:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高達美與傳統:哲學詮釋學與修辭學關聯之研究
作者:宋維科
作者(外文):Wei-Ko Sung
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:外國語文學研究所
指導教授:張漢良
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2004
主題關鍵詞:詮釋學高達美佩赫曼柏拉圖修辭學應用亞里斯多德對話PerelmanPlatorhetoricAristotledialogueGadamerhermeneuticsapplication
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
The general aim of this dissertation is to demonstrate that Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics can be understood in terms of the divergence between Plato and Aristotle. Besides that, the other major concern of this dissertation is to probe into the linkage between hermeneutics and rhetoric. In the first two sections, an analysis of the fundamental difference between Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and other hermeneutics proposed by thinkers such as Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Betti, and Hirsch in light of several classical concepts, including phronesis, techne, and episteme, will be the focus. Starting from the conclusion achieved in the first two sections, the third section will show that Gadamer’s hermeneutics can be regarded as more “Aristotelian,” while other hermeneutics more “Platonic.” The fourth section is to investigate the notion of dialogue in terms of its connection with classical philosophy. On the other hand, in this section the validity and the limit of the dialogical model in philosophical hermeneutics are also the targets of research. The fifth section is an investigation of the relation between philosophical hermeneutics and Perelman’s New Rhetoric by paying special attention to the fact that in both philosophical hermeneutics and New Rhetoric the interpretation of law plays an integral part. The remaining part of this thesis is on the whole to understand philosophical hermeneutics by looking into Gadamer’s elaboration on the aesthetic experience, since by virtue of a scrutiny of the relation between the hermeneutic experience and the aesthetic experience we can also tease out the classical elements that are influential on the formation of philosophical hermeneutics.
亞里士多德。《政治學》。顏一、秦典華譯。顏一註。台北縣中和市:知書房,2001。
---. 《論詩•修辭學•亞歷山大修辭學》。崔延強、顏一譯。台北市:慧明,2001。
---. 《倫理學》。苗力田、徐開來譯。苗力田註。台北縣中和市:知書房,2001。
周明泉(Ming-quan Chou)。<伽達瑪「哲學詮釋」與哈伯瑪斯「批判理論」的論戰:從《真理與方法》開展的論諍>。《當代》。197 (2004):14-33。
洪漢鼎(Han-ding Hong)。<貝蒂關於解釋的方法論原則及其與伽達默爾的爭論>。《社會理論學報》。4.2 (2001):227-57。new window
張旺山(Wahng-shan Chang)。《狄爾泰》。台北:東大,1986。
張鼎國(Ting-kuo Chang)。<「實踐智」與新亞里思多德主義>。《哲學雜誌》。19 (1997a): 66-84。new window
---. <海德格、高達美與希臘人>。《哲學雜誌》。21 (1997b): 98-125。
---. <「較好地」還是「不同地」理解?─從詮釋學論爭看經典註疏中的詮釋定位與取向問題>。《中國文哲研究通訊》。9.3 (1999): 87-109。
---. <詮釋學論爭中的兩條路徑:理解對話與爭議析解>。《哲學雜誌》。34 (2001):32-61。
陳榮華(Wing-wah Chan)。《葛達瑪詮釋學與中國哲學的詮釋》。台北:明文,1998。
---. <海德格與高達美論語言:獨白與對話>。《哲學論評》。24 (2001a): 115-63。
---. <論海德格與艾保林(G. Ebeling)之從語言與人的關係論人的本性>。《臺大文史哲學報》。54 (2001b): 333-65.
彭文林(Wen-lin Peng)。<柏拉圖《克拉梯樓斯篇》研究>。《哲學論評》。24 (2001): 165-217。new window
鄧安慶(An-ching Deng)。《施萊爾馬赫》。台北:東大,1999。
廖義銘(I-ming Liao)。《佩雷爾曼之新修辭學》。台北:唐山,1997。
嚴平(Ping Yan)。《高達美》。台北:東大,1997。
Allen, Charles W. “The Primacy of Phronesis: A Proposal for Avoiding Frustrating Tendencies in Our Conceptions of Rationality.” The Journal of Religion. 69.3 (1989): 359-74.
Ambrosio, Francis J. “Gadamer, Plato and the Discipline of Dialogue.” International Philosophical Quarterly 27 (1987): 17-32.
---. “The Figure of Socrates in Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics.” The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1997.
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998.
Aristotle. Aristotle’s Poetics. Trans. S. H. Butcher. New York: Hill and Wang, 1961.
---. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. David Ross. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1980.
---. Nicomachean Ethics. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1984a. Vol. 2 of The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. 1729-1867.
