臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：通識課程是營養學分嗎？--以教學與選課決策模型分析為例
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：張榮富
作者(外文)：Chang, Jung-fu
出版日期：2010
卷期：33:4
頁次：頁81-107
主題關鍵詞：通識教育；選修課；配合法則；放寬教學；營養學分；General education courses；Elective courses；The Matching law；Reduce the standard of course；Easy course
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:80
  • 點閱點閱:139
本文以「理性選擇」、「紀合法則」與「道德情緒」建立一個老師在教學及學生在選課時的成本效益分析模型，用以分析兩個與放寬教學標準相關的問題：一、多數教師在面臨評鑑分數低落或倒課風險升高的「教學不順」困境時，是否會以放寬教學標準的方式來紓解其教學生涯中的壓力？二、因爲教師在開通識課時面臨較高的「倒課風險」與較低的「道德風險」，通識課程是否會因此比系內專業選修課程史爲簡單容易？本文以某國立大學的學生與老師爲樣本，問卷調杳結果顯示：一、受訪教師多傾向於認爲他的同事們會因評鑑結果差或選課人數少而調高給分、降低不及格率並減少作業：二、教師與學生們普遍認爲通識課的不及格比例及成績嚴格程度皆會低於專業選修課。本文的預測得到初步證實，通識課程比系內專業選修課程更寬鬆容易，是（該校）師生眼中的「營養學分」。
Does a general education course equal to an "easy" course? A general model of choosing and teaching elective courses, which combine Herrnstein's matching law and Frank's moral emotion theory, is build in order to answer this question. Based on the model, this paper focuses on analyzing the market competition and the teaching environment differences between departmental elective courses and general education courses. Because teachers confront higher competition and unfavoble environment to the general education course, the study predicts that the general education courses are easier than the departmental elective courses. A questionnaire was used to test the students and teachers in one national university in Thiwan. Firstly, statistics show that most teachers tend to believe that their colleagues will reduce the standard of course when the risk of courses being cancelled (due to insufficient enrollment) is high or when the scores of students' evaluation teaching is low. Secondly, the results also support the prediction that teachers and students both feel that the general education courses are easier than in the departmental elective courses. More similar studies are suggested to do in the future to prove if the above statistic results are a general phenomena in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Greenwald, A. G.、Gillmore, G. M.(1997)。Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings。American Psychologist，52(11)，1209-1217。  new window
2.Goldman, L.(1985)。The betrayal of the gatekeepers: Grade inflation。Journal of General Education，37，97-121。  new window
3.張榮富(20070300)。從道德演化的「賽局模型」與「名譽模型」談道德教育--Frank道德情緒理論之應用。教育實踐與研究，20(1)，119-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Koshland, D. E.(1991)。Teaching and research。Science，251，249。  new window
5.Marsh, H. W.(1980)。The influence of student, course, and instructor characteristics in evaluations of university teaching。American Educational Research Journal，17(2)，219-237。  new window
6.Ryan, J. J.、Anderson, J. A.、Birchler, A. B.(1980)。Student evaluation: The faculty responds。Research in Higher Education，12，317-333。  new window
7.吳齊殷(1996)。社會贊許度與民主測驗中的民意。科學月刊，8，640-648。  延伸查詢new window
8.Leventhal, L.、Abrami, P. C.、Perry, R. P.、Breen, L. J.(1975)。Section selection in multi-section courses: Implications for the validation and use of teacher rating forms。Educational and Psychological Measurement，35，885-895。  new window
9.Powell, P. W.(1977)。Grades, learning, and student evaluation of instructors。Research in Higher Education，7，193-205。  new window
10.Babad, E.(2001)。Students’ course selection: Differential considerations for first and last course。Research in Higher Education，42(4)，469-492。  new window
11.Babad, E.、Tayeb, A.(2003)。Experimental analysis of students’ course selection。The British Journal of Educational Psychology，73(3)，373-393。  new window
12.Goldberg, G.、Callahan, J.(1991)。Objectivity of student evaluations of instructors。Journal of Education for Business，66(6)，377-378。  new window
13.Marsh, H. W.、Dunkin, M. J.(1992)。Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: A Multidimensional Perspective。Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research，8，143-233。  new window
14.Marsh, H. W.、Yeung, A. S.(1997)。Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement。American Educational Research Journal，34，691-720。  new window
15.Holtgraves, T. M.、Eck, J.、Lasky, B.(1997)。Face management, question wording, and social desirability。Journal of Applied Social Psychology，27，1650-1672。  new window
16.Clayson, D. E.、Haley, Debra A.(1990)。Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured?。Journal of Marketing Education，12(3)，9-17。  new window
17.曹嘉秀、魏孟雪(20030600)。影響學生評鑑教學之背景因素探討。測驗學刊，50(1)，143-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Herrnstein, R.(1970)。On the law of effect。Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour，13，242-266。  new window
19.葉紹國(19970900)。淡江大學通識教育改革之路--核心課程方案的實施、問題與展望。通識教育，4(3)，149-173。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳介英(20080600)。通識教育與臺灣的大學教育。思與言，46(2)，1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.葉紹國、溫博仕(20010500)。淡江大學核心課程學生選課行為與教學評鑑、學期成績等相關因素研究。淡江人文社會學刊，7，307-344。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Cohen, P. A.(1981)。Student rating of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies。Review of Educational Research，51(3)，281-309。  new window
23.Fisher, Robert J.(1993)。Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning。Journal of Consumer Research，20(2)，303-315。  new window
24.Mitchell, V. W.(1999)。Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisation and models。European Journal of Marketing，33(1/2)，163-195。  new window
25.Conchar, M. P.、Zinkhan, G. M.、Peters, C.、Olavarrieta, S.(2004)。An Integrated Framework for the Conceptualization of Consumers' Perceived-risk Processing。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，32(4)，418-437。  new window
26.Spears, Russell、Lea, Martin(1994)。Panacea or panopticon: The hidden power in computer-mediated communication。Communication Research，21(4)，427-459。  new window
27.黃毅志、巫有鎰(20030600)。影響教學評鑑得分因素之探討--以臺東師院為例。臺東師院學報，14(上)，347-370。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Crowne, Douglas P.、Marlowe, David A.(1960)。A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology。Journal of Consulting Psychology，24(4)，349-354。  new window
29.Zocco, D.(2009)。Risk theory and student course selection。Research in Higher Education Journal，3，1-29。  new window
30.林珊如(19991200)。大學生評鑑教學量表：編製及效度考驗。教育與心理研究，22(下)，295-321。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Baldwin, G.,、James, R.(2000)。The market in Australian higher education and the concept of student as informed consumer。Journal of Higher Education Policy and Managemen4 22(2)，22(2)，139-148。  new window
32.Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., Sethna, B. N.(1991)。The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups。Human-Computer Interaction，6，119-146。  new window
33.Marlin, J. W.,、Niss, J. F.(1980)。End-of- course evaluations as indicators of student learning and instructor effectiveness。Journal of Economic Education，11，16-27。  new window
34.Martin, E. S.(1989)。The relationship among college student characteristics and their assigned importance to dimensions of course choice information。Journal of College Student Development，30(1)，69-76。  new window
35.Modell, S.(2005)。Students as consumers: An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices。Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal，18(4)，537-563。  new window
36.Singh, G(2002)。Educational consumers or educational partners: A critical theory analysis。Critical Perspectives on Accounting，13(5-6)，681-700。  new window
37.Stumpf, S. A.,、Freedman, R. D.(1979)。Expected grade covariation with student ratings of instruction: Individual versus class effects。Journal of Educational Psychology，71，293-302。  new window
38.Baldwin, G.、James, R.(2000)。The market in Australian higher education and the concept of student as informed consumer。Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management，22(2)，139-148。  new window
39.Dubrovsky, V. J.、Kiesler, S.、Sethna, B. N.(1991)。The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups。Human-Computer Interaction，6，119-146。  new window
40.Modell, S.(2005)。Students as consumers: An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices。Accounting, Auditing; Accountability Journal，18(4)，537-563。  new window
41.Martin, E. S.(1989)。The relationship among college student characteristics and their assigned importance to dimensions of course choice information。Journal of College Student Development，30(1)，69-76。  new window
42.Singh, G.(2002)。Educational consumers or educational partners: A critical theory analysis。Critical Perspectives on Accounting，13(5/6)，681-700。  new window
43.Stumpf, S. A.、Freedman, R. D.(1979)。Expected grade covariation with student ratings of instruction: Individual versus class effects。Journal of Educational Psychology，71，293-302。  new window
44.Marlin, J. W.、Niss, J. F.(1980)。End-of-course evaluations as indicators of student learning and instructor effectiveness。Journal of Economic Education，11，16-27。  new window
會議論文
1.張德勝(1997)。學生評鑑教師教學--以花蓮師範學院為例。86學年教育學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
2.林孟彥、黃運圭、詹雪蘭(2006)。教學口碑對網路課程選課意願之影響。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.張德勝(1997)。學生評鑑教師教學―以花蓮師範學院為例。花蓮市。1-22。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅至良、林烘煜(2002)。電腦問卷、匿名效果對降低社會期望反應之探討。臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
5.Pereira, M. A. C.,、Da Silva, M. T.(2003)。A key question for higher education: Who are the customers?。GA。  new window
6.林孟彥、黃運圭、詹雪蘭(2006)。教學口碑對網路課程選課意願之影響。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.羅至良、林烘煜(2002)。電腦問卷、匿名效果對降低社會期望反應之探討。臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
8.Pereira, M. A. C.、Da Silva, M. T.(2003)。A key question for higher education: Who are the customers?。Atlanta, GA。  new window
圖書
1.Sixhury, G. R.,、Cashin, W. B.(1995)。Idea technical report no. 9: Descriptions of database for the IDEA diagnostic form。Manhattan, KS：Kansas State University。  new window
2.Frank, R.(1988)。Passions within reason。New York：W.W. Norton。  new window
3.Herrnstein, R.(1997)。The matching law。New York：Russel Sage Foundation。  new window
4.Brown, Penelope、Levinson, Stephen C.(1987)。Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.席玉蘋（譯）、R. Frank、P.Cook（原作者）(2004)。贏家通吃的社會。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.Feldman, K. A.(1997)。Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings。Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice。New York。  new window
7.席玉蘋、R. Frank、P. Cook(2004)。贏家通吃的社會。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.Feldman, K. A.(1997)。Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings。Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice。New York。  new window
單篇論文
1.Civian, J. T.，Brennan, R. T.(1996)。Student and course factors predicting satisfaction in undergraduate courses at Harvard University，Boston, MA：Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning, Harvard University。(No. ED 394440)。  new window
其他
1.Birnbaum, M. H.(1999)。A survey of faculty opinions concerning student evaluations of teaching，http://psych.fullerton.edu/mbimbaum/faculty3.htm， 20090601。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1308（臺灣：1301，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67640333
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上