應用多目標模糊決策分析的供應商綠色評價體系研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	應用多目標模糊決策分析的供應商綠色評價體系研究
作者：	吳嘉興
作者(外文)：	Chia-Hsing Wu
校院名稱：	元智大學
系所名稱：	管理研究所
指導教授：	盧煜煬
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2008
主題關鍵詞：	綠色供應鏈管理；層級分析法；多目標模糊決策分析；Green Supply Chain Management；Analytical Hierarchy Process；Multi-Objective Decision Making
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:30

近年來，消費者購買習慣由購買產品本身改變為購買整套產品及其服務，這個轉變使得資源循環、重覆利用零件或產品變得更有價值。為因應政府單位提高相關規定及大眾對環保議題的關注，許多企業組織正主動試著改變其供應鏈。與過去逆物流模式比較，綠色供應鏈管理（Green Supply Chain Management, GSCM）是比較廣泛的概念，其中包括各式工具供企業與其供應商及顧客使用，以達到降低其產品或生產流程中所產生的污染物。綠色供應鏈主要的兩個目標為：
1.在所有的供應鏈的成員裡，維持特定的環境績效準則，並且在環境準則下提升企業的行為。
2.必須幫助供應商了解環境問題之重要性，並且支援他們改善環境品質。
在過去十年間，綠色供應鏈管理突然之間的崛起，是一個非常重要的發展。綠色供應鏈管理增加企業與其供應鏈其它成員，在環境品質議題上合作及整合的機會。另外，綠色供應鏈管理提供中小企業資訊及技術的支援，因為中小企業不像大企業有足夠的資源。綠色供應鏈也可以偵測環境改善的歷程及提升。未來，將會有更多的產品或原料成為可回收資源，而企業也必需面對不斷向上提升的環境保護意識，在供應鏈的決策當中去考量其環境品質及責任。本研究提供了一個創新的方法，也就是利用一個簡單而有效率的程序，評估企業推動綠色供應鏈的效率及為實踐綠色供應鏈管理概念的狀況，更重要的是，在綠色供應鏈裡面應用多目標模糊決策分析的評價方法，來衡量評估供應商的績效。

以文找文

The recent shift from buying products to purchasing sets of services makes the re-use of recovered materials, parts and products desirable. In response to heightened governmental regulations and rising public awareness of the effect of industrial production on the environment, many organizations are now undertaking major initiatives to transform their supply chain processes. In contrast with the reverse logistic models, the Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) is abroad concept that refers to a variety of methods by which companies work with their suppliers to improve the environmental performance of their products or manufacturing processes of the suppliers, customers or both. Two primary goals of GSCM include: (1) Consistently meeting specified environmental performance criteria among the participants in the supply chain, and promoting responsible corporate environmental behavior among all the players in the chain of products and services, and (2) Helping suppliers to recognize the importance of resolving environmental issues and support them in installing their own improvement initiatives.
The emergence of GSCM is one of the most significant environmental developments in the past decade, offering the opportunity for companies to align their supply chains in accordance with environmental and sustainability goals. GSCM provides information and technical assistance to small- and medium-sized businesses that lack the resources of large companies, and can monitor and measure progress to facilitate environmental enhancement. The number of products produced entirely of recyclable materials will increase in the future, and organizations will have to make supply chain decisions within the context of growing environmental concerns and responsibilities. This study presents an innovative method using simple and efficient procedures to evaluate the effectiveness of projects supplying GSCM concept. Specifically, a multi-objective decision making process for GSCM is presented to help the supply chain manager in measuring and evaluating suppliers performance based on an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) decision-making method. In addition, to reduce subjective bias in designing a weighting system, a fuzzy logic process is used to modify the AHP.

以文找文

參考文獻
1.王士元 (2005)，「模糊環境下供應績效衡量之研究」，博士論文，國立台灣科技大學工業管理系。 new window

2.王能民、孫林岩、汪應洛 (2001)，「綠色製造模式下的供應商選擇」，《系統工程》，第19卷第2期，37-41。
3.王彬彬 (2007)，「綠色供應鏈戰略及其實施模式研究」，《當代經濟管理》，第29卷第3期。
4.天下企業公民 (2007)，「企業公民調查方式」，《天下雜誌》，URL:http://ad.cw.com.tw/cw/csr/analysis.asp。
5.世界公民人權觀 (2007)，「人權與法治」《台中市南區國光國小》，URL:http://mail.kkes.tc.edu.tw/~722/howto3.html。
6.李欣岳 (2007)，「環保消費意識抬頭，3C產業必須綠化」，《數位時代12月號》，URL:http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/14125。
7.李樹丞 (2006)，「基於模糊多層次綜合評價的綠色供應商選擇」，《湖南大學學學報(自然科學版)》，第33卷第3期，130-140。
8.武春友、朱慶華、耿勇 (2001)，「綠色供應鏈管理與企業可持續發展」，《中國軟科學》，第3期。
9.洪曉辰 (2007)，「應用分析網路程序法於企業供應商之評選」，碩士論文，東吳大學商學院企業管理學系。
10.席一凡、姚樹俊、李繼軍、何董 (2007)，「模糊優選法在綠色供應鏈合作關係評價中的套用」，《價值工程》，第4期，69-71。
11.施勵行、賴義芳 (2003)，「跨國綠色供應鏈管理的型態及策略出探」，永續性產品與產業管理研討會，台南成功大學。
12.郭財吉 (2002)，「綠色供應鏈管理系統」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，計劃編號：NSC:90-2218-E-159-003。
13.許享承 (2006)，「綠色供應鏈管理機制建構之研究-以A公司為例」，碩士論文，中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班。
14.曾玉津 (2001)，「掩埋場模糊多準則決策選址法之研究」，碩士論文，臺灣大學環境工程學研究所。
15.葉牧青 (1989)，「AHP層級結構設定問題之探討」，碩士論文，交通大學管科研究所。
16.楊健武 (2007)，「綠色供應鏈管理建置案」，《綠色供應鏈管理－方法論發展趨勢及實務研究》，清華大學國際研討會。
17.鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989)，「層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（上）、（下）」，《中國統計學報》，第27卷第6、7期。 new window

18.賴義方 (2004)，「綠色供應鏈中綠色供應商之評估-以PCB供應商為例」，碩士論文，國立成功大學資源工程學系。
19.蔡淑芳 (2005)。綠色供應商之評選模式研究－以IC封裝業為例，碩士論文，國立中山大學企業管理學系。
20.繆興鋒、王蘇生 (2007)，「基於循環經濟綠色供應鏈管理績效評價指標體系」，《生態經濟》，第12期，57-61。
21.謝銘和 (2006)，「綠色供應商評選模式之建構與分析-以生物科技產業為例」，碩士論文，國立勤益技術學院企業管理研究所。
22.Azzone, G., & Noci, G. (1996), “Measuring the environmental performance of new products: an integrated approach”, International Journal of Production Research, 3 (11), 3055-3078.
23.Baas, S. M., & Kwakernaak, H. (1977), “Rating and ranking of multiple aspect alternative using fuzzy sets”, Automatica, (13), 47-58.
24.Barbarosoglu, G. & Yazgac, T. (1997), “An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem”, Journal of Production and Inventory Management, (38), 14-21.
25.Beamon, B.M. (2005), “Environmental and sustainability ethics in supply chain management”, Science and Engineering Ethics, (11), 221-234.
26.Bellman, R., Zadeh, L. A., (1970), “Decision making in a fuzzy environment”, Management Science, 17B (4), 141-164.
27.Belton, V. & Gear T., (1984), “On the short-coming of Satty’s method of analytic hierarchies”, Omega, 11(3), 228–230.
28.Bettac, E., Maas, K., Beullens, P. & Bopp, R. (1999), “RELOOP: reverse logistics chain optimization in multi-user trading environment, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment”, IEEE, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA, 42–47.
29.Bhutta, K.S. (2002), “Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches”, Supply Chain Management, 7 (3/4), 35-126.
30.Bloemhof-Ruwarrd, J.M., Van Beek, P., Hordijk, L. & Van Wassenhove, L.N. (1995), “Interactions between operational research and environmental management”, European Journal of Operations Research, (85), 229–243.
31.Boer, L. D., Labro, E. & Morlacchi, P. (2001), “A review of methods supporting supplier selection,” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, (7), 78-89.
32.Bonissone, P. P. (1982), “A fuzzy set based linguistic approach: Theory and applications”, In: Approximate Rezoning in Decision Analysis, M. M. Gupta & E. Sanchez (eds.), North-Holland, 329-339.
33.Boons, F. (2002), “Greening products: a frame for product chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (10), 495–505.
34.Brans, J. P., Mareshal, B. &. Vincke P.H. (1984), “Promethee: A new family of outranking method in multi-criteria analysis”, In: J. P. Brans (ed.), Operational Research’84, North-Holland, Amsterdam(Proceedings of the Tenth IFORS International Conference on Operational Research, Washington, D. C.), 477-490.
35.Burke, S. & Gaughran, W.F. (2006), “Intelligent environmental management for SMEs in manufacturing”, Robotics & Compute-Integrate Manufacture, (22), 566–575.
36.Buckley, J.J. (1985), “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247.
37.Calantone, R. J., Di Benedetto, C. A. & Schmidt, J. B. (1999), “Using the analytic hierarchy process in new product screening”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(1), 65–76. new window

38.Chen, S. J., & C. L. Hwang (1992), Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, (375).
39.Cheng, Y. M., & Mclnnis, B. (1980), “An algorithm for multiple attribute, multiple alternative decision problem based on fuzzy sets with application to medical diagnosis”, IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-10, 645-650.
40.Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1982), The use of fuzzy numbers in decision analysis, In: Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes. M. M. Gupta and E. Sanchez (eds.), North-Holland, 309-321.
41.Dubois, D., Prade, H. & Testemale, C. (1988), “Weighted fuzzy pattern matching”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28(3), 313-331.
42.Dyer, J.S. (1990a), “Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”, Management Science, 36(3), 249–258.
43.Dyer, F.S. (1990b), “A clarification of remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”, Management Science, 36(3), 274–275.
44.Efstathiou, J., & Rajkovic, V. (1979), “Multi-attribute decision-making using a fuzzy heuristic approach”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, SMC-9, 326-333.
45.Enarsson, L. (1998), “Evaluation of suppliers: how to consider the environment”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 28(1), 5-17. new window

46.EUP, Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the setting of eco-design requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
47.Fishbein, B.K., McGarry, L.S. & Dillon, P.S. (2000), Leasing: A Step toward Producer Responsibility, Inform Inc.: New York.
48.Gabriel, J., Jacques, M., Kirby, J. R., Mann, T. & Dewey, P.（2000）, Integrating Environmental Requirements into the Supply Chain: IBM’s ECP Initiatives, IBM Corporation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, U.S.A.
49.Geoffrey, J.L.F., Hagelaar, J.G. & Van der Vorst, A.J. (2002), “Environmental supply chain management: using life cycle assessment to structure supply chains”, International Food & Agribusiness Management Review, (4), 399–412.
50.Godfrey, R. (1998), Ethical purchasing: developing the supply chain beyond the environment; greener purchasing: opportunities and innovations, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, England, 244-251.
51.Green K., Morton B. & New S. (1996), “Purchasing and Environmental Management：Interactions, Policies and Opportunities”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 5 (1), 188－197. new window

52.Gregory, R.E. (1986), “Source selection: a matrix approach”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 22(2), 24-29.
53.Hall, J. (2000), “Environmental supply chain dynamics”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (8), 455-471.
54.Handfield, R., Walton, S.V., Sroufe, R. & Melnyk, S.A. (2002), “Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process”, European Journal of Operations Research, (141), 70–87.
55.Handfield, R., Sroufe, R. & Walton, S.V. (2005), “Integrating environmental management and supply chain strategies”, Business Strategy and the Environment, (14), 1-19.
56.Hart, S.L. (1997), “Beyond greening: Strategies of a sustainable world”, Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66-76. new window

57.Humphreys, P. K., Wong Y. K. & Chan F. T. S. (2003), “Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process”. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, (138), 349-356.
58.Hwang & Yoon (1981), Multiple Decision Making：Method and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.
59.Kopicki, R., Berg, M.J., Legg, L., Dasappa, V. & Maggioni, C. (1996), “Reuse and Recycling—Reverse Logistics Opportunities”, 1993 (Council of Logistics Management: Oak Brook, IL). Journal of Management, (7), 45–62.
60.Kumar, S. & Malegeant, P. (2006), “Strategic alliance in a closed-loop supply chain, a case of manufacturer and eco-non-profit organization”, Technovation, (26), 1127–1135.
61.Kwakernaak, H. (1979), “An algorithm for rating multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets”, Automatica, (15), 615-616.
62.Laarhoven, V., P, J. M., & Pedrycs, W. (1983), “A fuzzy extension of Sattys priority theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, (11), 279-302.
63.Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C. & Pagh, J. D. (1998), “Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities,” International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1-19.
64.Lamming, R & Hampson, J. (1996), “The environment as a supply chain management issue”, British Journal of Management, 7(1), 45-62. new window

65.Linton, J. D. (1999), “Electronic products at their end-of-life: options and obstacles”, Journal of Electronics Manufacturing, 9(1), 29–40. new window

66.Liu, Z.F., Liu, X.P., Wang, S.W. & Liu, G.F. (2002), “Recycling strategy and a recyclability assessment model based on an artificial neural network”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, (129), 500–506.
67.McDonough, W., Braungart, M., Anastas, P.T. & Zimmerman, J.B. (2003), “Applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-cradle design”, Environmental Science & Technology, 37(23), 434–441.
68.Messelbeck, J. & Whaley, M. (1999), “Greening the health care supply chain: triggers of change, models for success”, Corporate Environmental Strategy, 6(1), 39-45. new window

69.Mulder, L., Scheidt, L. & Schneider, A. (1999), “Collecting electronic waste in Europe: a Sony view, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment”, IEEE, Massachusetts.
70.Muralidharan, C. (2002), “A multi-criteria group decision-making model for supplier rating”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(4), 22.
71.Nagel, C., Nilsson, J. & Boks, C. (1999), “Europe end-of-life systems for electrical and electronic equipment, in Proceedings of Eco-Design Conference”, IEEE, Tokyo, February, 1999.
72.Nagel, M. H. (2000), “Environmental Supply-Chain Management versus Green Procurement in the Scope of a Business and Leadership Perspective,”International Symposium on Electronic and Environment, 225-228.
73.Narasimhan, R. & Carter, J.R. (1998), Environmental supply chain management. The Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA..
74.Negi, D. S. (1989), Fuzzy Analysis and Optimization, Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering, Kansas State University.
75.Noci, G. (1995), “Supporting decision making on recycling based investment”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 4(2), 62-72.
76.Noci, G. (1997), “Designing green vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 3(2), 103-114.
77.Nydick, R.L., & Hill, R.P. (1992), “Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(2), 31-36.
78.Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, the Free Press: New York, NY.
79.PPW, Directive 2004/12/EC (amending Directive 94/62/EC) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004.
80.Purba, R., O’Castillo, O.L., & Ponciano, S.I.J. (2006), “Environmental indicators for small and medium enterprises in the Philippines: an empirical research”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (14), 505-515.
81.Robert, L. N. & Hill, R. P. (1992), “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Supplier Selection Procedure,”Journal of Supply Chain Management, 28(2), 31-36.
82.Ross, A. (2000), “An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center”, Journal of Operations Management, (20), 19-32.
83.Saaty, T. L. (1977), “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structure”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
84.Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
85.Saaty, T. L. & Luis G. Vargas (1982), The Logic of Priorities, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
86.Saaty, T. L. & Luis G. Vargas (1984), “The Legitimacy of Rank Reversal”, Omega, 12(5), 513-516.
87.Saaty, T. L. (1987), “Concepts, Theory, & Techniques–Rank Generation, Preservation, and Reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Decision Process”, Decision Sciences, (18), 157-177.
88.Saaty, T. L. (1990), “How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operation Research, 48(1), 9-26. new window

89.Satty, T. L. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
90.Sarkis, J. (1995), “Supply chain management and environmental consciousness”, Technovation, 15(2), 79–97.
91.Sarkis, J., Nehaman, G., & Priest, J. (1996), “A systemic evaluations model for environmentally friendly conscious business practices and strategy”, Proceeding of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Dallas, May, 281-286.
92.Sarkis, J. (1998), “Theory and methodology evaluating environmentally conscious business practices”, European Journal of Operational Research, (107), 159-174.
93.Sarkis, J. (2003), “A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (11), 397–409.
94.Sarkis, J. (2002), “A model for strategic supplier selection”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(1):18-28. new window

95.Sharratt, P.N. & Choong, P.M. (2002), “A life-cycle framework to analyze business risk in process industry projects”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (10), 479–493.
96.Siskos, J. L., Lochard, J. & Lombard, J. (1984), “A multicriteria decision making methodology under fuzziness: Application to the evaluation of radiological protection in nuclear power plants”, In: TIMS/studies in the Management Science, 20, H. J.Zimmermann (eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, 261-283.
97.Sony (2005), Sony Green Partner Activities, Developments in the Green Partner Environmental Quality Approval Program, Sony Corporation Procurement Center.
98.Soukup, W. R. (1987), “Supplier Selection Strategies”, Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, 23(2), 7-13.
99.Talluri, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2003), “Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach”, European Journal of Operational Research, (146), 543-552.
100.Timmerman, E. (1986), “An approach to vendor performance evaluation”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 22(4), 2-8.
101.Tsoulfas, G.T. & Pappis, C.P. (2006), “Environmental principles applicable to supply chain design and operation”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (14), 1593–1602.
102.Van Hoek, R. (1999), “From reversed logistics to green supply chains”, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 4(3), 129–135.
103.Walton, S.V., Handfield, R.B., & Melnyk, S.A. (1998), “The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management processes.” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(2), 2-11.
104.WEEE, Directive 2002/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment.
105.Woods, J.A. & Marien, E.J. (2001), The Supply Chain Yearbook, McGraw-Hill: New York.
106.Wu, H.J. & Dunn, S. (1995), “Environmentally responsible logistics systems”, International Journal of Physics Distribution & Logistic Management, 25(2), 20–38.
107.Yager, Ronald R. (1978), “Fuzzy decision-making including unequal objective”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(2), 87-95. new window

108.Zhua, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004), “Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises”, Journal of Operations Management, 3(22), 265-289.
109.Zsidisin, G. A. & Siferd, S.P. (2001), “Environmental purchasing: A framework for theory development”, Europe Journal of Purchase & Supply Management, 7(1), 61–73. new window

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	易(可)燃液體存於市內儲槽災害因子預防及設備探討--以路科廠房為例
2.	超市經營成功因素重要性分析
3.	以層級分析法探討夜間工作重要性及關注因素之研究
4.	運用AHP探討保修收集站選址關鍵因素
5.	電視媒體頻道產業之娛樂性節目評選探討
6.	博物館疲勞：空間因子權重分析
7.	應用AHP探討消費者選擇餐飲外送平臺之關鍵因素
8.	國小特教老師參與研習進修關鍵因素之研究--以苗栗縣國小為例
9.	建構師資培育生教學成熟度模式之研究
10.	司法公信力指標之建構--以臺中高等行政法院稅捐訴訟案件為例
11.	應用層級分析法探討影響國軍派訓國外軍校學生工作熱情之重要因素--以陸軍官校為例
12.	建構女大學生選用醫學美容行為之影響因素模式
13.	產學攜手合作僑生專班學生壓力來源之研究--以北部某科技大學為例
14.	應用AHP探討自行車賽會選擇評估
15.	國民中小學學習共同體運作評估指標系統之建構：學習領導之觀點

1.	臺灣地區科技大學系所評鑑影響因素之分析
2.	以品質機能展開建構雲端運算資訊安全之關鍵要素
3.	我國推動募兵制關鍵成功因素之探討
4.	我國警察機關情資整合中心成效指標之研究
5.	歌仔戲「文生」扮像彩妝教學評估指標之建構
6.	地方產業發展評估與策略研擬之研究
7.	非學校型態實驗教育評鑑指標建構與應用
8.	我國職業網球錦標賽經營績效評估指標之建構
9.	國民中學兼任行政教師行政專業能力指標建構與實證分析之研究
10.	驅動工業4.0之IT能力影響商業模式創新之研究：基於動態能力的觀點
11.	建構新產品開發方案的綜合多準則決策模式：應用在有機發光二級體產業
12.	運用AHP與DEMATEL探討產後護理機構服務品質指標與改善策略之研究
13.	應用財務分配觀點探討全面品質管理於構建競爭力關鍵成功因素(KSF)–以台北市補習班為例
14.	使用層級分析法評估大數據對個人隱私的影響
15.	我國樂齡學習中心評鑑指標建構之研究

1.	觀光暨旅遊個案分析
2.	市場調查：新式與基礎調查方法及實例
3.	臺灣公共關係職能建構之研究
4.	舊鐵橋濕地公園開發影響遊客休閒行為、知覺價值與生態文化旅遊發展效益評估之研究
5.	公共事務管理研究方法
6.	教育績效責任研究
7.	層級分析法在犯罪偵查上之應用
8.	鐵路立體化策略評估準則與方案選擇之研究
9.	航空站區位選擇評估程序之研究
10.	高速鐵路技術型式評估準則及方法之研究

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