:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:古代世變與儒者的進退
書刊名:長庚人文社會學報
作者:杜正勝 引用關係
作者(外文):Tu, Cheng-sheng
出版日期:2011
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁1-54
主題關鍵詞:儒者六藝弟子職ConfucianistsConfucian six artsRules for disciplesOfficialRecluse
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:495
  • 點閱點閱:29
摘 要 本文自時代變化著眼,考察中國知識份子歷史,以「世變」為題,討論 中國古代封建制度崩潰到秦漢之際,約公元前550-200 年,政治、社會與文 化的交會。然此時代「知識份子」不限於後世所謂「儒者」,本文亦僅討論 儒家的一部分,其餘則留待日後,冀能形成一部中國古代儒士史。 主體分六節,即儒者的來源、儒者集團形成的現實基礎、儒者集團的精 神內涵、新時代儒者進退的挑戰、高尚其志者短暫的光輝、降志辱身之路。 本文認為,後世儒家可溯源至封建家臣;箇中差異在其形成集團,並從中建 立緊密的第六倫── 師生關係,擺脫封建家臣僅對上級負責的狹窄倫理,以 面對全體人民的使命自任,並以專屬統治貴族的君子人格自勵;孔子尤是促 成轉變的關鍵。 本文以三位指標性人物分別代表三個時代。春秋末年至戰國初為孔子; 這時封建趨於崩潰,部分遺習猶存。到戰國中期,列國競爭,統治者禮遇知 識份子以吸引人材,代表人物是孟軻。荀況則代表戰國晚期,專制王國已然 成形,知識份子淪為國家機器的小零件。全文論述雖不掩飾作者個人文化關 懷,但皆出於可信史料;惟思慮不及之處,仍望學界同好斧正。
Abstract This article examines the history of Chinese intellectuals from the perspective of changes during China’s ancient period from approximately the collapse of the feudal system to Qin and Han dynasties (550-200 BC), with an emphasis on the convergence of politics, society, and culture as the title, “changes in the ancient world”. The “intellectuals” during this period were not all “Confucianists” as we recognize today, and the Confucians involved in this article were also a portion of the Confucianists at that time. The author believes that the Confucianists can trace back to retainers in the feudal period. Unlike feudal retainers, however, the Confucianists formed their own separate group, established the sixth ethical relationship, between teachers and students, of an extremely close nature, and broke the narrow ethical principle by which feudal retainers were responsible only to their superiors. In this way, they could contribute themselves to take the responsibilities for the whole society. Furthermore, the Confucianists used the moral integrity of the gentlemen, monopolized by nobles during the feudal period, to motivate themselves. The key figure to promote this change was Confucius. In this article, the author provides three characteristic figures, namely Confucius, Mencius, and Xunzi to represent three different time periods as the period from the end of the Spring and Autumn period to the beginning of the Warring States period, the middle of the Warring States period, and the late Warring States period respectively.
期刊論文
1.杜正勝(19790900)。周代封建制度的社會結構--封建與宗法。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,50(3),551-613。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.趙翼(2009)。陔餘叢考。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.王引之(1980)。經義述聞。臺北:漢京文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.錢穆(1981)。先秦諸子繫年。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊寬(1997)。戰國史。上海:上海出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.杜正勝(1990)。編户齊民--傳統政治社會結構之形成。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.杜正勝(1996)。古典與現實之間。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.杜正勝(1992)。古代社會與國家。允晨文化實業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊伯峻(1982)。春秋左傳注。台北:源流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.荀況、楊倞、王先謙(1962)。荀子集解。世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.杜正勝(19790000)。周代城邦。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.傅斯年、陳槃(1980)。傅斯年全集。臺北:聯經出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.孫詒讓、王文錦、陳玉霞(1987)。周禮正義。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.清.崔述(1975)。《洙泗考信錄》。《崔東壁遺書》,第二冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.白川靜(1955)。《甲骨金文學論叢》第三集(油印本)。  延伸查詢new window
15.杜正勝(2010)。〈醫療社會文化史外一章:從專職技術到政事治理〉。中國古代的醫學、醫史與政治。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.胡適(1935)。《胡適文存》第四集(卷一)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.Toynbee, A. J.(1934)。A Study of History, vol.1。London。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳槃(1985)。春秋時代的教育。中國上古史:待定稿。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE