:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Liang Qichao and the Conceptualization of "Race" in Late Qing China
書刊名:中央研究院近代史研究所集刊
作者:沙培德 引用關係
作者(外文):Zarrow, Peter
出版日期:2006
卷期:52
頁次:頁113-164
主題關鍵詞:種族知識梁啟超晚清辛亥革命帝國主義科學Racial knowledgeLiang QichaoLate QingRevolution of 1911ImperialismScience
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:383
  • 點閱點閱:93
讓晚清知識分子起而追求政治現代化的種族知識,屬於「應用知識」的一種。而現代中國認同之建立,則是依賴物種科學來奠定。梁啟超(1873-1929)是此一中國認同之建立的關鍵人物。他希望中國人能夠在世界人種當中求得一席立足之地,進而壯大。晚清革命分子中,其反滿民族主義是以種族知識為基礎的人,亦大多與梁啟超持相同觀點。梁啟超扮演著兩種關鍵性角色:首先,他是將種族知識引進中國的中樞人物;其次,在與革命分子的對話中,他對於強烈「反種族霸權」觀點的建立,扮演著舉足輕重的地位。   種族概念在十九世紀末是以西方科學為基礎。「種族」成了帝國主義的基礎架構之一,但是梁啟超與其他中國知識分子則使用種族知識,來挑戰西方帝國主義合理化的意識形態。梁啟超大半都堅持,種族間存在著彼此融合演變的易變性,而他同時也表白「黃種人」並不差於「白種人」。雖然他不免也帶有種族歧視的態度,不過他反對反滿主義的言論,則已替未來在辛亥革命之後所誕生的多民族國,預留伏筆。梁啟超利用種族知識來重寫中國歷史,並致力爭取中國在世界的地位。他並非唯一這樣做的知識分子,也說不上是中國知識分子的典型代表。話雖如此,我們卻可以從梁啟超身上看出,晚清知識分子是如何採納由帝國主義強權首先闢用之新文化和新象徵等資源,以遂其目的。
Racial knowledge was a kind of “applied knowledge” that enabled late Qing intellectuals to pursue political modernization. The creation of modern Chinese identity depended on the science of biological race. Critical to this process was Liang Qichao 梁啟超 (1873-1929). Liang sought to situate the Chinese in a world of races and make it stronger. Much the same was true of late Qing revolutionaries, whose anti-Manchu nationalism was based on racial knowledge. Liang’s role was two-fold. First, he was pivotal to the introduction of racial knowledge to China. And second, in conversation with the revolutionaries, he was critical in establishing a deeply anti-hegemonic vision of the relationship between the races.   By the late nineteenth century, the concept of race was based on Western science. “Race” formed a building block of imperialism, but Liang and other intellectuals used racial knowledge to challenge the hegemony of Western justifications of imperialism. For the most part, Liang insisted on the mutability of races, while he simultaneously proclaimed the “Yellow” race to be the equal of the “White” race. Liang was hardly immune from racialist attitudes, but his opposition to anti-Manchuism foreshadowed the multi-ethnic state that would emerge from the Revolution of 1911. Liang used racial knowledge to rewrite Chinese history and to position China in the world. Liang was not the only intellectual to do this, nor did he speak for all Chinese intellectuals. Yet by focusing on Liang, we can highlight how late Qing intellectuals could adopt new cultural and symbolic resources that were first wielded by the imperialist powers to their [the late Qing intellectuals'] own purposes.
期刊論文
1.羅志田(20020600)。包容儒學、諸子與黃帝的國學--清季士人尋求民族認同象徵的努力。臺大歷史學報,29,87-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Zhao, Gang(2006)。Reinventing China: Imperial Qing Ideology and the Rise of Modern Chinese National Identity in the Early Twentieth Century。Modern China,32(1),3-30。  new window
3.遲雲飛(2001)。清末最後十年的平滿漢畛域問題。近代史研究,2001(5),21-44。  延伸查詢new window
4.汪榮祖(19830600)。Chang Ping-lin and the Rising Chinese Revolutionary Movement, 1900-1905。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,12,219-247。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.沈松僑(19971200)。我以我血薦軒轅--黃帝神話與晚清的國族建構。臺灣社會研究季刊,28,1-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王明珂(20020900)。論攀附:近代炎黃子孫國族建構的古代基礎。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,73(3),583-624。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蔣俊(1993)。梁啟超早期史學思想與浮田和民的《史學通論》。文史哲,1993(5),28-32。  延伸查詢new window
8.李朝津(1996)。章太炎的民族主義─中國近代自由民族主義典形成初探。臺灣社會研究季刊,21,171-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.孫隆基(2000)。清季民族主義與黃帝崇拜之發明。歷史研究,2000(3),68-79。  延伸查詢new window
10.高強、劉海玲(2002)。論梁啟超的「大民族主義」。寶雞文理學院學報 (哲學社會科學版),22(1),75-80。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊思信(2000)。試論傳統「大一統」觀念對清末「排滿」運動的影響。中州學刊,2000(4),159-163。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊肅獻(1979)。梁啟超與中國近代民族主義:一八九六~一九○七。史原,9,129-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.楊際開(1998)。章炳麟為甚麼要「反滿」?。二十一世紀,46,49-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.小野川秀美(1964)。劉師培と無政府主義。東洋學報,36,695-720。  延伸查詢new window
15.石川禎浩(2005)。20世紀初年中國留日學生"黃帝"之再造。清史研究,2005(4),51-62。  延伸查詢new window
16.Blue, Gregory(1999)。Gobineau on China: Race Theory, the "Yellow Peril," and the Critique of Modernity。Journal of World History,10(1),93-139。  new window
17.Dureau, Chrsitine、Low, Morris(1999)。The Politics of Knowledge: Science, Race and Evolution in Asia and the Pacific。History and Anthropology,11(2)/11(3),131-156。  new window
18.Zarrow, Peter(2004)。Historical Trauma: Anti-Manchuism and Memories of Atrocities in Late Qing China。History and Memory,1(2),67-104。  new window
19.Zarrow, Peter(2003)。Old Myth into New History: The Building Blocks of Liang Qichao's 'New History'。Historiography East and West,1(2),204-241。  new window
20.蔣俊(1993)。梁啟超早期史學思想與浮田和民的《史學通論》。文史哲,5,28-32。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Yang, Fang-yen(1999)。Nation, People, Anarchy: Liu Shih-p’ei and the Crisis of Order in Modern China(博士論文)。University of Wisconsin-Madison。  new window
2.Tsu, Jing-Yuen(2001)。Failure: Nation, Race, and Literature in China, 1895-1937,Cambridge, MA。  new window
圖書
1.Edward J.M. Rhoads(2000)。Manchus & Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861–1928。University of Washington Press。  new window
2.(清)康有為(1958)。孔子改制考。孔子改制考。上海。  延伸查詢new window
3.蕭公權(1975)。A Modern China and a New World: K'ang Yu-wei, Reformer and Utopian, 1858-1927。Seattle, WA:University of Washington。  new window
4.Crossley, Pamela Kyle(1999)。A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology。University of California Press。  new window
5.坂元ひろ子(2004)。中国民族主義の神話--人種‧身体.ジェンダー。東京:岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.Frederickson, George M.(2002)。Racism: A Short History。Carlton North:Scribe。  new window
7.羅福惠(1996)。中國民族主義思想論稿。武漢。  延伸查詢new window
8.Laitinen, Kauko(1990)。Chinese Nationalism in the Late Qing: Zhang Binglin as an Anti-Manchu Propagandist。London。  new window
9.Hannaford, Ivan(1996)。Race: the History of an Idea in the West。Washington, DC。  new window
10.Lust, John(1968)。The Revolutionary Army: A Chinese Nationalist Tract of 1903。The Revolutionary Army: A Chinese Nationalist Tract of 1903。The Hague。  new window
11.陶緒(1995)。晚清民族主義思潮。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭師渠(1993)。晚清國粹派--文化思想研究。北京:北京師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Chung, Yuehtsen Juliette(2002)。Struggle for National Survival: Eugenics in Sino-Japanese Contexts, 1896-1945。Routledge。  new window
14.Pusey, James Reeve(1983)。China and Charles Darwin。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
15.Foucault, Michel(1980)。Power and Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977。New York:Pantheon。  new window
16.張枬、王忍之(1978)。辛亥革命前十年間時論選集。北京:生活‧讀書‧新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
17.Karl, Rebecca E.(2002)。Staging the World: Chinese Nationalism at the Turn of the Twentieth Century。Duke University Press。  new window
18.張朋園(1964)。梁啟超與清季革命。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
19.狹間直樹(1999)。共同研究梁啟超:西洋近代思想受容と明治日本。みすず書房。  延伸查詢new window
20.Foucault, Michel、Bertani, Mauro、Fontana, Alessandro、Macey, David(2003)。"Society Must be Defended": lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976。Picador。  new window
21.湯志鈞(1984)。康有為與戊戌變法。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.Dikötter, Frank(1992)。The discourse of race in modern China。Stanford, Calif:Stanford University Press。  new window
23.王汎森(1985)。章太炎的思想(1869-1919)及其對儒學傳統的衝擊。臺北:時報文化出版事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.Wong, Young-tsu(1989)。Search for Modern Nationalism: Zhang Binglin and Revolutionary China, 1869-1936。Oxford University Press。  new window
25.Williams, Raymond(1983)。Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
26.Williams, Raymond(1985)。Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society。Oxford University Press。  new window
27.Chang, Hao(1971)。Liang Ch'i-Ch'ao and Intellectual Transition in China, 1890-1907。Harvard University Press。  new window
28.康有為(1979)。大同書。臺北:龍田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
29.湯志鈞(1989)。近代經學與政治。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
30.劉師培(1997)。劉師培全集。北京市:中共中央黨校出版社。  延伸查詢new window
31.鄭匡民(2003)。梁啟超啟蒙思想的東學背景。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
32.Young, Robert J. C.(1995)。Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race。Routledge。  new window
33.王汎森(19870000)。古史辨運動的興起:一個思想史的分析。臺北:允晨。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Perdue, Peter C.(2005)。China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
35.梁啟超(1996)。飲冰室合集‧文集七。飲冰室合集‧文集七。北京。  延伸查詢new window
36.鄒容(1958)。革命軍。革命軍。上海。  延伸查詢new window
37.錢宗翰(1906)。繪圖中國白話史。繪圖中國白話史。  延伸查詢new window
38.白河次郎、國府種德(1911)。支那文明史。支那文明史。東京。  延伸查詢new window
39.姜義華(2002)。章炳麟評傳。南京:南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
40.張朋園(1981)。梁啟超與清季革命。梁啟超與清季革命。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Mosse, George L.(1978)。Toward the Final Solution: A History of European Racism。London:J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.。  new window
42.Nicholson, Philip Yale(1999)。Who Do We Think We Are? Race and Nation in the Modern World。Who Do We Think We Are? Race and Nation in the Modern World。Armonk, NY。  new window
43.Stepan, Nancy(1984)。The Idea of Race in Science: Great Britain, 1800-1960。The Idea of Race in Science: Great Britain, 1800-1960。London。  new window
44.Sun, Lung-Kee(2002)。The Chinese National Character: From Nationhood to Individuality。Armonk, NY:M.E. Sharpe。  new window
45.石川禎浩(2001)。近代東アジア"文明圈"の成立とその共同言語-梁啟超における「人種」お中心に。西洋近代文明と中華世界:京都大學人文科學硏究所70周年記念シンポジウム論集。京都。  延伸查詢new window
46.石川禎浩(2002)。辛亥革命時期的種族主義與中國人類學的興起。辛亥革命與20世紀的中國。北京。  延伸查詢new window
47.坂元ひろ子(2005)。中國史上の人種概念をめぐつて。人種概念の普遍性を問う:西洋的パラダイムを越えて。京都。  延伸查詢new window
48.森時彥(1978)。民族主義と無政府主義:國學の徒、劉師培の革命論。辛亥革命の研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
49.Bernal, Martin(1976)。Liu Shih-p' ei and National Essence。The Limits of Change: Essays on Conservative Alternatives in Republican China。Cambridge, MA。  new window
50.Geertz, Clifford(1983)。Common Sense as a Cultural System。Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology。New York。  new window
51.Yoshihiro, Ishikawa(2004)。Liang Qichao, the field of geograph in Meiji Japan, and Geographical Determinism。The Role of Japan in Liang Qichao's Introduction of Modern Western Civilization to China。Berkeley。  new window
52.Price, Don C.(2004)。From Might to Right: Liang Qichao and the Comforts of Darwism in Late-Meiji Japan。The Role of Japan in Liang Qichao's Introduction of Modern Western Civilization to China。Berkeley。  new window
53.Hiroki, Sakamoto(2004)。The Formatin of National Identity in Liang Qichao and Its Relationship to Gender。The Role of Japan in Liang Qichao's Introduction of Modern Western Civilization to China。Berkeley。  new window
54.Schneider, Laurence A.(1976)。National Essence and the New Intelligentsia。The Limits of Change: Essays on Conservative Alternatives in Republican China。Cambridge, MA。  new window
55.Furth, Charlotte(1976)。The Sage as Rebel: The Inner World of Chang Ping-lin。The Limits of Change: Essays on Conservative Alternatives in Republican China。Cambridge, MA。  new window
56.De LaCouperie, Terrien(1966)。Wester, Western Origin of the Early Chinese Civilization from 2300 B. C. to 200 A. D.。Osnabruck:Ottozeller。  new window
其他
1.(1892)。格致彙編。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1905)。國粹學報。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)丁寶書。蒙學中國歷史教科書,上海。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Fogel, Joshua Andrew(2004)。The Role of Japan in Liang Qichao's Introduction of Modern Western Civilization to China。The Role of Japan in Liang Qichao's Introduction of Modern Western Civilization to China。Berkeley。  new window
2.嚴復(1998)。嚴復合集。嚴復合集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bastid-Bruguière, Marianne(2004)。The Japanese-Induced German Connection of Modern Chinese Ideas of the State: Liang Qichao and the Guojia lun of J. K. Bluntschli。The Role of Japan in Liang Qichao's Introduction of Modern Western Civilization to China。Berkeley:Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE