:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:九年一貫綜合活動領域實施概念構圖教學之成效研究
書刊名:家政教育學報
作者:陳惠娟洪久賢 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Hui-chunHong, Jeou-shyan
出版日期:2005
卷期:7
頁次:頁1-29
主題關鍵詞:九年一貫綜合活動教學概念構圖Grade 1-9 curriculumIntegrated activityTeachingInstructionConcept-mapping
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:309
  • 點閱點閱:34
綜合活動領域以「活動」進行教學,期能提供反思訊息、擴展學習經驗、推動整體關聯、鼓勵多元自主,以達生活實踐、體驗意義、個別發展、學習統整之目標。為了活動課程能促進有意義的學習,本研究發展綜合活動概念構圖教學方案,並採實驗教學驗證其成效。 本研究以七年級學生為對象,安排兩班實驗組(閱讀概念圖組,34人、繪製概念圖組,35人)與一班對照組(一般教學策略組,34人),進行八個單元的實驗教學。研究結果:繪製概念圖組有較佳的綜合活動學業成就;學生的認知結構因繪製概念圖策略而有顯著差異;學生對概念構圖策略持正向的知覺滿意度。然在問題解決方面,實驗組與對照組未有顯著差異。文末提出建議,以供日後綜合活動教學之參考。
Teachers are expected to teach by applying activities in integrated activity curriculum in order to provide reflective information, expand learning experiences, motivate whole connections, and to encourage students to be independent. Thus students will be able to approach the goals of practicing, experiencing, developing, and overall- learning. For promoting meaningful learning, the purposes of this study were to develop the program of applying concept-mapping instruction in integrated activity curriculum at junior high school level, and the results is displayed within an experiment conducted over eight units to evaluate the effects of this program. The 103 subjects of this study were the 7th grade students of a high school who were sampled and divided into three groups. There were two experimental groups that were concept map reading group (34 students) and concept-mapping construction group (35 students); the other was the control group (34 students). The major findings were as followings: (1)The concept-mapping construction group obtained higher scores than the control group in integrated activity curriculum learning units achievement test. (2)Cognitive structures of the concept-mapping construction group students were changed due to the concept-mapping instructive strategies. (3)Students of experimental groups demonstrated the positive reaction to concept-mapping instruction. But there was no significant difference between experimental groups and control group in problem solving abilities. The result would be suggestive for the reference of future teaching strategies.
期刊論文
1.Noh, T.、Scharmann, L. C.(1997)。Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(2),199-217。  new window
2.吳武典、蔡崇建(19860600)。國中資優學生的認知方式與學習方式之探討。特殊教育研究學刊,2,219-230。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Berkowitz, S. J.(1986)。Effects of instruction in text-organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading。Reading Research Quarterly,21,161-178。  new window
4.黃譯瑩(20010300)。從系統理論觀點探究活動課程與九年一貫綜合活動課程:本質、原理與展望。應用心理研究,9,215-251。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃萬居(19920600)。師範學院學生的概念構圖和化學成就、科學過程技能、邏輯思考能力和性別相關之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,23,345-356。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lambiotte, J. G.、Dansereau, D. F.、Cross, D. R.、Reynolds, S. B.(1989)。Multirelational semantic maps。Educational Psychology Review,1(4),331-367。  new window
7.陳嘉成(19980600)。合作學習式概念構圖在國小自然科教學之成效研究。教育與心理研究,21(上),107-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.游家政(19980700)。建構主義取向課程設計的評析。課程與教學,1(3),31-46+135。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.McCagg, E. C.、Dansereau, D. F.(1991)。A convergent paradigm for examining knowledge mapping as a learning strategy。The Journal of Educational Research,84(6),317-324。  new window
10.洪久賢、蔡長艷、黃鳳雀(19980400)。國中家政科實施批判思考教學之成效研究。家政教育學報,1,1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.許美瑞(19951200)。統整文學於家政教學之概念分析。中華家政,24,1-17。  延伸查詢new window
12.林生傳(1998)。建構主義的教學評析。課程與教學,1(3),1-13+133。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳嘉成、余民寧(19981100)。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對自然科學習的促進效果之研究。國立政治大學學報,77,201-235。  延伸查詢new window
14.王春展(19970300)。專家與生手間問題解決能力的差異及其在教學上的啟示。教育研究資訊,5(2),80-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Novak, Joseph D.、Bob Gowin, D.、Johansen, Gerard T.(1983)。The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students。Science Education,67(5),625-645。  new window
會議論文
1.林瑞文(2001)。概念構圖教學策略對促進國二學生光概念理解及問題解決能力之研究。中華民國第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。高雄:高雄師大。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪久賢(2001)。綜合活動統整課程與教學策略。開創新世紀--九年一貫課程綜合活動學習領域課程與教學研討會。台北:臺灣師大。37-55。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪久賢(2002)。綜合活動之批判性建構教學。新課程--建構式教學研討會。台北:臺灣師大。26-49。  延伸查詢new window
4.張志芳(2001)。概念構圖教學策略對國三學生複習光概念理解與問題解決能力影響之研究。中華民國第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。高雄:高雄師大。  延伸查詢new window
5.顏妙桂(2001)。綜合活動學習領域之學理基礎與實施策略。開創新世紀--九年一貫課程綜合活動學習領域課程與教學研討會。台北:臺灣師大。4-21。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳憲章(2002)。閱讀概念圖教學策略應用於高工立體圖教學成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林純年(1997)。概念圖對國小學童自我學習科學說明資料之影響(碩士論文)。國立台南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪麗卿(2002)。社會科概念構圖教學策略之建構(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hall, R.(1988)。Knowledge maps and the presentation of related information domains(博士論文)。Texas Christian University,Fort Worth, TX。  new window
5.李秀娟(1998)。不同教學策略對國中生學習生物的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.江淑卿(1997)。知識結構的重要特性之分析暨促進知識結構教學策略之實驗研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.邱德才(2001)。解決問題的諮商架構。張老師文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Holley, C. D.、Dansereau, D. F.(1984)。Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
3.教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫暫行綱要。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.詹秀美、吳武典(2002)。問題解決測驗指導手冊。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.司琦(1997)。課程導論。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。臺北:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李咏吟(1998)。認知教學:理論與策略。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Naidu, Som(1990)。Concept mapping: Student workbook(ED 329247)。  new window
其他
1.Plotnick, E.(1997)。Concept mapping: A graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts(ED 407 938)。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE