:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:實作評量融入師資生班級經營課程實施成效探究
書刊名:朝陽人文社會學刊
作者:曾素秋 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Su-chiu
出版日期:2010
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁91-134
主題關鍵詞:班級經營師資培育師資生實作評量課程實施Classroom managementCurriculum implementationPerformance assessmentPre-service teacherTeacher education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:102
班級經營課程,強調學生多元能力開展及實務經驗建立,而實作評量重視提升學生之實務能力,恰符合班級經營課程目標。因此,研究者以實作評量融入班級經營課程教學活動,培養師資生務實之班級經營能力,並探究其實施效益。 本研究採量表與文件分析瞭解課程實施成效。量表部分以陳木金(1999)編製之「教師班級經營策略量表」為研究工具,採單組前、後測之設計,以相依樣本t-test考驗,瞭解師資生課程實施前、後之差異。研究結果發現,實作評量融入班級經營課程教學活動之課程實施後:1.師資生在「教師班級經營策略量表」之總分、「安排教室環境」、「建立和諧溝通」、「督導學生活動」、「建立教室規則」、「處理不良行為」的班級經營知能顯著提升。2.師資生在「善用獎懲增強」層面之班級經營能力,未能顯著提升。 文件分析部分,研究者於課程實施後蒐集學生的反思報告,進行成效探討。研究結果發現:1.師資生感受不同課程單元實作評量之實施成效,以優良導師訪談與報告最佳,其次依序為班級經營計畫與發表、班級特色活動之帶領與發表、教室佈置成果發表、班規擬定與發表。2.各種不同課程單元之實作評量均能有效地提供師資生建構不同層面之班級經營能力,但也發現實作評量設計不易,增加學生負擔。
The purpose of this study is to explore the efficiency of implementing performance assessment in classroom management program of pre-service teachers. Class management program emphasizes to build students' multi and practical abilities, and performance assessment just has the characteristics. Therefore the researcher implements assessment performances in a pre-service teachers' classroom management program and then investigates the effect of the program. This study uses questionnaire and document analysis to understand the effectiveness of curriculum implementation. In the scale part, the researcher adopted the Scale of Teacher Classroom Management Strategies Inventory designed by Chen Mu Jin in 1999 and used t-test to compare the pre and the post score of the scale. The result was found that the effectiveness of implementing performance assessment in classroom management program was great. The total score and sub-scale scores were promoted, including of arranging classroom environment, communication with students, supervising students' activities, building classroom' rules, treatment disorder behaviors. But the sub-score of utility punishment and reinforcement wasn't promoted obviously. Document analysis section, the researcher collected the documents after the implementation of the course and discussed the effectiveness of the course. The result was found: 1. The effectiveness was different from the different types of performance assessment. Pre-service teachers felt the effectiveness of performance assessments in order is class management plan, class activity designing, decoration of classroom, and drawing up classroom rules. 2. All the different types of performance assessment can effectively constructing different levels of pre-service teachers classroom management ability, but designing performance assessment into practice is not easy. Performance assessment also increases the loading of pre-service teachers.
期刊論文
1.李靜如(20051200)。實作評量在兩性關係課程上的應用:以技術學院學生為例。教育研究與發展期刊,1(3),147-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Claudia, L.、Kendyll, S.(1994)。Performance assessments for beginning teachers。Phi Delta Kappan,76,318-322。  new window
3.Okhremtchouk, I., Seiki, S., Gilliland, B., Ateh, C., Wallace, M.,、Kato, A..(2009)。Voices of Pre-Service Teachers: Perspectives on the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT)。Issues in Teacher Education,18(1),39-62。  new window
4.王千倖(20070800)。多元教材運用於「班級經營」學習之行動研究。師大學報・教育類,52(2),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張麗麗(20040400)。影響教師自評實作評量實施品質相關因素之探討。南師學報(教育類),38(1),95-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Pierson, C. A.、Beck, S. S.(1993)。Performance assessment-the realities that will influence the rewards。Childhood Education,70(1),29-32。  new window
7.張民杰(20080300)。以案例教學法增進實習教師班級經營知能之研究。國民教育研究學報,20,147-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.魯俊賢、吳毓瑩(20070400)。過程技能之二階段實作評量:規劃、實踐與效益探究。科學教育學刊,15(2),215-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王秀琲、胡豐榮、許天維(2004)。國小五年級學童分數概念之實作評量與SS分析。測驗統計年刊,12(上),101-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.周春美、沈健華(2004)。教育學程學生發展「班級經營」知能之行動研究。教育科學,3(2),82-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.周家卉(2008)。實作評量在生活科技課程實施之探討。生活科技教育月刊,41(7),51-83。  延伸查詢new window
12.林志忠(2000)。實作評量與真實評量的運用與反省。國教輔導,40(2),30-35。  延伸查詢new window
13.徐怡詩、王國華(2003)。國中自然與生活科技教師是行實作評量之行動研究。科學教育,14,21-35。  延伸查詢new window
14.高博銓(2009)。班級經營的問題與策略。課程與教學,25(4),85-90。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳學淵、王國華(2004)。國中教師發展實作評量之探討-以自然與生活科技領域教師為例。科學教育,14,165-180。  延伸查詢new window
16.謝麗雪、蕭雅萍(2002)。國小英語實施口語實作評量初探。教育研究月刊,101,82-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Brualdi, A.(1998)。Implementing performance assessment in the classroom。Practical Assessment,6(2)。  new window
18.Chung, R..(2008)。Beyond Assessment: Performance Assessments in Teacher Education。Teacher Education Quarterly,35(1),7-28。  new window
19.Deborah, A. G., Donetta J. C.,、Pamela H. K.(2005)。Voices From the Trenches: An Exploration of Teachers' Management Knowledge。The Journal of Educational Research,99(1),56-64。  new window
20.Gary, R. G.(2005)。Performance Assessment and Renewing Teacher Education: The Possibilities of the NBPTS Standards。The Clearing House,78(4),142-145。  new window
21.Joan, L. H.(1998)。The state of performance assessments。School Administrator,55(11),17。  new window
22.Johnsen, S..(2010)。Teacher Performance Assessments。Gifted Child Today,33(1),565。  new window
學位論文
1.楊銀興(2000)。傳統評量與新式評量之比較及國小教師對實施新式評量相關問題覺知情形之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.傅于珊(2006)。實作評量實施於生活課程之個案研究,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Airasian, P. W.(1991)。Classroom assessment。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.陳木金(1999)。班級經營。揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭生玉(1993)。心理與教育研究法。臺北市:精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.單文經譯(2008)。班級經營理論與實務。台北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE