:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:師資培育的創新--MOOCs補救教學師資培育課程之初探
書刊名:當代教育研究季刊
作者:洪儷瑜袁銀娟
作者(外文):Hung, Li-yuYuan, Yin-juan
出版日期:2020
卷期:28:2
頁次:頁65-67+69-106
主題關鍵詞:補救教學師資培育教師進修MOOCsRemedial instructionTeacher preparationTeacher development program
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:20
研究目的:補救教學開始走向專業化師資,教育部於100年推出師資基本資格,但近年來傳統實體研習的補救教學師資培育面臨瓶頸,補救教師師資缺口持續存在。本研究旨在透過對學習者學習背景、歷程與經驗的分析,探討以MOOCs途徑作為擴充型補救教學師資培育途徑之可行性。研究設計/方法/取徑:本研究以一門依據教育部規定之補救教學師資研習課程架構所設計的MOOCs國中階段補救教學師資培育課程為研究平台。該課程共13單元,包括教學影片、隨堂作業、議題討論、大作業、課程簡報和參考資料等6項學習項目。以第一期開課期間註冊的421名學員為研究對象,全體學員在學習平臺的學習歷程資料以及課後調查問卷回應的部分學員(N=65名)兩筆不同資料分析,綜合多元資料回應研究問題。研究發現或結論:(1)所有註冊學員約一成完成者,其他未完成課程學員依據其線上參與行為分未出席者、中輟和潛水學員等三類。根據整體參與情形發現前兩個單元是學員退出課程的最高峰,隨課程陸續上線各單元瀏覽量大體呈逐步下降趨勢。MOOCs的學習項目中以隨堂作業總體瀏覽量最高,議題討論次之;觀看過八成共同科目影片學員僅佔9.4%。(2)課後問卷調查所得學員背景以在職教師和職前教師為主,但有少量社會人士;學員註冊課程的主要動機包括對補救教學師培課程內容本身、以及對MOOCs學習方式感興趣;持續修課的主要原因有本課程能增進其對補救教學的認識和經驗,另外可能由於本課程架構符合教育部規定,期待獲得完成修課證明為持續修課的次要原因。(3)本研究綜合學員背景、滿意度和參與者在線上學習的表現等資料,支持MOOCs作為教師研習之擴充形式的可行性。回應問卷之學員普遍肯定本課程內容與形式,以及自身學習收穫;能開放研習對象包括在職教師、社會人士等多元背景,且不限時空、進度的研習方式滿足學員個別化的專業發展需求,一期完成的人數和學習表現不亞於一般實體研習,且具重複運用等優勢。研究原創性/價值:本研究將教育部規定之補救教學師資培育課程首創採MOOCs方式,試圖以MOOCs的優勢探討補充補救教學師資培育之可行性,並在首次實作經驗採多元資料獲得本土運用成效,對臺灣學習者對師資培育的線上課程提供本土的樣貌。教育政策建議或實務意涵:本研究之結果反映出臺灣對於MOOCs途徑運用在補救教學師資培育或推廣補救教學專業知能之真實結果,採用MOOCs補充不易補足的教師專業知能確實可行,本研究發現線上學習的不同類型、學習者對MOOCs線上活動的反應,所得之結果均可作為未來MOOCs運用在其他教師進修課程之參考。
Purpose: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer open courses to the public. The professional knowledge of remediation received attention when the 18-hour basic course was made a requirement for teacher preparation by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan. There is a shortage of professional development resources for remedial teachers. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of the application of MOOCs to the required Remediation Teacher Preparation program. Design/methodology/approach: "Every Student Can Succeed: Effective Remediation" was designed as an xMOOC and was opened to the public to meet the demand for professional development. Six types of learning activities were designed: video, homework, issue-discussion, project, PowerPoint slide, and reference. There were 421 students registered for the online course. Students' learning behavior data and a post-course online survey were collected from 65 participants. The data were analyzed to answer the research questions. Findings/results: 1. Approximately 10% of enrolled students completed the course requirements. Three types of participants were found on the basis of participation behavior: the no-show, drop-out, and lurker. They showed significantly different behavior online. Participation decreased as the units advanced and the most significant decrease occurred after the second unit. The "homework" was the learning activity that received the most visits, followed by "issue-discussion". 2. The survey found that the highest proportion of participants were teachers or teacher trainees. Some of the participants did not work in schools or study education but enrolled for personal interests. Most participants reported positive attitudes toward MOOCs and considered MOOCs as a potential way to provide professional development for remediation. 3. The varied backgrounds of the participants, the positive feedback from them, and the number of participants, all supported the feasibility of the MOOC for remediation teacher training. Originality/value: The application of MOOCs to remediation teacher training is in the trial stages in Taiwan. The results and suggestions of this study provide information for further consideration for online teacher development programs. Suggestions/implications: The results of this study reflect the actual outcome of the application of MOOCs in remedial instruction and teacher training in Taiwan. The study also supports the feasibility of using MOOCs to supply remedial teacher professional development which is difficult to meet the needs. The study also unveils different modes of learning and participants' responses to online learning activities. The aforementioned results provide a reference for future teacher development programs based on MOOCs.
期刊論文
1.Hew, K. F.、Cheung, W. S.(2014)。Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges。Educational Research Review,12,45-58。  new window
2.Liyanagunawardena, T. R.、Adams, A. A.、Williams, S. A.(2013)。MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012。The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,14(3),202-227。  new window
3.李孟峰、連廷嘉(20100600)。「攜手計畫--課後扶助方案」實施歷程與成效之研究。教育實踐與研究,23(1),115-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Fini, A.(2009)。The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools。The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,10(5),1-26。  new window
5.Rodriguez, C. O.(2012)。MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two Successful。European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning,15(2)。  new window
6.Koutropoulos, A.、Gallagher, M. S.、Abajian, S. C.、de Waard, I.、Hogue, R. J.、Keskin, N. Ö.、Rodgriguez, C. O.(2012)。Emotive Vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & Participant Retention。European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning,2012(1)。  new window
7.Daniel, J.(2012)。Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility。Journal of Interactive Media in Education,2012(3),(18)1-(18)20。  new window
8.Vivian, R.、Falkner, K.、Falkner, N.(2014)。Addressing the challenges of a new digital technologies curriculum: MOOCs as a scalable solution for teacher professional development。Research in Learning Technology,22,1-19。  new window
9.黃能富(2015)。磨課師(MOOCs)與師博課(SPOCs)協同授課之翻轉教學法。教育脈動,1,101-110。  延伸查詢new window
10.王金國(20161100)。補救教學之問題與建議。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(11),12-17。  延伸查詢new window
11.胡小勇、伍文臣、饒敏(2017)。面向私播課的混合學習設計與實證研究。電化教育研究,38(8),70-77。  延伸查詢new window
12.Brooks, C.、Gibson, S.(2012)。Professional learning in a digital age。Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology,38(2),1-17。  new window
13.Glass, C. R.、Shiokawa Baklan, M. S.、Saltarelli, A. J.(2016)。Who takes MOOCs?。New Directions for Institutional Research,2015(167),41-55。  new window
14.Kaplan, A. M.、Haenlein, M.(2016)。Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster。Business Horizons,59(4),441-450。  new window
15.Zutshi, S.、O'Hare, S.、Rodafinos, A.(2013)。Experiences in MOOCs: The perspective of students。American Journal of Distance Education,27(4),218-227。  new window
16.洪儷瑜(20120900)。由補救教學到三層級學習支援。教育研究月刊,221,13-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Margaryan, A.、Bianco, M.、Littlejohn, A.(2015)。Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)。Computers & Education,80,77-83。  new window
會議論文
1.Karlsson, N.、Godhe, A. L.、Bradely, L.、Lindström, B.(2014)。Professional development of teachers in a MOOC。The 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education。  new window
2.Kizilcec, R. F.、Piech, C.、Schneider, E.(2013)。Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses。  new window
3.Vigentini, L.、Zhao, C.(2016)。Evaluating the 'Student' experience in MOOCs。New York, NY:ACM Press。161-164。  new window
研究報告
1.Haggard, S.、Brown, S.、Mills, R.、Tait, A.、Warburton, S.、Lawton, W.、Angulo, T.(2013)。The maturing of the MOOC: Literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of online distance learning。London, England:UK Government。  new window
圖書
1.黃國禎、蘇俊銘、陳年興(2015)。數位學習導論與實務。博碩文化股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.甄曉蘭、洪儷瑜(2011)。國民中小學補救教學師資研習課程參考手冊。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學教育研究與評鑑中心。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2013)。迎接數位化學習時代--教育部規劃全面性的數位學習推動計畫,http://epaper.edu.tw/old/print.aspx?print_type=topical&print_sn=767&print_num=550, 。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2014)。國民小學及國民中學補救教學實施方案,教育部。,http://priori.moe.gov.tw/download/2014-2-5-10-15-30-nf1.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡文綺,甄曉蘭,洪儷瑜(2012)。中小學補救教學教師增能與支援需求初探,https://priori.moe.gov.tw/index.php?mod=rdm/index/content/forums2012。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2011)。教育部國民小學及國民中學補救教學實施方案,臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.Brown, M.(20130730)。Moving into the post-MOOC era,https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2013/7/moving-into-the-postmooc-era。  new window
6.Hill, P.(20130310)。Emerging student patterns in MOOCs: A (revised) graphical view,https://eliterate.us/emerging-student-patterns-in-moocsa-revised-graphical-view/, 。  new window
7.Kleiman, G.,Wolf, M. A.,Frye, D.(2013)。The digital learning transition MOOC for educators: Exploring a scalable approach to professional development,http://miblendonline.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/76438373/MOOC-Ed.pdf。  new window
8.Seaton, D. T.,Coleman, C. A.,Daries, J. P.,Chuang, I.(2014)。Teacher enrollment in MITx MOOCs: Are we educating educators?,http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/96661/SSRN-id2515385.pdf?sequence=1。  new window
圖書論文
1.洪儷瑜(2014)。補救教學概論。帶好每一個學生:有效的補救教學。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.Krause, S. D.(2014)。After the invasion: What's next for MOOCs。Invasion of the MOOCs。California, CA:Parlor Press。  new window
3.林弘昌(20140000)。MOOCs課程在高等教育的發展與應用。大學課程與教學的改革與創新。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE