:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建構主義的教學評析
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:林生傳
作者(外文):Lin, Sheng-chuan
出版日期:1998
卷期:1:3
頁次:頁1-13+133
主題關鍵詞:建構主義建構教學知識論與教學創新教學建構觀ConstructivismConstructivist teachingEpistemology and teachingAlternative teachingConstructivist perspective
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(30) 博士論文(25) 專書(1) 專書論文(5)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:30
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:93
     在各方亟待教育改革的現階段,建構教學成為部份人士創新教學的唯一,而未加 客觀審慎明辨其長短。本文先溯建構主義之源由,辨析建構主義知識論與認知論,據以 評析建構教學的理念及其限制,並探討應如何運用為宜。建構主義強調知識的主觀性,認知 的主動性,於教育實際的應用,宜視為一種觀點而兼顧各種不同的模式,體會其對學生認知 主體性的意涵,用以活潑化教學情境,調適班級師生關係,重視教學過程,鼓勵學生構思發 表評論與討論,而不以被動學習為事,更不以吸收現成知識為已足。
     Constructivist teaching has been taken as a fashionable teaching in educational sector, sepecially in science teaching, without considering carefully the prototype theory of constructivist teaching which is genuinelly based on constructivism, a particular epistemology, and its inherent dilemma and limits. This paper attempts to examine this theory of knowing and its implications in teaching objectively and critically. Upon the conclusions, it was proposed that constructivist teaching should be taken as a promising one rather than an almighty one, among alternative perspectives of teaching theory, and be used appropriately to take advantage of its strength and avoid its weakness. This is to say, it can be used wisely for emphasizing the learner as an active role and encouraging him/her to participate more enthusiastically; adapting curriculum and instruction to individual differences; adjusting the teacher as a facilitator, a supporter, and a manager role rather than as a lecturer; harmonizing the relationships in a class as a social system; and focusing on teaching and learning process.
期刊論文
1.Anderson, R. C.(1984)。Some reflections on the acquisition of knowledge。Educational Researcher,13(9),5-10。  new window
2.Law, L. C.、Wong, K. M.(1996)。Implications and problems of construtivism for instrutctional design。Education Journal,23(2),73-103。  new window
圖書
1.Johnson-Laird, P. N.(1983)。Mental model。Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Schank, R. C.、Abelson, A.(1977)。Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. An inquiry into human knowledge structure。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Steffe, Leslie P.、Gale, Jerry E.(1995)。Constructivism in education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995)。A constructivist approach to teaching。Constructivism in Education。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Driver, R.(1995)。Constructivist approaches to science teaching。Constructivism in education。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Duit, R.(1995)。The constructivist view: A fashionable and fruitful paradigm for science education research and practice。Constructivism in education。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Gergen, K. J.(1995)。Social construction and the education process。Constructivism in education。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Saxe, G. B.(1995)。From the field to the classroom: Studies in mathematical understanding。Constructivism in education。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Spivey, N. N.(1995)。Written discourse: A constructivist perspective。Constructivism in Education。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
7.von Glaserfeld, E.(1990)。An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical。Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
8.Wood, T.(1995)。From alternative epistemologies to practice in education: rethinking what means to teach and learn。Constructivism in education。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
9.von Foerster, H.(1984)。On constructing a reality。The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know?。London:New York:Norton。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE