:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學教師教學評鑑--一所私立科技大學的實踐之反思與探究
書刊名:弘光學報
作者:潘世尊 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Thie-tzueu
出版日期:2009
卷期:57
頁次:頁24-45
主題關鍵詞:教師評鑑教學評鑑大學教學評鑑教師教學評鑑Teacher evaluationTeaching evaluationEvaluation of university teachingEvaluation of teacher's teaching
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:378
  • 點閱點閱:115
依大學法規定,大學必須針對教師的教學進行評鑑,以做為獎勵以及停聘或不續聘之參考依 據。因此,大學的教學評鑑制度是否完善、適當與可行,是一項值得探究之問題。有鑑於此,研究 者以本身所任職大學之教學評鑑制度為研究對象,針對教學評鑑的項目、指標及其配分等事項進行 探究。為使探究結果儘量符合學校發展與教師需求以及合理與可行之要求,研究者除參照相關文 獻,還訪談本校教學評鑑業管單位主管及探詢校內教師之意見。最後,研究者針對本校教學評鑑制 度改善方向提出建議,且具體提出兩種類型不同之評鑑方案。本文的探究歷程與結果不但可做為本 校改善教學評鑑制度之基礎,還可供其他大學校院參考。
According to the University Act regulations, universities must evaluate teachers’ teaching so as to provide a reference for reward, temporary termination of contract, or discontinuation of contract. Given this, fundamental questions about the systems of teaching evaluation’s appropriateness and feasibility are issues worth investigating. The researcher examined a sample school’s teaching evaluation system, exploring the teaching evaluation’s items, indicators, and scores. In order to align research results with the needs of school and teacher development, as well as including a rational and feasible base, the researcher referenced relevant literature and interviewed the director of the unit in charge of teaching evaluations. Teachers inside the school were also asked for opinions. Finally, the researcher suggests directions for improvement of the school’s evaluation system, proposing two different types of evaluation approaches. Results can form the basis of improving this school’s teaching evaluation system and provide a reference to departments and colleges of other universities.
期刊論文
1.張倍禎、王健華(20020300)。大學教學優良教師評鑑指標的建立--教學資源中心教師評鑑個案研究。教學科技與媒體,59,46-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王振世、陳芃婷(20050900)。大學教師績效評量模型之建立:以新竹某國立大學為例。科技管理學刊,10(3),121-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳佩真、張民杰(2007)。內大學教師教學評鑑現況分析。評鑑雙月刊,9。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉美慧、黃嘉莉、康玉琳(20070900)。臺灣教師評鑑制度之分析。當代教育研究,15(3),37-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張德勝(20041100)。大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」與「教學諮詢方案」。教育研究月刊,127,63-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.葉紹國、溫博仕(20010500)。淡江大學核心課程學生選課行為與教學評鑑、學期成績等相關因素研究。淡江人文社會學刊,7,307-344。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃政傑(19990400)。落實教學評鑑的實施。教師天地,99,39-45。  延伸查詢new window
8.丁一顧、張德銳(20040900)。美英兩國教師評鑑系統比較分析及其對我國之啟示。臺北市立師範學院學報. 教育類,35(2),85-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.丁一顧、張德銳(20040900)。美英兩國教師評鑑系統比較分析及其對我國之啟示。臺北市立師範學院學報. 教育類,35(2),85-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.歐陽教、張德銳(19930300)。教師評鑑模式之研究。教育研究資訊,1(2),90-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳琦媛(20070900)。大學教學評鑑的新途徑--同儕評鑑。評鑑雙月刊,9,21-23。  延伸查詢new window
12.孫志麟(20070900)。績效控制或專業發展?--大學教師評鑑的兩難。教育實踐與研究,20(2),95-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Shulman, Lee S.(1986)。Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching。Educational Researcher,15(2),4-14。  new window
14.陳碧祥(20010900)。我國大學教師升等制度與教師專業成長及學校發展定位關係之探究。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,163-205+207-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳岳、蔣臺程、蔡信豐(20080100)。以策略性人力資源管理思維建構學校教師評鑑制度--以東南科技大學為例。東南學報,32,243-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.張德銳(20060300)。評介Charlotte Danielson和Thomas L. McGreal《教師評鑑--增強專業實務》。當代教育研究,14(1),147-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.王國明、顧志遠(19941000)。績效奬勵制度建立之理論與實務--以元智工學院教師績效奬勵制度為例。研考雙月刊,18(5)=183,32-41。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳明和、郭靜芳(20041200)。從學校本位管理觀點探究教師評鑑制度的實施。人文及社會學科教學通訊,15(4)=88,17-37。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.彭森明、施俊名(2006)。大學教師評鑑機制之研究 (計畫編號:94A1004EI)。新竹市:國立清華大學高等教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.呂美花(2003)。我國技職校院教師教學服務考核指標之建構(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳宇正(2002)。大學教師績效評估模式之研究--應用DHP法(碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Arreola, R. A.(2000)。Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system。Bolton, MA:Anker Publishing Company。  new window
2.McLaughlin, M. W.、Pfeifer, R. S.(1988)。Teacher Evaluation: Improvement, Accountability, and Effective Learning。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
3.Cangelosi, J. S.(1991)。Evaluating classroom instruction。New York:Longman。  new window
4.Valentine, J. W.(1992)。Principles and practices for effective teacher evaluation。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.Habermas, Jürgen、McCarthy, Thomas(1984)。The Theory of Communicative Action。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
6.McGreal, Thomas L.(1983)。Successful teacher evaluation。Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
7.Ramsden, P.(2003)。Learning to teach in higher education。Routledge Falmer。  new window
8.Peterson, Kenneth D.(1995)。Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices。Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
9.Aristotle、Crisp, Roger(2000)。Nicomachean Ethics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Cashin, W. E.(1996)。Developing an effective faculty evaluation system(ED 395536)。  new window
2.Cobum, L.(1984)。Student evaluation of teacher performance,Princeton, New Jersey。(ED289887)。  new window
3.Boyd, R.(1989)。Improving teacher evaluation(ED315437)。  new window
其他
1.Bakutes, A. P.(1998)。An examination of faculty development centers。  new window
2.Haris, B. M.(1980)。Improving staff performance through in-service education,Boston:Allyan & Bacon。  new window
3.Murray, J. P.(2002)。Faculty development in SACS-accredited community colleges。  new window
4.Michael, B. P., & Kenneth, A. F.(1995)。Taking teaching seriously: Meeting the challenge of instructional improvement。  new window
5.Neal, J. E.(1988)。Faculty evaluation: Its purpose and effectiveness。  new window
6.Redmon, K. D.(1999)。Faculty evaluation in community colleges: A response to competing values。  new window
7.Thomas, I. E.(1984)。Teacher competency: What administrators can do?。  new window
8.Thomas, I. E.(1984)。Motivating teachers for excellence。  new window
圖書論文
1.Iwanicki, E. F.(1990)。Teacher evaluation for school improvement。The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers。Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications。  new window
2.Turner, B.(1990)。Design Evaluation。Design Management: A Handbook of Issues and Methods。Cambridge:Basil Blackwell Ltd.。  new window
3.黃光國(19880000)。中國人的權力遊戲。中國人的心理。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE