:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Culture and Corruption: The Blurring Effect of Confucian Relationalism on Legal Boundaries
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:余一鳴蔡季安顏志龍 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Yi-mingTsai, Chi-anYen, Chih-long
出版日期:2019
卷期:69
頁次:頁85-118
主題關鍵詞:華人關係主義社會交換差序格局關係自己人陌生人Confucian relationalismSocial exchangeDifferential matricesGuanxiZiji renMosheng ren
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:242
  • 點閱點閱:3
本研究主要探討文化對貪腐的影響。研究採用深度訪談的方式,蒐集19位軍人的訪談資料進行分析,以瞭解華人關係主義對公務員在法規界線的認知影響。研究結果發現,華人關係主義的確會對法規界線產生模糊效果,在法令規定清楚,沒有太多的自由裁量空間時,面對陌生人會公事公辦,而面對自己人則要設法協助解決。在法令規範不清楚時,官員有較大的裁量空間時,面對陌生人,會藉由公共資源來建立自己的關係;而面對自己人則會透過公資源來鞏固原有關係。官員在法令規範清楚,沒有自由裁量空間時,透過違法動用資源來滿足自己人的需求,通常會以幫助自己人解決問題也是在為公家解決問題,等合理化手段來化解認知失調(cognitive dissonance)所造成的心理壓力,透過合理化的手段也讓官員跨越法規界線幫助自己人變得更為容易。
This study drew a sample from Taiwan's military to investigate the effects of culture on corruption. In-depth interview data were collected from 19 Taiwanese military personnel and analyzed to examine the cognitive effects of Confucian relationalism on legal boundaries. The results of this study indicated that Confucian relationalism has a blurring effect on legal boundaries. When laws and regulations are clear, there is not much discretionary leeway and civil servants do not let private affairs interfere with their public duty when dealing with strangers while they must devise solutions to help inner circle friends and associates. When legal norms are not clear, civil servants have relatively more discretion; they might use public resources to establish relations when dealing with strangers or to strengthen existing relations when dealing with those in their inner circles. Under clear legal norms and the absence of discretionary leeway, civil servants who illegally utilize resources to satisfy their own needs normally use rationalization to resolve cognitive dissonance in order to help themselves and perform their public sector duties. Rationalization allows civil servants to step across legal boundaries, making it easier to help those in their inner circles.
期刊論文
1.Taormina, R. J.、Gao, J. H.(2010)。A research model for guanxi behavior: Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking。Social Science Research,39(6),1195-1212。  new window
2.Husted, B. W.(1999)。Wealth, culture, and corruption。Journal of International Business Studies,30(2),339-359。  new window
3.Jacobs, J. Bruce(1979)。A Preliminary Model of Particularistic Ties in Chinese Political Alliances: Kan-Ch'ing and Kuan-Hsi in a Rural Taiwanese Township。The China Quarterly,78(1),237-273。  new window
4.Chan, R. Y. K.、Cheng, L. T. W.、Szeto, R. W. F.(2002)。The dynamics of guanxi and ethics for Chinese executives。Journal of Business Ethics,41(4),327-336。  new window
5.Herzfeld, Thomas、Weiss, Christoph(2003)。Corruption and legal (in) effectiveness: an empirical investigation。European Journal of Political Economy,19(3),621-632。  new window
6.Li, Ling(2011)。Performing bribery in China: Guanxi-practice, corruption with a human face。Journal of Contemporary China,20(68),1-20。  new window
7.Ben-Shalom, U.(2012)。Soldiers' In-Group and Out-Group Peer Perception: Contact and Ethnic Identity。Military Psychology,24(5),473-487。  new window
8.Fisman, Raymond、Miguel, Edward(2007)。Corruption, norms, and legal enforcement: Evidence from diplomatic parking tickets。Journal of Political Economy,115(6),1020-1048。  new window
9.Haritos‐Fatouros, M.(1988)。The official torturer: A learning model for obedience to the authority of violence。Journal of Applied Social Psychology,18(13),1107-1120。  new window
10.Li, L.(2018)。The moral economy of guanxi and the market of corruption: Networks, brokers and corruption in China's courts。International Political Science Review,39(5),634-646。  new window
11.Wang, P.(2016)。Military corruption in China: the role of guanxi in the buying and selling of military positions。The China Quarterly,228,970-991。  new window
12.Zhan, J. V.(2012)。Filling the gap of formal institutions: the effects of Guanxi network on corruption in reform-era China。Crime, Law and Social Change,58(2),93-109。  new window
13.張兵、樂雲、王予紅、李永奎(2015)。B2G關係視角下的招投標腐敗研究--基於90個典型案例。公共行政評論,8(1),141-163。  延伸查詢new window
14.齊杏發(2008)。差序格局、關係網絡與政府間運行機制。武漢大學學報(哲學社會科學版),61(5),670-675。  延伸查詢new window
15.Cai, S.、Jun, M.、Yang, Z.(2010)。Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust。Journal of Operations Management,28(3),257-268。  new window
16.Glynn, M. A.、Abzug, R.(2002)。Institutional Identity : Symbolic Isomorphism and Organizational Names。The Academy of Management Journal,45(1),267-280。  new window
17.彭宏偉、張衛東(2010)。透析「差序格局」背景下的公共權力腐敗。北京行政學院學報,2010(1),81-85。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.梁式榮(2009)。儒家文化與貪腐犯罪之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Andvig, Jens C.、Fjeldstad, Odd-Helge(2001)。Corruption: A Review of Contemporary Research。Bergen:Chr. Michelsen Institute。  new window
2.Pope, J.(2000)。Confronting Corruption: The Elements of a National Integrity System。Berlin:Transparency International。  new window
3.費孝通(1947)。鄉土中國與鄉土重建。風雲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Huntington, Samuel P.(2002)。The soldier and the state: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations。New York:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Coates, C. H.、Pellegrin, R. J.(1965)。Military Sociology: A Study of American Military Life。New York:Russel Sage。  new window
6.Quah, J. S. T.(2007)。Combating corruption Singapore-style: Lessons for other Asian countries。Baltimore, MA:School of Law University of Maryland。  new window
圖書論文
1.楊宜音(2001)。「自己人」: 一項有關中國人關係分類的個案研究。中國人的人際關係、情感與信任:一個人際交往的觀點。臺北:遠流出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kobayashi, Masaya(2006)。Political Clientelism and corruption: Neo-structuralism and Republicanism。Comparing political corruption and clientelism。Ashgate Publishing。  new window
3.Schramm, Matthias、Taube, Markus(2003)。The institutional economics of legal institutions, Guanxi, and corruption in the PR China。Fighting Corruption in Asia: Causes, Effects, and Remedies。World Scientific Publishing。  new window
4.黃光國(1988)。人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。中國人的權力遊戲。台北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Banuri, S.、Eckel, C.(2012)。Experiments in Culture and Corruption: A Review。New Advances in Experimental Research on Corruption。Princeton, NJ:Emerald Group Publishing Limited。  new window
6.Johnston, M.(1997)。Public officials, private interests, and sustainable democracy: When politics and corruption meet。Corruption and the global economy。Washington:Institute for International Economics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE