:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:藥物濫用役男之情緒、生活適應及輔導策略之硏究
書刊名:青少年犯罪防治研究期刊
作者:吳岳秀蔡宗晃
作者(外文):Wu, Yueh-hsiuTsai, Tsung-huang
出版日期:2014
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁79-120
主題關鍵詞:藥物濫用替代役役男負向情緒生活適應Drug abuseAlternative servicesNegative emotionLife adaption
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:259
  • 點閱點閱:109
役男藥物濫用影響軍紀與軍力素質的問題,已經受到國際間的重視。然而,軍方是一個封閉的體系,再加上吸毒成因至為複雜,所以國內外欠缺有關役男藥物濫用問題之研究。根據Muisner(1994)藥物濫用學者所提供生物心理社會模型(Biopsychosocial Model)以及Agnew(1992)提出一般化緊張理論(General Strain Theory,GST),之核心觀念「負面情緒狀態」,皆會影響一個人從事藥物濫用或偏差行為。因此,本文即針對藥物濫用役男(以替代役為例)為對象,研究其藥物濫用狀況、情緒及生活適應與一般役男之差異情形及特性,並據以研提一個兼具心理發展、家庭功能及同儕關係之輔導策略。本研究首先對服役中之藥物濫用替代役役男180人(19-23歲)進行用藥現況分析。另立意抽樣72人分別實施情緒適應、生活適應二種問卷進行調查,並安排對照組一般役男72人進行比較其差異性。經研究發現:1、藥物濫用役男用藥成因為好奇心及受同儕影響與美國士兵因作戰創傷壓力需求,顯然不同。2、藥物濫用役男在負向情緒方面之攻擊、言語敵意及疑心向度;生活適應方面之家庭適應、社會適應、工作技能及自主定向能力,與比一般青年相比有顯著差異。基於上述研究發現,提出建議:1、讓役男在服役期間接受轉介諮商輔導,學習處理負面情緒並因應憤怒、恐懼、壓力等,可以避免藉由藥物排解痛苦而成癮。2、另指派服勤單位管理幹部教導其從事公益服務與毒品防治宣導活動,將可增進人際關係。3、安排工作技能訓練及增進生活適應能力,有助於輔導期解決問題,以戒除毒癮。相關研究發現之意涵與建議在文內有具體之討論。
Drug abuse of soldiers has been a problem that affected the military discipline and qualities, and it has brought international attention. Since the military is a closed' system and that the reasons of drug abuse are extremely complicated, there are few studies about drug abuse of soldiers. However, according to the Biopsychosocial Model proposed by Musiner( 1994), and the “negative emotional state’ advocated by Agnew(1992), these factors are important determinants for substance abuse and delinquent behaviors. As a result, drug-addicted alternative services are studies in this article and we researched their condition of drug abuse, emotion and life adaptability to determine their difference with the soldiers. And then we proposed counseling strategies that focus on the three factors, psychological development, family functioning, and peer relationships. First of all, this research is carried out having analysis of drug status to 180 drug- addicted alternative services (aged from 19 to 23) during service. Then we randomly sample 72 regular alternative services as a comparison to have questionnaires of emption adaptability and life adaptability. The results of this research:a. The reason why drug addicted alternative services take drug are curiosity and peer influence. It is obviously different from American soldiers, since soldiers take drug because of operational needs of post-traumatic stress.b. Drug addicted alternative services have significant difference comparing with general young people in negative emotional aspects such as attacks, verbal hostility, and suspicion dimension, also in life adaption like domestic adaption, working skills, and the ability to self-directed. After exploring the results of this research, we offered the following suggestions: a.Altemative services can avoid relieving their pain by drug abuse if they learn how to deal with negative emotion and responding to anger, fear, and stress. Thus, we suggest them be referred for counseling during service, b. In order to improve their interpersonal relationships, we planned inspectors of the departments to teach them to engage in public service and drug prevention propaganda, c. To enhance their life adaptability, we also planned training of working skills, which is also helpful to solving problems during counseling and abstaining drug addiction. Implications and suggestions of related studies are discussed in details.
期刊論文
1.Dawe, S.、Gullo, M. J.、Loxton, N. J.(2004)。Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: Implications for substance misuse。Addictive Behaviors,29(7),1389-1405。  new window
2.Holmqvist, R.、Hill, T.、Lang, A.(2009)。Effects of Aggression Replacement Training in Young Offender Institutions。International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,53(1),74-92。  new window
3.Olah, A.(1995)。Coping strategies adolescents: a cross-cultural study。Journal of Adolescent,18(4),491-512。  new window
4.Rosenblum, A.、Magura, S.、Fong, C.(2005)。Effects of peer mentoring on HIV-affected youths'substance use risk and association with substance using friends。Journal of Social Service Research,32,45-60。  new window
5.Swadi, H.(1992)。Relative risk factors in detecting adolescent drug abuse。Drug Alcohol Depend,29,253-254。  new window
6.李思賢、趙運植(20030900)。臺灣地區某單位軍人愛滋相關知識與高危險性行為之探討。臺灣性學學刊,9(2),63-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Folkman, S.、Lazarus, R. S.(1985)。If it changes, it must be a process: A study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48(1),150-170。  new window
8.Agnew, R.(1992)。Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency。Criminology,30(1),47-87。  new window
9.Shedler, J.、Block, J.(1990)。Adolescent drug use and psychological health--A longitudinal inquiry。American Psychologist,45(5),612-630。  new window
10.林健陽、陳玉書、廖有祿、曹光文(20011200)。「毒品危害防制條例」施行後毒品犯罪者矯治成效之研究。中央警察大學犯罪防治學報,2,101-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林瑞欽、黃秀瑄(2003)。吸毒者認知行為策略戒治成效之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 91-2414-H-194-007-SSS)。  延伸查詢new window
2.林健陽(2009)。新犯毒品施用者施用行為及毒品取得管道之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳岳秀(2008)。替代役藥物濫用役男之情緒、認知行為與服勤管理之研究 (計畫編號:097000000AU622001)。  延伸查詢new window
4.柯慧貞(2003)。吸毒病患之戒治處遇成效與再犯之預測因子分析。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴兩陽、趙碧華(2005)。社會役制度人力運用及成效評估研究 (計畫編號:PG9403-1099)。臺北市:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李宗憲(201008)。我國毒品犯戒癮治療政策之評估研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃靖婷(2008)。毒品受戒治人戒治經歷與成效認知之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡宗晃(2004)。性侵害犯與暴力犯之自尊、焦慮、憂鬱及敵意相關因子研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.江振亨(1999)。認知行為團體療法對濫用藥物者輔導成效之研究(-), 。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴擁連(2000)。臺灣地區毒品犯罪者戒治處遇成效之研究(碩士論文)。中央警察大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
6.張伯宏(2007)。我國毒品戒治政策與成效之研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳筱萍(1994)。刺激尋求動機、焦慮和憂鬱情緒與男性藥物濫用關係之研究(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林杰梁(1997)。臨床毒品藥物濫用學。臺北:合計圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳李綢(2004)。青年生活適應指導手冊。臺北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊士隆(2004)。臺灣地區毒品戒治體系成效及社會成本分析研究。行政院衛生署管制藥品管理局研究發展計畫。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡德輝、楊士隆(2012)。少年犯罪:理論與實務。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fields, R.(1998)。Drug in Perspective: A Personalized Look at Substance Use and Abuse。Boston, MA:WCB/McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.William, James(1890)。The hidden self。Scriner's Magazine。  new window
7.Gerrig, Richard J.、Zimbardo, Philip G.(2008)。Psychology and Life。Pearson。  new window
8.楊士隆、李思齊(2012)。藥物濫用、毒品與防治。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Rosenberg, Morris(1979)。Conceiving the Self。Basic Books。  new window
10.Marlatt, G. A.、Gordon, J. R.(1985)。Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors。New York:Guilford Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Aseltine, R. H.,Dupre, M.,Lamlein, P.(2000)。Mentoring as a drug prevention strategy: An Evaluation of "Across Ages"。  new window
2.Brodsky, S.(1988)。The psychology of adjustment and well-being: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston。  new window
3.United Nations Offices for Drug and Crime Prevention(2000)。Demand Reduction- A Glossary of Terms。  new window
其他
1.Stanton, John(2012)。Substance abuse programs: Money vs. soldier treatment, health,crioran123@yahoo.com。  new window
2.Moeller, F. G.,Barratt, E. S.,Dougherty, D. M.,Schmitz, J. M.,Swann, A. C.(2001)。Reviews and overviews: Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity,https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1783。  new window
圖書論文
1.林山田、林東茂、林燦璋(2007)。衝動性與犯罪。犯罪學。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
2.Turner, S.(1995)。Family variables related to adolescent substance misuse: risk and resiliency factor。Form Substance Misuse in Adolescence。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
3.Wills, T. A.、Schiffman, S.(1985)。Coping and Substance Use: A Conceptual Framework。Coping and Substance Use。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE