:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:同儕互動回饋策略提高學生創造力與學習動機
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:黃美瑤 引用關係薛名淳 引用關係張琬渝黃筱卉
作者(外文):Huang, Mei-yaoHsueh, Ming-chunChang, Wan-yuHuang, Xiao-hui
出版日期:2012
卷期:14:1
頁次:頁13-23
主題關鍵詞:合作學習思考小組競賽法Cooperative learningThinkingTeam-game-tournament method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:142
  • 點閱點閱:302
本研究目的在探討以合作學習教學課程介入國中體育課對學生創造力及學習動機之影響。研究採「準實驗設計」的方式進行,本研究以兩班八年級學生為研究對象,其中一班30位學生為實驗組,另外一班27位學生為控制組。每週實施二節課的教學實驗,為期八週。研究工具以「威廉斯創造力評量組合」與「學習動機量表」進行測驗。所得資料以描述性統計分析、多變量共變數分析等統計方法進行分析。在進行統計分析後獲得以下結果:實驗組學生的開放性及精密性等創造力得分上顯著高於控制組學生,而實驗組學生的專注力、切身關係、自信心等體育課學習動機得分上顯著高於控制組學生。本研究結論驗證此套合作學習教學課程,能提高國中學生創造力與體育課學習動機,也說明學生的創造力培養可透過合作學習小組組員的互動、腦力激盪、解釋、提問、鼓勵等方式進而提高。
The purpose of this study was to investigate how the cooperative learning teaching program impact on the junior high school student’s creativity and learning motivation in physical education. A quasi-experimental design was used to conduct this study. Two intact classes of eighth graders participated in this study. One class of thirty (n = 30) students were assigned as the experimental group, and another class of twenty-seven (n = 27) students were assigned as the control group. The teaching period was two times a week for eight weeks. Williams Creativity Assessment Package and Learning Motivation Assessment were used as instruments to collect all the inquired data. Descriptive statistic and MANOVA were applied to analyze all the data. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher openness and elaboration of creativity test. Attention, relevance, and confidence of learning motivation assessment scores were higher than control group. The results of this study demonstrated that the creativity and learning motivation were enhanced through the cooperative learning teaching program. Findings also supported the creativity can be taught and enhanced when students interact with their peers to brainstorm, explain, question, and persuade.
期刊論文
1.Hung, H. L.(2004)。Effects of cooperative learning and motivation on student performance and satisfaction during woodball instruction。Annual Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science,4,35-48。  new window
2.鄭麗媛(20080900)。合作學習與訊息策略運用對韻律體操動作技能學習成效之影響。體育學報,41(3),69-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.McBride, R. E.(1992)。Critical thinking-An overview with implications for physical education。Journal of Teaching in physical Education,11,112-125。  new window
4.Dyson, B.(2001)。Cooperative learning in an elementary school physical education program。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,20,264-281。  new window
5.鄭金昌、王宗吉(20040900)。合作學習與精熟學習在排球技能學習成就之研究。體育學報,37,265-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張振成(19970600)。實施創造思考教學--以培養富有創意的學生。中等教育,48(3),68-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Schempp, P. O.、Cheffers, J. T.、Zaichkowsky, L. D.(1983)。Influence of decision making on attitudes, creativity, motor skills and self-concept in elementary children。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,54,183-186。  new window
8.熊明禮(19961000)。傳統學習教學法與合作學習教學法在飛盤擲遠教學效果之比較。大專體育,27,48-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Gossett, M.、Fischer, O.(2005)。Bringing Together Critical Thinking and Cooperative Learning Between Two Schools。Strategies,19(2),27-30。  new window
10.黃永寬、陳瓊茶(200110)。動作教育模式在幼兒運動遊戲教學之觀察研究。國立體育學院論叢,12(1),99-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃政傑、張嘉育(20100700)。讓學生成功學習:適性課程與教學之理念與策略。課程與教學,13(3),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.周建智、涂馨友(20091200)。以合作式概念構圖發展學童運動學習。中華體育季刊,23(4)=91,117-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Davidson, N.、O'Leary, P. W.(1990)。How cooperative learning can enhance mastery teaching。Educational Leadership,47(5),30-40。  new window
14.何添生(20070900)。不同訊息回饋策略在合作學習的情境下對高低不同能力在足球學習成效與互動行為之研究。大專體育學刊,9(3),11-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳榮章、王琦正、駱俊霖(20100400)。同儕互動回饋策略對棒球打擊能力低學生學習成效與學習動機之研究。臺南科技大學通識教育學刊,9,63-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王文宜、闕月清、周建智(2010)。創思教學對不同身體動覺能力學生創造力之影響。運動研究,19(2),42-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.張書瑋、周建智、黃美瑤(2010)。從運動情境中培養學童創造力:槪念構圖理論觀點。大專體育,106,48-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Hannon, J. C.、Ratliffe, T.(2004)。Cooperative learning in physical education。Strategies,17(5),29-32。  new window
19.Kuhn, D., Shaw, V.、Felton, M.(1997)。Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning。Cognition and Instruction,15(3),287-315。  new window
會議論文
1.Murray, J.(1994)。The teaching portfolio: the department chairperson's role in creating a climate of teaching excellence。The Annual International Conference for Community College Chairs, Deans, and Other Instructional Leaders。Phoenix, AZ。  new window
研究報告
1.周建智(2008)。不同教學策略進行創造性問題解決對國小高年級學童在運動表現與思考能力之影響 (計畫編號:NSC-96-2413-H154-002)。臺北:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳明雄(1999)。創造教學思考方案對高職機械修護科實用技能班學生學習成效之影響。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.周建智(2004)。創造思考教學介入體育課之後對國小學童之動作技能發展在創造性思考、批判性思考及問題解決能力影響。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.徐岳聖(2008)。合作學習對國小五年級學童創造力與籃球技能表現之影響(碩士論文)。台北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.姜禮任(2006)。擴散式體育教學策略對國小六年級學童動作技能與創造力之影響(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.王文宜(2005)。教育性體操課程對國小五年級學童動作技能、創造力與兒童社交技巧之影響(碩士論文)。台北市立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.林信宏(2006)。合作學習介入籃球教學對大專生籃球策略認知與批判思考能力影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
5.張樹琳(2004)。運用動作教育模式對國小學生創造力培育之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
6.Keller, J. M.(1999)。Motivation by design(碩士論文)。Florida State University。  new window
7.陳嘉弘(2005)。資訊融入體育教學對國小五年級學童動作技能學習與學習動機之影響(碩士論文)。臺北巿立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schempp, P. G.(2003)。Teaching sport and physical activity: Insights on the road to excellence。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
2.Williams, F. E.(1972)。A total creativity program for individualized and humanizing the learning process: Identifying and measuring creative potential。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology。  new window
3.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Johnson, David W.、Johnson, Roger T.、Holubec, Edythe Johnson(1994)。The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom and School。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
5.溫世頌(1997)。教育心理學。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Slavin, Robert E.(1990)。Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice。Prentice-Hall。  new window
7.Kirk, Roger E.(1995)。Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
8.Williams, F. E.、林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗:指導手冊。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1991)。Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
11.Slavin, Robert E.(1995)。Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice。Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
12.Cohen, Jacob(1988)。Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences。Academic Press。  new window
13.周建智、黃璧惠、黃美瑤、藍美玉(2003)。探討擴散式之摩斯登體育教學策略對學童之腦力激盪與獨立思考能力的影響。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.Anderson, C.、Windeatt, D.(1995)。Interpersonal skills and goal setting through cooperative learning in physical education。ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED388630。Chicago。  new window
15.Torrance, E. P.(1970)。Encouraging creativity in the classroom。Dubuque, IA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Keller, John M.(1983)。Motivational design of instruction。Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE