:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:An Examination of Adult Literacy Education in Taiwan Based on an Analysis of the Meaning of Literacy and Literacy Education Related Issues
書刊名:高雄師大學報
作者:何青蓉 引用關係
出版日期:1995
卷期:6
頁次:頁45-68
主題關鍵詞:成人識字識字教育
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:105
  • 點閱點閱:33
     本文目的在解析識字內涵及成人識字教育有關議題,進而省視我國成人 識字教育。文中就認知、歷史、及批判社曾文化角度解析識字和其相關詞彙的意 義與歷史背景,及識字、學校化與識字教育的關係。凹明識字本質上是多向度直 接或間接地使用印刷及書寫訊息的能力,以完成個人在社會的功能、達成個人的 目標、及發展個人的知識與潛能。識字與否的認定端視個人目標與其所在社會任 務之是否達成。「功能性識字」定義本身無助於識字功能定位。能力本位教育盛 行後,功能性識字被功能性能力取代。「識字」一詞廣泛地被引申於不同畫寫的 傳統,反映的是在各該範悅完成其任務所須的能力或知識。識字原本不等於學校 教育。但隨著學校專業化及普遍性識字教育結果,識字成為學校學習的基本元 素。學校成為個人進入技術化社會的一個先決的合法化勢力。識字成為一種自環 境脈絡中抽離的知識。教育不是價值中立的,成人識字教育亦然。睽諸歷史,不 幸地不識字曾被標記為缺乏能力者,妨礙國家經濟發展者。識字的目的除在完成 個人所處社會功能外,並在達成個人目標、發展個人的知識與潛能。因此,個人 識字過程中應為知的主體,能以批判方式看待其文化,並能經由反省而對其世界 產生作用。成人識字教育應該零向學習者意識的光醒,印幫助學習者具有反省、 批判及行動的能力。 成人識字教育的實施涉及三個相互關聯的思考向度:語言、個人、及社會文化。 就語言層面而言,台灣成人識字教育面臨的是多語言併存的背景。就個人層面而 言,台灣成人識字教育潛在對象包括四類;五十歲以下曾受部分國民教育但中途 輟學者、五十歲以上因國家變動未曾受國民教育者、識字不多想進一步接受教育 者、及外藉勞工。成人識字教育的規剖自應各就其特性分別擬定。就社會文化層 面而言,台灣成人識字教育面臨的課題包括:國民補習教育制度重新定位與規 劃、相對性識字觀念的闡揚、終生學習理念的導進、及整體成人(識字)教育體制 的建立。整體而言,我們所缺乏的是幫助個人適應社會生活及賦予個人力量的成 人識字教育,如何強化識字的這兩項功能應是我國未來成人識字教育的最大挑 戰。
     This article is to analyze the meaning of literacy and literacyeducation related issues in general and then reflect on adult literacyeducation in Taiwan. Literacy and its related issues were reviewed fromthe following three perspectives: cognitive, historical, and critical-social-cultural ones. Specifically, the meaning of literacy was reviewed in itsoriginal historical and social context and the relationships amongliteracy, schooling, and literacy education were discussed. The secondpurpose is to examine literacy education in Taiwan via threeinterrelated dimensions: linguistics, individual, and society. From amacro viewpoint, this article criticizes adult literacy education inTaiwan in the following aspects: language context, populationcharacteristics, education system, and popular views of literacy.Finally, it is suggested that adult literacy education in Taiwanemphasize the function of adjustment and empowerment. The design ofadult literacy education should start from a multiple, integrated lifelonglearning point of view. Only by this, will culture have a chance tomove toward a more creative level.
期刊論文
1.Scribner, S.(1984)。Literacy in three metaphors。American Journal of Education,93,6-21。  new window
2.Cervero, R. M.(1985)。Is a common definition of adult literacy possible?。Adult Education Quarterly,36(1),50-54。  new window
3.Fingeret, A.(1983)。Social network: A new perspective on independence and illiterate adult learners。Adult Education Quarterly,33(3),133-146。  new window
4.Freire, P.(1970)。The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom。Harvard Educational Review,40(2),205-225。  new window
5.Hunter, C. St. J.(1987)。Literacy: What do the definitions tell us?。Convergence,20(3/4),23-26。  new window
6.莫慧如(19890900)。由英、美成人基本教育方式與目的看我國國民補習教育之發展。社教雙月刊,33,58-61。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Hsue, L. C.(1994)。高雄市成人基本教育研習班教材實施現況與回應。Teaching materials and methods of adult basic educational programs conference。Kaohsiung:Adult Education Research Center, National Kaohsiung Normal University。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Campbell, A.、Kirsch, I.、Kolstad, A.(1992)。Assessing literacy: The framework for the National Adult Literacy Survey。Educational Testing Service and Westat, Inc.。  new window
2.Fingeret, A.(1984)。Adult literacy education: Current and future directions。Columbus, Ohio:ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education。  new window
3.Fingeret, A.(1992)。Adult literacy education: Current and future directions。Columbus, Ohio:ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education。  new window
4.何進財(1993)。落實地方教育建設,加強辦理國民小學補習學校及成人基本教育研習班,以厚植國力。臺北:教育部社教司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hunter, C. St. J.、Harman, D.(1979)。Adult illiteracy in the United States: A report to the Ford Foundation。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.Imel, S.、Grieve, S.(1985)。Adult literacy education: Overview。Columbus, Ohio:ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education。  new window
7.Levine, K.(1986)。The social context of literacy。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
8.Merriam, S. B.、Caffarella, R. S.(1991)。Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide。Jossey-Bass。  new window
9.黃富順(1989)。成人心理與學習。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Freire, P.、Macedo, D.(1987)。Literacy: Reading the word and the world。Bergin & Garvey。  new window
其他
1.Wu, C. C.(1993)。我國國民補習教育實施狀況調查研究摘要,Taipei:Social Educational Department, Ministry of Education。  延伸查詢new window
2.Huan, F. S.(1993)。我國成人識字教育之研究摘要,Taipei:Social educational Department, Ministry of Education。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Fingeret, A.(1989)。The social and historical context of participatory literacy education。Participatory literacy education。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Thomas, A.(1989)。Definitions and evolution of the concepts。Adult literacy-perspectives。Toronto, Ontario:Culture Concepts Inc.。  new window
3.Cook-Gumperz, J.(1986)。Introduction: The social construction of literacy。The social construction of literacy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Cook-Gumperz, J.(1986)。Literacy and schooling: An unchanging equation?。The social construction of literacy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Draper, J. A.(1991)。A selected chronology of literacy events。Adult literacy perspectives。Toronto, Ontario:Culture Concepts Inc.。  new window
6.Gardner, H.(1986)。The development of symbolic literacy。Toward a new understanding of literacy。New York:Praeger。  new window
7.Lankshear, C.(1993)。Functional literacy from a Freirean point of view。Paulo Freire: A critical encounter。London:New York:Routledge。  new window
8.Nickerson, R. S.(1986)。Literacy and cognitive development。Toward a new understanding of literacy。New York:Praeger。  new window
9.Ryan, J. W.(1989)。Literacy and numeracy policies。Lifelong education for adults: An international handbook。Oxford:Pergamon Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE