:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:治安策略公共性的理論探究
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:陳譓森
作者(外文):Chen, Hui-sen
出版日期:2014
卷期:20:2
頁次:頁107-151
主題關鍵詞:公共性公共價值公共利益治安策略PublicnessPublic valuePublic interestPolicing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:236
  • 點閱點閱:98
公共性一向是公共行政、公共政策與公共管理等學科的理論核心,但是各家學者從不同觀點研究公共性,使得公共性呈現不同的內涵。本文首先從研究途徑與本體論意涵等兩部分,分別檢閱與公共性、公共利益以及公共價值的有關文獻;其次,就內政部警政署所發行的「警政白皮書」與「警政工作年報」一書,有關「治安情勢分析與對策」章節中所陳述的治安策略,依學者所發展的「公共價值接近性」作為基礎,將這些策略概念化,最後再從本體論意涵建構治安策略公共性的不同構面。研究結果發現我國治安策略的公共性概念有偵查犯罪、警政服務、社區參與以及治安網絡,其中又可歸類為強調效率與強調回應性雙重構面;最後,分別討論效率與回應性對於實踐治安策略公共性的啟示。
Publicness has always been the theoretical core of public administration, public policy and public management, but scholars discovered this topic from different aspects making it presented different connotations. This paper proposes two lenses for analyzing literatures in the publicness of public administration-research approaches and ontological implications. Then the author analyze the strategies published in Police White Paper and Annual Report of Police Tasks, and the conceptualization and dimensions construction to these strategies are conducted by using proximity of values as the basis. Results show that the concepts of publicness of policing include crime investigation, police services, community participation, and social order networking. Dimensions elicited, are the emphasis of efficiency and of responsiveness. Finally, the implications to the practice of publicness of policing are discussed.
期刊論文
1.Moulton, S.(2009)。Putting Together the Publicness Puzzle: A Framework for Realized Publicness。Public Administration Review,69(5),889-900。  new window
2.許立一、梁美慧、李沛慶(20110800)。政府策略規劃與公共價值創造的理論建構:金門縣古蹟維護政策的啟發。空大行政學報,22,57-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊冬艷、賀慶(2006)。警察行政的公共性及其倫理向度。道德與文明,6,39-42。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bohte, John(2007)。Governmental Efficiency in Our Time: Is the 'What' Really More Important Than the 'How'?。Public Administration Review,67(5),811-815。  new window
5.Bozeman, Barry、Pamela N. Reed、Patrick Scott.(1992)。Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations。Administration & Society,24(3),290-322。  new window
6.Goldstein, S. M.、M. Naor.(2005)。Linking Publicness to Operations Management Practices: A Study of Quality Management Practices in Hospitals。Journal of Operations Management,23(2),209-228。  new window
7.Hart, David K.、Hart, David W.(1997)。Why the Gore Report Will Probably Fail。International Journal of Public Administration,20(1),183-220。  new window
8.Pesch, U.(2008)。The Publicness of Public Administration。Administration & Society,40(2),170-193。  new window
9.Ranson, Stewart、Stewart, John(1989)。Citizenship and Government: The Challenge for Management in the Public Domain。Political Studies,37(1),5-24。  new window
10.Rutgers, Mark R.、Hendriekje van der Meer(2010)。The Origins and Restriction of Efficiency in Public Administration: Regaining Efficiency as the Core Value of Public Administration。Administration & Society,42(7),755-779。  new window
11.Schachter, H. L.(2007)。Does Frederick Taylor's Ghost Still Haunt the Halls of Government? A Look at the Concept of Governmental Efficiency in Our Time。Public Administration Review,67(5),800-810。  new window
12.Scott, Patrick G.、Santa Falcone(1998)。Comparing Public and Private Organizations: An Exploratory Analysis of Three Frameworks。American Review of Public Administration,28(2),126-145。  new window
13.Schubert, Glendon A.(1957)。The Public Interest in Administrative Decision Making: Theorem, Theosophy, or Theory?。The American Political Science Review,51(2),346-368。  new window
14.高辛陽(19950400)。莫等待、莫依賴、成果絕不會從天上掉下來[行政革新]。研考雙月刊,19(2),57-65。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳敦源(20050600)。為公共選擇辯護:論公共選擇理論與「公共性」議題在行政學中的相容性。行政暨政策學報,40,1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.章光明(20071200)。警察政策評估方法之演進。警政論叢,7,15-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Antonsen, Marianne、Jorgensen, Torben Beck(1997)。The Publicness of Public Organizations。Public Administration,75(2),337-357。  new window
18.Perry, James L.、Rainey, Hal G.(1988)。The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy。Academy of Management Review,13(2),182-201。  new window
19.Bozeman, Barry、Bretschneider, Stuart B.(1994)。The Publicness Puzzle in Organization Theory: A Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences Between Public and Private Organizations。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,4(2),197-224。  new window
20.Haque, M. Shamsul(2001)。The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance。Public Administration Review,61(1),65-82。  new window
21.Burgess, T. P.(1994)。Service Breakdown and Service Recovery。The Police Journal,67(1),26-38。  new window
22.Coursey, David、Bozeman, Barry(199009)。Decision making in public and private organizations: A test of alternative concepts of Publicness。Public Administration Review,50(5),525-535。  new window
23.謝秀能(20060700)。我國當前強化治安策略之探討。警學叢刊,37(1)=167,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Waldo, Dwight(1952)。Development of Theory of Democratic Administration。The American Political Science Review,46(1),81-103。  new window
25.章光明(20061200)。各國警政發展歷程之簡述。警政論叢,6,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.孫煒(20121200)。民主治理中準政府組織的公共性與課責性:對於我國政府捐助之財團法人轉型的啟示。人文及社會科學集刊,24(4),497-528。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Wilson, Woodrow(1887)。The Study of Administration。Political Science Quarterly,2(2),197-222。  new window
28.顧忠華(20000700)。臺灣非營利組織的公共性與自主性。臺灣社會學研究,4,145-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Denhardt, Robert B.、Denhardt, Janet Vinzant(2000)。The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering。Public Administration Review,60(6),549-559。  new window
30.Jørgensen, Torben B.、Bozeman, Barry(2007)。Public values: An inventory。Administration & Society,39(3),354-381。  new window
31.Denhardt, Robert(1981)。Toward a Critical Theory of Public Organization。Public Administration Review,41(6),628-635。  new window
32.Bozeman, B.、Kingsley, G.(1998)。Risk culture in public and private organizations。Public Administration Review,58(2),109-118。  new window
33.Rainey, H. G.、Bozeman, B.(2000)。Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,10(2),447-470。  new window
學位論文
1.蕭鈺(2003)。「公共性」概念意涵之探索性研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.內政部警政署(2009)。97年警政工作年報。台北市:內政部警政署。  延伸查詢new window
2.Goldstein, H.(1990)。Problem oriented Policing。New York:McGraw Hill。  new window
3.Mill, J. S.(2011)。On Liberty。London:The Walter Scott Publishing Co., Ltd.。  new window
4.Dunn, William N.(2012)。Public Policy Analysis。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education, Inc.。  new window
5.俞可平(1999)。社群主義。揚智文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Roberg, Roy R.、Kuykendall, Jack(1990)。Police Organization and Management: Behavior, Theory, and Processes。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
7.Hughes, Owen E.(2003)。Public management and administration: An introduction。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
8.內政部警政署(2005)。警政白皮書。台北:警政署。  延伸查詢new window
9.梅可望、陳明傳、李湧清、章光明、朱金池、洪文玲(2008)。警察學。桃園:中央警察大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Schubert, Glendon A.(1960)。The Public Interest: A Critique of the Theory of a Political Concept。Illinois:Glencoe, IL:Free Press。  new window
11.Rosenbloom, David H.、Kravchuk, Robert S.、呂育誠、陳恆鈞、許立一(2002)。行政學:管理、政治、法律的觀點。學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Rainey, H. G.(1991)。Understanding and Managing Public Organizations。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
13.Harmon, Michael M.(1981)。Action Theory for Public Administration。New York, N.Y.:Chatelaine Press。  new window
14.Wamsley, G. L.、Zald, M. N.(1973)。The Political Economy of Public Organizations: A critique and approach to the study of public administration。Lexington:Mass Heath Co:Lexington Books。  new window
15.Rosenbloom, David H.、Kravchuk, Robert S.、Rosenbloora, Deborah G.(2002)。Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector。McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.。  new window
16.Trojanowicz, Robert C.、Bucqueroux, Bonnie(1994)。Community Policing: How to Get Started。Cincinnati, OH:Anderson Publishing Company。  new window
17.Bozeman, Barry(1987)。All Organizations Are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
18.Avineri, Shlomo、De-Shalit, Avner(1992)。Communitarianism and individualism。Oxford University Press。  new window
19.Wilson, James Q.(1978)。Varieties of Police Behavior--The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities。Harvard University Press。  new window
20.Jun, Jong S.(1986)。Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving。New York:Macmillan。  new window
21.Frederickson, H. George(1997)。The Spirit of Public Administration。Jossey-Bass。  new window
22.張潤書(2009)。行政學。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.Moore, Mark Harrison(1995)。Creating Public Value: Strategic management in government。Harvard University Press。  new window
24.內政部警政署(2006)。警政白皮書。台北:内政部警政署。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部警政署(2011)。99年警政工作年報,台北:內政部警政署。  延伸查詢new window
2.内政部警政署(2009)。98年警政工作年報,台北市:內政部警政署。  延伸查詢new window
3.顧忠華(2000)。台灣非營利組織的公共性問題:理論及經驗研究結案報告,http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/4950/1/872418H004006E21.pdf, 2011/07/09。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Goodsell, C. T.(1990)。Public Administration and the Public Interest。Refounding Public Administration。Sage。  new window
2.余致力(1999)。公私管理的比較。公共管理。台北市:商鼎文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴維堯(2007)。公共利益與行政理念。行政學。新北市:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Allison, Graham T.(2012)。Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?。Classics of Public Administration。Massachusetts:Wadsworth, Cengage Learning。  new window
5.Benn, S. I.、G. F. Gaus.(1983)。The liberal conception of the public and the private。Public and private in social life。London:Croom Helm。  new window
6.Hoover, L.(1998)。Rationale for Police Program Evaluation。Police Program Evaluation。Washington, DC:Police Executive Research Forum。  new window
7.Kirkhart, L.(1971)。Toward a Theory of Public Administration。Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective。New York:Chanlder Publishing Company。  new window
8.Wamsley, Gary L.、Bacher, R. N.、Goodsell, C. T.、Kronenberg, P. S.、Rohr, J. A.、Stivers, C. M.、White, O. F.、Wolf, J. F.(1990)。Public Administration and the Governance Process: Shifting the political Dialogue。Refounding Public Administration。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE