:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:企業組織親信角色之實證研究
書刊名:管理評論
作者:戚樹誠 引用關係
作者(外文):Chi, Shu-cheng
出版日期:1996
卷期:15:1
頁次:頁37-59
主題關鍵詞:親信角色領導行為員工知覺親信關係Confidant rolesLeadership behaviorEmployee perceptionsConfidant relationships
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:206
  • 點閱點閱:68
親信現象在歷史上一直是個令人注目的課題,現代企業組織中,親信角色依然存在。本研究實證探討台灣企業員工對於親信角色的知覺以及親信角色主管領導行為之關聯性。由於研究主題較為敏感,研究者採取便利取樣的方式,共回收137份有效問卷。資料顯示,主管大多選用相差10歲以下的部屬作為親信,至於年齡、性別、服務年資對員工知覺的影響並不明顯。企業員工知覺到的親信角色依分數高低排列:諮詢者最高、公關使次之、資源掌控者再次之,情報密使及黑白臉則最低。另外,企業員工對主管及親信的知覺與親信角色之間呈部份關聯性。主管的領導行為與親信角色間亦呈部份關聯性。研究者由研究結果歸納出領導行為與親信角色之連鎖模型,並討論其管理意涵。
Confidant phenomenon has been a fascinating topic in history. The roles of confidants still exist in modem business organizations. This study examines the perceptions of confidant roles by corporate employees in Taiwan and the relationships between confidant roles and superiors' leadership behaviors. Owing to the sensitivity of the underlying subject, the researcher used a convenient sampling technique. One hundred and thirty-seven effective questionnaires were received in total. Data shows that superiors choose confidants with a 10-year age-gap mostly. The effects of age, gender, and tenure on employee perceptions are not significant. The perceptions of confidant roles in rank order are as follows: decision advisor, public relations agent, resource controller, and, lastly, information spy and black/white face. Also, there exist partial relationships between employees' perceptions on superiors and confidant roles. Similarly, there exist partial relationships between employees' perceptions on confidants and confidant roles. Partial relationships between superiors' leadership behaviors and confidant roles also exist. Finally, the researcher suggests an Interlock Model of Leadership Behavior and Confidant Roles and discusses its managerial implications.
期刊論文
1.Wood, R. E.(1986)。Task Complexity: Definition of the Construct。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,37(1),60-82。  new window
2.Fleishman, E. A.(1953)。The description of supervisory behavior。Journal of Applied Psychology,37(1),1-6。  new window
3.Buchanan, P. C.(1974)。Organizational Commitment。Journal of Alienation and Commitment,88-89。  new window
4.Pettigrew, A. M.(1972)。Information Control as a Power Resource。Sociology,6(2),187-204。  new window
5.Salancik, G. R.、Pfeffer, J.、Kelly, J. P.(1978)。A Contingency Model of Influence in Organizational Decision-Making。Pacific Sociological Review,21(2),239-253。  new window
6.戚樹誠、林行宜(19940700)。企業高階主管親信關係之研究。管理科學學報,11(2),281-312。  延伸查詢new window
7.Yukl, G.、Falbe, C. M.(1990)。Influence tactics in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts。Journal of Applied Psychology,75(2),132-140。  new window
8.Sternberg, Robert J.(1986)。A Triangular Theory of Love。Psychological Review,93(2),119-135。  new window
9.Dansereau, Fred Jr.、Graen, George B.、Haga, William J.(1975)。A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,13(1),46-78。  new window
會議論文
1.劉兆明(1992)。「報」的概念分析及其在組織研究上的意義。中國人的心理與行為科際學術研討會。中央研究民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chi, S.(1994)。The Role of Confidants of Top Managers in Chinese Organizations。The Association of Management 12th Annual International Conference,(會議日期: 12-2, 1994),160-165。  new window
學位論文
1.杜仲傑(1990)。大學生人際親密的評量與身心適應--親子、情人、異性朋友、同性朋友四種角色的相關分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.危芷芬(1991)。關係取向、交往原則與道德判斷的文化比較研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙梅如(1989)。國中學生教師信任感與生活適應、學業成就關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lapan, S. D.(1976)。The Development and Validation of an Instrument that Measures Student Perceptions of Teacher Credibility(博士論文)。  new window
圖書
1.Mintzberg, H.(1973)。The nature of managerial work。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
2.費孝通(1947)。鄉土中國。香港:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Weber, Max、Henderson, A. M.、Parsons, Talcott(1947)。The theory of Social and Economic Organizations。Free Press。  new window
4.堺屋太一、呂美女、吳國禎(1993)。組織的盛衰。PHP Institute, Inc.。  延伸查詢new window
5.嚴家其(1987)。首腦論。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mill, C. R.(1980)。Activities for Trainers: 50 Useful Designs。San Diego, California:University Associates, Inc.。  new window
7.山本七平、周君銓(1983)。帝王學。日本經濟新聞社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hellriegel, D.、Slocum, O. W. Jr.(1992)。Management。Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
9.Myers, I. B.、McCaulley, M. H.(1985)。Manual: A Guide to the Development and the Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator。Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
10.Smith, P. C.、Kendall, L. M.、Hulin, C. L.(1969)。The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement。Rand McNally。  new window
11.Hofstede, Geert H.(1980)。Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values。Beverly Hills, California:Sage。  new window
12.Stogdill, Ralph Melvin(1974)。Handbook of leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research。New York, NY:Free Press。  new window
13.Yukl, Gary A.(1994)。Leadership in Organizations。Prentice-Hall。  new window
14.Maslow, Abraham H.(1954)。Motivation and Personality。Harper & Row。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳其南(1990)。中國人的家族與企業經營。中國人:觀念與行為。台北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃光國(1990)。人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。現代化與中國化論集。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Graen, G. B.、Cashman, J. F.(1975)。A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach。Leadership Frontiers。Kent State University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE