臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國中基本學力測驗之DIF的實徵分析：以91年度兩次測驗為例
書刊名：教育學刊
作者：余民寧 引用關係／謝進昌
作者(外文)：Yu, Min-ning／Hsieh, Jin-chang
出版日期：2006
卷期：26
頁次：頁241-275
主題關鍵詞：ETS DIF分類系統；M-H法；差異試題功能；國中基本學力測驗；Basic competence test；Differential item functioning；ETS DIF classification rules；Mantel-haenszel method
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:127
本研究主要目的為探討國中基本學力測驗不同考區間存在的DIF現況，以91年度兩次測驗之實徵資料為例，採M-H法進行試題的檢定，同時搭配ETS DIF分類系統，針對DIF試題進行分類，欲呈現一客觀及多角度的DIF檢定報告。研究結果如下：一、不同考區間DIF檢定情況，大致可獲得滿意的結果，其中以第二比較組（基隆與嘉義）DIF情況較嚴重；科目間，以社會科第一次測驗DIF整體現象最高。二、91年國中基測中仍存有少數偏高DIF比率的科目，且多數存在著一致性的有利或不利於某考區的現象。三、採M-H法進行DIF檢定時，同時搭配ETS DIF分類系統，較不受樣本因素影響，可得到一客觀、可信的DIF指標。最後根據研究結果，於文後提出相關建議與省思供讀者參考。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the phenomena of DIF on Basic Competence Test (BCT) among different exam-areas. We tried to use Mante-Haenszel method and ETS DIF classification rules to analyze the actual data of 2002 BCT two tests to present an objective and multidimensional DIF report. The conclusions are as follows: 1. The condition of DIF among different exam-areas may come to a satisfying result. Among exam-areas, the second comparison group (Keelung vs. Chiayi) exhibits the highest level of DIF; among exam-courses, the first social exam-course test exhibits the highest level of DIF. 2. There are still a few exam-courses having higher DIF ratio on 2002 BCT and mostly tending to favor or disfavor some exam-areas. 3. The use of M-H method along with ETS DIF classification rules may efficiently exclude the impact of sample sizes and obtain an objective-and-trustworthy DIF evidence. Finally, some suggestions and reflections for future studies are proposed.
期刊論文
1.簡茂發、劉湘川、許天維、郭伯臣、殷志文(19950100)。以Mantel-Haenszel法檢定試題區別功能之相關因素探討。測驗年刊，42，85-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Roussos, L.、Stout, W.(1996)。Simulation studies of effects of small sample size and studied item parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenszel Type I error performance。Journal of Educational Measurement，33，215-230。  new window
3.Fidalgo, A. M.、Mellenbergh, G. J.、Muñiz, J.(2000)。Effects of amount of DIF, test length, and purification type on Robustness and power of Mantel-Haenszel procedures。Methods of Psychological Research Online，5(3)，43-54。  new window
4.Swaminathan, H.、Rogers, H. J.(1990)。Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures。Journal of Educational Measurement，27(4)，361-370。  new window
5.Mantel, N.、Haenszel, W. M.(1959)。Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from respective studies of disease。Journal of the National Cancer institute，22，719-748。  new window
6.Dorans, N. J.、Kulick, E.(1986)。Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the SAT。Journal of Educational Measurement，23，355-368。  new window
7.Narayanan, P.、Swaminathan, H.(1994)。Performance of the Mantel-Haenszel and simultaneous item bias procedures for detecting differential item functioning。Applied Psychological Measurement，18，315-328。  new window
8.Landis, R. J.、Heyman, E. R.、Kock, G. G.(1978)。Average Partial Association in Three-way Contingency Tables: A Review and Discussion of Alternative Tests。International Statistical Review，46，237-254。  new window
9.Linn, R. L.、Harnisch, D. L.(1981)。Interaction between Item Content and Group Membership on Achievement Test Items。Journal of Educational Measurement，18(2)，109-118。  new window
10.Narayanan, P.、Swaminathan, H.(1999)。Identification of Items that Show Nonuniform DIF。Applied Psychological Measurement，20，257-274。  new window
11.Raju, Nambury S.(1990)。Determining the Significance of Estimated Signed and Unsigned Areas Between Two Item Response Functions。Applied Psychological Measurement，14(2)，197-207。  new window
12.Schmitt, A. P.、Dorans, N. J.(1990)。Differential Item Functioning for Minority Examinees on the SAT。Journal of Educational Measurement，27(1)，67-81。  new window
13.Shealy, R.、Stout, W.(1993)。Model-based Standardization Approach that Separates True Bias/DIF from Group Ability Differences and Detects Test Bias/DTF as Well as Bias/DIF。Psychometrika，58，159-194。  new window
14.Zenisky, A. L.、Hambleton, R. K.(2003)。Detection of Differential Item Functioning in Large-scale State Assessments: A Study Evaluating a Two-stage Approach。Educational and Psychological Measurement，63(1)，51-64。  new window
15.余民寧(1993)。試題反應理論的介紹（13）－試題偏差的診斷。研習資訊，10(6)，7-11。  延伸查詢new window
16.盧雪梅(2000)。Mantel-Haenszel DIF程序之第一類型錯誤率和DIF嚴重度分類結果研究。測驗年刊，47(1)，57-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Birch, M. W.(1964)。The Detection of Partial Association: The 2*2 Case。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Methodological，26，313-324。  new window
18.Clauser, B.、Mazor, K.、Hambleton, R. K.(1994)。The Effects of Score Group Width on the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure。Journal of Educational Measurement，31(1)，67-78。  new window
會議論文
1.王振世(1997)。不同計分方式對DIF呈現的影響。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇雅蕙、王文中(2001)。三種Mantel-Haenszel DIF檢驗程序的效果。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.張麗麗(1995)。城鄉、性別與教學差異對試題偏差指標的影響與四種試題偏差探查方法的比較。屏東縣屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cardall, C.、Coffman, W. E.(1964)。A Method for Comparing the Performance of Different Groups on the Item in a Test。Princeton, NJ。  new window
學位論文
1.戴麗紅(1994)。大學入學考試試題偏誤之研究 : 試題特徵曲線法和Mantel-Haenszel法之比較(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳明終(1996)。能力測驗試題偏誤之研究，0。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Lehman, J. D.(1986)。Opportunity to Learn and Differential Item Functioning，0。  new window
4.林坤昌(1998)。DIF檢定方法之探討與比較，0。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉雅俐(2000)。以概率比法探討兩種量尺限制在試題反應理論的差異試題功能檢定之效果，0。  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇雅蕙(2001)。多分題差異試題功能之檢定，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院主計處(1983)。中華民國統計地區標準分類。臺北：行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
2.Camilli, G.、Shepard, L. A.(1994)。Methods for identifying biased test items。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
3.Lord, Frederic M.(1980)。Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
4.Cox, D. R.(1970)。Analysis of Binary Data。Analysis of Binary Data。London, UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Holland, P. W.、Thayer, D. T.(1988)。Differential Item Performance and Mantel-Haenszel procedure。Test Validity。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Dorans, Neil J.、Holland, Paul W.(1993)。DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization。Differential item functioning。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：679（臺灣：668，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2017497 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67833946
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上