:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「攜手計畫--課後扶助方案」實施歷程與成效之研究
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:李孟峰連廷嘉 引用關係
作者(外文):Li, Meng-fengLien, Ting-chia
出版日期:2010
卷期:23:1
頁次:頁115-143
主題關鍵詞:補救教學課後扶助學習動機攜手計畫Remedial instructionEducation support for disadvantaged childLearning motivationHand-in-Hand Project
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(17) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:309
  • 點閱點閱:292
本研究旨在探討晚近台灣推動「攜手計畫-課後扶助方案」之實施歷程與成效,研究者以台東縣一所國小作為個案研究的對象,深入瞭解其實施歷程;亦完成一至六年級之國語科及數學科能力檢測卷,兼採準實驗設計,進而評估其51位受輔學童的學習成效。所獲得之結論如下:(1) 個案學校其課後扶助之實施係以「補救教學為主,作業指導為輔」之方式,由課扶教師針對受輔學童的國語科與數學科予以加強,並積極引發其學習動機、增進其學習信心。(2) 此方案之實施,對於一、二、四、六年級受輔學童的國語科基本能力有顯著之提升;而對於二、四、六年級受輔學童的數學科基本能力亦達顯著提升之效果。整體而言,受輔學童的學習成效普遍有所成長與進步。
This study aimed to investigate the implementation process and results of the “Hand-in-Hand Project—Education Support for Disadvantaged Child” recently promoted in Taiwan. An elementary school in Taitung County was selected to explore the implementation process of this project. Chinese and Math competence test sheets for students in Grade 1~6 were also designed to assess the learning outcome of 51 pupils participating in this project based on a quasi-experiment design. Conclusions were as follows: 1. This project aimed at “providing pupils with remedial instructions while also helping them with their homework.” The teachers assisted the pupils in their learning of the Chinese and Math subjects and also endeavored to induce their learning motivation and increase their learning confidence. 2. Grade 1, 2, 4, and 6 Pupils who participated in the project had significant improvements in their Chinese language, while grade 2, 4, and 6 pupils had significant improvements in Math. Pupils who received remedial instructions under this project showed overall growth and progress in their learning outcomes.
期刊論文
1.曾柏瑜、陳淑麗(2010)。初任補救教學大專生的專業成長研究。特殊教育研究學刊,35(1),39-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Pierson, H. D.、Fu, G. S.、Lee, S.(1980)。An analysis of the relationship between language attitudes and English attainment of secondary student in Hong Kong。Language Learning,30,289-316。  new window
3.McDonnell, L. M.(2005)。No child left behind and the federal role in education: Evolution or revolution?。Peabody Journal of Education,80(2),19-38。  new window
4.Foorman, B. R.、Torgesen, J. K.(2001)。Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children。Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,16(4),203-214。  new window
5.Torgesen, J. K.(2000)。Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problems of Treatment Resisters。Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,15(1),55-64。  new window
6.陳淑麗(20080700)。二年級國語文補救教學研究--一個長時密集的介入方案。特殊教育研究學刊,33(2),25-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Foorman, B. R.、Francis, D. J.、Fletcher, J. M.、Schatschneider, C.、Mehta, P.(1998)。The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children。Journal of Educational Psychology,90(1),37-55。  new window
8.Vellutino, F. R.、Scanlon, D. M.、Sipay, E. R.、Small, S. G.、Pratt, A.、Chen, R.、Denckla, M. B.(1996)。Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of special reading disability。Journal of Educational Psychology,88(4),601-638。  new window
9.Vandell, D. L.、Su, H. C.(1999)。Child care and school-age children。Young children,54(6),62-71。  new window
10.Nieting, P. L.(1983)。School-age child care: In support of development and learning。Childhood Education,60(1),6-11。  new window
11.陳淑麗、洪儷瑜、曾世杰(20050900)。以國語補救教學診斷原住民低成就學童是否為學習障礙:轉介前介入的效度考驗研究。特殊教育研究學刊,29,127-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Torgesen, J. K.、Alexander, A. W.、Wagner, R. K.、Rashotte, C. A.、Voeller, K. K.、Conway, T.(2001)。Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches。Journal of Learning Disabilities,34(1),33-58。  new window
13.黃俊傑(20090500)。「攜手計畫課後扶助」執行成效之評析與建議。學校行政,61,196-211。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐諶(19961100)。「雙頭馬車」如何行?--為活潑、多元的托育制度請命。師友月刊,353,6-10。  延伸查詢new window
15.Pintrich, Paul R.、De Groot, Elisabeth V.(1990)。Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),33-40。  new window
16.陳明印(20020200)。美國2001年初等級中等教育修正法案之分析。教育研究資訊,10(1),205-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.莊耀嘉、黃光國(19811200)。國中學生的成敗歸因與無助感特徵。中華心理學刊,23(2),155-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.林進山(1995)。從課後活動班談開放教育的實施。北縣教育,10,50-54。  延伸查詢new window
19.黃俊傑(2009)。「攜手計畫課後扶助」執行成效之評析與建議。學校行政,61,196-211。  延伸查詢new window
20.Hall, A. H.,、Niemeyer, J. A.(2000)。Inclusion of children with special needs in school-aged child care programs。Early Childhood Education Journal,27(3),185-190。  new window
21.McDermott, A.,、Jensen, S.(2005)。Dubious sovereignty: Federal conditions of aid and the no child left behind act。Peabody Journal of Education,80(2),39-56。  new window
22.林進山(1995)。從課後活動班談開放教育的實施。北縣教育,10,50-54。  延伸查詢new window
23.Hall, A. H.、Niemeyer, J. A.(2000)。Inclusion of children with special needs in school-aged child care programs。Early Childhood Education Journal,27(3),185-190。  new window
24.McDermott, A.、Jensen, S.(2005)。Dubious sovereignty: Federal conditions of aid and the no child left behind act。Peabody Journal of Education,80(2),39-56。  new window
會議論文
1.謝宜庭、魏俊華、李孟峰(2009)。台東縣國民小學「攜手計畫-課後扶助方案」實施現況、需求與滿意度之調查研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝宜庭、魏俊華、李孟峰(2009)。台東縣國民小學「攜手計畫--課後扶助方案」實施現況、需求與滿意度之調查研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2008)。教育部補助辦理攜手計畫課後扶助要點成果報告。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林素珍(2009)。苗栗縣國民小學攜手計畫課後扶助實施現況與發展策略之研究,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
2.李冠萩(2007)。台東縣國小學生常見行為之有效賞罰策略研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡季誠(2009)。大專學生志工參與攜手計畫之經驗探究(碩士論文)。亞洲大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳苓瑜(2009)。教育部「攜手計畫-課後扶助」執行現況與成效之研究-以苗栗縣天恩國小為例(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾昱螢(2009)。國民小學實施「攜手計畫-課後扶助」之研究-以中南部某縣市為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.莊珮瑋(2001)。台中市單親家長對其國小子女課後照顧安排之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.王尤秋(2009)。攜手計畫課後扶助政策實施成效之研究--教育機會均等的觀點(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.熊正蕙(2009)。攜手計畫課後扶助政策執行現況與影響因素之研究--以臺北縣為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃鈺雯(2004)。嘉義地區國小高年級教師教學態度、師生互動與學生學習動機之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。  延伸查詢new window
10.謝建國(2001)。國小實習教師國語科學科教學知識之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,台北。  延伸查詢new window
11.王福林(1990)。新制師院學生與師專學生家庭社經地位及其學習行為、學業成就之調查分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳淑珠(1998)。國小學童自我概念、數學學習動機與數學成就的關係(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
13.曾勝任(2009)。攜手計畫實施現況之研究--以臺中市國民小學為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.余民寧(1987)。考試焦慮、成就動機、學習習慣與學業成績之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.單文經(1991)。美國教育研究-師資培育及課程與教學。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Peterson, P. E.,、West, M. R.(2003)。No child left behind?。Washington, D.C:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
3.Hess, Frederick M.、Petrilli, Michael J.(2006)。No Child Left Behind Primer。NY:Peter Lang Publishing。  new window
4.王文科(1994)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:師大書苑有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃政傑、張芬芬、蔡敏玲、黃瑞琴、孫敏芝、熊召弟、陳添球、方德隆、劉蔚之、曾惠敏、王錦珍(1996)。質的教育研究:方法與實例。台北:漢文。  延伸查詢new window
6.李新民(2001)。課後托育理論與實務。高雄市:麗文文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃毅志(2002)。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識:台灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。台北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Krashen, S. D.(1982)。Principles and practices in second language learning。NY:Pergamon。  new window
9.徐貞美(1986)。Attitude, Motivation and Achievement in EFL: A Case Study of Chinese Junior High School Students。Taipei:The Crane Publishing Co.。  new window
其他
1.台東縣政府教育處(2006)。95 年度全國國中學力測驗統計報告,台東。  延伸查詢new window
2.台東縣政府教育處(2006)。95年度全國國中學力測驗統計報告,台東。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2007)。周延弱勢學生助學措施,http://cna.com.tw/top10/20070801cap0158.html, 20070801。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2003)。國民小學辦理兒童課後照顧服務及人員資格標準,http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/SECRETARY/EDU0835001/92publicnews/9209/11.htm, 20061230。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(2006)。「攜手計畫--課後扶助方案」補助要點,http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/EJE/EDU8777001/96hand/01.doc, 20070127。  延伸查詢new window
6.教育部(2006)。「攜手計畫--課後扶助方案」開始,http://epaper.edu.tw/news/950227/950227c.htm, 20070128。  延伸查詢new window
7.教育部(2007)。給孩子一個希望--「攜手計畫--課後扶助方案」說明,http://epaper.edu.tw/news/960213/960213c.htm, 20070718。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳麗珠(2007)。解析「攜手計畫--課後扶助方案」之政策與補救教學歷程,http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/EJE/EDU8777001/, 20070127。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE