. M.、Üstün, T. B.(1999)。Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps。Social Science & Medicine,48(9),1173-1187。  new window
12.Hurst, R.(2003)。The International Disability Rights Movement and the ICF。Disability and Rehabilitation,25(11/12),572-576。  new window
13.邱大昕(20111200)。誰是身心障礙者:從身心障礙鑑定的演變看「國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統」(ICF)的實施。社會政策與社會工作學刊,15(2),187-213。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.張恆豪、顏詩耕(20110300)。從慈善邁向權利:臺灣身心障礙福利的發展與挑戰。社區發展季刊,133,402-416。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.劉宜君、陳啟清(20130600)。國民年金政策執行之研究--福利治理的觀點。臺灣社會福利學刊,11(1),69-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.林金定、嚴嘉楓、羅慶徽(20090300)。推動以ICF為基礎的身心障礙者鑑定標準之困境與建議。身心障礙研究,7(1),1-18。  延伸查詢new window
17.Schneidert, M.、Hurst, R.、Miller, J.、Üstün, T. B.(2003)。The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning , Disability and Health (ICF)。Disability and Rehabilitation,25(11/12),588-595。  new window
18.劉家勇(20151000)。社區獨居老人社會照顧模式之研究:以臺灣及日本在宅服務方案為例。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,5(2),47-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.周宇翔、李淑貞、謝東儒、張聿淳(20150600)。ICF架構下的身心障礙者需求評估制度現況與挑戰。社區發展季刊,150,40-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.周宇翔、李淑貞、謝東儒、陳政智、張聿淳(20150600)。從服務使用者觀點探討身心障礙者鑑定與需求評估制度流程之研究。身心障礙研究,13(2),86-106。  延伸查詢new window
21.嚴嘉楓、廖華芳、紀彣宙、劉燦宏(20150600)。活動參與功能評估對臺灣身心障礙者鑑定系統之意義與衝擊。社區發展季刊,150,99-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.陳政智、許庭涵(20110100)。迎接ICF的新時代:ICF的推動對障礙兒童及少年福利與服務的影響。兒童及少年福利期刊,18,11-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳政智、許庭涵(2015)。身心障礙鑑評新制的下一哩路:談運用個案管理銜接後續服務之規劃。社區發展季刊,150,154-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Glendinning, C.(2008)。Increasing choice and control for older and disabled people: a critical review of new developments in England。Social Policy and Administration,42(5),451-469。  new window
25.Griffo, Giampiero、Leonardi, Matilde、Martinuzzi, Andrea、Francescutti, Carlo、Raggi, Alberto、Kosic, Vladimir、Barbieri, Pietro Vittorio(2009)。Moving towards ICF use for monitoring the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: The Italian experience。Disability and Rehabilitation,31(s1),S74-S77。  new window
26.張光華、林靖瑛、王淑真、劉燦宏、賴甫誌、陳適卿、邱弘毅(20150600)。新制身心障礙鑑定制度實施後,身心障礙者的看法與期許。社區發展季刊,150,111-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.王國羽(20080900)。聯合國身心障礙者權利公約對我國的啟示。社區發展季刊,123,106-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.謝東儒、張嘉玲、黃珉蓉(20050300)。殘障聯盟發展史。社區發展季刊,109,300-309。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.王文娟(20110600)。智能障礙者雙老家庭壓力負荷之初探。身心障礙研究,9(2),96-110。  延伸查詢new window
30.Engel, George L.(1977)。The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine。Science,196(4286),129-136。  new window
31.廖華芳、嚴嘉楓、黃靄雯、劉燦宏、紀彣宙(20150600)。身心障礙鑑定功能量表之發展與應用。社區發展季刊,150,77-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.廖華芳、嚴嘉楓、黃靄雯、劉燦宏、張本聖、吳亭芳、呂淑貞、紀彣宙、張光華(2013)。身心障礙鑑定功能量表之運用。臺灣醫學,17(3),317-331。  延伸查詢new window
33.Mégret, Frederic(2008)。The disabilities convention: Human rights of persons with disabilities or disability rights?。Human Rights Quarterly,30(2),494-516。  new window
會議論文
1.周月清、朱貽莊(2011)。檢視台灣身心障礙福利政策與法案之歷史進程與變革。2011年兩岸社會福利學術研討會:社會福利模式--從傳承到創新研討會。北京:中國社會科學院社會政法學部。  延伸查詢new window
2.衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2016)。身心障礙福利與服務需求評估新制執行報告。第六次ICF學術研討暨論文發表大會。台北:臺北醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.衛生福利部統計處(2015)。身心障礙者人數。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳輝明(2014)。身心障礙者專用停車位實施現況與相關問題之研究(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃源協(2013)。社會工作管理。臺北市:雙葉書廊。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Krueger, Richard A.、Casey, Mary Anne(2009)。Focus group: a practical guide for applied research。Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications, Inc.。  new window
3.World Health Organization(1980)。International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps。Geneva:WHO。  new window
4.Kanter, Arlene S.(2015)。The Development of Disability Rights Under International Law: From Charity to Human Rights。New York:Routledge。  new window
5.Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation(1976)。Fundamental Principles of Disability。London:Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS)。  new window
6.陳伶珠(2015)。長期照顧保險:韓國模式論析。臺北市:華騰文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Fitzpatrick, Tony(2011)。Welfare Theory: an introduction to the theoretical debates in social policy。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
8.Oliver, Michael(1996)。Understanding disability:from theory to practice。Macmillan Press。  new window
9.Summers, Nancy(2006)。Fundamentals of case management practice: Skills for the human services。Australia Thomson Brooks/Cole。  new window
10.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Shakespeare, Tom W.(2006)。Disability Rights and Wrongs。Routledge。  new window
12.林萬億(2012)。臺灣的社會福利:歷史與制度的分析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.World Health Organization(2001)。International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)。World Health Organization。  new window
14.Barnes, Colin、Mercer, Geof(2010)。Exploring disability: a sociological introduction。Polity Press。  new window
15.Drake, Robert F.(1999)。Understanding Disability Policies。Macmillan Press Ltd.。  new window
其他
1.日本厚生勞動省(2014)。市町村審查委員指南手冊,http://www.pref.miyagi.jp/soshiki/syoufuku/sienkubun2.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.林萬億(2006)。身心障礙者保護法大變革,http://internationalnewsstation.tw/ct.asp?xItem=30274&ctNode=4620。  延伸查詢new window
3.衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2012)。身心障礙鑑定與需求評估流程,http://dpws.sfaa.gov.tw/commonch/home.jsp?menudata=null&contlink=ap/idfbook_view.jsp&dataserno=201212280004&mserno=200805260011&serno=200805260018。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lang, Raymond(2001)。The Development and Ctrtique of the Social Model of Disability,http://www.ucl.ac.uk/lc-ccr/lccstaff/raymond-lang/DEVELOPMMENT_AND_CRITIQUE_OF_THE_SOCIAL_MODEL_OF_D.pdf.。  new window
圖書論文
1.王國羽(20120000)。世界衛生組織分類系統與障礙測量議題。障礙研究:理論與政策應用。巨流圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林萬億(2014)。了解身心障礙者:概念與觀點。臺灣身心障礙者權益與福利。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.周月清(2002)。身心障礙福利服務。社會工作與台灣社會。台北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.林萬億(2014)。身心障礙者的服務輸送模式。臺灣身心障礙者權益與福利。台北市:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
5.Barnes, Colin(2012)。Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future。Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies。Routledge。  new window
6.Cameron, Colin(2014)。The Medical Model。Disability studies: a student's guide。Los Angeles:SAGE。  new window
7.Cameron, Colin(2014)。The social Model。Disability studies: a student's guide。Los Angeles:SAGE。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE