:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:特殊學校專業團隊服務之調查研究
書刊名:東臺灣特殊教育學報
作者:楊俊威羅湘敏 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Gin-weLo, Hsiang-ming
出版日期:2003
卷期:5
頁次:頁73-96
主題關鍵詞:特殊學校專業團隊Disciplinary team serviceSpecial education schools
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:78
本研究旨在探討目前我國特殊學校實施專業團隊服務的現況,透過自編之「專業團隊服務調查問卷」,配合訪談二十三所公立特殊學校負責團隊服務的行政人員,主要發現如下: 一、目前專業人員在特殊學校實施專業服務情形尚稱良好,多數特殊學校所提供的服務內容為職能治療、物理治療與心理諮商。 二、特殊學校內多數相關專業人員,服務方式的方式仍以抽離式為主,專業人員間缺乏統整合作。 三、多數專業人員認為在特殊學校服務能發揮所長。學生障礙程度重、支援人力不足、家長配合度不佳、行政單位整合不易、工作負荷重、進修機會不足、福利與權益不受重視,是專業人員最不滿意的地方。 四、特教教師實施專業團隊服務較相關專業人員來得積極;工作年資較深與年齡較長的專業人員,團隊服務調適情形較佳;啟聰類別特殊學校專業團隊服務施行狀況較差;不分類特殊學校的專業人員,對目前的工作環境與內容,工作滿意感受較不理想;而特殊學校編制內之相關專業人員,實施專業團隊服務的情況,較以約聘方式任用的相關專業人員為佳。 五、相關專業人員人力不足、家長配合度不佳與專業整合不足等,是目前推動專業團隊服務最困擾的問題。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the situation of the disciplinary team service in the special education schools in Taiwan. The samples include 334 specialists from 23 special education schools in Taiwan. The questionnaire survey is conducted by 「scales of disciplinary team service」. The researcher also interviewed 25 administrators of disciplinary team service in special education schools. The questionnaire data are analyzed by means of descriptive statistics, t-test, and owe-way ANOVA. The major findings are as follows. 1.In the present time, specialists in special education school can fulfill themselves quite well. The number of hired specialists are different among schools. The services offered by most schools are occupational therapy, physical therapy and psychological consultation. Speech therapists and social workers are employed by less than half of the schools. Service provided by special schools, on the whole, are accorded with the teachers’ expectation. However, lacking of speech therapy service leads to the teacher's expectation unfulfilled. 2.Most specialists of special schools serve provide pull-out service, and there is a considerable lack of integrated collaboration. 3.Most specialists think they can fulfill themselves in special education school. Although they have confidence in themselves, but the most unsatisfied are as followed : the severity of students’ disabilities ; lack of supported worker ; lack of parents’ cooperation ; lack of integration of administrative units ; lack of opportunities for advanced study ; and the negligence of specialists’ welfares and rights. 4.The results of the analysis are as followed : special education school teachers are found more aggressive than related specialists on the performance of the disciplinary team service ; senior or older specialists adapt themselves better than junior or younger ones ; the disciplinary team service of hearing impaired schools does not perform as well as expected ; the specialists of general special schools are less satisfied with their jobs and working conditions than other schools ; the related specialists who are employed permanently work more positively and efficiently than those who are employed annually or only for a certain period. 5.Administrators responsible for disciplinary team service think the lack of related specialists, lack of parents’ cooperation, and lack of collaboration among specialists are the biggest problems in performing the disciplinary team service. According to the result of this research, suggestions for solving the problems and the future researches are hence made.
期刊論文
1.汪宜霈、王志中(20021100)。高雄市身心障礙兒童專業團隊中之職能治療。職能治療學會雜誌,20,75-94。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅鈞令、褚增輝、施陳美津、施杏如、林清良、毛慧芬、黃曼聰、張志仲、呂淑貞、吳錦喻(20010900)。我國職能治療人力現況與分析。職能治療學會雜誌,19,9-23。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖華芳(19980400)。發展遲緩兒童早期療育專業團隊合作模式。中華民國物理治療學會雜誌,23(2),127-140。  延伸查詢new window
4.林韋宏、張哲豪(19970900)。職能治療師在臺灣特殊學校與機構之現況初探。職能治療學會雜誌,15,25-32。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾進興(19990500)。也談專業團隊--兼談語言治療人力資源。特教新知通訊,6(3),1-4。  延伸查詢new window
6.廖華芳、李靜芬、黃惠聲(20010600)。臺北縣特殊教育三年專業團隊運作模式之成果。物理治療,26(3),147-158。  延伸查詢new window
7.Hanft, B. E.、Anzalone, M.(2001)。Issues in professional development: Preparing and supporting occupational therapists in early childhood。Infant and young children,13(4),67-78。  new window
8.Pretti-Frontczak, K.、Bricker, D.(2000)。Enhancing the quality of individualized education plane goals and objectives。Journal of early intervention,23(2),92-105。  new window
9.Wolery, M.、Brashers, M. S.、Neitzel, J. C.(2002)。Ecological Congruence Assessment for Classroom Activities and Routines: Identifying Goals and Intervention Practices in Childcare。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,22(3),131-142。  new window
10.吳武典(19960900)。特殊教育國際學術交流的經驗與啟示。特殊教育季刊,60,1-7。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.蕭夙娟、王天苗(19980600)。國中小啟智班實施專業整合之意見調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊,16,131-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.胡永崇(20030300)。個別化教育計畫的困境與檢討:接受問卷調查的啟智班教師之書面陳述意見分析。屏東師院學報,18(上),81-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.傅秀媚(20020800)。早期療育中跨專業團隊評估模式相關問題研究。特殊教育學報,16,1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.盛華、葉文英、鄭志卿(20011100)。聽語治療人力政策建言。中華民國聽力語言學會雜誌,16,76-91。  延伸查詢new window
15.王南梅(2002)。2000年台灣聽語人員教育規劃及人力分析。中華民國聽語治療學會雜誌,16,92-107。  延伸查詢new window
16.王雅瑜、李淑貞、孫世恆、王慧儀、白偉男、林素華(2001)。台灣地區身心障礙學生之物理治療專業服務調查。中華民國物理治療學會雜誌,26(6),277-289。  延伸查詢new window
17.廖華芳、劉淑玉、黃惠聲、林麗音、楊素端、李佳蕙、郭美雀、林銀秋、吳淑芬(1997)。跨科技專業整合早期療育模式教養院探討。中華物療誌,23(1),12-16。  延伸查詢new window
18.廖鳳伶(2000)。專業團隊在特殊教育裡的運用。班級經營,4(4),29-34。  延伸查詢new window
19.鄧壽山(2001)。特殊學校專業人員進用狀況探討。特殊教育品質的提昇。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,227-241。  延伸查詢new window
20.羅均令(1999)。台北市學校體系職能治療服務模式之發展。職能治療學會雜誌,17,67-74。  延伸查詢new window
21.Dixie, S. H.(2000)。The risks and opportunities of the IEP requirements under IDEA97。The journal of special education,33(4),195-204。  new window
22.Kovanen, P. S.(2001)。Professional practice in child assessment and planning。Journal of early intervention,24(1),25-34。  new window
23.Perry, D. F.、Greer, M.、Goldhammer, K.(2001)。Fulfilling the promise of early intervention: Rates of delivered IFSP services。Journal of early intervention,24(2),90-102。  new window
24.Thomas, S. T.、Hawke, C.(1999)。Health-Care service for children with disabilities。The Journal of Special education,32(4),226-237。  new window
會議論文
1.曾進興(1999)。專業整合介紹。高雄市八十八學年身心障礙教育專業團隊服務研討會,1-21。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾進興(2001)。特教團隊的兩種意義。身心障礙學生個案管理與轉銜研討會,高師大特殊教育中心主辦 (會議日期: 九十年十二月七日)。高雄:高雄師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳靜江(1995)。殘障者社區化就業輔導模式之發展與成效分析:第一階段成果報告。高雄師範大學特殊教育系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.趙可屏(1997)。臺灣地區國民教育階段在家教育學童專業整合服務之現況研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡昌原(2002)。國小啟仁班實施專業團隊服務模式之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳麗圓(1998)。個別化教育方案發展模式之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉斐文(2003)。啟智學校教師參與專業團隊合作之基本能力的研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林寶貴(2000)。特殊教育理論與實務。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.林寶貴(1999)。身心障礙相關專業人員專業整合研習會手冊。行政院國科會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Orelove, F. P.、Sobsey, D.(1996)。Educating children with multiple disabilities: A transdisciplinary approach。Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
4.Bondurant-Utz, J. A.、Luciano, L. B.(1994)。A practical guide to infant and preschool assessment in special education。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.教育部(1999)。中華民國特殊教育概況。臺北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
6.鈕文英(1998)。身心障礙教育專業團隊設置與實施辦法之制定研究。高雄:高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
7.Mcloughlin, J. A.、Lewis, R. A.(2001)。Assessing students with special needs。Merrill:Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.Rainforth, B. J.、York-Barr, J.(1997)。Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities:Integrating therapy and educational services。Baltimore:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
其他
1.Jeschke, T. A.(1994)。Special education: Program evaluation(ED375503)。  new window
2.Smith, P. D.(1990)。Integrating related services into programs for students with service and multiple handicaps: Kentucky systems change projec(No. ED354679)。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳靜江(1995)。生態評量在支持性就業之應用。殘障者職業訓練與就業輔導之理論與實務。台北:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅湘敏(1999)。特殊教育專業團隊的理念、模式和運作之探討。特殊教育文集。屛東:屛東師範學院特教中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊妙芬(1996)。生態評量再重度障礙教學上之應用。重度障礙教育之理論與實務(1)。台南:台南師院特教中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE