期刊論文1. | Doran, Sean、Jackson, John D.、Seigel, Michael L.(1995)。Rethinking Adversariness in Nonjury Criminal Trials。Am. J. Crim. L.,23,1-5。 |
2. | Katsuta, Takuya(2010)。Japan's Rejection of the American Criminal Jury。Am. J. Comp. L.,58,497+509。 |
3. | Hans, Valerie P.(2002)。U.S. Jury Reform: The Active Jury and the Adversarial Ideal。St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev.,21,85-86。 |
4. | Leib, Ethan J.(2008)。A Comparison of Criminal Jury Decision Rules in Democratic Countries。Ohio St. J.Crim. L.,5,629。 |
5. | Fukurai, Hiroshi(2007)。The Rebirth of Japan’ s Petit Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems: A Cross-National Analysis of Legal Consciousness and the Lay Participatory Experience in Japan and the U.S.。Cornell Int’l L. J.,40,315。 |
6. | Kiss, Lester W.(1999)。Reviving the Criminal Jury in Japan。Law & Contemp. Probs.,62,261-284。 |
7. | 三井誠、陳運財(20100400)。日本檢察審查會制度。法學新論,21,13-19。 延伸查詢 |
8. | Jackson, John D.(2001)。Paradoxes of Lay and Professional Decision Making in Common Law Criminal Systems。INT’L REV. PENAL L.,72,579。 |
9. | 王寶輝(20110100)。從司法文化窺探臺灣司法倫理--淺談臺灣司法反思能力。月旦法學,188,93-116。 延伸查詢 |
10. | 陳運財(20040600)。論日本刑事司法制度之改革。東海大學法學研究,20,113-151。 延伸查詢 |
11. | 陳恭平、黃國昌、林常青(20110601)。臺灣人民對於國民參與審判之態度--以2011年《紛爭解決行為實證研究》預試調查結果為基礎。臺灣法學雜誌,177,15-27。 延伸查詢 |
12. | Poulin, Anne Bowen(1994)。The Jury: The Criminal Justice System's Different Voice。U. Cin. L. Rev.,62,1377-1437。 |
13. | 井上正仁、陳運財(1999)。日本刑事訴訟法當事人進行主義之採行及其發展。法學叢刊,44(2),1-33。 延伸查詢 |
14. | Landsman, Stephan(1990)。The Rise of the Contentious Spirit: Adversary Procedure in Eighteenth Century England。Cornell Law Review,75(2),497-609。 |
15. | 後藤昭、林裕順、李怡修(20131100)。裁判員制度事實認定爭議之上訴救濟。月旦法學,222,161-171。 延伸查詢 |
16. | 中村孝義(200908)。ボアソナード刑事訴訟法典草案。立命館法學,2=324,190-383。 延伸查詢 |
17. | 中村宗雄(192707)。陪審制度と其公判の機微。早稻田法學,1(1),1-28。 延伸查詢 |
18. | 佐藤文哉(200401)。裁判員に何を期待するか。法の支配,132,444。 延伸查詢 |
19. | 岡原昌男(194304)。『陪審法ノ停止ニ關スル法律』に就て。法曹會雜誌,21(4),10-24。 延伸查詢 |
20. | Bowman, Gregory W.(1993)。Supreme Court Review: Fifth Amendment-Substantial Exculpatory Evidence, Prosecutorial Misconduct and Grand Jury Proceedings: A Broadening of Prosecutorial Discretion: United States v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735 (1992)。J. CMM. L. and CMMNLOGY,83,718。 |
21. | Diamond, Shari Seidman、Vidmar, Neil(2001)。Comment: Jury Room Ruminations on Forbidden Topics。Va. L. Rev.,87,1857。 |
22. | Diesen, Christian(2001)。The Advantages and Disadvantages of Lay Judges from a Swedish Perspective。Int, L Rev. Penal L.,72,313。 |
23. | Dobrovolskaia, Anna(2010)。Japan’s Past Experiences with the Institution of Jury Service。Asian-Pacific L. and Pol’y,12,1。 |
24. | Dripps, Donald A.(1996)。People v. Simposon: Perspectives on the Implications for the Criminal Justice System: Relvant but Prejudicial Exculpatory Evidence: Rationality Versus Jury Trial and the Right to Put on a Defense。S. CAL. L. Rev.,69,1389。 |
25. | Foote, Daniel H.(1992)。From Japan's Death Row to Freedom。Pac. Rim L. and POL'Y. J.,1,11。 |
26. | Garde, Peter(2001)。The Danish Jury。Int'L. Rev. Penal L.,72,87。 |
27. | Ibusuki, Makoto(2010)。Quo Vadis? First Year Inspection to Japanese Mixed Jury Trial。Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal,12,24-54。 |
28. | Kemmitt, Chris(2006)。Function Over Form: Reviving the Criminal Jury's Historical Role as a Sentencing Body。U. Mica J. L. Reform,40,94。 |
29. | Kessler, Amalia D.(2005)。Our Inquisitorial Tradition: Equity Procedure, Due Process, and the Search for an Alternative to the Adversarial。CORNELL L. Rev.,90,1181。 |
30. | Landsman, Stephan(1993)。The Civil Jury in America: Scenes from an Unappreciated。HASTINGS L. J.,44,579。 |
31. | Langbein, John H.(1978)。The Criminal Trial Before Lawyers。U. CHI. L. Rev.,45,263。 |
32. | Langbein, John H.(1979)。Land Without Plea Bargaining: How the Germans Do It。Mich. L. Rev.,78,204。 |
33. | Langbein, John H.(1981)。Mixed Court and Jury Court: Could the Continental Alternative Fill the American Need?。American Bar Foundation Research Journal,6,195。 |
34. | Langbein, John H.(1996)。Historical Foundations of the Law of Evidence: A View from the Ryder Sources。Columbia Law Review,96(5),1168-1202。 |
35. | Lempert, Richard(2001)。Citizen Participation in Judicial Decision Making: Juries, Lay Judges and Japan。St. LOUIS-WARSAW TRANS'L.,2001,1。 |
36. | Lempert, Richard O.(2001)。Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, and a Supreme Court Inspired Agenda for Jury Research。lNT'L Rev. PENAL L.,72,405-413。 |
37. | Loftus, Elizabeth F.、Greene, Edith(1984)。Twelve Angry People: The Collective Mind of the Jury。COLUM. L. Rev.,84,1425。 |
38. | Mottleey, Kimberly A.、Abrami, David、Brown, Darryl K.(2002)。The Jury’s Role in Administering Justice in the United States: An Overview of the American Criminal Jury。St. LOUIS U. Pub. L. Rev.,21,99。 |
39. | Murphy, Colleen P.(1993)。Integrating the Constitutional Authority of Civil and Criminal Juries。GEO. Wash. L. Rev.,61,724。 |
40. | Nepveu, Kate H.(2003)。Beyond "Guilty" or "Not Guilty": Giving Special Verdicts in Criminal Jury Trials。Yale L. and POL'Y Rev.,21,263。 |
41. | Simmons, Ric(2002)。Re-Examination the Grand Jury: Is There Room for Democracy in the Criminal Justices System?。B. U. L. Rev.,82,1。 |
42. | Smith, Douglas G.(1996)。The Historical and Constitutional Contexts of Jury Reform。Hofstra L. Rey.,25,377。 |
43. | Smith, Douglas G.(1997)。Structure and Functional Aspects of the Jury: Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Reform。Ala. L. Rev.,48,441。 |
44. | Smith, Eva(2002)。The Danish Jury and Mixed Court System。ST. LOUIS-WARSAW TRANS'L.,2001,29。 |
45. | Standen, Jeffrey(1993)。Plea Bargaining in the Shadow of the Guidelines。CAL. L. REV.,81,1471。 |
46. | Taslitz, Andrew E.(2006)。Just Right?: Assessing the Rehnquist Court's Parting Words on Criminal Justice: Temporal Adversarialism, Criminal Justice, and the Rehnquist Court: The Sluggish Life of Political Factfinding。GEO. L. J.,94,1589。 |
47. | Thaman, Stephen C.(1999)。Europe's New Jury Systems: The Case of Spain and Russia。Law and Contemp. Probs.,62,233。 |
48. | Weber, Ingram(2009)。The New Japanese Jury System: Empowering the Public, Preserving Continental Justice。East Asia Law Review,4(1),125-176。 |
49. | Zuckerman, Adrian A. S.(1986)。Symposium: Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence: I. Theories of Inference and Adjudication: Law, Fact or Justice?。B. U. L. Rev.,66,487-488。 |
50. | 陳運財(20030900)。刑事訴訟制度之改革及其課題。月旦法學,100,73-90。 延伸查詢 |
51. | 王兆鵬、吳從周(200106)。板橋地方法院實驗「當事人進行主義」之實證研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,30(5),57-131。 延伸查詢 |
52. | 蘇俊雄(19991200)。量刑法理與法制之比較研究。法官協會雜誌,1(2),25-56。 延伸查詢 |
53. | 陳運財(20100500)。國民參與刑事審判之研究--兼評日本裁判員制度。月旦法學,180,131-149。 延伸查詢 |
54. | 許玉秀(20110800)。論正當法律程序原則。軍法專刊,57(4),14-22。 延伸查詢 |
55. | Amar, Akhil Reed(1991)。The Bill of Rights as a Constitution。Yale L. J.,100。 |
56. | 黃國昌(20110700)。美國陪審制度之規範與實證。月旦法學,194,68-89。 延伸查詢 |
57. | Alschuler, Albert W.、Deiss, Andrew G.(1994)。A Brief History of the Criminal Jury in the United States。University of Chicago Law Review,61,867-928。 |
58. | Langbein, J. H.(1985)。The German Advantage in Civil Procedure。University of Chicago Law Review,52,826。 |