Hare holds that any moral judgment is composed of prescriptiveness and universalizability that are rooted in the human nature aiming at survival and self-development. Furthermore, Hare contends that the property of universalizability deriving from the human nature implies the agreement on the value of "equality" interpreted by Hare in a utilitarian way.Th is paper will point out that the value of "equality" approved by all men for maintaining their survival must not be understood in a utilitarian way only. Th e utilitarianism cannot accommodate "individual rights", but "rights" are necessary for the human survival and self-realization. Even if nobody is opposed to the idea of "equality", people might disagree on its interpretation. For example, may the "equality" mean that all people own certain equal rights? Th is question should be answered, instead of by the arbitrariness of any theoretician alone, by all people involved, namely through a kind of social contract theory.