---. Magna Moralia. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1984b. 1868-1921.
---. Rhetoric. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1984c. 2152-2269.
Augustine. Confessions. Trans. R. S. Pine-Coffin. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1961.
Aylesworth, Gary E. “Dialogue, Text, Narrative: Confronting Gadamer and Ricoeur.”Gadamer and Hermeneutics. Ed. Hugh J. Silverman. New York: Routledge,
1991.
Barilli, Renato. Rhetoric. Trans. Giuliana Menozzi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1989.
Bauman, Zygmunt. Hermeneutics and Social Science. New York: Columbia UP, 1978.
Behler, Ernst. “Deconstruction versus Hermeneutics: Derrida and Gadamer on Text and Interpretation.” Southern Humanities Review 21.3 (1987): 201-23.
Benhabib, Seyla. “In the Shadow of Aristotle and Hegel: Communicative Ethics and Current Controversies in Practical Philosophy.” The Philosophical Forum 21.1-2 (1989-90): 1-31.
Bennington, Geoffrey, and Jacques Derrida. Jacques Derrida. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.
Bernasconi, Robert. “‘You Don’t Know What I’m Talking About’: Alterity and the Hermeneutical Ideal.” The Specter of Relativism: Truth, Dialogue, and Phronesis in Philosophical Hermeneutics. Ed. Lawrence K. Schmidt. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1995.
Bernstein, Richard J. “From Hermeneutics to Praxis.” Review of Metaphysics 35 (1982): 823-45.
---. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.
Betti, Emilio. “Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Geisteswissenschaften.” Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique. Ed. Josef Bleicher. London: Routledge, 1980. 51-94.
Bineham, Jeffery L. “Displacing Descartes: Philosophical Hermeneutics and Rhetorical Studies.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 27.4 (1994): 300-12.
---. “The Hermeneutic Medium.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28.1 (1995): 1-16.
Blanshard, Brand. Reason and Goodness. New York: Macmillan, 1961.
Bleicher, Joseph, ed. Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique. London: Routledge, 1980.
Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel. The Emotional Tie: Psychoanalysis, Mimesis, and Affect. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1993.
Bruns, Gerald L. Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern. New Haven: Yale UP, 1992.
Bultmann, Rudolf Karl. Geschichte und Eschatologie. Tübingen: Mohr, 1964.
Cairns, Huntington. Legal Philosophy from Plato to Hegel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins P, 1949.
Coltman, Rodney R. The Language of Hermeneutics: Gadamer and Heidegger in Dialogue. Albany: State U of New York P, 1998.
Copleston, Frederick Charles. A History of Philosophy. Vol. 1. Westminster: Newman Bookshop, 1946.
Crowell, Steven G. “Dialogue and Text: Re-marking the Difference.” The Interpretation of Dialogue. Ed. Tullio Maranhão. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990. 338-60.
Daelemans, Sven, and Tullio Maranhão. “Psychoanalytic Dialogue and the Dialogical Principle.” The Interpretation of Dialogue. Ed. Tullio Maranhão. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990. 219-41.
Davey, R. Nicholas. “A Response to P. Christopher Smith.” Gadamer and Hermeneutics. Ed. Hugh J. Silverman. New York: Routledge, 1991. 42-59.
---. “Hermeneutics, Language, and Science: Gadamer’s Distinction between Discursive and Propositional Language.” Journal of the British Society for Pheno-
menology 24.3 (1993): 250-64.
Deetz, Stanley. “Words without Things: Toward a Social Phenomenology of Language.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 59 (1973): 40-51.
De Man, Paul. The Resistance to Theory. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1986.
Derrida, Jacques. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.”The Languages of the Criticism and the Science of Man: The Structuralist
Controversy. Ed. Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1969. 247-65.
---. “White Mythology.” Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester, 1982. 207-71.
---. “Three Questions to Hans-Georg Gadamer.” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State U of New York P, 1989. 52-54.
Descartes, René. Discourse on Method and Meditations. Trans. Laurence J. Lafleur. New York: The Library of Liberal Arts, 1960.
Detmer, David. “Gadamer’s Critique of the Enlightenment.” The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1997. 275-86.
Devlin, Keith J. Goodbye, Descartes: The End of Logic and the Search for a New Cosmology of the Mind. New York: Wiley, 1997.
DiCenso, James. Hermeneutics and the Disclosure of Truth: A Study in the Work of Heidegger, Gadamer, and Ricoeur. Charlettesville: UP of Virginia, 1990.
Dilthey, Wilhelm. “The Rise of Hermeneutics.” New Literary History 3.2 (1972): 229-44.
---. “The Hermeneutics of the Human Sciences.” The Hermeneutics Reader: Texts of the German Tradition from the Enlightenment to the Present. Ed. Kurt Mueller-Vollmer. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. 148-64.
Dockhorn, Klaus. “Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Truth and Method.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 13.3 (1980): 160-80.
Dunne, Joseph. “Aristotle after Gadamer: An Analysis of the Distinction between the Concepts of Phronesis and Techne.” Irish Philosophical Journal 2 (1985): 105-23.
---. Back to the Rough Ground: ‘Phronesis’ and ‘Techne’ in Modern Philosophy and in Aristotle. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 1993.
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
Eden, Kathy. Hermeneutics and the Rhetorical Tradition: Chapters in the Ancient Legacy and Its Humanist Reception. New Haven: Yale UP, 1997.
Farrell, Thomas B. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven: Yale UP, 1993.
Fee, Gordon D. How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth: A Guide to Understanding the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1982.
Ferguson, Sinclair B. and David F. Wright, eds. New Dictionary of Theology. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity P, 1988.
Ferrara, Alessandro. “On Phronesis.” Praxis International 7.3-4 (1987): 246-67.
Ferraris, Maurizio. History of Hermeneutics. Trans. Luca Somigli. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities P, 1996.
Florescu, Vasile. “Rhetoric and Its Rehabilitation in Contemporary Philosophy.”Philosophy and Rhetoric 3.4 (1970): 193-224.
Frank, David A. “The New Rhetoric, Judaism, and Post-Enlightenment Thought: The Cultural Origins of Perelmanian Philosophy.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 83 (1997): 311-331.
Friedman, Wolfgang Gaston. Legal Theory. New York: Columbia UP, 1967.
Froman, Wayne J. “L’Ecriture and Philosophical Hermeneutics.” Gadamer and Hermeneutics. Ed. Hugh J. Silverman. New York: Routledge, 1991. 136-48.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Hermeneutik.” Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey. Vol. 3. Metaphysics, Phenomenology, Language and Science. Ed. R. Klibansky. Florence: La Nuova Italia, 1969. 360-72.
---. Truth and Method. Trans. Garrett Barden and John Cumming. New York: Continuum, 1975a.
---. Foreword to the Second Edition. Truth and Method. Trans. Garrett Barden and John Cumming. New York: Continuum, 1975b. xvi-xxvi.
---. “Hermeneutics and Social Science.” Cultural Hermeneutics 2 (1975c): 307-16.
---. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Ed. and trans. David E. Linge. Berkeley: U of California P, 1976a.
---. “The Universality of the Hermeneutical Problem.” Philosophical Hermeneutics. Ed. and trans. David E. Linge. Berkeley: U of California P, 1976b.
---. “Man and Language” Philosophical Hermeneutics. Ed. and trans. David E. Linge. Berkeley: U of California P, 1976c. 59-68.
---. “Practical Philosophy as a Model of the Human Sciences.” Research in Phenomenology 9 (1979a): 74-85.
---. “The Problem of Historical Consciousness.” Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Eds. Paul Rabinow and William M. Sullivan. Berkeley: U of California P, 1979b. 103-61.
---. Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato. Trans. P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale UP, 1980.
---. Reason in the Age of Science. Trans. Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1981a.
---. “Hermeneutics as Practical Philosophy.” Reason in the Age of Science. Trans. Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1981b.
---. Philosophical Apprenticeships. Trans. Robert R. Sullivan. Cambridge: MIT P, 1985.
---. Hermeneutik II: Wahrheit und Methode. J. C. B. Mohr: Tübingen, 1986a.
---. The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy. Trans. P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale UP, 1986b.
---. The Relevance of the Beautiful and other Essays. Ed. Robert Bernasconi. Trans. Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986c.
---. “Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and the Critique of Ideology.” Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy. Albany: State U of New York P, 1986d.
---. “Text and Interpretation.” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State U
of New York P, 1989a. 21-51.
---. “Reply to Jacques Derrida.” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State U
of New York P, 1989b. 55-57.
---. “Destruktion and Deconstruction.” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E Palmer. Albany: U of New York P, 1989c. 102-13.
---. “Hermeneutics and Logocentricism.” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State U of New York P, 1989d. 114-25.
---. “Hermeneutics and Historicism.” Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1989e. 505-41.
---. Afterword. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1989f. 551-79.
---. “Reply to My Critics.” The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur. Albany: State U of New York P, 1990.
---. “Interview: Writing and the Living Voice.” Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics. Eds. Doeter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Trans. Lawrence Schimidt and Monica Reuss. Albany: State U of New York P, 1992. 63-71.
---. “Reflections on My Philosophical Journey.” The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1997a. 3-63.
---. “Reply to Francis J. Ambrosio.” The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1997b. 274.
---. “Rhetoric and Hermeneutics.” Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader. Eds. Walter Jost and Michael J. Hyde. New Haven: Yale UP, 1997c. 45-59.
---. Praise of Theory: Speeches and Essays. New Haven: Yale UP, 1998.
---. Gadamer in Conversation: Reflections and Commentary. Ed. and trans. Richard E. Palmer. New Haven: Yale UP, 2001.
Garver, Newton. Preface. Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs. By Jacques Derrida. Trans. David B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973. ix-xxix.
Golden, James L, Goodwin F. Berquist, and William E. Coleman. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co., 1989.
Gower, Barry. Scientific Method: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge, 1997.
Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale UP, 1994.
---. Sources of Hermeneutics. Albany: State U of New York P, 1995.
---. Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography. Trans. Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale UP, 2003.
Habermas, Jürgen. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen and Jerry A. Stark. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1988.
Hahn, Lewis Edwin, ed. The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Peru, IL: Open Court, 1997.
Handelman, Susan A. The Slayers of Moses: The Emergence of Rabbinic Interpretation in Modern Literary Theory. Albany: State U of New York P, 1982.
---. Fragments of Redemption: Jewish Thought and Literary Theory in Benjamin, Scholem, and Levinas. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1991.
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper, 1962.
Heller, Agnes. Beyond Justice. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
Hinman, Lawrence M. “Quid Facti or Quid Juris: The Fundamental Ambiguity of Gadamer’s Understanding of Hermeneutics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (1980): 512-35.
Hintikka, Jaakko. Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
Hirsch, E. D. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale UP, 1967a.
---. “Objective Interpretation.” Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale UP, 1967b. 209-44.
---. The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1976.
Hollinger, Robert. “Practical Reason and Hermeneutics.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 18.2 (1985): 113-22.
How, Alan. The Habermas-Gadamer Debate and the Nature of the Social: Back to Bedrock. Brookfield, VT: Avebury, 1995.
Hoy, David Couzens. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: U of California P, 1978.
---. “Must We Say What We Mean? The Grammatological Critique of Hermeneutics.”Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy. Ed. Brice R. Wachterhauser. Albany: State U of New York P, 1986. 397-415.
Ijsseling, Samuel. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Conflict: An Historical Survey. Trans. Paul Dunphy. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1976.
Jamison, Kathleen M. “Pascal vs. Descartes: A Clash over Rhetoric in the Seventeenth Century.” Communication Monographs 43 (1976): 44-50.
Jost, Walter, and Michael J. Hyde, eds. Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader. New Haven: Yale UP, 1997a.
---. Introduction. Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader. New Haven: Yale UP, 1997b. 1-42.
Kant, Immanuel. Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: St Martin’s P, 1965.
Kelsen, Hans. Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy. Trans. Peter Heath. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973.
Kepnes, Steven. The Text as Thou: Martin Buber’s Dialogical Hermeneutics and Narrative Theology. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1992.
Kirkland, M. Frank. “Gadamer and Ricoeur: The Paradigm of the Text.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 6.1 (1977): 131-43.
Kneale, William, and Martha Kneale. The Development of Logic. London: London P, 1962.
Krell, David Farrell. “‘Ashes, ashes, we all fall . . .’: Encountering Nietzsche.” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State U of New York P, 1989.
Kusch, Martin. Language as Calculus vs. Language as Universal Medium: A Study in Husserl, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Naked Man. Trans. John and Doreen Weightman. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990.
Linge, David E. Introduction. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Trans. and ed. David E. Linge. Berkeley: U of California P, 1976. xi-lviii.
Lloyd, Dennis. The Idea of Law. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1964.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1979.
Madison, G. B. Understanding, a Phenomenological-Pragmatic Analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood P, 1982.
---. The Hermeneutics of Postmodernity: Figures and Themes. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1988.
---. “The New Philosophy of Rhetoric.” Texte: Revue de Critique et de Theorie Litteraire. 8-9 (1989): 247-77.
---. “Hermeneutics: Gadamer and Ricoeur.” Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophy. Ed. Richard Kearney. London: Routledge, 1994. 290-349.
Manguel, Alberto. A History of Reading. New York: Penguin, 1996.
Maranhão, Tullio. Introduction. The Interpretation of Dialogue. Ed. Tullio Maranhão. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990. 1-22.
Markovà, Ivana. Introduction. The Dynamics of Dialogue. Eds. Ivana Markovà and Klaus Foppa. New York: Harvester, 1990. 1-22.
Michelfelder, Diane P., and Richard E. Palmer. Introduction. Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State U of New York P, 1989. 1-18.
Ormiston, Gayle L., and Alan D. Schrift, eds. The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur. Albany: State U of New York P, 1990.
Palmer, Richard E. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1969.
Pellauer, David. “The Significance of the Text in Paul Ricoeur’s Hermeneutical Theory.” Studies in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. Ed. Charles Reagan. Athens: Ohio UP, 1979. 98-114.
Perelman, Chaïm. The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. Trans. John Petrie. New York: Humanities, 1963.
---. “Justice Re-examined.” Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel, 1980. 88-94.
---. The Realm of Rhetoric. Trans. William Kluback. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 1982.
---. “Old and New Rhetoric.” Practical Reasoning in Human Affairs: Studies in Honor of Chaim Perelman. Eds. James C. Golden and Joseph J. Pilotta. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company, 1986. 1-9.
---. “Formal Logic and Informal Logic.” From Metaphysics to Rhetoric. Ed. Michel Meyer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. 9-14.
Perelman, Chaïm, and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 1969.
Peters, F. E. Greek Philosophical Terms. New York: New York UP, 1967.
Radmacher, Earl D., and Robert D. Preus, eds. Hermeneutics, Inerrancy, and the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Academic Books, 1984.
Ramm, Bernard. Protestant Biblical Interpretation: A Textbook of Hermeneutics. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1970.
Ricoeur, Paul. “The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation.” Philosophy Today 17.2 (1973): 129-41.
---. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian UP, 1976.
---. Main Trends in Philosophy. New York: Holmer & Meier, 1979.
---. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Ed. and trans. John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1981.
Risser, James. “The Two Faces of Socrates: Gadamer/Derrida.” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and
Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State U of New York P, 1989. 176-85.
---. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Rereading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany: State U of New York P, 1997.
Rommetveit, Ragner. “On Axiomatic Features of a Dialogical Approach to Language and Mind.” The Dynamics of Dialogue. Eds. Ivana Markovà and Klaus Foppa. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990. 83-104.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.
Schleiermacher, D. E. “The Hermeneutics: Outline of the 1819 Lectures.” New Literary History 10 (1978): 1-16.
Seebohm, Thomas M. “Deconstruction’ in the Framework of Traditional Methodical Hermeneutics.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 17.3 (1986): 275-88.
Self, Lois S. “Rhetoric and Phronesis: The Aristotelian Ideal.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 12.2 (1979): 130-45.
Simon, Joseph. “Good Will to Understand and the Will to Power: Remarks on the Improbable Debate.’” Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Debate Encounter. Eds. Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer. Albany: State U of New York P, 1989. 162-75.
Smith, P. Christopher. Translator’s Introduction. The Idea of the Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy. Trans. P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale UP, 1986. vii-xxxi.
---. “Plato as Impulse and Obstacle in Gadamer’s Development of a Hermeneutical Theory.” Gadamer and Hermeneutics. Ed. Hugh J. Silverman. New York: Routledge, 1991a. 23-41.
---. Hermeneutics and Human Finitude: Toward a Theory of Ethical Understanding. New York: Fordham UP, 1991b.
Suchman, Lucille Alice. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987.
Sullivan, Robert R. Political Hermeneutics: The Early Thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1989.
Swearingen, C. Jan. “Dialogue and Dialectic: The Logic of Conversation and the Interpretation of Logic.” The Interpretation of Dialogue. Ed. Tullio Maranhão. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1990. 47-71.
Taylor, Charles. Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985.
Toulmin, Stephen Edelston. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.
---. Interview with Sheldon Hackney. Available
http://www.neh.fed.us/news/humanities/1997-03/toulmin.html
Tracy, David. The Analogical Imagination. New York: Crossroad, 1986.
Turing, Alan. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 236 (1950): 433-60.
Walzer, Arthur E., and Alan G. Gross, eds. Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2000.
Walzer, Arthur E., Michael Tiffany, and Alan G. Gross. “Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Guide to the Scholarship.” Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern
Illinois UP, 2000. 185-203.
Warnke, Georgia. Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason. Oxford: Polity, 1987.
Weinsheimer, Joel. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method. New Haven: Yale UP, 1985.
---. Philosophical Hermeneutics and Literary Theory. New Haven: Yale UP, 1991.
Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Harper, 1960.
Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1987.
Žižek, Slavoj. For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London: Verso, 1991.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE