臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：環評制度中的專家會議--被框架的專家理性
書刊名：臺灣民主季刊
作者：杜文苓 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tu, Wen-ling
出版日期：2012
卷期：9:3
頁次：頁119-155
主題關鍵詞：風險管理；專家；環境影響評估；科學知識；公民參與；Risk management；Expert；Environmental impact assessment；EIA；Scientific knowledge；Public participation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:107
  • 點閱點閱:50
期刊論文
1.周桂田(2005)。爭議性科技之風險溝通--以基因改造工程為思考點。生物科技與法律研究通訊，18，42-50。  延伸查詢new window
2.Limoges, Camille(1993)。Expert Knowledge and Decision-making in Controversy Contexts。Public Understanding of Science，2(4)，417-426。  new window
3.杜文苓、施麗雯、黃廷宜(20071000)。風險溝通與民主參與：以竹科宜蘭基地之設置為例。科技、醫療與社會，5，71-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.周桂田(20020300)。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口--遲滯型高科技風險社會。臺灣社會研究，45，69-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Jasanoff, Shelia(2004)。Science and Citizenship: A New Synergy。Science and Public Policy，31(2)，90-94。  new window
6.杜文苓(20091200)。高科技污染的風險論辯--環境倡議的挑戰。臺灣民主，6(4)，101-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.周桂田(20041200)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」--在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊，56，1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.杜文苓(20110600)。環境風險與科技決策：檢視中科四期環評爭議。東吳政治學報，29(2)，57-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Tu, Wen-ling(2009)。The Risk Debates on High-Tech Pollution: A Challenge to Environmental Advocacy。Taiwan Democracy Quarterly，6(4)，101-139。  new window
10.Tu, Wen-ling(2011)。Environmental Risks and Policy Making: Examining the EIA Controversies of CTSP-IV。Soochow Journal of Political Science，29(2)，57-110。  new window
11.Tu, Wen-ling、Shih, Li-wen、Huang, Ting-yi(2007)。Public Participation Deliberative Democracy Risk Risk Communication Hsin-chu Science-based Industrial Park in I-lan。Taiwanese Journal for Studies of Science, Technology and Medicine，5，71-107。  new window
12.Chou, Kuei-tien(2004)。‘Dialogue’ between Monopolistic Scientific Rationality and Tacit (Submerged) Social Rationality: A Discussion of Risk Culture between Local Public, Scientists, and the State。Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies，56，1-63。  new window
13.Chou, Kuei-tien(2005)。Risk Communication in the Disputed Technology: Example of Genetic Engineering。Bio-Technology and Law Research Newsletter，18，42-50。  new window
14.De Boer, Martin、McCarthy, Mary、Brennan, Mary、Kelly, Alan、Ritson, Christopher(2005)。Public Understanding of Food Risk Issues and Food Risk Messages on the Island of Ireland: The View of Food Safety Expert。Journal of Food Safety，25(4)，241-265。  new window
15.Hinchliffe, Steve(2001)。Indeterminacy In-Decisions: Science, Policy and Politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) Crisis。Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers，26(2)，182-204。  new window
16.Nelkin, Dorothy(1975)。The Political Impact of Technical Expertise。Social Studies of Science，5(1)，35-54。  new window
17.Petts, Judith、Niemeyer, Simon(2004)。Health Risk Communication and Amplification: Learning from the MMR Vaccination Controversy。Health, Risk & Society，6(1)，7-23。  new window
18.Renn, Ortwin(1999)。A Model for an Analytic-Deliberative Process in Risk Management。Environmental Science & Technology，33(18)，3049-3055。  new window
19.Sarewitz, Daniel(2004)。How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse。Environmental Science & Policy，7(5)，385-403。  new window
20.Weingart, Peter(1999)。Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics。Science and Public Policy，26(3)，151-161。  new window
會議論文
1.林崇熙(2011)。不負責任的知識--對環境評估的知識論考察。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lin, Chong-si(2011)。Irresponsible Knowledge: Examining EIA’s Epistemology。Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院環境保護署(2010)。我國環境風險評估之公眾參與和專家代理機制探討(環保署委託計畫報告EPA-099-E101-02-220)。  延伸查詢new window
2.Environmental Protection Administration(2010)。Research on Public Participation and Expert Representation Mechanism in Environmental Risk Assessment Process (Environmental Protection Administration Department of Document No. EPA-099-E101-02-220)。  new window
圖書
1.Latour, Bruno、Porter, Catherine(2004)。Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy。Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Cole, J.、Foster, S.(2005)。Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice。Cambridge, MA：The MIT Press。  new window
3.Davis, Debra L.(2002)。When Smoke Ran Like Water: Tales of Environmental Deception and the Battle Against Pollution。New York, NY：Basic Books。  new window
4.Jasanoff, Sheila(1990)。The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Beck, Ulrich(1986)。Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in einen andere Moderne。Frankfurt am Main：Suhrkamp。  new window
6.Beck, Urich、汪浩(2004)。風險社會：通往另一個現代的路上。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
7.Ascher, William、Steelman, Toddi、Healy, Robert(2010)。The Generation of Policy-relevant Environmental Knowledge。Knowledge and Environmental Policy: Reimagining the Boundaries of Science and Politics \\ William Ascher ; Toddi Steelman ; Robert Healy (eds.)。Cambridge, Massachusetts。  new window
8.Lambert, Barrie(2002)。Radiation: Early Warnings; Late Effects。Late Lessons from Early Warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896-2000 \\ Poul Harremoes ; David Gee ; Malcolm MacGarvin ; Andy Stirling ; Jane Keys ; Brian Wynne ; Sofia Guedes Vaz (eds.)。Luxembourg。  new window
9.Martin, Brian、Richards, Evellen(1995)。Scientific Knowledge, Controversy, and Public Decision Making。Handbook of Science and Technology Studies \\ Jasanoff, S. ; Gerald E. Markle ; James C. Peterson ; Trevor Pinch (eds.)。Newbury Park, California。  new window
10.Ridley, M. Rosalind、Baker, Harry(1998)。Fatal Protein: The Story of CJD, BSE and Other Prion Diseases。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.朱淑娟(2010)。體檢中科三期健康風險專家會議。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chu, Shu-juan(2010)。Reviewing CTSP III Health Risk Assessment Expert Meeting。  new window
3.朱淑娟(2010)。未納入后里既存風險，中科三期環評初審過關。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chu, Shu-juan(2010)。Not Including Houli’s Existing Risk, The CTSP III EIA Preliminary Review Is Approved。  new window
5.朱淑娟(2010)。環評委員噤聲，中科三期環評大會過關。  延伸查詢new window
6.Chu, Shu-juan(2010)。The EIA Committee Silenced, The CTSP III EIA Review Passed。  new window
7.行政院環境保護署(2008)。行政院環保署未管制污染物健康風險評估諮詢作業規範 (環署毒字第0970103180號函)，台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Environmental Protection Administration(2008)。EPA Non-regulated Pollutants Health Risk Assessment Consultation Guidline (Environmental Protection Administration Department of Environmental Sanitation & Toxic Substance Document no.0970103180)，Taipei。  new window
9.行政院環境保護署(2009)。「六輕相關計畫之特定有害空氣污染物所致健康風險評估」專家會議議事說明 (環署綜0980057269號函)，台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Environmental Protection Administration(2009)。6th Naphtha-cracking Plant Certain Air Pollutant Caused Health Risk Assessment Expert Meeting Guideline (Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning Document no.0980057269)，Taipei。  new window
11.行政院環境保護署(2010)。「彰化縣西南角(大城)海埔地工業區計畫環境影響評估報告書初稿」及「彰化縣西南角(大城)海埔地工業區工業專用港開發計畫環境影響評估報告書初稿」案之「健康風險評估」議題專家會議第3次延續會議紀錄 (環署綜0990103954號)，台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Environmental Protection Administration(2010)。Da Cheng Industrial Park EIA Report: 3rd Extended Expert Meeting Minutes (Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning Document No.0990103954)，Taipei。  new window
13.行政院環境保護署(2010)。「中部科學工業園區第三期發展區(后里基地--七星農場部分)開發計畫環境影響說明書」之「健康風險評估」專家會議延續會議紀錄 (環署綜0990076500號)，台北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Environmental Protection Administration(2010)。CTSP Stage III EIA Report: Health Assessment Report Extended Expert Meeting Minutes (Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning Document No.090076500)，Taipei。  new window
15.行政院環境保護署綜計處(2009)。澄清事實，不是打壓--環保署回應「籲請環保署勿濫用行政資源打壓環保團體《聯合聲明》。  延伸查詢new window
16.Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning(2009)。Fact Clarification: EPA’s Reponse to the Joint Statement of Enviornmental Groups。  new window
17.行政院環境保護署綜計處(2011)。環保署澄清健康風險評估的方法論討論會不是環評審查會。  延伸查詢new window
18.Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning(2011)。Clarification: Risk Assessment Methodology Discussion Meeting is not EIA Meeting。  new window
19.行政院環境保護署綜計處(2011)。環保署說明「健康風險評估方法論--以國光石化為例」討論會議結果。  延伸查詢new window
20.Environmental Protection Administration Department of Comprehensive Planning(2011)。EPA Statement on Risk Assessment Method Discussion Meeting。  new window
21.胡慕情(2010)。讓專家們進退維谷的環評「專家會議」。  延伸查詢new window
22.Hu, Mu-ching(2010)。Expert in Dilemma in the Expert Meeting。  new window
23.單厚之(2011)。沈世宏：六輕十年，雲林人更長命。  延伸查詢new window
24.Shan, Hou-chi(2011)。EPA Director: Yunlin People Have Longer Life, 10 Years After 6th Naphthacracking Plant Operated。  new window
25.詹順貴(2010)。中科三期專家會議大騙局。  延伸查詢new window
26.Chan, Shun-kui(2010)。The Hoax of the CTSP III Expert Meeting。  new window
27.廖靜蕙(2010)。莊秉潔：國光運轉後，每年死亡人數增加1,356人。  延伸查詢new window
28.Liao, Jing-hui(2010)。Professor Chung: The Death Number Will Increase 1,356 Annually if Kuokuang Petrochemical Operates。  new window
29.鐘聖雄，胡慕情(2011)。青年擋國光，第四次專案小組慘勝。  延伸查詢new window
30.Chong, Sheng-hsiung，Hu, Mu-ching(2011)。The Youth Stop Kuokuang and Barely Win in the 4th EIA Preliminary Meeting。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bucchi, Massimiano、Neresini, Federico(2008)。Science and public participation。The handbook of science and technology studies。Cambridge, Mass：MIT Press。  new window
2.Funtowicz, Silvio O.、Ravetz, Jerome R.(1992)。Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science。Social Theories of Risk。Praeger。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：702（臺灣：684，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67801723
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上