臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科技大學教師評鑑影響性評估量表發展之研究
書刊名：教育研究與發展期刊
作者：張媛甯 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Yuan-ning
出版日期：2013
卷期：9:3
頁次：頁1-30
主題關鍵詞：教師評鑑；評鑑影響性；驗證性因素分析；Confirmatory factor analysis；Evaluation influence；Faculty evaluation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:217
  • 點閱點閱:132
本研究旨在發展科技大學教師評鑑影響性之評估量表，透過文獻探討分析國內外有關教師評鑑與評鑑影響性的理論與實務，以建立構念和發展題項，經過專家學者修正與項目分析來進行題項的篩選與確認，建立初步的量表結構與測量題項。本研究立意抽樣七所科技大學之教師為施測對象，有效問卷共247份，首先運用探索性因素分析以純化測量工具，再透過驗證性因素分析進行競爭模式的比較以選擇最簡效模式，繼而進行該模式的信效度檢定。研究結果發現，本量表證實具有二階層模式的因素結構，其整體模式適配度評估皆符合建議水準，評鑑投入、評鑑活動與評鑑影響性三個分量表分別包含三個潛在變項，總計35個測量題項。最後，根據研究結果對科技大學及後續研究提出建議。
The purpose of this study was to develop faculty evaluation influence assessment scale for universities of science and technology. The construct and measuring items were developed according to the literature review of faculty evaluation and evaluation influence. After experts’ modifications and item analysis, the factor structure and items of the preliminary scale were confirmed. After collecting 247 samples from seven universities of science and technology, exploratory factor analysis was first conducted to purify the dimensions and measuring items of faculty evaluation influence. Secondly, confirmatory factor analysis was employed to choose the best model by comparisons of model fits, and further its reliability and validity was tested. Results showed that the two-hierarchical factor structure of the scale was verified, and its goodness-offitness conformed to standard. The 35 items were divided into three subscales which included evaluation input, evaluation activity and evaluation influence, and each subscale had 3 latent variables. Lastly, suggestions were offered for universities of science and technology and future research.
期刊論文
1.Stockdill, S. H.、Baizerman, M.、Compton, D. W.(2002)。Toward a definition of the ECB process: A conversation with the ECB literature。New Directions for Evaluation，93，7-26。  new window
2.Torres, R. T.、Preskill, H.(2001)。Evaluation and organizational learning: Past, present and future。American Journal of Evaluation，22(3)，387-395。  new window
3.Amo, C.、Cousins, J. B.(2007)。Going through the process: An examination of the operationalization of process use in empirical research on evaluation。New Directions for Evaluation，116，5-26。  new window
4.Hachtmann, F.、Signal, S.(2005)。The peer review of teaching portfolio as scholarship assessment in higher education。International Journal of Learning，12(5)，31-40。  new window
5.潘世尊(20091200)。大學教師教學評鑑--一所私立科技大學的實踐之反思與探究。弘光學報，57，24-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Brett, B., Hill(2000)。Perspectives on evaluation use and demand by users: The case of City Year。New Directions for Evaluation，88，71-83。  new window
7.Christie, C. A.(2007)。Reported influence of evaluation data on decision maker´s actions。American Journal of Evaluation，28(1)，8-25。  new window
8.Greenberg, D.、Mandell, M、Onstott, M.(2000)。The dissemination and utilization of welfareto- work experiments in state policymaking。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management，19，367-382。  new window
9.Henry, G. T.(2000)。Why not use?。New Directions for Evaluation，88，85-98。  new window
10.Henry, G. T、Gordon, C. S.(2001)。Tracking issue attention: Specifying the dynamics of the public agenda。Public Opinion Quarterly，65，157-177。  new window
11.Huberty, C.(2000)。An approach to annual assessment and evaluation of university faculty。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，14(3)，241-251。  new window
12.King, J. A.(2002)。Building the evaluation capacity of a school district。New Directions for Evaluation，66，27-34。  new window
13.Kirkhart, K. E.(2011)。Culture and influence in multisite evaluation。New Directions for Evaluation，129，73-85。  new window
14.Lawrenz, F.、King, J. A、Ooms, A.(2011)。The role of involvement and use in multisite evaluations。New Directions for Evaluation，129，49-57。  new window
15.Mark, M. M.(2011)。Toward better research on--and thinking about--evaluation influence, especially in multisite evaluation。New Directions for Evaluation，129，107-119。  new window
16.Mark, M. M.、Henry, G. T.(2004)。The mechanisms and outcomes of evaluation influence。Evaluation，10(1)，35-57。  new window
17.Morabito, S. M.(2002)。Evaluation roles and strategies for expanding evaluation process influence。American Journal of Evaluation，23(2)，321-330。  new window
18.Patton, M. Q.(2007)。Process use as a usefulism。New Directions for Evaluation，116，99-112。  new window
19.Preskill, H.、Zuckerman, B.、Matthews, B.(2003)。An exploratory study of process use: Findings and implications for future research。American Journal of Evaluation，24(4)，423-442。  new window
20.Rebolloso, E.、Fernández-Ramirez, B.、Canton P.、Pozo, C.(2005)。The influence of evaluation on changing management systems in educational institutions。Evaluation，11(4)，463-479。  new window
21.Shulha, L. M.(2000)。Evaluation inquiry in university–school professional learning partnerships。New Directions for Evaluation，88，39-53。  new window
22.Weiss, C. H.、Murphy-Graham, E.、Birkeland, S.(2005)。An alternate route to policy influence: Evidence from a study of the drug abuse resistance education program。American Journal of Evaluation，26(1)，12-30。  new window
23.王振世、陳芃婷(20050900)。大學教師績效評量模型之建立：以新竹某國立大學為例。科技管理學刊，10(3)，121-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Klenowski, V.、Askew, S.、Carnell, E.(2006)。Portfolio for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education，31(3)，267-286。  new window
25.Stronge, J. H.(1995)。Balancing individual and institutional goals in educational personnel evaluation: A conceptual framework。Studies in Educational Evaluation，21，131-151。  new window
26.Alkin, M. C.、Taut, S. M.(2003)。Unbundling evaluation use。Studies in Educational Evaluation，29(1)，1-12。  new window
27.Kirkhart, K. E.(2000)。Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence。New Directions for Evaluation，88，5-23。  new window
28.Shulha, L. M.、Cousins, J. B.(1997)。Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986。Evaluation Practice，18(3)，195-208。  new window
29.蘇錦麗、黃曙東(20090500)。美國大學教師評鑑制度之探討。教育政策論壇，12(2)，1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.鄭淑惠(20091200)。教育評鑑的效用性：促進組織學習的觀點。新竹教育大學教育學報，26(2)，57-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.潘慧玲、陳文彥(20100900)。教師專業發展評鑑促進組織學習之個案研究。教育研究集刊，56(3)，29-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Monroe, A. D.(1998)。Public opinion and public policy, 1980-1993。Public Opinion Quarterly，62(1)，6-28。  new window
33.Little, Todd D.(1997)。Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues。Multivariate Behavioral Research，32(1)，53-76。  new window
34.游森期、余民寧(20060600)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較：多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊，53(1)，103-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Marsh, H. W.、Hocevar, D.(1985)。Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept: First and Higher Order Factor Models and Their Invariance Across Groups。Psychological Bulletin，97(3)，562-582。  new window
36.吳佩真、張民杰(20070900)。國內大學教師教學評鑑現況分析。評鑑雙月刊，9，9-15。  延伸查詢new window
37.張媛甯(20100900)。大學教師對教師評鑑態度之研究--以S科技大學為例。南臺學報，35(2)，91-114。  延伸查詢new window
38.Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research，18(1)，39-50。  new window
39.孫志麟(20070900)。績效控制或專業發展？--大學教師評鑑的兩難。教育實踐與研究，20(2)，95-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.施俊名、吳裕益(20081200)。「大學生身心健康量表」構念效度驗證之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(4)，201-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。  new window
42.Noar, S. M.(2003)。The role of structural equation modeling in scale development。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，10(4)，622-647。  new window
43.Henry, G. T.、Mark, M. M.(2003)。Beyond use: Understanding evaluation's influence on attitudes and actions。American Journal of Evaluation，24(3)，293-314。  new window
會議論文
1.成群豪(2007)。我國新設大學校院教師評鑑機制功能之研究。「教師評鑑：挑戰、因應與展望」研討會，臺灣教育政策與評鑑學會等（舉辦） 。臺北市。222-238。  延伸查詢new window
2.高熏芳、張寒菱(2010)。從教師發展到學校發展：利用教師專業發展評鑑促進學校改進的個案研究。新世紀學校革新之挑戰與展望國際研討會。臺北市臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾淑惠(2010)。使用評鑑促進高職學校革新。新世紀學校革新之挑戰與展望國際研討會。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘慧玲(201012)。驅動學校革新的評鑑機制。新世紀學校革新之挑戰與展望國際研討會。臺北市臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃玉幸(2009)。以產學合作為績效的大學教師評鑑制度之評析。「2009年大專校院評鑑制度」學術研討會，南臺科技大學教育領導與評鑑研究所 。臺南市。89-107。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.彭森明、施俊名(2006)。大學教師評鑑機制之研究 (計畫編號：94A1004EI)。新竹市：國立清華大學高等教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃綉雲(2008)。大學教師評鑑現況分析研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳佩如(2007)。我國大學教師對大學教師評鑑態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.江惠真(2009)。教師專業發展評鑑促進學校革新之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.鄭淑惠(2007)。探究評鑑如何影響教師的專業成長：以個案研究為例。教師評鑑與專業成長。臺北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation(2009)。The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators。Newbury Park：Corwin。  new window
3.Peterson, K. D.、Peterson, C. A.(2006)。Effective teacher evaluation: A guide for principals。Thousand Oaks, California：Corwin Press。  new window
4.教育部高教司(2006)。獎勵大學教學卓越計畫九十五年度計畫作業手冊。臺北市：教育部高教司。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃嘉雄(2010)。課程評鑑。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bullock, A. A.、Hawk, P. P.(2005)。Developing a teaching portfolio: A guide for pre-service and practicing teachers。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Pearson Prentice Hall。  new window
7.Seldin, P.(1997)。The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions。Bolton, MA：Anker Publishing Company Inc。  new window
8.Tucker, P. D.、Stronge, J. H.(2005)。Linking evaluation and student learning。Alexandria, VI：ASCD。  new window
9.Stronge, J. H.、Tucker, P. D.(2003)。Handbook on teacher evaluation: assessing and improving performance。Eye on Education。  new window
10.Patton, M. Q.(1978)。Utilization-focused evaluation。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。  new window
11.Danielson, C.、McGreal, T. L.(2000)。Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice。Alexandria, Virginia：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)。  new window
12.Patton, M. Q.(2008)。Utilization-focused evaluation。Sage。  new window
13.The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation(1994)。The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage。  new window
14.Rossi, P. H.、Freeman, H. E.、Lipsey, M. W.(2004)。Evaluation: A systematic approach。Sage。  new window
15.Byrne, Barbara M.(2010)。Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming。Routledge。  new window
16.Kline, Rex B.(2005)。Principles and practice of structural equation modeling。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
17.黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.張德銳(20000000)。師資培育與教師評鑑。臺北：師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS（PASW）資料分析範例解析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.Jöreskog, Karl G.、Sörbom, Dag(1996)。LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide。Scientific Software International, Inc.。  new window
21.Hair, J. F.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R.、Black, W. C.、Babin, B. J.(2010)。Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings。Prentice Hall International。  new window
圖書論文
1.潘慧玲(2006)。以評鑑促進學校之革新。優質、創新與前瞻：郭為藩教授七秩華誕祝壽論文輯。學富。  延伸查詢new window
2.Alkin, M. C.(2005)。Utilization of evaluation。Encyclopedia of evaluation。Sage。  new window
3.Arreola, R. A.(2006)。Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems。Bolton, MA：Anker。  new window
4.Cousins, J. B.(2003)。Utilization effects of participatory evaluation。International handbook of educational evaluation: Practice。Dordrecht：Kluwer。  new window
5.Patton, M. Q.、Grimes, P. S.、Guthrie, K. M.、Brennan, N. J.、French, B. D.、Blyth, D. A.(1977)。In search of impact: An analysis of the utilization of federal health evaluation research。Using social research in public policy making。Lexington, MA：Lexington Books。  new window
6.Weiss, C. H.(1972)。Evaluating educational and social action programs: A treeful of owls。Evaluating action programs: Readings in social action and education。Boston, MA：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
7.Weiss, C. H.(1981)。Measuring the use of evaluation。Utilizing evaluation: Concepts and measurement techniques。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。  new window
8.Bird, T.(1990)。The schoolteacher’s portfolio: An essay on possibilities。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary teachers。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
9.Weick, K. E.、Quinn, R. E.(1999)。Organizational change and development。Annual Review of Psychology。Palo Alto, CA：Annual Reviews。  new window
10.Iwanicki, E. F.(1990)。Teacher evaluation for school improvement。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers。Newbury Park, California：Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1281（臺灣：1267，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2516201 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68318347
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上