:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:擺盪、跨越、與承認: 一位小學教師自我身分認定的對話與探尋
作者:柯禧慧 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsi-Hui Ko
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:郭丁熒
吳芝儀
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2006
主題關鍵詞:規訓小學教師自我身分認定對話研究差異differencediscipline.dialogue studyidentityelementary school teacher
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:40
本研究是我-一位在博士班進修的小學教師探尋自我身分認定的歷程。除了「研究者」的身分以外,我的「小學教師」身分也指引著這個探尋的歷程。因此這個探尋的歷程採用從實地中紮根的探尋路徑,也就是在與小學教師的對話中摸索前進,而不是在文獻探討中擬定架構,依循架構而行。
在正式研究之前,我進行了兩個前導性研究。第一個前導性研究在小學實地中尋找研究焦點。第二個前導性研究則是藉由與另一位小學教師的對話,建構「跨越差異的對話研究」,做為正式研究的方法,並進一步探究「小學教師自我身分認定」這個研究焦點,使研究方向更為明確。
在正式研究中與台灣的林老師、及美國的Mr.W.對話,釐清「我是一個怎麼樣的老師?」、「『我』如何在小學場域中被形塑成一位『小學教師』? 」、以及「如何在被建構的事實中,找到小學教師的另一條可能的出路?」這些與自我密切相關的議題。經由對話林老師釐清自己是個盡本分的老師,Mr.W.承認自己是個不一樣的老師,而我則在我在與林老師及Mr.W.的對話中,發現自己在「走一樣的路」和「走自己的路」之間臍A明白了我需要一個可以被看見的展能位置,但在小學場域中我卻受制於「和大家要一樣」的魔咒,只有以自己是個好老師來自我安慰。
在我們三人的相同與差異中,我統整小學教師自我身分認定的建構路徑,在其中豁然看見「承認」是一種接納自己與轉化自己的力量。因為承認對他者看待的無能為力,而看清自己能力可及之處,由此退出「他者」編造的戲局,藉由「對話」編寫自己的劇本,演出「我們」自己的戲。
在這個探尋歷程中,我體察到開啟對話平台對小學教師的重要性,探尋之後的行動便是積極為下一場對話佈局。
I am an elementary school teacher studying for my Ph.D. degree. The study focuses on searching for my identities by means of dialogues with some other elementary school teachers. The processes of exploration include two pilot studies and one formal study.
In an initial investigation conducted in an elementary school, I set up the focus of this study, that is, the identity of an elementary school teacher. In the next pilot study, I conducted a study of “dialogues across differences” by dialogizing with a peer teacher in my school. I realized the differences caused by background and power relations between the researcher and the person invited into research were prominent, and not easy to eliminate. However, to dialogue with each other should be the best way to across those differences.
In the formal research, I dialogize with two other elementary school teachers, one of whom in Taiwan and the other in the USA. We worked together, each in a time, to explore our identities as school teachers. In this process, I found my identities were constantly swinging between “an elementary school teacher” and “a researcher”. I was also swinging between going “the way what I want to” and “the way same with the others”. I eventually realized I had better recognize I am incapable to fulfill the expectation set by others. Moreover, I have got new sights which focus on I am good at. It is a good way for elementary school teachers to clarify their identities through dialogues. The dialogue platform will be constructed after the study.
(一)中文部份

王文祥(1991)。中國古代同一思想史。山東:齊魯書社。
王德威譯(1993)。知識的考掘。台北:麥田。
江宜樺(1997)。自由民主體制下的國家認同。台灣社會研究,25,頁83-121。new window
何福田、羅瑞玉(1992)。教育改革與教師專業化。載於中華民國教育協會主編,教育專業。台北:師大書苑。
吳明清(1991)。教育研究─基本觀念與方法分析。台北:五南。
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。台北:桂冠。
吳芝儀、廖梅花譯(2001)。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法。嘉義:濤石。
吳慎慎(2003)。教師專業認同與終身學習:生命史敘說研究。台灣師範大學社會教育學系博士論文。new window
李奉儒(1990)。批判理論及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法(頁23-52)。高雄:麗文。
李雅菁(2004)。教育改革外一章:從教師角色及教師授課時數的角度來談教育改革出了什麼問題? 應用心理研究,21,頁123-137。new window
姚人多(2000)。論傅柯的《主體與權力》—一個批判性的導讀(下)。當代,150,頁108-132。
施正鋒(2000)。台灣人的民族認同。臺北:前衛。new window
柯禧慧(2000)。教室安靜的潛在教育學之研究〜以一個六年級的開放教室為例。台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
柯禧慧(2003)。 從identity的追尋到「研究」的再建構:一位小學教師/研究生的發聲。載於第九屆教育社會學論壇國際學術研討會論文集,九年一貫課程中的教學變革:社會學觀點。頁164-176。台中:台中師範學院。
洪志成(1990)。俗民方法論及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法(頁133-150)。高雄:麗文。
冥王貓(2005)。談同志認同問題與出櫃技巧。取自http://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/?qid=1005040302835
張春興(1983)。心理學概要。台北:東華。
敏兒(2004)。我的恐懼:別人眼中的問題人物。應用心理研究,21,頁152-151。new window
郭丁熒(1996)。小學教師理想角色與實際角色知覺差距之探討~一個Q分類及晤談研究報告。台南師院學報,29期,頁1-44。new window
郭丁熒(2003)。聽話頭,知話尾!小學教師的不合理意涵量表之發展及其核心概念之建構。台灣教育社會學研究,3(1),頁27-75。new window
郭生玉(1995)。心理與教育研究法。中和:精華書局。
陳添球(1989)。國民小學教師教學自主性之研究─依所國民小學日常生活世界的探討。東吳大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
勞思光(1980)。新編中國哲學史(一)。台北:三民。
曾慶台 (2004)。寫給行動研究工作坊夥伴們的一封信:談焦慮/恐懼的危機與轉機。應用心理研究,21,頁154-163。new window
黃志順(2004)。一位男性國小教師/博士研究生的教師身分認同歷程與反思。台南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文。new window
黃春明(1974)。莎喲娜拉‧再見。台北:遠景。
黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理。
楊大春(1995)。傅柯。台北︰生智。
楊俊鴻(2002)。Struart Hall文化研究中的「認同」與「再現」及其在課程研究上的蘊義。台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
劉育忠(2002)。自覺、批判與轉化─從批判教育學中「抗拒」概念之意涵試論其在課程改革中之實踐途徑。載於中華民國課程與教學學會主編,新世紀教育工程:九年一貫課程再造(頁211-229)。台北:揚智。
蔡淑玲(1996)。界外的主體—傅柯的哲學練習。哲學雜誌,15,頁96-111。
鄧運林 (1997)。開放教育新論。高雄︰復文。new window
蕭明珠(2001)。資訊時代的教師身分認同。新竹師院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
蕭蓉蓉(2000)。麻辣女教師。臺北:平安。
饒見維 (1996)。教師專業發展─理論與實務。台北:五南。

(二)英文部分

Alvesson, M. & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive Methodology:New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London:SAGE.
Anderson, G. L. (1962). Professional Education:Present Status and Continuing Problems. In N. B. Henry (Ed.). Education for the Professions. Chicago:The University of Chicago.
Armstrong, L. J.(2004). Identity, Communities of Practice, and Learning in a Professional Development School:Experiences of Preservice Teacher Candidates Explored and Exposed. Ph.D. Dissertation of The University of Iowa.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Introducing Monsieur Foucault. In J. S. Ball (Ed.). Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge.(pp.1-8) London: Routledge.
Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S.(1982). Qualitative Research for Education:An Introduction to Theory and Method. MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Bond, W. H. (1996). Teachers’ Professionalism: Overview. In M. Kompf et al., (Eds.). Changing Research and Practice: Teachers’ Professionalism, Identities and Knowledge. (pp.5-7). London︰The Falmer Press.
Britzman, D. P. (1989). Who Has the Floor? Curriculum, Teaching, and the English student Teacher’s Struggle for Voice. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(2). pp143-162.
Britzman, D. P. (1991). Practice Makes Practice:A Critical Study of Learning to Teach. New York:State University of New York Press.
Burbules, N. C. & Torres, C. A. (2000). Globalization and Education: An Introduction. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.). Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives,(pp.1-36).London: Routledge.
Casey, K. (1993). I Answer with My Life:Life Histories of Women Teachers Working for Social Change. New York︰Routledge.
Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age: Society and Culture Vol.Ⅱ: The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chickering, A. W. & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Coffey, A. (1999). The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. London: Sage.
Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J. (1999). Shaping a Professional Identity:Stories of Educational Practice. New York:Teachers College, Columbia University.
Cooper, J.E. (1991). Telling Our Own Stories: The Reading and Writing of Journals or Diaries. In C. Witherell. & N. Noddings.(Eds.). Stories Lives Tell: Narrative and Dialogue in Education,(pp.96-112). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Cooper, K. & Olson, M. R. (1996). The Multiple ‘I’s’of Teacher Identity. In M. Kompf et al (Eds.). Changing research and practice: teachers’ professionalism, identities and knowledge,(pp.78-89).London: The Falmer Press.
Danielewicz, J. (2001). Teaching Selves: Identity, Pedagogy, and Teacher Education. New York: State University of New York Press.
Day, B. E. (2002). Rethink Change in Teacher Education Reform: Constructing Identity in Political, Cultural, and Personal Fragmentation. Ph.D. Dissertation of University of Wisconsin Madison.
Denscombe, M. (1980). Keeping'em Quiet ︰The Significance of Noise for the Practical Activity of Teaching. In P. Woods.(Ed.). Teacher Strategies. London: Croom Helm.
Denscombe, M.(1985). Classroom Control. London: Geoge Allen & Unuin.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Denzin, N. K.(1997). Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. London: Sage.
Doworet, D. (1996). Teachers’Identities: Overview. In M. Kompf et al(Eds.). Changing Research and Practice: Teachers’ Professionalism, Identities and Knowledge, (pp.67-68). London: The Falmer Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. & Rabinow, P.(1983). Michel Foucault︰Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics(2nd). Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Ellsworth, E. (1992). Why Doesn’t this Feel Empowering? Working Through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy. In C. Luke. & J. Gore. (Eds.). Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy,(pp.90-119). New York: Routledge.
Fidler, B. & Atton, T. (1999). Poorly Performing Staff in School and How to Manage Them. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M.(1977). Discipline and Punish︰The Birth of The Prison.(Trans. by A. Sheridan). New York︰Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality Vol.1: An Introduction. (Trans. by Robert Hurley). New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge︰Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972-1977. Brighton︰Harvester Press.
Foucault, M. (1985). The History of Sexuality Vol. 2: The Use of Pleasure. (Trans. by Robert Hurley). New York︰Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of The Self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, P. H. Hutton (Eds.). Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault.(pp.16-49) The University of Massachusetts Press.
Funnel, R. (1995). Corporatism, Self and Identity Within Moral Orders: Prestructuralist Reconsiderations of a Poststructuralist Paradox. In R. Smith & P. Wexler (Eds.). After Postmodernism: Education, Politics and Identity. (pp.156-181). London: The Falmer Press.
Gergen, K. J. (1991). The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.
Giddens, A.(1991). Modernity and Self-Identity:Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge:Polity.
Giroux, H . A. (1983). Theory and Resistance in Education: A Pedagogy for the Opposition. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux, H. A. (1992). Border Crossings:Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. New York:Routledge.
Giroux, H. A. & McLaren, P. (1986). Teacher Education and the Politics of Engagement: The Case for Democratic Schooling. Harvard Educational Review, 56, pp213-238.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L.(1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory︰Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago:Aldine.
Goodson, I. (1991). Teachers’ Lives and Educational Research. In I. F. Goodson. & R. Walker. (Eds.). Biography, Identity and Schooling: Episodes in Educational Research,(pp. 137-149). London: The Falmer Press.
Goodson, I. F. (1992). Studying Teachers’ Lives: An Emergent Field of Inquiry. In I. F. Goodson.(Ed.). Studying Teachers’ Lives.(pp.1-17). New York and London: Teachers College Press.
Goodson, I. F. (2001). Professional Knowledge: Educational Studies and the Teacher. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Goodson, I. & Walker, R. (1991).The Development of Educational Research. In I. F. Goodson. & R. Walker. (Eds.). Biography, Identity and Schooling: Episodes in Educational Research. (pp.197-204).London: The Falmer Press.
Grace, G. (1978). Teachers, Ideology, and Control: A Study in Urban Education. London: Routledge Kegan Paul .
Grant, C. A. & Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). Dictionary of Multicultural Education. Arizona: The Oryx Press.
Grumet, M. R. (1989). Bitter Milk: Women and Teaching. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y.S.(1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research.(pp.105-117). London :Sage.
Hall, S.(1992). The Question of Cultural Identity. In S. Hall., D. Held., & T. McGrew (Eds.). Modernity and Its Futures.(pp.273-326) Combridge : Polity Press.
Jackson, P. (1968). Life in Classrooms. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jenkins, R. (1996). Social Identity. London︰Routledge.
Johson, T. J. (1972). Professions and Power. London:Macmillan.
Kelchtermans,G. (2000). Telling Dreams: A Commentary to Newman from a European Context. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, pp209-211.
Leacock, E.B. (1969). Teaching and learning in city schools. New York︰Basic Books.
Lieberman, M. (1956). Education as a Profession. N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Logan, R. D. (1987). Historical Change in Prevailing Sense of Self. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.). Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives.(pp.13-26).New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago, I.L.: Chicago University Press.
Luke, C. & Gore, J. (1992). Introduction. In C. Luke. & J. Gore. (Eds.). Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy,(pp.1-14). New York: Routledge.
Marshall, J.D. (1990). Foucault and Educational Research. In J. S. Ball (Ed.). Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge.(pp.11-28). London: Routledge.
McAdams, D. (1993). The Stories We Live by:Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York:Morrow.
McLaren, P. (1998). Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education. New York: Longman.
Measor, L. & Sikes, P. (1992). Visiting Lives: Ethics and Methodology in Life History. In I. F. Goodson. (Ed.). Studying Teachers’ Lives.(pp.209-233).New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Miedema, S.& Wardekker, W. L. (1999). Emergent Identity versus Consistent Identity: Possibilities for a Postmodern Repoliticization of Critical Pedagogy. In T. S. Popkewitz. & L. Fendler. (Eds.).Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics.(pp.67-86).New York: Routledge.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research Interviewing:Context and Narrative. Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.
Nash, K. (2000). Contemporary Political Sociology:Globalization, Politics, and Power. Oxford:Blackwell.
Orner, M. (1992). Interrupting the Calls for Student Voice in “Liberatory” Education: A Feminist Poststructuralist Perspective. In C. Luke. & J. Gore. (Eds.). Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy. (pp.74-89).New York: Routledge.
Orner, M. (1998). School Marks: Education, Domination, and Female Subjectivity. In T. S. Thomas & M. Brennan (Eds.). Foucault’s Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education.(pp.278-296). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1991). A Political Sociology of Educational Reform: Power/Knowledge in Teaching, Teacher Education, and Research. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1998a). The Sociology of Knowledge and the Sociology of Education: Michel Foucault and Critical Traditions. In C. A. Torres. & T. R. Mitchell. (Eds.). Sociology of Education : Emerging Perspectives.(pp.47-87). New York: State University of New York Press.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1998b).Struggling for the Soul: The Politics of Schooling and the Construction of the Teacher. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2000). Rethinking Decentralization and the State/Civil Society Distinctions:The State as a Problematic of Governing. In T. S. Popkewitz. (Ed.). Educational Knowledge:Changing Relationships Between the State, Civil Society, and the Educational Community.(pp.173-200). New York:SUNY Press.
Reynolds, C. (1996). Cultural Scripts for Teachers: Identities and their Relation to Workplace Landscapes. Changing Research and Practice: Teachers’ Professionalism, Identities and Knowledge, (pp.69-77).London: The Falmer Press.
Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park:Sage.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York:Vintage.
Simola, H., Heikkinen, S., & Silvonen, J. (1998). A Catalog of Possibilities: Foucaultian History of Truth and Education Research. In T. S. Thomas & M. Brennan (Eds.). Foucault’s Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education,(pp.64-90). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Simpson, J.A. & Weiner, E.S.C.(1989). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nded). Oxford University Press
Singh, P. (1995). Voicing the ‘Other’, Speaking for the ‘Self’, Disrupting the Metanarratives of Educational Theorizing with Poststructural Feminisms. In R. Smith & P. Wexler (Eds.). After Postmodernism: Education, Politics and Identity. (pp.182-206). London: The Falmer Press.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research : Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA︰Sage.
Strauss, A & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research : Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Torres, C. A. (1999). Critical Theory and Political Sociology of Education: Arguments. In T. S. Popkewitz. & L. Fendler. (Eds.). Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics.(pp.87-116). New York: Routledge.
Usher, R. & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and Education. London︰ Routledge.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Ontario: The University of Western Ontario.
Walker, R. (1991). Social Research as A Deviant Activity. In I. F. Goodson. & R. Walker. (Eds.). Biography, Identity and Schooling: Episodes in Educational Research. (pp.7-27). London: The Falmer Press.
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wexler, P. (1995). After Postmodernism: A New Age Social Theory in Education. R. Smith & P. Wexler (Eds.).After Postmodernism: Education, Politics and Identity. (pp.56-80). London: The Falmer Press.
Woodward, K. (1997). Identity and Difference. London: Sage.
Wragg, E. C., Haynes, G. S., Wragg, C. M. & Chamberlin, R.P. (2000). Failing Teachers. London: Routledge.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE