There's an important achievement of the intertextuality research which bring up by the at the present literature theory. In Dr. Chiez, Tzung-wu's essay on the relationship between Fu and assumed dialogues, he claims the form of the Fu of ”assumed dialogue style” had been transition from ”assumed roles” to ”real historical roles”. If we analyze 'wind fu', 'autumn fu', 'snow fu' and 'moon fu' by close reading, we will discover that the Assumed role had designed very careful and attentive in many characteristics, like dialogue, action, behavior, mood, attitude…etc. So in this paper, I analyze the ”Assumed Dialogue” of Wushai-Fu in all the past dynasties. I will differentiate between ”assumed historical roles” and ”respond to Canon”. In my conclusions, I consider the ”Assumed Historical roles” and the ”respond to canon” make Fu's authors bring up the ”intertextuality” to the classic works that had passed. Besides, no matter ”Assumed Historical roles” or ”respond to Canon”, there both are an ”Dialogue” or ”intertextuality” with History. And interestingly, the ”Dialogue” there's most important Component of Fu.